Your message dated Sun, 22 Jun 2014 06:49:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#746898: fixed in qdbm 1.8.78-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #746898,
regarding qdbm: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On 06/21/14 18:55, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is basically a follow up from the lengthy discussion at
> debian-devel:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00171.html
> (somewhere deeper in the thread).
>
> Admittedly I didn't read through the whole code of torbr
control: severity -1 important
control: tag -1 -security
control: retitle -1 suggestions for flashplugin fetching improvements
Contrib doesn't get any security support. Users worried about
security should avoid contrib and non-free.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 important
Bug #752277 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: several security issues
Severity set to 'important' from 'critical'
> tag -1 -security
Bug #752277 [flashplugin-nonfree] flashplugin-nonfree: several security issues
Removed tag(s) security.
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:3.4
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
Hi.
This is basically a follow up from the lengthy discussion at
debian-devel:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00171.html
(somewhere deeper in the thread).
I've hea
Package: torbrowser-launcher
Version: 0.0.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi.
This is basically a follow up from the lengthy discussion at
debian-devel:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/06/msg00171.html
(somewhere deeper in the thread).
Admittedly
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jun 2014 00:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#752048: fixed in funny-manpages 1.3-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #752048,
regarding funny-manpages: installs /usr/share/lintian/overrides/lintian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jun 2014 00:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#752048: fixed in funny-manpages 1.3-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #752048,
regarding funny-manpages and lintian: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jun 2014 00:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#269703: fixed in funny-manpages 1.3-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #269703,
regarding funny-manpages: installs /usr/share/lintian/overrides/lintian
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Your message dated Sun, 22 Jun 2014 00:18:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#269703: fixed in funny-manpages 1.3-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #269703,
regarding funny-manpages and lintian: error when trying to install together
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 -upstream
Bug #752267 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Possible problem with variable
PRESSED in config/common
Removed tag(s) upstream.
> severity -1 normal
Bug #752267 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Possible problem with variable
PRESSED in config
Control: tag -1 -upstream
Control: severity -1 normal
ewew (2014-06-22):
> Hello
>
> Unfortunatly I Am using pressed for installing debian and I wanted
> to include this file in initrd.gz while building netboot.tar.gz.
> When trying to build this file I haved ran into few issues. It is
> strange
On 21 Jun, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> python-networkx needs some work. It currently FTBFS due to failed tests
> (see #750233). As much as I can tell, there's no such issue in the
> Ubuntu package. It's a bit weird, cause it doesn't seem to be only
> because of the Debian specific patchset. Copying the
Package: debian-installer
Version: 201403616 and others
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello
Unfortunatly I Am using pressed for installing debian and I wanted to include
this
file in initrd.gz while building netboot.tar.gz. When trying to build this
Dear Reinhard,
We've just uploaded a new upstream release which should fix this:
https://github.com/libavg/libavg/releases.
Cheers,
Uli
On 06.04.2014, at 19:49, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I'm writing you because your package is part of the upcoming libav10
> transtion,
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 21:49:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#746860: fixed in icu 52.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #746860,
regarding icu: ftbfs with GCC-4.9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Just for the record, I think the problem fixed here actually doesn't
have anything to do with gcc 4.9. ICU was probably FTBFS for all
versions. There was a time-based test that started failing between the
last time we built and when the gcc 4.9 build was attempted. I didn't
verify that the problem
Hi,
You currently have to uninstall python-configparser to use weboob on Debian.
On weboob bug tracker, this bug is reported[1] and the patch attached makes
weboob work when python-configparser is installed.
Yannick
[1] https://symlink.me/issues/1393--- a/weboob/core/repositories.py
+++ b/webo
Control: severity -1 normal
# this is no policy violation and doesn't make the package
# unsuitable for release
# /etc/default/iodine is not shipped and is no conffile
Control: found -1 0.6.0~rc1-13
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 19:58:24 +
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 normal
Bug #752263 [iodine] The exact same issue that was previously resolved in
#612723 is happening again
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
--
752263: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752263
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow
The version of ICU I'm about to upload builds and tests fine for me
locally with the latest gcc-4.9 package from sid. Hopefully this solves
the problem. There was a failing test case, and I found a fix for it
from upstream.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
Package: iodine
Version: 0.6.0~rc1-19
Severity: serious
I couldn't find out how to re-open an existing bug but this issue that
I reported & was resolved a while ago is now happening again:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612723
Upgrading from 0.6.0~rc1-12 to 0.6.0~rc1-19 yields
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 18:32:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751834: fixed in iodine 0.6.0~rc1-12+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #751834,
regarding iodine: CVE-2014-4168: authentication bypass
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 743748 important
Bug #743748 [icedove] Folders are not listed, blank folder pane
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tags 743748 unreproducible
Bug #743748 [icedove] Folders are not listed, blank folder pane
Added tag(s) unreproduc
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 01:18:53AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 07:35:56AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > Package: librime-dev
> > Version: 0.9.9-1
> > Severity: grave
> > User: trei...@debian.org
> > Usertags: edos-outdated
> >
> > librime-dev can no longer b
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 1:33 AM, GUO Yixuan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:39:39PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why are not we uploading the new librime?
>>
>> Osamu
>
> I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev => librime1-dev
> renaming, from Aron, as we discus
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:39:39PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why are not we uploading the new librime?
>
> Osamu
I'm just waiting for a confirmation on the librime-dev => librime1-dev
renaming, from Aron, as we discussed in a previous thread. [1]
In addition, because the symbol fi
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:19:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#746110: fixed in twidge 1.1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #746110,
regarding twidge: FTBFS: at least the following depedencies are missing: aeson
>=0.6.1.0 && <0.7
to be marked as done.
This means that y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 741196 important
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> tags 741196 +moreinfo
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libp
severity 741196 important
tags 741196 +moreinfo
thanks
2014-06-21 16:34 GMT+02:00 Francesco Poli :
> In the absence of any reply from either the FTP Masters or Julien, I am
> raising the severity of this bug report back to "serious" and removing
> the "moreinfo" tag.
I disagree with that. That is
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 16:04:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#750487: fixed in zfsnap 1.11.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #750487,
regarding missing dependency on bc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 726799 shared-mime-info/1.2-1
Bug #726799 [shared-mime-info] update-mime-database.real deletes files
installed by other packages
Marked as found in versions shared-mime-info/1.2-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
found 726799 shared-mime-info/1.2-1
thanks
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 03:40:34PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there any indication that this bug does *not* affect the version
> currently in testing (1.2-1)?
As impacting 1.0 and 1.3, it would be have been funny not to affect
1.2.
Just downg
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2 links with both
GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries
Severity set to 'serious' from 'important'
> tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #741196 [libpetsc3.4.2] libpetsc3.4.2: libpetsc.so.3.4.2
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 13:48:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751834: fixed in iodine 0.6.0~rc1-2+deb6u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #751834,
regarding iodine: CVE-2014-4168: authentication bypass
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Hi,
is there any indication that this bug does *not* affect the version
currently in testing (1.2-1)?
If not, maybe we should mark it as affected too, so that this bug
doesn't block the migration of 1.3-1 to testing for wrong reasons.
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bu
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # version tracking doesn't work with the 'src:' prefix
> notfixed 746906 src:sdcc/3.4.0+dfsg-1
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> fixed 746906 sdcc/3.4.0+dfsg-1
Bug #746906 {Done: "Gudjon I. Gudjonsson" } [src:sdcc] sdcc:
ftbfs
On 2014-06-09 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Package: pycurl
> Version: 7.19.3.1-1
> Severity: serious
> Usertags: goto-cc
> During a rebuild of all Debian packages in a clean sid chroot (using
> cowbuilder
> and pbuilder) the build failed with the following error.
[...}
> The following packages ha
control: tag -1 patch pending
This has been fixed in upstream git, here's the patch. I have checked in
an armhf chroot on harris.debian.org that the patch fixes the problem.
I have made a non-maintainer upload to DELAYED/5.
Cheers,
-Hilko
>From a7b0f770b0f3f058ff1682beba5a78def91e91a7 Mon Sep 17
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch pending
Bug #752107 [e2fsprogs] mke2fs apparently lacks large file support
Added tag(s) pending and patch.
--
752107: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752107
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 10:34:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#751487: fixed in debian-science 1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #751487,
regarding science-astronomy-dev: recommends non-free libsofa-c-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: src:biomaj-watcher
Version: 1.2.1-1
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: source-is-missing
severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
Your package seems to include some files that lack sources
in prefered forms of modification:
usr/share/biomaj-watcher/src/war/bmajwa
Package: axiom
Version: 20120501-14
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: source-is-missing
severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
Your package seems to include some files that lack sources
in prefered forms of modification:
src/axiom-website/axiomgraph/js/arbor.js
Accord
Package: automx
Version: 0.10.0-2
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: source-is-missing
severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
Your package seems to include some files that lack sources
in prefered forms of modification:
src/foundation-scss/javascripts/vendor/custom.mode
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 752215 src:advene
Bug #752215 [package] [src:advene] Some sources are not included in your
package
Warning: Unknown package 'package'
Bug reassigned from package 'package' to 'src:advene'.
No longer marked as found in versions 1.0-1.
Ig
Package: package
Version: 1.0-1
user: debian...@lists.debian.org
usertags: source-is-missing
severity: serious
X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmas...@debian.org
Hi,
Your package seems to include some files that lack sources
in prefered forms of modification:
share/web/HTML5/jqueryui.js
(you may depends and sy
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 09:35:41 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#752047: fixed in xterm 308-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #752047,
regarding latter half of Chinese lines now injured suddenly
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
Processing control commands:
> severity -1 serious
Bug #735227 [activemq] [activemq] Non sourced jquery
Severity set to 'serious' from 'minor'
--
735227: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=735227
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSC
Some more information about this from IRC:
p1otr: could you fix #735237? it is blocking other packages from
migrating and there is a patch in the BTS
pabs: a) removing file via patch doesn't change the fact that
file is still in the tarball (so it's not a fix) b) I don't consider it
a bug c) Sph
Package: src:collabtive
Version: 1.2+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
User: lintian-ma...@debian.org
Usertags: license-problem-md5sum-non-free-file
Dear Maintainer,
The file include/include/sRGB.icc is not licensed under the
same terms as the rest of this package -- it is a file from non free package
i
Package: src:calligra
Version: 1:2.7.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: DFSG3: must allow derived works
Dear Maintainer,
The file plugins/colorengines/lcms2/colorprofiles/data/fogra27l.icm is not
licensed under the
same terms as the rest of this package -- it is a file from non free package
Package: unison-gtk
Version: 2.40.65-2
Severity: grave
Tags: wheezy
Here we are using USB sticks to store important data which has to be
transported to places where we don't have internet access. They are regularly
backed up and updated using unison. This worked great in squeeze. Now we lost
so
Hi Sandro, and the rest of the Python module team,
python-networkx needs some work. It currently FTBFS due to failed tests
(see #750233). As much as I can tell, there's no such issue in the
Ubuntu package. It's a bit weird, cause it doesn't seem to be only
because of the Debian specific patchset.
2014-06-15 15:35 GMT+09:00 Hideki Yamane :
>> This pattern will match to words other than "class", eg. "fooClass".
> Any class should be accepted, maybe it'd cause some
> trouble but non-class should not named as *class, IMHO.
That might be the case. This issue might be a very small problem.
Act
Your message dated Sat, 21 Jun 2014 07:28:16 +
with message-id <20140621072816.ga13...@master.debian.org>
and subject line flashpluging-nonfree: failed to get upstream version
has caused the Debian Bug report #752023,
regarding "ERROR: Failed to get upstream version" when using
update-flashplu
55 matches
Mail list logo
