Olivier Sallou <olivier.sal...@irisa.fr> writes: > What is seedtop current goal ? 2.2.27 version is a binary. Should > ncbi-blast+ conflicts with blast2 ?
Good question. I'd probably rename the new binary to seedtop+, just as we rename BLAST+'s rpsblast to rpsblast+. (Alas, Debian's alternatives system isn't appropriate for either because they're command-line applications with incompatible syntax. :-/) > Renaming would be a problem for regular users, not finding correct exe > (or for there scripts). The C++ seedtop binary is new and still fairly preliminary, so I wouldn't expect that to be too much of a problem. If it is, perhaps ncbi-blast+ could divert blast2's seedtop and substitute a script that would figure out which version to launch, depending on whether it saw long or short option names. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?a...@monk.mit.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
