Bug#695739: ghc: FTBFS on armhf: braindead rebase of patch that duplicates upstream fix

2012-12-11 Thread Shawn Landden
Source: ghc Version: 7.6.1-3 Severity: serious Tags: patch Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) The patch "armhf_llvm_abi" appears to have been mindlessly "quilt refresh"ed against head, rather than noticing that a fix in the same place, for the same bug,

Processed: tagging 695736

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 695736 + pending Bug #695736 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: Wheezy transition package missing binaries provided in Squeeze Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695736: http://bug

Processed: Re: Bug#695698: [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 695706 important Bug #695706 [plymouth] please move libply-boot-client to /lib in support of mountall Severity set to 'important' from 'critical' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695706: h

Bug#695698: [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0

2012-12-11 Thread Daniel Baumann
severity 695706 important thanks On 12/11/2012 10:27 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: I see that libply.so.2 is already in /lib - is there any reason libply-boot-client isn't there as well? because there was no need for it to deviate from upstream in that regard. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, D

Processed: severity of 695736 is serious

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 695736 serious Bug #695736 [gcc-mingw32] gcc-mingw32: Wheezy transition package missing binaries provided in Squeeze Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. --

Processed: Trying a different way

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 623500 nordugrid-arc-nox/1.1.0~rc6-2.1 Bug #623500 {Done: Mattias Ellert } [nordugrid-arc-nox] nordugrid-arc-nox: FTBFS ("conditional expression between distinct pointer types 'stack_st_X509*' and 'stack_st_X509**' lacks a cast') Marked as

Bug#645133: marked as done (simile-timeline: source package should use proper source)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:17:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#645133: fixed in simile-timeline 2.3.0+dfsg-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #645133, regarding simile-timeline: source package should use proper source to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#687692: testcase bug 687692

2012-12-11 Thread Alberto Fernández
Hie Tobias and Niels I've upload to the BTS a testcase for the bug. It's a protected pdf sample file and a simple java program that counts the number of pages of a PDF. It works fine in sid and fails in testing. Grettings Alberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.deb

Bug#687692: examples

2012-12-11 Thread Alberto Fernández
Hi Tobias Here's a testcase. In sid it works fine, but if I use the jars provided in testing it fails. Important: the pdf file is "protected" , so it's necesary bouncycastle to decrpyt it. Normal pdf files don't fail because they don't need bouncycastle. Attached sample pdf and sample java that

Processed: Re: mlterm: missing copyright files

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #694153 [mlterm,mlterm-tiny] mlterm, mlterm-tiny: after upgrade from squeeze files are missing in /usr/share/doc/mlterm-common/ Added tag(s) pending and patch. -- 694153: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=694153 Debian Bug T

Processed: Re: mlterm: missing copyright files

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #688606 [mlterm-im-uim] mlterm-im-uim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. -- 688606: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688606 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org wit

Processed: Re: mlterm: missing copyright files

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #688605 [mlterm-im-m17nlib] mlterm-im-m17nlib: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. -- 688605: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688605 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian

Processed: Re: mlterm: missing copyright files

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #688604 [mlterm-im-scim] mlterm-im-scim: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. -- 688604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688604 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org w

Bug#688603: mlterm: missing copyright files

2012-12-11 Thread Ivo De Decker
Control: tag -1 patch pending Hi, On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:12:06PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > reading Andreas' hint how to really solve the problem looks pretty > straightforward to me. If you just need some helping hand for the > upload feel free to ping me for another NMU. In my tests, t

Processed: Re: mlterm: missing copyright files

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 patch pending Bug #688603 [mlterm-tools] mlterm-tools: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. -- 688603: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688603 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#695268: marked as done (liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:32:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695268: fixed in liblockfile 1.09-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #695268, regarding liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#692650: Bug#692442: Patches for CVE-2012-5783 and CVE-2012-5784

2012-12-11 Thread Alberto Fernández
Hi. Both patches attached at upstream JIRA and reopened HTTPCLIENT-1265. Waiting for response. Kind regards Alberto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#694871: marked as done (owncloud: Multiple security issues)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:18:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693990: fixed in owncloud 4.0.4debian2-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #693990, regarding owncloud: Multiple security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#693990: marked as done (owncloud: multiple security issues)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:18:21 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693990: fixed in owncloud 4.0.4debian2-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #693990, regarding owncloud: multiple security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#695724: gforth: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: gforth Version: 0.7.0+ds1-7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/* contains documentation with the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or

Bug#695721: gcl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: gcl Version: 2.6.7-108 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl gmp3/gmp.* contains GNU MP library documentation, with the following license: Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,

Bug#695720: gcc-h8300-hms: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with invariant sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: gcc-h8300-hms Version: 1:3.4.6-7 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl gcc/doc/* contains documentation licensed under GNU Free Documentation License with Invariant Sections. As per GR 2006-001, works licensed under GFDL with unmodifiable sections are not suitab

Bug#695718: ecl: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: ecl Version: 11.1.1-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl src/gmp/doc/gmp.texi contains the GNU MP library documentation, with the following license: Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Document

Bug#695717: cpio: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: cpio Version: 2.11-8 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/cpio.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or | any later version publi

Bug#695716: cgdb: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: cgdb Version: 0.6.6-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/cgdb.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or | any later version publ

Bug#695715: cflow: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: cflow Version: 1:1.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/cflow.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or | any later version pu

Processed: fontconfig: diff for NMU version 2.9.0-7.1

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 684923 + pending Bug #684923 [fontconfig-config] fontconfig-config: Please stop messing with my /etc Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684923: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#684923: fontconfig: diff for NMU version 2.9.0-7.1

2012-12-11 Thread intrigeri
tags 684923 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for fontconfig (versioned as 2.9.0-7.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Cheers, -- intrigeri diff -Nru fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog fontconfig-2.9.0/debian/changelog

Bug#694355: marked as done (munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2))

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:02:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694355: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694355, regarding munin-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: munin-common (<< 2) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#677943: marked as done (/etc/apache2/conf.d/munin removed on upgrade)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:02:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#677943: fixed in munin 2.0.9-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677943, regarding /etc/apache2/conf.d/munin removed on upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w

Bug#695710: adplug: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: adplug Version: 2.2.1+dfsg1-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/libadplug.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or | any later

Bug#695709: bash: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: bash Version: 4.2-5 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl bash-4.2/lib/readline/doc/ contains GNU Readline Library documentation, with the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free

Bug#693442: marked as done (wrong lintian check 'maintainer-script-removes-device-files')

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 21:33:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693442: fixed in lintian 2.5.11 has caused the Debian Bug report #693442, regarding wrong lintian check 'maintainer-script-removes-device-files' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#679198: bash: diff for NMU version 4.2-5.1

2012-12-11 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Control: tags 679198 + pending thanks Dear maintainers, I've prepared an NMU for bash (versioned as 4.2-5.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -u bash-4.2/debian/changelog bash-4.2/debian/changelog --- bash-4.2/debian/changelog +

Processed: bash: diff for NMU version 4.2-5.1

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 679198 + pending Bug #679198 [bash] bash: [on native FreeBSD] unable to set FD_CLOEXEC flag Bug #683271 [bash] [bash] preinst failing on kfreebsd Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 679198: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=679198 683

Processed: Re: Bug#695698: [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 695698 json-c Bug #695698 [upstart] [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0 Bug reassigned from package 'upstart' to 'json-c'. No longer marked as found in versions upstart/1.6.1-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions

Bug#695698: [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0

2012-12-11 Thread Steve Langasek
reassign 695698 json-c clone 695698 -1 reassign -1 plymouth retitle -1 please move libply-boot-client to /lib in support of mountall severity 695566 critical forcemerge 695566 695698 affects 695698 upstart thanks (Raising severity of the existing bug report to 'critical' to match the reported seve

Bug#668740: [Dsc-maintainers] Bug#668740: Bug#668740: purging dsc-statistics-* will always remove system user, even when still in use

2012-12-11 Thread Marc Haber
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 06:53:39PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > I'm sure you can do that if you want to have separate bugs. Thanks for being helpful. -- - Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadr

Bug#695704: autoconf2.59: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with unmodifiable sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: autoconf2.59 Version: 2.59-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl doc/autoconf.* has the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this | document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, | Version 1.1 or any later v

Bug#665199: Initiate dumping of dbs, but actual dumping yet to be fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Hi, Here's a tested patch for the part of the problem that's described in message #17 in this bug report. We still need a solution for the issue described in message #68. Cheers, sez --- openldap-2.4.31/debian/slapd.postinst 2012-12-11 14:34:47.0 +0100 +++ new/openldap-2.4.31/deb

Bug#694694: marked as done (jruby: CVE-2012-5370)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:48:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694694: fixed in jruby 1.5.6-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #694694, regarding jruby: CVE-2012-5370 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#691015: marked as done (conserver-client: fails to upgrade from testing: Can't locate Tie/Hash/NamedCapture.pm in @INC)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 20:47:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#691015: fixed in conserver 8.1.18-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #691015, regarding conserver-client: fails to upgrade from testing: Can't locate Tie/Hash/NamedCapture.pm in @INC to be marked as done. T

Bug#695703: chromium-browser: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with invariant sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: chromium-browser Version: 22.0.1229.94~r161065-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl chromium-browser includes GNU libc documentation: src/native_client/toolchain/linux_x86/x86_64-nacl/share/info/libc.info* This documentation is under the following license: |P

Bug#695702: cec-utils: Cannot load libcec.so

2012-12-11 Thread David Härdeman
Package: cec-utils Version: 1.6.2-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, running cec-client or cec-config results in the following error messages: No device type given. Using 'recording device' cannot find libcec.solibcec.so: cannot open shared object file: No

Bug#695701: kdesdk: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with invariant sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: kdesdk Version: 4:4.8.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 kdesdk includes the file scripts/kde-emacs/kde-emacs-tips.texi with the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation Lice

Bug#695698: [upstart] System fails to boot due to missing libjson0

2012-12-11 Thread Christian Frommeyer
Package: upstart Version: 1.6.1-1 Severity: critical --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Hi, after updating upstart the system would not boot issuing a kernel panic. The error message suggest that libjson0 is missing. In fact it's there but in /usr/lib which is not on my root-Part

Processed: severity of 651291 is serious, usertagging 651291

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 651291 serious Bug #651291 [gcc-snapshot] gcc-snapshot contains evil gfdl licensed man pages Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > usertags 651291 + gfdl User is jw...@debian.org There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: gfdl. > t

Bug#695695: gcj-4.7: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with invariant sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: gcj-4.7 Version: 4.7.2-2 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl The gcc-linaro-doc patch includes the file src/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.orig with the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU

Bug#695660: marked as done (libdr-tarantool-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:47:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695660: fixed in libdr-tarantool-perl 0.24-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #695660, regarding libdr-tarantool-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#695694: gcc-4.7: includes non-free documentation (GFDL with invariant sections)

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: gcc-4.7 Version: 4.7.2-4 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.2.1 Usertags: gfdl The gcc-linaro-doc patch includes the file src/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.orig with the following license: | Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document | under the terms of the GNU

Bug#693442: marked as done (wrong lintian check 'maintainer-script-removes-device-files')

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:32:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#693442: fixed in lintian 2.5.10.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #693442, regarding wrong lintian check 'maintainer-script-removes-device-files' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#695056: marked as done (xen - Missing support for XZ compressed bzimage kernels)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 19:18:55 + with message-id and subject line Bug#695056: fixed in xen 4.1.3-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #695056, regarding xen - Missing support for XZ compressed bzimage kernels to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#695690: openvdb: FTBFS on ia64: TestCurl finds numeric discrepancies

2012-12-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: openvdb Version: 0.99.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source The automated build of openvdb on ia64 failed with test suite errors: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openvdb&arch=ia64&ver=0.99.0-1&stamp=1355188024 The test suite's output mostly consis

Bug#695689: openvdb: FTBFS on 32-bit systems: TestParticlesToLevelSet.c mixes size_t and Index64

2012-12-11 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: openvdb Version: 0.99.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Builds of openvdb on 32-bit architectures (i386, and 32-bit PowerPC if tbb ever materializes there) are failing because two functions in TestParticlesToLevelSet.c compare an explicitly calculated size_t t

Bug#695684: scolasync: FTBFS: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc3 in position 33

2012-12-11 Thread Jakub Wilk
Source: scolasync Version: 4.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source scolasync FTBFS: | ./update_config_dox | Traceback (most recent call last): | File "./update_config_dox", line 9, in | indat=infile.readlines() | File "/usr/lib/python3.2/encodings/ascii.py", lin

Bug#668740: [Dsc-maintainers] Bug#668740: purging dsc-statistics-* will always remove system user, even when still in use

2012-12-11 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Marc Haber writes: > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:02:20PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: >> And one more issue: > > Why is this in this bug report then? Because like the rest of the bug it's about the system user stuff. >> After installing both dsc-statistics-{collector,presenter}, purging one >>

Bug#694898: marked as done (libuuid1: harmful purge action in M-A: same package: rm -rf /var/lib/libuuid)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:32:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694898: fixed in util-linux 2.20.1-5.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #694898, regarding libuuid1: harmful purge action in M-A: same package: rm -rf /var/lib/libuuid to be marked as done. This means that yo

Processed (with 1 errors): forcibly merging 693744 694362

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 693744 694362 Bug #693744 [libnetcf1] libnetcf1: incompatibility with libvirt-bin Unable to merge bugs because: package of #694362 is 'netcf' not 'libnetcf1' Failed to forcibly merge 693744: Did not alter merged bugs Debbugs::Co

Bug#668740: [Dsc-maintainers] Bug#668740: purging dsc-statistics-* will always remove system user, even when still in use

2012-12-11 Thread Marc Haber
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 02:02:20PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > And one more issue: Why is this in this bug report then? > After installing both dsc-statistics-{collector,presenter}, purging one > of them will remove the system user even tough it is still in use by the > other package. This s

Bug#677861: marked as done (lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t')

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 15:47:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#677861: fixed in lftp 4.3.6-1+deb7u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #677861, regarding lftp: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: error: conflicting declaration 'typedef __int32_t gl_intptr_t' to be marked as done. This m

Bug#677861: RFS: lftp/4.3.6-1+deb7u1 [RC] [NMU] [T-P-U]

2012-12-11 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:25:12 +0100, Ivo De Decker wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my NMU for testing-proposed-updates of "lftp". > It was approved by the release team: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695152 Uploaded, thank you. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage:

Bug#694893: marked as done (planner-el: package installation creates /root/.gnupg/*)

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:47:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#694893: fixed in planner-el 3.42-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #694893, regarding planner-el: package installation creates /root/.gnupg/* to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#680084: none

2012-12-11 Thread intrigeri
Hi Michael, intrigeri wrote (27 Nov 2012 22:44:13 GMT) : > Michael Gilbert wrote (19 Nov 2012 00:10:21 GMT) : >> reassign 680084 grub-common >> forcemerge 680084 673573 >> thanks > I'm glad you found the root cause of #680084, but perhaps another kind > of relationship would have expressed more c

Processed: severity of 695660 is serious

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # FTBFS > severity 695660 serious Bug #695660 [libdr-tarantool-perl] libdr-tarantool-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid Severity set to 'serious' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695660: http://

Processed: found 695660 in 0.23-1

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 695660 0.23-1 Bug #695660 [libdr-tarantool-perl] libdr-tarantool-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid Marked as found in versions libdr-tarantool-perl/0.23-1. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 695660: htt

Bug#695660: libdr-tarantool-perl: FTBFS in Debian Sid

2012-12-11 Thread Angel Abad
Package: libdr-tarantool-perl Severity: grave Dear Maintainer, package fails to build from source in amd64 sid pbuilder chroot, see log part: ok 78 - select deleted status ok 79 - tuple was selected isa DR::Tarantool::Tuple ok 80 - field was updated ok # Failed test 'error message' # at t/06

Processed: Re: Bug#695621: Tag wheezy-ignore every bug concerning non free code of adobe in font hinting

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 665334 + wheezy-ignore Bug #665334 [fontforge] non-DFSG postscript embedded in fontforge Added tag(s) wheezy-ignore. > tags 694308 + wheezy-ignore Bug #694308 [general] A lot of type 1 fonts include Adobe all right reserved code Added tag(s)

Bug#690067: what is to be done?

2012-12-11 Thread Gergely Nagy
Csillag Tamas writes: > The patch seems fine to me. > Is something missing? Is something still needs to be done? I still need to prep the other things. I most likely will have time this coming friday. For the record, pretty much everything that needs to be fixed, is fixed in my tree[1], on eith

Bug#695268: liblockfile1: harmful remove action in M-A:same package

2012-12-11 Thread Aníbal Monsalve Salazar
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 05:55:20PM -0600, Rob Browning wrote: >I suspect this may be a reasonable fix: Thank you. Please see http://bugs.debian.org/695655 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

2012-12-11 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 09:55:38AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > Package: lynx-cur > Version: 2.8.8dev.15-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > On any https URL[*], I get te following error: > > SSL error:self signed certificate-Continue? (y) > > As accepting is

Processed: Re: Bug#695614: CVE-2012-6303: buffer overflows

2012-12-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 grave Bug #695614 [snack] CVE-2012-6303: buffer overflows Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' -- 695614: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=695614 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#686231: still not fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-12-11 10:20:29 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 11/12/2012 10:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > Unfortunately I don't know how to do that. What I mean is that > > if dragonegg-4.6 is built with gcc-4.6 4.6.3-14, then it should > > have in its dependency: > > > > Depends: ..., gcc-4.6 (= 4.6

Bug#686231: still not fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 11/12/2012 10:18, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-12-11 09:36:20 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Could you provide a patch ? I am not sure to see what you mean. > > Unfortunately I don't know how to do that. What I mean is that > if dragonegg-4.6 is built with gcc-4.6 4.6.3-14, then it should

Bug#686231: still not fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-12-11 09:36:20 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Could you provide a patch ? I am not sure to see what you mean. Unfortunately I don't know how to do that. What I mean is that if dragonegg-4.6 is built with gcc-4.6 4.6.3-14, then it should have in its dependency: Depends: ..., gcc-4.6 (= 4.

Bug#695653: lynx-cur: on any https URL, I get "SSL error:self signed certificate"

2012-12-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
Package: lynx-cur Version: 2.8.8dev.15-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable On any https URL[*], I get te following error: SSL error:self signed certificate-Continue? (y) As accepting is regarded as a security problem (for most sites), one can consider that lynx no longer

Bug#686231: still not fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 11/12/2012 09:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-12-11 07:38:47 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 11/12/2012 00:23, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> On 2012-12-10 20:44:08 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Gcc plugin system sucks from a distribution point of view... The best solution would b

Bug#686231: still not fixed

2012-12-11 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2012-12-11 07:38:47 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > On 11/12/2012 00:23, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2012-12-10 20:44:08 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > >> Gcc plugin system sucks from a distribution point of view... > >> The best solution would be to rebuild dragonegg at installation time. >

Bug#679198: bash: typo in FD_CLOEXEC invocation

2012-12-11 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Doko: may I NMU 4.2-5.1 to unstable? It should then be easy to > backport the debdiff to testing-proposed-updates. I'm not doko, but please go ahead. Be sure to remember to attach the debdiff here. Many thanks, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-r

Bug#672524: Please retry bitcoin package

2012-12-11 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 01:03:06AM +, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Can you give back bitcoin to buildd i386, please? Done Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#695422: ntop: links with both libssl and libgdbm and is mainly GPL-licensed without linking exception

2012-12-11 Thread Ludovico Cavedon
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Francesco Poli wrote: > Even if there's no *direct* linking of libgdm3 with libssl, it is my > understanding that there is indeed an issue, as long as one single > binary executable is linked with both libgdm3 and libssl. > > I believe that this follows from Sectio