Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 775618 + pending
Bug #775618 [src:beets] beets: FTBFS in jessie: Tests failures
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
775618: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=77
Looks like:
https://github.com/sampsyo/beets/commit/80038e2a3fe6f5ac174a30f6fd01ebf8dd63e414
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list
reassign 775638 geoip-database 20141027-1
retitle 775638 IPv6 database is corrupt
severity 775638 grave
thanks
Hi,
thanks
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 01:44:44AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
> sid chroot), your package failed to b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 775638 geoip-database 20141027-1
Bug #775638 [src:gdnsd] gdnsd: FTBFS in jessie: dh_auto_test: make -j1 test
returned exit code 2
Bug reassigned from package 'src:gdnsd' to 'geoip-database'.
No longer marked as found in versions gdnsd/2.
Hi Ian!
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Ian Jackson
wrote:
>
> Anyway, I'm a bit puzzled. I uploaded a new version of this package
> in November 2014 and it built fine. tcl8.4-dev seemed to be available
> then. I deliberately did not update it to build-depend on 8.5 because
> I wanted to avoi
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> That said, debbugs hasn't seen an upload to unstable since 2003, and
> the upload in experimental was in 2010 (the patch should apply to git
> without many changes)... maybe it shouldn't ship with Jessie?
Yeah, I'm trying to figure that out myself; I
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775632 + confirmed
Bug #775632 [src:libdate-pcalc-perl] libdate-pcalc-perl: FTBFS in jessie: Tests
failures
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded 775632 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=101232
Bug #775632 [src:libdate-pcalc-perl]
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775617 + confirmed
Bug #775617 [src:libdate-calc-xs-perl] libdate-calc-xs-perl: FTBFS in jessie:
Tests failures
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded 775617 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=101232
Bug #775617 [src:libdate-calc-xs
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775628 + confirmed
Bug #775628 [src:libdate-calc-perl] libdate-calc-perl: FTBFS in jessie: Tests
failures
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded 775628 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=101232
Bug #775628 [src:libdate-calc-perl] li
Control: tags -1 +patch
On 2015-01-10, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from
> /usr/share/doc in its maintainer scripts which is a violation of
> Policy 12.3: "Packages must not require the existence of any files in
> /usr/share/doc/ in order to
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +patch
Bug #775053 [debbugs] debbugs: postinst uses /usr/share/doc content (Policy
12.3): /usr/share/doc/debbugs/examples/config
Added tag(s) patch.
--
775053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775053
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 775640 + confirmed
Bug #775640 [src:libarchive-zip-perl] libarchive-zip-perl: FTBFS in jessie:
Tests failures
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
775640: http://bugs.debia
Le dimanche 18 janvier 2015 à 01:42 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> 8<
http://aws-logs.debian.net/ftbfs-logs/2015/01/17/node-tap_0.4.13-1_jessie.log
I'd like to know the output of
nodejs -e "console.log(process.platform)"
on that build machine, to see if it is nodejs that sets a wron
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Bug#775635: chiark-tcl: FTBFS in jessie:
build-dependency not installable: tcl8.4-dev"):
> Source: chiark-tcl
> Version: 1.1.2
> Severity: serious
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > sbuild-build-depends-chiark-tcl-dummy : Depends: tcl8.4-dev but i
Source: check-postgres
Version: 2.21.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to bu
[ Just as reference, as this previous mail doesn't appear to have
reached bugs.d.o either ('thanks' to changes in my provider's
smarthost configuration) ]
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Re: [Pkg-lirc-maint] Bug#774867: lirc-x: unhandled symlink to
directory conversion:
Source: stressapptest
Version: 1.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to buil
Source: pocl
Version: 0.10-10
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i386
Hi
On Saturday 17 January 2015, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tags 774867 + patch
> Control: tags 774867 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Source: pymvpa
Version: 0.4.8-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on i3
Source: gdnsd
Version: 2.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: libarchive-zip-perl
Version: 1.39-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: neon27
Version: 0.30.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: chiark-tcl
Version: 1.1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: openstack-trove
Version: 2014.1.3-4
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Source: libdate-pcalc-perl
Version: 6.1-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: libdate-calc-perl
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: horizon
Version: 2014.1.3-6
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: ruby-pygments.rb
Version: 0.5.4~ds1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: php-crypt-gpg
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: php-mdb2
Version: 2.5.0b5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: mysql-5.5
Version: 5.5.40-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: pry
Version: 0.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: php-structures-datagrid
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: node-tap
Version: 0.4.13-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: mail-notification
Version: 5.4.dfsg.1-12
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: symfony
Version: 2.3.21+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to
Source: golang-go-xdg
Version: 0~bzr20140219-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: procps
Version: 2:3.3.9-8
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: python-biopython
Version: 1.64+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package
Source: beets
Version: 1.3.8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: lua-rings
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: seaborn
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build on
Source: kwave
Version: 0.8.11-1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to build
Source: libdate-calc-xs-perl
Version: 6.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20150117 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in jessie on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in jessie (in a jessie chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed
Your message dated Sun, 18 Jan 2015 00:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#774163: fixed in root-system 5.34.19+dfsg-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #774163,
regarding Unable to upgrade or install ttf-root-installer (dpkg: error
processing package) because of invalid certificate
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:3.3.6-4
Followup-For: Bug #775612
This bug is rather strange as I have rerun using the exact commandline and now
the command succeeds with no
error message.
I have been getting these messages in some but not all of my emails from
amanda. There is something dis
On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 01:03:36 +0100, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2015, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
> > uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > should delay it longer.
> First of all, I
Hi
[ Apologies if you receive this twice, my mail relay/ smarthost seems
to have problems and my previous/ identical response hasn't gotten
through yet. ]
On Saturday 17 January 2015, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Control: tags 774867 + patch
> Control: tags 774867 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:3.3.6-4
Severity: serious
Justification: depends on software not in debian
Seen when attemping to do amrmtape, but also occurs when doing a flush:
an't locate Tie/StdHash.pm: Permission denied at /usr/share/perl/5.20/base.pm
line 97.
...propagated at /
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:51:48 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 at 22:18:53 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I suspect this is essentially the same bug as #616689 and #678696,
> > except that now it may affect mounting /usr as well as /.
>
> I think this bug report is actually descr
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 11:51:48 + Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 at 22:18:53 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I suspect this is essentially the same bug as #616689 and #678696,
> > except that now it may affect mounting /usr as well as /.
>
> I think this bug report is actually descr
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 23:38:14 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> libGL.so.1 => /usr/lib/tls/libGL.so.1 (0xb7611000)
that's not something we ship.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 09:12:53PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello Jonathan Wiltshire.
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:31:54PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Control: tags 775350 + patch
> > Control: tags 775350 + pending
> >
> > Dear maintainer,
> >
> > I've prepared an NMU for ut
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:20:50AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:48:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>
> > Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
> > Version: 10.3.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > After upgrading from wheezy to jessie, I
chown() and write() should clear all privilege attributes on
a file - setuid, setgid, setcap and any other extended
privilege attributes.
However, any attributes beyond setuid and setgid are managed by the
LSM and not directly by the filesystem, so they cannot be set along
with the other attribute
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
initramfs-tools.8 | 7 +++
scripts/local | 2 ++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/initramfs-tools.8 b/initramfs-tools.8
index 1d48e66..dbb430c 100644
--- a/initramfs-tools.8
+++ b/initramfs-tools.8
@@ -415,6 +415,13 @@ present (local) or the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 762984 + patch
Bug #762984 [initramfs-tools] New boot script stage needed for preparing
non-root block devices
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
762984: http://bugs.debian.o
Closes: #762984
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings
---
debian/control | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index fb2c918..928a8de 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Depends: klibc-utils (>= 2.0-1~), cpio, kmo
Control: tag -1 patch
Here is a new script cribbed from the existing scripts/local-top/lvm2.
Tested in conjunction with the patch I'm about to send to #762984.
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/initramfs-tools/lvm2/scripts/local-extra/lvm2
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+PREREQ="mdadm mdrun multipath"
+
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #775583 [lvm2] New initramfs-tools boot script needed to activate VG needed
only for /usr
Added tag(s) patch.
--
775583: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 05:22:52PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:16:56PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:28:51PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> >> Hi Mike,
> >>
> >> Have you seen this again recently? Is it still happening for you?
> >
> >As a ma
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:48:33 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
> Version: 10.3.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After upgrading from wheezy to jessie, I found I was unable to use gdm3
> (with an unhelpful generic error message, but
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 23:18:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#771776: fixed in dirdiff 2.1-7.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #771776,
regarding dirdiff needs wish8.6 but does not depend on tk8.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 12:23:47PM +0100, Nicolas wrote:
>
>2015-01-06 12:14 GMT+01:00 Holger Levsen :
>
>> control: tags -1 moreinfo
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks for your bug report. Do you know (or can find out) whether this also
>> happens on wheezy?
>
>I can patch but I'm afraid pLoader is more maint
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 22:57:07 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
This looks very similar to the NMU I uploaded a few hours ago :)
Cheers,
grego
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user debian-secur...@lists.debian.org
Setting user to debian-secur...@lists.debian.org (was car...@debian.org).
> usertags 773085 + tracked
Usertags were: tracked.
Usertags are now: tracked.
> retitle 773085 xdg-utils: CVE-2014-9622: command injec
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 + patch pending
Bug #774867 [lirc-x] lirc-x: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #774867 to the same tags previously set
--
774867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774867
D
Control: tag -1 + patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Develop
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:34:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#773342: fixed in gcc-mingw-w64 15
has caused the Debian Bug report #773342,
regarding mingw32: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:21:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#768756: fixed in wader 0.5.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #768756,
regarding wader: FTBFS in jessie: Tests failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:19:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#773626: fixed in libav 6:11.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #773626,
regarding libav: multiple security issues
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 21:20:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#774678: fixed in libykneomgr 0.1.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #774678,
regarding ykneomgr: Missing dependency on pcscd
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 775590 normal
Bug #775590 [src:xymon] xymon: Missing copyright information
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
775590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
Hello Jonathan Wiltshire.
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:31:54PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tags 775350 + patch
> Control: tags 775350 + pending
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for util-linux (versioned as 2.25.2-4.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 662823 + pending
Bug #662823 [wader-core] please publish vcs-* fields in debian/control
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #662823 to the same tags previously set
> tag 768756 + pending
Bug #768756 [src:wader] wader: FTBFS in jessie: Tests
Processing control commands:
> clone -1 -2
Bug #773626 [src:libav] libav: multiple security issues
Bug 773626 cloned as bug 775593
> retitle -2 libav: CVE-2014-{8544,8546,9316,9318,9319}
Bug #775593 [src:libav] libav: multiple security issues
Changed Bug title to 'libav: CVE-2014-{8544,8546,9316,9
Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 libav: CVE-2014-{8544,8546,9316,9318,9319}
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream pending
On 2014-12-20 23:31:11, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> CVE-2014-8544[4]:
> | libavcodec/tiff.c in FFmpeg before 2.4.2 does not properly validate
> | bits-per-pixel fields, which
Processing control commands:
> tags 774791 + pending
Bug #774791 [src:xine-ui] xine-ui: Creates dpkg trigger cycle via
libxine2-ffmpeg, libxine2-misc-plugins or libxine2-x
Added tag(s) pending.
--
774791: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774791
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Control: tags 774791 + pending
Dear maintainer,
Michael Gilbert has prepared an NMU for xine-ui (versioned as
0.99.9-1.2) and I've uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to
tell me if I should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68
2015-01-17 7:19 GMT+02:00 Andreas Beckmann :
> On 2015-01-16 14:15, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
>> ---
>> xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.16/debian/xserver-xorg-video-geode-dbg.maintscript
>> 1970-01-01 02:00:00.0 +0200
>> +++
>> xserver-xorg-video-geode-2.11.16/debian/xserver-xorg-video-ge
Hi,
Thanks to Jonathan who did approve the patch by the release team but I'm a
little bit worried : Debian 7.8 is out and still no news ...
Openvswitch kernel module is still not working in Debian stable :(
I suspect that you are quite busy and it's of course a voluntary work.
Thank you in adva
On Sat, 17 Jan 2015 10:44:18 + Steve McIntyre
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 09:38:05PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> >
> >My personal opinion is that the right thing is to not add entries to
> >/etc/fstab for removable devices at all (where "removable" means
that
> >the device itself
Control: tags 774867 + patch
Control: tags 774867 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for lirc (versioned as 0.9.0~pre1-1.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP ke
Processing control commands:
> tags 774867 + patch
Bug #774867 [lirc-x] lirc-x: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 774867 + pending
Bug #774867 [lirc-x] lirc-x: unhandled symlink to directory conversion:
/usr/share/doc/PACKAGE
Added tag(s
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:47:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#739245: fixed in conky 1.9.0-2+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #739245,
regarding conky-std: fails to upgrade lenny -> squeeze -> wheezy - trying to
overwrite /etc/conky/conky.conf
to be marked as done
Processing control commands:
> tags 748657 + patch
Bug #748657 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg failed to run test: work/misc/fopen-fail.mk
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 748657 + pending
Bug #748657 [make-dfsg] make-dfsg failed to run test: work/misc/fopen-fail.mk
Added tag(s) pending.
--
748657: http://bugs.
Control: tags 748657 + patch
Control: tags 748657 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for make-dfsg (versioned as 4.0-8.1).
Testing fopen is machine-dependent and reliant on local ulimit values.
The previous patch to simply timeout based on the (unknown) value of
the current ulimit i
Source: darcs
Version: 2.8.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy § 12.5
Hi,
The copyright information and the license terms for the files
src/Crypt/*
is missing from debian/copyright. One file is "GPL" (no
version specified, and the others are BSD-3-clause licensed.
Package haskell-h
Source: tellico
Version: 2.3.9+dfsg.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy § 12.5
Hi,
The copyright information and the license terms for the files
src/fetch/sha2.*
is missing from debian/copyright. They are BSD-3-clause licensed.
Package haskell-hashed-storage has these files, too. T
Source: xymon
Version: 4.3.17-4
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy § 12.5
Hi,
The copyright information and the license terms for the files
lib/sha?.*
is missing from debian/copyright. The sha1.* files are public domain,
and the sha2.* files are BSD-3-clause licensed.
Package haskell-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 762984 with 775583
Bug #762984 [initramfs-tools] New boot script stage needed for preparing
non-root block devices
762984 was not blocked by any bugs.
762984 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 762984: 775583
> thanks
Stoppi
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.111-2
Severity: serious
initramfs-tools 0.117 added mounting of /usr from the initramfs.
Currently, if /usr is on a VG that is not also used by root or a
hibernation device, that VG is not activated and the user must
explicitly activate it through the emergency shell.
Your message dated Sat, 17 Jan 2015 18:03:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#727800: fixed in kdepim-runtime 4:4.14.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #727800,
regarding kmail: KMail goes bonkers following Qt update
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 762984 New boot script stage needed for preparing non-root block
> devices
Bug #762984 [initramfs-tools] cannot mount /usr if it is a separate LVM LV:
Alert! /dev/vg0/usr does not exist
Changed Bug title to 'New boot script stage needed
severity 771205 important
thanks
This isn't a release-critical bug for Debian. If anything, it would be
normal rather than important but the referenced bug in evince is also
important, so keeping at that.
The description from the upstream bug makes the issue clearer:
> Scaling in common_render_p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 771205 important
Bug #771205 [libgtk-3-0] libgtk-3-0: Scale bug in gtk which affect a lot gnome
applications
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
77120
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:25:55AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I agree, and have fixed this in git for libykneomgr-dpkg. I'm not sure
> whether this fix should go into jessie, or how to go about doing that
> (help appreciated, or I'll read up on it eventually).
Just an ordinary upload to unst
On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 04:16:56PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:28:51PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Have you seen this again recently? Is it still happening for you?
>
>As a matter of fact, it hasn't happened recently. That being said, I'm
>not upgrading
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 774678 - patch
Bug #774678 [ykneomgr] ykneomgr: Missing dependency on pcscd
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
774678: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=77467
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
