Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 735237 src:python-weberror
Bug #735237 [python-weberror] [python-weberror] non sourced minified javascript
Bug reassigned from package 'python-weberror' to 'src:python-weberror'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #735237 to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 735893 735237
Bug #735893 [src:python-weberror] Sourceless file
Unable to merge bugs because:
package of #735237 is 'python-weberror' not 'src:python-weberror'
Failed to forcibly merge 735893: Did not alter merged bugs
Debbugs::
Your message dated Sun, 06 Apr 2014 03:38:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#742423: fixed in wine-unstable 1.7.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #742423,
regarding wine-unstable: wine-wrapper (aka everything) tries to call
/usr/bin/wine (which is missing)
to be marked as done.
Th
Source: procps
Version: 1:3.3.9-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
checking why the fix for #732920 isn't in testing yet, it appears this
is due to (unfiled) FTBFS on mips and powerpc:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=procps&arch=mips&ver=1%3A3.3.9-4&stamp=1393591135
Package: gdebi-kde
Version: 0.9.5.2
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n upstream patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
Installed gdebi-kde and attempted to use it to
Hi Aubrey,
> gNewSense appears to have fixed this bug:
>
> https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?35790
>
> gNewSense is Debian-based; perhaps the patch can be used for Debian's
> package?
they've just removed that file from the package and that's certainly step 1 of
fixing this problem (a
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 743736 normal
Bug #743736 [texlive-lang-french] [texlive-lang-french] Babel french does not
work with luatex
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> tags 743736 + pending upstream
Bug #743736 [texlive-lang-french] [texlive-lang-french]
severity 743736 normal
tags 743736 + pending upstream
thanks
> it install the lua file under
> /usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/generic/babel-french/frenchb.lua.gz
> and not under the right place
Yes, known. I posted on this item in my blog entry.
lowering severity, as luatex/latex is not considered
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 723957 + patch
Bug #723957 [slapd] slapd: commented olcDbDirectory config line causes unusable
system and potential data loss on upgrade
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
72
tags 723957 + patch
thanks
Hi Matt,
Thanks for reporting and triaging this bug. I'm sorry no one has
answered it until now.
On 21/09/13 09:13 AM, Matt Brown wrote:
The get_directory method used in several maint scripts contains a
bug that causes it to return multiple lines of output if a comme
Package: sylpheed
Version: 3.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: causes data loss
This is for preventing migration of current unstable version to testing
because of bug http://sylpheed.sraoss.jp/redmine/issues/193
Upstream already released 3.4.1 to address this, which will be pack
Package: icedove
Version: 24.4.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
This bug manifested itself after I upgraded from Wheezy to Jessie.
The software seems to be working (filters, calendars etc.) except for
the folder pane and the folder list in the subscrip
VF> BTW, there was no need to reopen #709845: while the symptoms were
VF> the same, it was a different cause.
OK.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#743042: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.8.8.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #743042,
regarding alternative path /usr/bin/compare-im6 doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 22:06:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#743042: fixed in imagemagick 8:6.8.8.9-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #743042,
regarding update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/compare-im6
doesn't exist
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:34:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#739229: fixed in arora 0.11.0+qt5+git2014-04-05-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #739229,
regarding arora: Supports insecure SSL ciphers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 21:34:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#742218: fixed in burp 1.3.48-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #742218,
regarding [burp] burp initscript is missing exit 0 statement at end of file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Hello Maintainers,
It looks that the problem has been fixed with the current "gem2deb"
package (release 0.7.5, Bug: #743671).
I have rebuilt this package with the new gem2deb for my own and the
mkmf.log file is gone.
I my eyes there is only a "Binary-only" rebuild with the new gem2deb needed.
But
Hello,
> Setting up imagemagick (8:6.8.8.9-2) ...
> update-alternatives: error: alternative path /usr/bin/compare-im6 doesn't
> exist
> dpkg: error processing package imagemagick (--configure):
> subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
> Errors were encounter
Package: texlive-lang-french
Version: 2013.20140314-1
Severity: serious
it install the lua file under
/usr/share/doc/texlive-doc/generic/babel-french/frenchb.lua.gz
and not under the right place
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1-amd64
Debian Release: je
On 04.04.2014 19:57, Antoine wrote:
> On 04/03/2014 07:27 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
[...]
>> and try out different settings. It would be great if you confirmed that
>> the solutions mentioned in #718624 worked for you.
>
> Actually I didn't have to change anything at all in the service file
> aft
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 19:02:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#714529: fixed in lcms2 2.2+git20110628-2.2+deb7u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #714529,
regarding lcms2 needs security updates found in the last openjdk-7 security
updates (CVE-2013-4160)
to be marked as d
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 10:43:02AM -0300, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
>
> In the meantime I'm going to review your changes to svnkit.
Hi again,
I just uploaded svnkit 1.8.5+dfsg-1 to DELAYED/5 so it can enter to
the archive in combination with updated trilead-ssh2 package.
As comment, I had quite lo
Package: ntfs-3g
Version: 1:2013.1.13AR.4-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
Upgrading from version 1:2013.1.13AR.1-2 to 1:2013.1.13AR.4-2.
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffe
As of now it looks like this DFSG violation in a package marked DFSG
is going unfixed and ignored when some patches have been proposed. Any
news on this? Is the only issue that somebody needs to buckle down and
actually submit the patch? Because it's a major issue putting
non-free software in the
Hi Ivo,
On 5 April 2014 at 19:15, Ivo De Decker wrote:
| The build on ipa.debian.net succeeded. The one on harris is still running.
| However, it seems the buildd build on hasse succeeded as well this time, so
| there is a build of 3.0.3.20140403-1 in the archive now, so I'm closing this
| bug. S
Your message dated Sat, 5 Apr 2014 19:43:42 +0200
with message-id <20140405174341.ga6...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: [DRE-maint] Bug#743720: ruby-redcarpet: FTBFS on all archs
has caused the Debian Bug report #743720,
regarding ruby-redcarpet: FTBFS on all archs
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sat, 5 Apr 2014 19:15:30 +0200
with message-id <20140405171530.ga6...@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#743703: r-base: FTBFS on armhf
has caused the Debian Bug report #743703,
regarding r-base: FTBFS on armhf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: ruby-bcrypt
Followup-For: Bug #743664
Confirmed.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (500,
'oldstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.12-1
2014-04-05 21:10 GMT+05:30, Ivo De Decker :
> The latest upload of ruby-redcarpet FTBFS on all architectures. The upload
> was
> probably built in an unclean or outdated environment.
It missed a nokogiri rebuild.
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ruby-redcarpet&suite=sid
I was hop
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> block 743661 with 743671
Bug #743661 [ruby-eventmachine] ruby-eventmachine: file conflict with ruby-god
743661 was not blocked by any bugs.
743661 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 743661: 743671
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 734518 14.1.1-1
Bug #734518 {Done: Julian Taylor } [src:pyzmq]
pyzmq: FTBFS on i386: pypy build reports ImportError
Marked as fixed in versions pyzmq/14.1.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 743406 14.1.1-1
Bug #743406 {Done: Julian Taylor } [pyzmq] pyzmq
fails tests on mips and kfreebsd-amd64
There is no source info for the package 'pyzmq' at version '14.1.1-1' with
architecture ''
Unable to make a source version for version
Package: ruby-debian
Version: 0.3.8+b2
Severity: grave
I guess this should have been spotted before ruby2.0 reaches testing
:}
$ how-can-i-help
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb:24:in `require': no such file to load --
debian_version (LoadError)
from /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/debian.rb
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:20:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#742730: fixed in qemu 2.0.0~rc1+dfsg-1exp
has caused the Debian Bug report #742730,
regarding image format processing issues: lack of input validation
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Hi,
It's unreproducible with cowbuilder(amd64). I'll check it with other build
environments later, so not tag it now.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
package: ruby-redcarpet
version: 3.1.1-2
severity: serious
Hi,
The latest upload of ruby-redcarpet FTBFS on all architectures. The upload was
probably built in an unclean or outdated environment.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ruby-redcarpet&suite=sid
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUB
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 04:45:26PM +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> could you please comment on that? I have no experience with itk
> whatsoever. Therefore, I do not how if this is a problem in itk or a
> configuration issue.
This is almost certainly a configuration issue. It sounds like he is hitting
su
package: subunit
version: 0.0.18-2
severity: serious
Hi,
The latest upload of subunit FTBFS on all arches. The upload was probably
built in an unclean or outdated environment.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=subunit&suite=sid
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bug
On 5 April 2014 at 17:01, Ivo De Decker wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 09:50:47AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > | It's probably a good idea to submit a bug report against gcc, and to
notify
| > | the arm* porters, to make sure the gcc issue is investigated.
| >
| > Can you
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:59:58 +0200
with message-id <53401a6e.2000...@googlemail.com>
and subject line fixed in latest upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #743406,
regarding pyzmq fails tests on mips and kfreebsd-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 16:59:58 +0200
with message-id <53401a6e.2000...@googlemail.com>
and subject line fixed in latest upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #734518,
regarding pyzmq: FTBFS on i386: pypy build reports ImportError
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Hi Dirk,
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 09:50:47AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | It's probably a good idea to submit a bug report against gcc, and to notify
> | the arm* porters, to make sure the gcc issue is investigated.
>
> Can you take care of that, please?
It seems there are other packages f
On 05.04.2014 04:06, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> Please let trafficserver 4.1.2-1.2 migrate to testing. It's the result
> of the efforts of Petr, Dejan, myself and some other people who looked
> into the bugs fixed by the NMUs.
Sure thing. The MIPS patch is supposed to be included in ATS 5.0,
On 5 April 2014 at 15:39, Ivo De Decker wrote:
| Hi Dirk,
|
| On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:11:03AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| > That's a gcc error.
| >
| > I changed how to set CFLAGS etc by calling dpkg-buildflags so I am pretty
| > much playing by the book. What do you suggest I do? T
> On 03/19/2014 09:28 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 09:18:20PM +0100, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> I'm not sure what the best course of action is. But Jérémy suggested
> backporting a change from upstream, I'll give that a go tomorrow:
>
> https://github.com/mapnik/mapni
Steinar,
could you please comment on that? I have no experience with itk
whatsoever. Therefore, I do not how if this is a problem in itk or a
configuration issue.
Moreover, please reasign this bug to the itk source package, if this is
a still persisting problem.
--
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 740199 + sid jessie
Bug #740199 {Done: Niels Thykier } [tar] [regression] tar
mess up \ and \\ files
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 742675 + sid jessie
Bug #742675 [libreoffice-kde] libreoffice: Libreoffice crashes when I select
"Save
Hi Dirk,
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 08:11:03AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> That's a gcc error.
>
> I changed how to set CFLAGS etc by calling dpkg-buildflags so I am pretty
> much playing by the book. What do you suggest I do? Take out -O2 or -g on
> armhf?
It's probably a good idea to su
Hi Markus,
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 12:47:52PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> >
> > I'll review it and upload it to DELAYED/5 if everything is OK.
I just uploaded trilead-ssh2 to DELAYED/5.
> that would be great. Please go ahead and let me know if t
On 5 April 2014 at 13:55, Ivo De Decker wrote:
| package: r-base
| version: 3.0.3.20140403-1
| severity: serious
|
| Hi,
|
| The latest upload of r-base FTBFS on armhf:
|
| https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=r-base
|
| It seems the previous version built fine.
gcc -std=gnu99-I
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch confirmed
Bug #734238 [libopenjpeg2] Fix for CVE-2013-6045 breaks decoding of
chroma-subsampled images
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
734238: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=734238
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Control: tag -1 patch confirmed
>
> Here is the backported patch (attached). I have no clue on how to use
> dpatch to convert it. 20.jp2 does not segfault anymore, and p0_06.j2k
> does decode normally.
Of course segfault1.dpatch needs to
Control: tag -1 patch confirmed
Here is the backported patch (attached). I have no clue on how to use
dpatch to convert it. 20.jp2 does not segfault anymore, and p0_06.j2k
does decode normally.
--- libopenjpeg/tcd.c 2014-04-05 14:49:32.0 +0200
+++ ../../openjpeg-1.3+dfsg/libopenjpeg/tcd.c
Just for reference, I was given by geissert@d.o the input files to
reproduce the segfault.
segfaul1.dpatch work around issue as demonstrated in:
https://openjpeg.googlecode.com/svn/data/input/nonregression/edf_c2_20.jp2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:48:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#743565: fixed in cacti 0.8.8b+dfsg-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #743565,
regarding cacti: CVE-2014-2708 CVE-2014-2709
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
[...]
If you follow the whole thread, get_proc_stats is not available
anymore in recent procps releases. Therefore the only solution is to
follow:
http://www.freelists.org/post/procps/private-symbol-get-proc-stats,1
Would it be possible that it gets included in upstream directly
instead of withi
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 12:34:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#743671: fixed in gem2deb 0.7.5
has caused the Debian Bug report #743671,
regarding Building extensions breaks resulting packages
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Package: jscommunicator
Version: 1.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid jessie
seen in current unstable:
make[1]: Entering directory `/scratch/packages/tmp/jscommunicator-1.1.1'
./make-release
/usr/bin/closure-compiler: line 1: $'PK\003\004': command not found
/usr/bin/closure-compiler: line 2: $'\
On 27-03-14 04:20, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Source: enigmail
> Source-Version: 2:1.6+git0.20140323-1
> Distribution: experimental
Was it really intentional to upload to experimental? Enigmail is now
listed for removal from testing because this bug is not fixed in sid.
Paul
signature.asc
D
package: r-base
version: 3.0.3.20140403-1
severity: serious
Hi,
The latest upload of r-base FTBFS on armhf:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=r-base
It seems the previous version built fine.
Cheers,
Ivo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Control: reassign -1 gem2deb
Hello, thanks for your bug report.
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 01:14:04AM +0200, Marc Dequènes (Duck) wrote:
> Package: libruby2.1
> Version: 2.1.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Control: block 743664 with -1
>
> Coin,
>
> Building extensions leaves mkmf.log files in weird place
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 gem2deb
Bug #743671 [libruby2.1] Building extensions breaks resulting packages
Bug reassigned from package 'libruby2.1' to 'gem2deb'.
No longer marked as found in versions ruby2.1/2.1.1-2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #743671 to the sam
Dear maintainer,
Attached patches make samidare to work with current sid ruby packages.
I test with these packages.
ii ruby1:2.0.0.1
ii ruby-htree 0.8+dfsg-2
Best Regards,
Kouichi ONO
--- mconv.rb.org 2008-07-24 21:55:19.0 +0900
+++ mconv.rb 2014-04-02 21:39:30.176448762 +090
Package: gevent-socketio
Version: 0.3.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid jessie
gevent-socketio tries to download python packages during the build, and fails to
build when it doesn't succeed.
complete build log at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gevent-socketio/0.3.6-1
dh_auto_clean
Downloa
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 upstream
Bug #743554 [src:python-astropy] python-astropy: FTBFS on all buildds except on
amd64 and kfreebsd-amd64
Added tag(s) upstream.
> forwarded -1 https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/2171
Bug #743554 [src:python-astropy] python-astropy: FTBFS on al
Control: tag -1 upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/2171
These problems are already forwarded to upstream. While the
test_composite_static_matrix_transform failure could be fixed by
increasing the tolerance, the checksum test failures would need to be
silenced
On 03.04.2014 15:34, Miguel Landaeta wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 07:00:35PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>>
>> I have tested all reverse dependencies of svnkit and they seem to work.
>> Only netbeans could not be tested because it's affected by another RC bug.
>
> Hi Markus,
>
> Since Matth
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 742580 + sid jessie
Bug #742580 [juffed] juffed: Segmentation fault on startup
Added tag(s) sid and jessie.
> tags 743605 + sid jessie
Bug #743605 [libusbmuxd-tools,usbmuxd] usbmuxd and libusbmuxd-tools: error when
trying to install together
Hi Bastian,
your bug report is very vague:
[12:25] < h01ger> | "seems to include", "could be a licence violation",
"if this is a false positive..." - and no list of actual files without sources
given. if you arent sure that a bug is RC, than dont file it.
If I were the maintainer, I woul
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 742620 + wheezy-ignore
Bug #742620 [testresources] wrong information in debian/copyright
Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
742620: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 11:51:16 +0200
with message-id <533fd214.9060...@debian.org>
and subject line closing old bug reports in gcc-snapshot
has caused the Debian Bug report #713323,
regarding gcc-snapshot: FTBFS: There were fixinclude test FAILURES
to be marked as done.
This means th
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:25:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#736806: fixed in lcms 1.19.dfsg1-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #736806,
regarding [src:lcms] Non free file
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:25:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#718682: fixed in lcms 1.19.dfsg1-1.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #718682,
regarding liblcms1: CVE-2013-4276: Buffer overflows in Little CMS v1.19
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Source: urwid
Version: 1.2.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Dear Maintainer,
urwid 1.2.1-1 currently FTBFS on i386 and mipsel according to the buildd [1]
logs. Note that the test suite is now run against all python2 and python3
v
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 685140 + pending
Bug #685140 [eric] Eric5 is 2 years old yet non-existent in repository
Added tag(s) pending.
> tag 735897 + pending
Bug #735897 [src:eric] Sourceless file
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 743308 dh-ada-library/5.9
Bug #743308 [dh-ada-library,gnat-4.6-base] gnat-4.6-base and dh-ada-library:
error when trying to install together
Marked as found in versions dh-ada-library/5.9.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 743376 gnat-4.9-base/4.9-20140330-1
Bug #743376 [gnat-4.6-base,gnat-4.9-base] gnat-4.9-base and gnat-4.6-base:
error when trying to install together
The source gnat-4.9-base and version 4.9-20140330-1 do not appear to match any
binary pack
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 743308 gnat-4.6-base/4.6.4-2
Bug #743308 [dh-ada-library,gnat-4.6-base] gnat-4.6-base and dh-ada-library:
error when trying to install together
The source gnat-4.6-base and version 4.6.4-2 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 743376 gnat-4.6-base/4.6.4-1
Bug #743376 [gnat-4.6-base,gnat-4.9-base] gnat-4.9-base and gnat-4.6-base:
error when trying to install together
The source gnat-4.6-base and version 4.6.4-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 743308 dh-ada-library/5.9
Bug #743308 [dh-ada-library,gnat-4.6-base] gnat-4.6-base and dh-ada-library:
error when trying to install together
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #743308 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 743376 gnat-4.6-base/4.6.4-2
Bug #743376 [gnat-4.6-base,gnat-4.9-base] gnat-4.9-base and gnat-4.6-base:
error when trying to install together
The source gnat-4.6-base and version 4.6.4-2 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Marked as
Processing control commands:
> found -1 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3
Bug #743565 [cacti] cacti: CVE-2014-2708 CVE-2014-2709
Marked as found in versions cacti/0.8.7g-1+squeeze3.
> found 742768 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3
Bug #742768 [cacti] cacti: CVE-2014-2326 CVE-2014-2327 CVE-2014-2328
Marked as found in versions ca
Control: found -1 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3
Control: found 742768 0.8.7g-1+squeeze3
On 04/03/14 21:30, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> If you fix the vulnerabilities please also make sure to include the
> CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids in your changelog entry.
Hi security team,
Do you consid
Your message dated Sat, 05 Apr 2014 07:03:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#742300: fixed in byobu 5.77-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #742300,
regarding byobu: incorrect dependencies on python interpreter and modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
85 matches
Mail list logo
