2015-08-01 22:36 GMT+01:00 Matthias Klose <d...@debian.org>: > reopen 791165 > severity 791165 serious > tags 791165 + confirmed > retitle 791165 libsdl-sge: library transition is needed when GCC 5 is the > default > thanks > > this is exactly what you should *not* do: > > libsdl-sge (030809dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium > . > * Bump Policy Standars-Version to 3.9.6 (no changes needed) > * Rebuild against GCC-5 (Closes: #791165) > * Enable parallel compilation with dh > * Fix mispelling in d/copyright (detected by lintian) > > Please rename the library package (and add a proper library version).
Why not? I already explained in the bug report why IMO we don't need a transition: - no packages in Debian use the functions In addition: - supertransball2 is going to be NMUd in the libstdc++ transition anyway - ruby-sdl has 200 reported installations in popcon, supertransball 129, infon-viewer 20 (the risk of breakage is not high, and it's in very unimportant packages) - it looks to me that RT are not very happy with unnecessary / gratuitous transitions [1], which to me it reads as if they can avoid them unless really needed [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2015/07/msg00333.html Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montez...@gmail.com> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
