Processed: conffiles

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 636158 688497 Bug #636158 [maradns] maradns: Debian default config is not robust to user change + upgrade Bug #636158 [maradns] maradns: Debian default config is not robust to user change + upgrade Marked as found in versions mara

Bug#687878: marked as done (python-zope.interface-dbg: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:47:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687878: fixed in zope.interface 3.6.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687878, regarding python-zope.interface-dbg: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#688838: marked as done (python-zope.interface: uselessly requires python-setuptools)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 26 Sep 2012 06:47:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688838: fixed in zope.interface 3.6.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688838, regarding python-zope.interface: uselessly requires python-setuptools to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#688841: glyr: FTBFS on armel

2012-09-25 Thread Etienne Millon
Source: glyr Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source Hello, glyr FTBFS on armel. The relevant log line is : build_doc.rb:43: undefined method `exists?' for Dir:Class (NoMethodError) For some reason, the armel buildd picked ruby 1.8 and the other ones ruby

Processed: python3-zope.exceptions: uselessly requires python-setuptools

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 684560 -1 Bug #684560 [python-zope.component] python-zope.component: uselessly requires python-setuptools Bug 684560 cloned as bug 688840 > reassign -1 python3-zope.exceptions Bug #688840 [python-zope.component] python-zope.component: usele

Processed (with 1 errors): conffiles

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 573970 by 688497 Bug #573970 [maradns] please provide an "include" statement for mararc 573970 was blocked by: 636158 573970 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 573970: 688497 > block 635254 by 688497 Bug #635254 [maradns-zon

Processed: your mail

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 688838 pending Bug #688838 [python-zope.interface] python-zope.interface: uselessly requires python-setuptools Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688838: http://bugs.debian.

Processed (with 1 errors): conffiles

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 636158 serious Bug #636158 [maradns] maradns: Debian default config is not robust to user change + upgrade Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > merge 636158 688497 Bug #636158 [maradns] maradns: Debian default config is not robu

Bug#688736: w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/w3c/checklink.conf

2012-09-25 Thread Nicholas Bamber
tag 688736 +patch thanks Hideki, Thanks for the patch. I'll be happy to apply and acknowledge the patch. I am however concerned that the it appears the version of piuparts which generates these reports is not yet in sid, and I would like to hold off working on it until it is. Ther

Processed: Re: Bug#688736: w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/w3c/checklink.conf

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 688736 +patch Bug #688736 [w3c-linkchecker] w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/w3c/checklink.conf Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688736: http://bugs

Processed: #684560 also affects python-zope.interface

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 684560 python-zope.component: uselessly requires python-setuptools Bug #684560 [python-zope.component] [gaphor] gaphor requires python-setuptools Changed Bug title to 'python-zope.component: uselessly requires python-setuptools' from '[ga

Processed: Patch to fix conffile handling

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 688713 + patch Bug #688713 [timidity-daemon] timidity-daemon: mishandles conffiles Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688713: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=6

Bug#688713: Patch to fix conffile handling

2012-09-25 Thread Guo Yixuan
tag 688713 + patch thanks Hi, I tried to fix this bug. In this patch, dpkg-maintscript-helper is used instead of old rm_conffile(). Please see dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) for its usage. If you release the fix as 2.13.2-41, then put 2.13.2-41~ as parameter for dpkg-maintscript-helper should be cor

Bug#643628: pidgin: Pidgin crash on sending first message

2012-09-25 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, It seems that reporter's environment is mixed of stable/testing/unstable/experimental - it means it's not normal environment. I've installed testing to G4 Cube (ppc arch) and pidgin works fine. >> $ apt-cache show liborc-0.4-0 >>Package: liborc-0.4-0 >>Source: orc >>Version: 1:0.4.16-2

Processed: your mail

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 687878 pending Bug #687878 [python-zope.interface-dbg] python-zope.interface-dbg: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 68787

Processed: Re: Bug#688794: PANIC: Circular dependancy after reboot when installing 1.20120606.6

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 688794 + moreinfo Bug #688794 [intel-microcode] PANIC: Circular dependancy after reboot when installing 1.20120606.6 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688794: http://bugs.

Bug#688794: PANIC: Circular dependancy after reboot when installing 1.20120606.6

2012-09-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
tag 688794 + moreinfo thanks I cannot reproduce this. I have installed a brand-new wheezy VM with the wheezy kernel (3.2.0-3). I installed the old microcode.ctl and intel-microcode packages. It worked. I rebooted. It worked. I upgraded to the new intel-microcode package (which also updates m

Bug#688794: PANIC: Circular dependancy after reboot when installing 1.20120606.6

2012-09-25 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Lionel Gamay wrote: > I tried to upgrade from 1.20120606.1 on my i386 netbook and my current x64 > machine, with either 3.2 or 3.5-trunk kernels on each PC. On reboot I always > get the following error messages before dropping down to BusyBox console: > > Loading, please wait.

Processed: Re: Bug#673469: libwebkitgtk-1.0-0: segfaults all the time on armel, javascript related

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # restore version from original bugreport > found 673469 webkit/1.8.1-2 Bug #673469 [libwebkitgtk-3.0-0] libwebkitgtk-1.0-0: segfaults all the time on armel, javascript related Marked as found in versions webkit/1.8.1-2. > thanks Stopping process

Processed: tagging 658352

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 658352 + pending Bug #658352 [debian-cd] amd64 UEFI support Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 658352: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=658352 Debian Bug Tra

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-09-25 Thread Keith Rarick
Hey, sorry, I didn't mean to imply that I wouldn't make a fix. I said before I'm happy to maintain 1.4.x for several years and that's still true. As part of my responsibility maintaining 1.4.x, I was just trying to start with the most expedient reasonable option, which would have been to use libev

Processed: tagging 687949

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 687949 + pending Bug #687949 [debian-cd] sort_deps does not track package versions Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687949: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Processed: limit source to libpri, tagging 688765

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #libpri (1.4.12-3) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * Remove version.c on clean (Closes: #688765). > # > limit source libpri Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'libpri' Limit currently set to 'source':'libpri' > tags

Bug#688765: FTBFS if built twice in a row

2012-09-25 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:36:47PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source: libpri > Version: 1.4.12-2 > Severity: serious > Justification: fails to build from source > > The upstream Makefile creates a version.c which is not removed > during (make) clean. Thus the second attempt to build the package

Bug#688053: Package version

2012-09-25 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:11:39PM +0100, Phillip Baker wrote: > Tzafrir, > > Thanks for your efforts on this and in maintaining the packages in general. > > Am I to understand from the bug report log ("No longer found in squeeze7") > that a new version of the package was uploaded with the same

Processed: libnss-ldap has no multiarch support in wheezy

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > block -1 by 653664 Bug #677741 [ia32-libs] Multiarch issues 677741 was blocked by: 677735 677788 676914 683573 684647 651475 679671 676918 684148 651024 653186 675797 663040 680153 677733 677741 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 677741: 653664 --

Bug#688726: marked as done (grub-linuxbios: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:03:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688726: fixed in grub2 2.00-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #688726, regarding grub-linuxbios: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#688725: marked as done (grub-efi: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:03:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688725: fixed in grub2 2.00-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #688725, regarding grub-efi: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#688724: marked as done (grub2: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 23:03:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688724: fixed in grub2 2.00-6 has caused the Debian Bug report #688724, regarding grub2: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#688233: /usr/bin/uim-module-manager: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/uim/installed-modules.scm, /etc/uim/loader.scm

2012-09-25 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Hi, all. I am uim-mozc maintainer. On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:13 PM, wrote: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:44:49AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> >> You probably should add to uim-data >> >> Breaks: uim-MODULE (<< FIXEDVERSION~) >> >> for all module packages that used the path /etc/uim >> > >

Bug#645487: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#645487: Bug#645487: ensembl: includes GPL code without source

2012-09-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 01:01:44PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 07:00:23PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > > > > This seems to be fixed in the packaging repo. What is left to do > > before the updated package is uploaded? Would you be terribly > > offended if I re

Bug#688736: w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/w3c/checklink.conf

2012-09-25 Thread Hideki Yamane
tags 688736 patch thanks Hi, I've created patch for this bug, piuparts clean one. It seems to be good for me, please check it. Thanks. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane diff -Nru w3c-linkchecker-4.81/debian/changelog w3c-linkchec

Bug#688727: marked as done (grub-emu: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:48:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688727: fixed in grub2 1.99-23 has caused the Debian Bug report #688727, regarding grub-emu: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#688726: marked as done (grub-linuxbios: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:48:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688726: fixed in grub2 1.99-23 has caused the Debian Bug report #688726, regarding grub-linuxbios: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#688725: marked as done (grub-efi: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:48:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688725: fixed in grub2 1.99-23 has caused the Debian Bug report #688725, regarding grub-efi: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#688724: marked as done (grub2: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:48:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688724: fixed in grub2 1.99-23 has caused the Debian Bug report #688724, regarding grub2: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#688707: marked as done (debian-edu-doc: symlink mess in /u/s/d/debian-edu-doc-en/images after squeeze->wheezy update)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:47:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688707: fixed in debian-edu-doc 1.4~20120925~6.0.6+r0 has caused the Debian Bug report #688707, regarding debian-edu-doc: symlink mess in /u/s/d/debian-edu-doc-en/images after squeeze->wheezy update to

Bug#688813: bitcoind: CVE-2012-4683 and CVE-2012-4682

2012-09-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
Package: bitcoind Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole Hi, it seems that two DoS CVEs were allocated for bitcoind, although it's not clear how it's affected, nor if there's a patch or anything. The only detail I was able to get was https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/CVE. Coul

Bug#679297: [canorus] canorus crashes when saving

2012-09-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2012-07-04 19:12:36, Tobias Quathamer wrote: > thanks a lot for the bug report. Unfortunately, you are right. The > current version of canorus is not usable. I'm not able to fix this right > now, and upstream development has been pretty silent in the last months, > so I don't have much hope for

Bug#688517: marked as done (kate: Kate unable to save new files)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:29:33 -0300 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#688517: kate: Kate unable to save new files has caused the Debian Bug report #688517, regarding kate: Kate unable to save new files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has bee

Bug#688517: kate: Kate unable to save new files

2012-09-25 Thread Moshe Yudkowsky
Hi Moshe! I find this bug unreproducible. Also kate is one of the main apps included in KDE, so if this is a packaging/app problem, more people would have certainly filled this bug before, or replied to it. Lisandro, Thank you for your help and suggestions. I find that I cannot perform a ful

Bug#688730: marked as done (lttng-tools: lttng-sessiond init script not working)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:32:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688730: fixed in ltt-control 2.1.0~rc3-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688730, regarding lttng-tools: lttng-sessiond init script not working to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#688730: lttng-tools: lttng-sessiond init script not working

2012-09-25 Thread Jon Bernard
* Michael Lundkvist wrote: > Package: lttng-tools > Version: 2.1.0~rc3-1 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Dear Maintainer, > I just tried installing lttng-tools, but the installation hangs when trying > to start lttng-sessiond. > > It seems like the init script f

Bug#688794:

2012-09-25 Thread Lionel Gamay
Sorry, typo error: it occurs when installing 1.20120606.6 coming from 0.20120606-1. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688798: tmailscanner.c references functions which are removed in ruby1.9

2012-09-25 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: ruby-tmail Version: 1.2.7.1-2 Severity: serious from the build log: compiling tmailscanner.c tmailscanner.c: In function 'mails_s_new': tmailscanner.c:105:5: warning: implicit declaration of function 'rb_get_kcode' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] tmailscanner.c:105:9: warning: assignme

Processed: libkdtree++: incomplete debian/copyright

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 688796 serious Bug #688796 [src:libkdtree++] libkdtree++: incomplete debian/copyright Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688796: http://bugs.debian.org/c

Bug#688794: PANIC: Circular dependancy after reboot when installing 1.20120606.6

2012-09-25 Thread Lionel Gamay
Package: intel-microcode Version: 0.20120606-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I tried to upgrade from 1.20120606.1 on my i386 netbook and my current x64 machine, with either 3.2 or 3.5-trunk kernels on each PC. On reboot I always get the following error m

Bug#682593: libkipi abi oops

2012-09-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 15:06:47 +0200, Sune Vuorela wrote: > There is 3 possible solutions: > > 1) hide head in sand and rebuild 'old' dependencies (kamoso, kphotoalbum, > digikam) > > 2) restore abi and rebuild 'new' dependencies (ksnapshot, gwenview) > > 3) do a full transition of libkipi.

Processed: closing 684825

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Actually close the bug too > close 684825 Bug #684825 [src:elfutils] elfutils: FTBFS: md5.c:108:3: error: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules [-Werror=strict-aliasing] Marked Bug as done > thanks Stopping processi

Bug#688755: marked as done (marble: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat .../MarbleSettings.qml)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:47:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688755: fixed in marble 4:4.8.4-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #688755, regarding marble: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat .../MarbleSettings.qml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#686033: libgl1-nvidia-glx: 304.37-1 libgl1-nvidia-glx:i386, removes libgl1-nvidia-glx (amd64) and Nvidia driver

2012-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-23 16:03, Ralf Jung wrote: > Hi, > > with the 304 drivers in current unstable, this bug even means that 32bit > apps get no acceleration at all since the ia32 packages have already > been removed. > > I can confirm that the patch by you, Andreas, is working fine. The > problems with th

Processed: notfound 684528 in 0.152-1

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # I can't see why this version would have a problem > notfound 684528 0.152-1 Bug #684528 {Done: Kurt Roeckx } [elfutils] elfutils: FTBFS with new dpkg-buildpackage due to build-arch split No longer marked as found in versions elfutils/0.152-1. >

Processed: Re: Bug#688784: Remount persistence filesystems read-only before shutdown

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 688784 important Bug #688784 [live-config] Remount persistence filesystems read-only before shutdown Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tag 688784 pending Bug #688784 [live-config] Remount persistence filesystems read-only before

Bug#688785: xbmc: Fatal: can't open /dev/urandom: Bad address

2012-09-25 Thread Julian Andres Klode
Package: xbmc Version: 2:11.0~git20120510.82388d5-1 Severity: grave I installed xbmc and ran xmbc from the command-line, but it crashed. jak@jak-thinkpad:~$ xbmc Fatal: can't open /dev/urandom: Bad address Aborted (core dumped) find: "/home/jak/.xbmc/": Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden Crash

Bug#688784: Remount persistence filesystems read-only before shutdown

2012-09-25 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Package: live-config Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hi Persistence filesystems have to be remounted readonly on shutdown or reboot to avoid data corruption. The attached patch fixes this problem. The commit message contains more details. I set the severity to grave as this should b

Processed: Re: Bug#688782: Moving of mount points in initramfs from /live to /root/live does not work in important cases

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 688782 important Bug #688782 [live-boot] Moving of mount points in initramfs from /live to /root/live does not work in important cases Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > tag 688782 pending Bug #688782 [live-boot] Moving of mount

Bug#688782: Moving of mount points in initramfs from /live to /root/live does not work in important cases

2012-09-25 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Package: live-boot Version: 3.0~b2-1 Severity: grave Tags: patch Hi The attached patch fixes the move of persistence and other mounts from /live to /root/live inside the initramfs. It also removes some leftover mount points that are not used because the device did not contain a persistence layer.

Bug#686962: CVE-2012-3549: kfreebsd SCTP DoS

2012-09-25 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 12:17:45PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Package: kfreebsd-8 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Control: clone -1 -2 -3 > Control: reassign -2 src:kfreebsd-9 > Control: reassign -3 src:kfreebsd-10 > > Hi, > > CVE-2012-3549 has been assigned to be a remote DoS (via a N

Bug#688779: liburcu1: shlibs too weak

2012-09-25 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Package: liburcu1 Version: 0.7.4-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 8.6 lttng-tools's postinst fails on my system, which still has liburcu1 0.6.7-2 (from testing), demonstrating that liblttng-ctl0 needs a versioned dependency on liburcu1. I would say liburcu1 is primarily at fault here (th

Processed: libkdtree++: diff for NMU version 0.7.0-1.1

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #687604 [libkdtree++-dev] libkdtree++-dev: kdtree headers are unusable on gcc 4.7.1 Added tag(s) patch. -- 687604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=687604 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#687604: libkdtree++: diff for NMU version 0.7.0-1.1

2012-09-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 + patch Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for libkdtree++ (versioned as 0.7.0-1.1). It is available at [1] and the debdiff is attached. Regards [1] http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libk/libkdtree++/libkdtree++_0.7.0-1.1.dsc -- Sebastian Ramacher diff -u libkdtre

Bug#680670: marked as done (obnam: add_key doesn't encrypt symmetric key with new key)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:02:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#680670: fixed in obnam 1.1-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #680670, regarding obnam: add_key doesn't encrypt symmetric key with new key to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Processed: tagging 688755

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 688755 + pending Bug #688755 [marble] marble: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat .../MarbleSettings.qml Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 688755: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#688053: Package version

2012-09-25 Thread Phillip Baker
Tzafrir, Thanks for your efforts on this and in maintaining the packages in general. Am I to understand from the bug report log ("No longer found in squeeze7") that a new version of the package was uploaded with the same version number as the broken one (can't see a squeeze8 in the repo)? Two

Bug#688756: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: Bug#688756: Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2012-09-25 at 15:44 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Please find it attached. > > Alright, reading the error message again, `/usr/bin/X` is not > installed > as it is in `xserver-xorg` `lightdm` only recommends. > > 1. Is that due to that LightDM can also be used from remote? Yes, I think

Bug#688684: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#688684: ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2

2012-09-25 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Olivier Sallou writes: > What is seedtop current goal ? 2.2.27 version is a binary. Should > ncbi-blast+ conflicts with blast2 ? Good question. I'd probably rename the new binary to seedtop+, just as we rename BLAST+'s rpsblast to rpsblast+. (Alas, Debian's alternatives system isn't appropriat

Bug#688765: FTBFS if built twice in a row

2012-09-25 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: libpri Version: 1.4.12-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source The upstream Makefile creates a version.c which is not removed during (make) clean. Thus the second attempt to build the package fails with a message from dpkg-source saying that local changes (to version.

Bug#688756: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 15:34 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: > Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 15:28 +0200 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > > > On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:52 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 14:

Bug#688756: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:52 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 14:45 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > > > On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:22 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > > Any help would be appreciated. >

Bug#682593: libkipi abi oops

2012-09-25 Thread Sune Vuorela
Hi Someone noticed a abi change that I didn't notice at the upload of the latest libkipi upstream release (bug 682593). The state of the archive is that everything built after the upload on june 17th is built against new abi. everything built before is built using the old abi. The abi change

Bug#688756: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:52 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 14:45 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > > On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:22 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Does X works by itself? > > Yes, I am sorry. GDM 3 worked before and

Processed: Re: timidity: embedded fork of libmikmod needs to be dealt with

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 649344 important Bug #649344 [timidity] timidity: embedded fork of libmikmod needs to be dealt with Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649344: http

Bug#649344: timidity: embedded fork of libmikmod needs to be dealt with

2012-09-25 Thread Guo Yixuan
severity 649344 important thanks Hi, I'm lowering severity, for policy 4.13 is a "should", and violations of it are not considered release critical. Regards, Guo Yixuan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm

Bug#688756: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Menzel
Am Dienstag, den 25.09.2012, 14:45 +0200 schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez: > On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:22 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Does X works by itself? Yes, I am sorry. GDM 3 worked before and going back to it works too. Thanks, Paul signature.asc Descrip

Bug#688756: [Pkg-xfce-devel] Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2012-09-25 at 14:22 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote: > Any help would be appreciated. Does X works by itself? -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#648941: marked as done (/usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local: Uses flock, not fcntl)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:32:13 +0200 with message-id <5061a44d.6070...@debian.org> and subject line Closing has caused the Debian Bug report #648941, regarding /usr/lib/sm.bin/mail.local: Uses flock, not fcntl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#688298: marked as done (jenkins: Multiple security issues)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 12:32:43 + with message-id and subject line Bug#688298: fixed in jenkins 1.447.2+dfsg-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #688298, regarding jenkins: Multiple security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit

Bug#688756: lightdm: no greeter: `Can't launch X server X, not found in path`

2012-09-25 Thread Paul Menzel
Package: lightdm Version: 1.2.2-3 Severity: serious Justification: Renders package unusable Dear Debian folks, installing `lightdm` it runs, but the greeter does not show up. :/ Only a blinking cursor in the top left corner on VT 7. Somehow the X server is just closed $ sudo more /var/

Bug#688755: marble: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat .../MarbleSettings.qml

2012-09-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Package: marble Version: 4:4.8.4-2 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, as mentioned on IRC, marble FTBFS: | # Also install common files in place of debian/*.install.linux variants | dh_install -pmarble-plugins --ignore=debian/marble-plugins.install.linux | cp: cannot stat `debian/tmp/usr/

Bug#687866: libapache-mod-security: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5)

2012-09-25 Thread Bart Martens
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 04:32:30PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 06:10:01PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 06:19:18PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > > > The output produced by piuparts can be found here : > > > http://piuparts.debian.org/sque

Bug#688739: grub-common: modifies conffiles during upgrade (policy 10.7.3): /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme

2012-09-25 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:58:36AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > during a test with piuparts I noticed that some package modifies your > conffile /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme during the squeeze->wheezy > distupgrade. Do you have any way to tell what does that? To the best of my knowledge, nothi

Bug#688298: jenkins: Multiple security issues

2012-09-25 Thread James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Note that the jenkins package in Debian is not effected by: CVE-2012-4440 jenkins XSS in Violations plugin CVE-2012-4441 jenkins XSS in CI game plugin These are problems in plugins which are not built as part of the jenkins source package. I h

Processed: take ownership

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 688433 osal...@debian.org Bug #688433 [biomaj] biomaj: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/biomaj/db_properties/global.properties Owner recorded as osal...@debian.org. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need a

Processed: grub-common: modifies conffiles during upgrade (policy 10.7.3): /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > affects -1 + grub-pc grub-ieee1275 grub-efi-ia32 grub-efi-amd64 grub-coreboot Bug #688739 [grub-common] grub-common: modifies conffiles during upgrade (policy 10.7.3): /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme Added indication that 688739 affects grub-pc, grub-ieee1275, grub-efi-

Bug#688739: grub-common: modifies conffiles during upgrade (policy 10.7.3): /etc/grub.d/05_debian_theme

2012-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: grub-common Version: 1.99-22.1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Control: affects -1 + grub-pc grub-ieee1275 grub-efi-ia32 grub-efi-amd64 grub-coreboot Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed that some package modifies your conffile /etc/grub.d/05_d

Processed: affects 688199, found 688682 in 0.0.2010.06.17-6, tagging 688682 ..., found 688250 in totd/1.4-4.4 ...

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 688199 + bacula-director-mysql Bug #688199 [bacula-director-sqlite3] bacula-director-sqlite3: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/bacula/scripts/delete_catalog_backup Added indication that 688199 affects bacula-director-mysql > found

Bug#687402: beanstalkd: FTBFS: tests failed

2012-09-25 Thread Serafeim Zanikolas
Keith, On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 05:03:45PM -0700, Keith Rarick wrote: > If libevent 1.4 is not an option, I'll get the 1.4.x series of beanstalkd > working with libevent 2 and make a bugfix release. Not, it's not an option. > Should I do that? Your previous email sort of implied that you wouldn'

Bug#688738: docbookwiki: ships a SVN repository in /usr, modified by postinst, overwritten during upgrade

2012-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: docbookwiki Version: 0.9.2-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies shipped files. That has the potential for big problems after upgrades or reinstallation: (in a clean sid chroot) # apt-get

Bug#687923: marked as done (bacula: CVE-2012-4430)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:18:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687923: fixed in bacula 5.2.6+dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #687923, regarding bacula: CVE-2012-4430 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is n

Bug#688233: /usr/bin/uim-module-manager: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/uim/installed-modules.scm, /etc/uim/loader.scm

2012-09-25 Thread dai
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:44:49AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >> You probably should add to uim-data > >> Breaks: uim-MODULE (<< FIXEDVERSION~) > >> for all module packages that used the path /etc/uim > > > > Added Breaks: only uim's own module packages, > > except not owned packages: uim

Bug#674039: [Pkg-sysvinit-devel] Bug#674039: mount -a still required

2012-09-25 Thread Ben Van Mechelen
Hi, Apparently this has now entered testing. I can confirm too that nfs isn't mounted when the interface is brought up by networkmanager and that changing [ "$ADDRFAM" = "inet" ] || [ "$ADDRFAM" = "inet6" ] || exit 0 to [ "$ADDRFAM" = "inet" ] || [ "$ADDRFAM" = "inet6" ] || [ "$ADDRFAM" = "Network

Bug#688737: code-aster{, -mpi}-engine: configuration file in /usr, modified by postinst: /usr/lib/codeaster/STA10.6{, _mpi}/config-py2.7.txt

2012-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: code-aster-engine,code-aster-mpi-engine Version: 10.6.0-1-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles. This is forbidden by the policy, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-fil

Bug#688684: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#688684: ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2

2012-09-25 Thread Olivier Sallou
Le 9/24/12 9:26 PM, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : > # Bcc-ing control@bugs > severity 688684 serious > clone 688684 -1 > reassign -1 blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2 > notfound 688684 2.2.26-3 > found 688684 2.2.27-1 > thanks > > Patrice DUROUX writes: > >> Version: 2.2.26-3 > [...] >> I hope everything is i

Processed: Re: Bug#680823: gpsshogi: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #680823 [src:gpsshogi] gpsshogi: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. -- 680823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contac

Bug#680823: gpsshogi: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpoco-dev

2012-09-25 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 unreproducible moreinfo Hi Lucas, On 2012-07-08 18:56:56, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > sbuild-build-depends-gpsshogi-dummy : Depends: libpoco-dev but it is not > > going to be installed > > E: Unable to correct problems, you have

Bug#688736: w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/w3c/checklink.conf

2012-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: w3c-linkchecker Version: 4.81-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles. This is forbidden by the policy, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files 10.7

Bug#687954: marked as done (elmer: non-free files in source tarball)

2012-09-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:48:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687954: fixed in elmerfem 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #687954, regarding elmer: non-free files in source tarball to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#688661: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#688684: ncbi-blast+: trying to overwrite '/usr/bin/seedtop', which is also in package blast2 1:2.2.26.20120620-2

2012-09-25 Thread Olivier Sallou
Fixed in SVN -- gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438 (keyring.debian.org) Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335 D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#688233: /usr/bin/uim-module-manager: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3): /etc/uim/installed-modules.scm, /etc/uim/loader.scm

2012-09-25 Thread Andreas Beckmann
On 2012-09-25 08:43, d...@debian.org wrote: > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 07:07:37PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> You probably should add to uim-data >> Breaks: uim-MODULE (<< FIXEDVERSION~) >> for all module packages that used the path /etc/uim > > Added Breaks: only uim's own module packages

Bug#688639: [SECURITY] [DSA 2550-1] asterisk security update

2012-09-25 Thread Michael Kozma
Le 25/09/2012 08:24, Herman van Rink a écrit : On 09/24/2012 07:25 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:07:15PM +0200, Michael Kozma wrote: Le 19/09/2012 12:00, Cyril Brulebois a écrit : Michael, that should be “chan_sip” apparently? Yes, sorry, but i have the same issue th

  1   2   >