On 11/12/2012 09:21, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2012-12-11 07:38:47 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> On 11/12/2012 00:23, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >>> On 2012-12-10 20:44:08 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >>>> Gcc plugin system sucks from a distribution point of view... >>>> The best solution would be to rebuild dragonegg at installation time. >>> >>> How about adding dependencies? >>> >>> For instance, dragonegg-4.6 could depend on some fixed version >>> of gcc-4.6. Or if you think that a dependency shouldn't be added >>> there, it could be done for llvm-gcc-4.6; it currently has: >>> >>> Depends: dragonegg-4.6, gcc-4.6, g++-4.6 >>> >>> Using = dependencies would solve the problem. >> No, it would not. >> dragonegg even fails when built with gcc 4.7.2-12 (experimental) and >> used with gcc 4.7.2-4 (unstable). > > That's precisely why I suggest = dependencies: gcc 4.7.2-4 and > a dragonegg-4.6 built with 4.7.2-12 couldn't be installed at the > same time. > Could you provide a patch ? I am not sure to see what you mean.
Thanks, Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
