Bug#617931: marked as done (gmsh: multiple licensing issues)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:34:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#617931: fixed in gmsh 2.6.1.dfsg-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #617931, regarding gmsh: multiple licensing issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Processed: re: wicd-daemon: does not connect to network

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #678439 [wicd-daemon] wicd-daemon: does not connect to network Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 678439: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=678439 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with proble

Bug#678439: wicd-daemon: does not connect to network

2012-09-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: severity -1 important No moreinfo recieved from the submitter in three months, and he was the only one running in to the problem. With no more info to go on, nothing can be done at this point. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#679641: marked as done (dpkg: if mcstransd is unexpectedly stopped then dpkg uses invalid SE Linux context)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 19 Sep 2012 06:31:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#679641: fixed in dpkg 1.15.8.13 has caused the Debian Bug report #679641, regarding dpkg: if mcstransd is unexpectedly stopped then dpkg uses invalid SE Linux context to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#681927: XFCE4-netload-plugin produce a kernel panic randomly and leave system unusable

2012-09-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
control: severity -1 important This bug seems fairly nebulous, and only affects one person, so there is no reason for it to be release critical. I use xfce with the netload plugin all the time, and don't get kernel panics. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@l

Processed: re: XFCE4-netload-plugin produce a kernel panic randomly and leave system unusable

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #681927 [xfce4-netload-plugin] XFCE4-netload-plugin produce a kernel panic randomly and leave system unusable Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' -- 681927: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681927 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#683695: libdrm-nouveau1a: when using Nvidia Gtx 550 Ti card boot stops at populating /dev

2012-09-18 Thread Michael Gilbert
Can you try adding "nouveau.tv_disable=1" to your kernel command line? As suggested by: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42869 Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Bug#674908: [sparc] iceweasel: JavaScript crash on some sites

2012-09-18 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 22:28:17 +0200 Hartwig Atrops wrote: > The error is still there ... > > I get bus errors or - more often - segmentation faults. > > Testet today with iceweasel 10.0.7esr2 after dist-upgrade on two machines > (Ultra 60 and Blade 100, both XFCE4) Thanks for checking. Umm..

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Anton Gladky
2012/9/19 Francesco Poli : > On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:46:45 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: > > As far as I can see, there are still the following unsolved parts of > the issue: > > * unused GPL-licensed libraries (libcholmod1.7.1 and libumfpack5.4.0) > should be kicked away from the (shlibdeps-generated)

Bug#593607: (no subject)

2012-09-18 Thread Jonas Baggett
I did watch well the dates of the messages before answering, sorry :) Anyway, I have the impression that for wheezy the best option is either to switch to 1.0, either switch to a lower version that is known to be enough stable like 0.9.7 because it looks like a lot of work is to be done on 0.9.1

Bug#593607: (no subject)

2012-09-18 Thread Jonas Baggett
>> Both newer version of libfm and pcmanfm are bug fixes release from >> upstream. Would this be an exception, please? >> > > Sorry but those have big changes. I'm not sure that it's wise to accept > them at this stage of the freeze. I'd prefer targeted fixes. > I'd suggest to accept 0.9.8 into

Bug#687311: [Openstack-devel] Bug#687311: Bug#687311: Bug#687311: Diff for keystone 2012.1.1-7, trying to fix RC bug #687311

2012-09-18 Thread YunQiang Su
Maybe what we should do is to: Init /etc/keystone/keystone.conf from example, and debconf only when the first time, etc if /etc/keystone/keystone.conf doesn't exist. Do nothing if /etc/keystone/keystone.conf is there. If user want to reinit the configuration with debconf, then ask them to delete

Bug#687311: [Openstack-devel] Bug#687311: Bug#687311: Bug#687311: Diff for keystone 2012.1.1-7, trying to fix RC bug #687311

2012-09-18 Thread YunQiang Su
Two questions about postinst: 1. if [ $RET = "sqlite3" ] then dbc_name="keystone.sqlite" db_set keystone/db/dbname $dbc_name fi If user modified /etc/keystone.conf manually to change the path of sqlite database file, while this paragraph will change it

Bug#687388: Completely breaks libsoup

2012-09-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 19.09.2012 01:54, schrieb Michael Biebl: > The way to fix this is to upload glib 2.33 to experimental with bumped > shlibs and recompile the packages from experimental so they pick up a ^ symbol versions -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are

Bug#687388: Completely breaks libsoup

2012-09-18 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 19.09.2012 00:44, schrieb Daniel Stone: > severity 687388 grave > thanks > > g_pollable_stream_read() and friends are only provided by glib 2.33, > which has only ever been in experimental. 2.32 is in unstable > (tragically, versioned as 2.33+2.32 due to a misguided upload), and > 2.33 seems t

Processed: notfound 687388 in 2.38.1-2

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > notfound 687388 2.38.1-2 Bug #687388 [libsoup2.4-1] libsoup2.4-1: Experimental version breaks gupnp-tools (unresolved + fails to rebuild) Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #687388 to the same values previously set > thanks Stopping

Processed: Completely breaks libsoup

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 687388 grave Bug #687388 [libsoup2.4-1] libsoup2.4-1: Experimental version breaks gupnp-tools (unresolved + fails to rebuild) Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: Re: jruby: CVE-2011-4838

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 686867 patch Bug #686867 [jruby] jruby: CVE-2011-4838 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 686867: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686867 Debian Bug Tracking Sy

Bug#686867: jruby: CVE-2011-4838

2012-09-18 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
tags 686867 patch thanks On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:03:58PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: jruby > Severity: grave > Tags: security > Justification: user security hole > > Hi, > jruby in Wheezy is still affected by > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-4838

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:46:45 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: > > There seem to be other GPL-licensed libraries linked with gmsh: > > libcholmod1.7.1 (some parts are GPL-licensed) > > libumfpack5.4.0 (UMFPACK is GPL-licensed) > > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/suitesparse/current/copyr

Bug#687398: unreproducible

2012-09-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
package src:rhash tags 687398 - unreproducible thanks > I could not reproduce this bug, either with cowbuilder or sbuild. > > Please find enclosed my build log with sbuild and the diff against the > one attached to the bug report. Thanks for the diff, it helped a lot. Your difference is that you

Bug#684528: marked as done (elfutils: FTBFS with new dpkg-buildpackage due to build-arch split)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#684528: fixed in elfutils 0.153-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #684528, regarding elfutils: FTBFS with new dpkg-buildpackage due to build-arch split to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#671337: marked as done (drift: FTBFS - ghc6: command not found)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#669554: fixed in drift 2.2.3-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #669554, regarding drift: FTBFS - ghc6: command not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#669554: marked as done (drift: FTBFS: Could not find module `System')

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:34 + with message-id and subject line Bug#669554: fixed in drift 2.2.3-2.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #669554, regarding drift: FTBFS: Could not find module `System' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#687815: marked as done (kanjipad: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:28:18 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687815: fixed in kanjipad 2.0.0-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #687815, regarding kanjipad: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#662041: marked as done (FTBFS on several architectures)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 21:29:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662041: fixed in elfutils 0.153-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #662041, regarding FTBFS on several architectures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If thi

Processed (with 1 errors): forwarded

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 688069 https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=79734 Bug #688069 [liblocale-subcountry-perl] liblocale-subcountry-perl: Version checks fail ("our $VERSION" moved before "package Locale::SubCountry") Set Bug forwarded-to-address t

Bug#688069: liblocale-subcountry-perl: Version checks fail ("our $VERSION" moved before "package Locale::SubCountry")

2012-09-18 Thread Ivan Kohler
Package: liblocale-subcountry-perl Version: 1.56-1 Severity: serious Tags: upstream patch Justification: (Team) Package maintainer's opinion - package unsuitable for release $ perl -e 'use Locale::SubCountry 54' Locale::SubCountry does not define $Locale::SubCountry::VERSION--version check faile

Processed: Re: Bug#687398: unreproducible

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package src:rhash Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'src:rhash' Limit currently set to 'package':'src:rhash' > tags 687398 - unreproducible Bug #687398 [src:rhash] rhash: FTBFS: plug_openssl.c:142: undefined referen

Bug#669554: drift: diff for NMU version 2.2.3-2.2

2012-09-18 Thread Iain Lane
tags 669554 + patch tags 669554 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for drift (versioned as 2.2.3-2.2) and uploaded it without delay. Regards. -- Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ la..

Processed: drift: diff for NMU version 2.2.3-2.2

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 669554 + patch Bug #669554 [src:drift] drift: FTBFS: Could not find module `System' Bug #671337 [src:drift] drift: FTBFS - ghc6: command not found Added tag(s) patch. Added tag(s) patch. > tags 669554 + pending Bug #669554 [src:drift] dri

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Anton Gladky
> There seem to be other GPL-licensed libraries linked with gmsh: > libcholmod1.7.1 (some parts are GPL-licensed) > libumfpack5.4.0 (UMFPACK is GPL-licensed) > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/s/suitesparse/current/copyright > Please correct me if I am wrong. > > Linking with these l

Bug#687931: #3 0x00007ffff7b9565a in jas_image_readcmpt2 () from /usr/lib/libjasper.so.1

2012-09-18 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
A better bt: #1 0x75ba26f0 in *__GI_abort () at abort.c:92 #2 0x77b92399 in getint (in=, sgnd=1, prec=16, val=0x7fffe368) at jas_image.c:1217 #3 0x77b93d59 in jas_image_readcmpt2 (image=0x393d, image@entry=0x70f190, cmptno=14653, x=0, y=-1, y@entry=0, width=888, h

Bug#682650: marked as done (feel++: FTBFS: -- Could NOT find GMSH (missing: GMSH_INCLUDE_DIR GMSH_LIBRARY))

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 22:02:04 +0200 with message-id and subject line fixed with last gmsh upload has caused the Debian Bug report #682650, regarding feel++: FTBFS: -- Could NOT find GMSH (missing: GMSH_INCLUDE_DIR GMSH_LIBRARY) to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Christophe Prud'homme
That is excellent news. thanks for your work and time ! Best regards C. PS: Feel++ will be also unstuck too On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi all! > > The upstream authors of GMSH kindly agreed > to add an license exception for the OCTPL [1] (username: gmsh, password

Bug#687925: diff for NMU version 1.4.20.2-10.1

2012-09-18 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Hello Release Team, We have 3 bugs for iscsitarget, which if permitted, would be good to see go in for Wheezy. These are: 687925 - This one. Fixes a session lock problem. Checked upstream and shouldn't create regressions. 687619 - This one has a 1 liner change, bumping the max_connections to 256.

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:19:41 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: > 2012/9/18 Francesco Poli : > > > > Something that is *not* legally distributable does *not* magically > > become distributable, just because the architecture is not officially > > supported by the Debian Project... > > This part of the issue

Bug#687757: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:22:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687757: fixed in tryton-modules-sale 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687757, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#687756: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:21:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687756: fixed in tryton-modules-product 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687756, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#687753: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:23:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687753: fixed in tryton-modules-timesheet 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687753, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#687752: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:22:59 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687752: fixed in tryton-modules-stock-supply 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687752, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the proble

Bug#687751: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:22:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687751: fixed in tryton-modules-purchase 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687751, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#687749: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:22:37 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687749: fixed in tryton-modules-stock 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687749, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#687747: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:23:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687747: fixed in tryton-server 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687747, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#687745: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:23:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687745: fixed in tryton-proteus 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687745, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#687742: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:21:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687742: fixed in tryton-modules-party-vcarddav 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687742, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#687754: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687754: fixed in tryton-modules-calendar-todo 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687754, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#687748: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687748: fixed in tryton-modules-calendar 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687748, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem ha

Bug#687744: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687744: fixed in tryton-modules-calendar-classification 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687744, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#687760: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:19:33 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687760: fixed in tryton-client 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687760, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Bug#687746: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687746: fixed in tryton-modules-calendar-scheduling 2.4.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687746, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#687759: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:19:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687759: fixed in tryton-modules-account-invoice 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687759, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#687758: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687758: fixed in tryton-modules-account-statement 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687758, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#687755: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:24 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687755: fixed in tryton-modules-analytic-purchase 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687755, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#687750: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:19:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687750: fixed in tryton-modules-account-invoice-history 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687750, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#687732: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:20:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687732: fixed in tryton-modules-analytic-sale 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687732, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#687743: marked as done (src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:19:38 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687743: fixed in tryton-modules-account 2.4.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687743, regarding src:tryton-*: maintainer address bounces to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#683925: marked as done (FTBFS with gcc-4.7 on i386)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:17:49 + with message-id and subject line Bug#683925: fixed in ocp 1:0.1.21-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #683925, regarding FTBFS with gcc-4.7 on i386 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#670111: marked as done (libreadline-gplv2-dev: error when trying to install together with libreadline6-dev/squeeze (6.1-3))

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:18:03 + with message-id and subject line Bug#670111: fixed in readline5 5.2-12 has caused the Debian Bug report #670111, regarding libreadline-gplv2-dev: error when trying to install together with libreadline6-dev/squeeze (6.1-3) to be marked as done. T

Bug#682412: marked as done (dynamips: FTBFS with multiarch paths: cc: error: /usr/lib/libelf.a: No such file or directory)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:14:56 + with message-id and subject line Bug#682412: fixed in dynamips 0.2.7-0.2.8RC2-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #682412, regarding dynamips: FTBFS with multiarch paths: cc: error: /usr/lib/libelf.a: No such file or directory to be marked as do

Bug#688056: 12mb source package, including binaries and old versions

2012-09-18 Thread Matthias Klose
Package: cairo-5c Version: 1.8 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy before arguing that these binaries are reproducible, please provide a sane packaging, as done with 1.7. $ ls cairo-5c-1.8/ AUTHORS cairo-5c-1.7.tar.gz.sha1 configure.ac COPYING

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Anton Gladky
2012/9/18 Francesco Poli : > > Something that is *not* legally distributable does *not* magically > become distributable, just because the architecture is not officially > supported by the Debian Project... > This part of the issue may be irrelevant for the release of wheezy, but > not generally ir

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Francesco Poli
Control: tags 617931 - pending On Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:18:10 +0200 Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi all! Hello! > > The upstream authors of GMSH kindly agreed > to add an license exception for the OCTPL [...] > So I think Opencascade issue is solved. I am afraid that this is not enough, unfortunately

Processed: Re: Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags 617931 - pending Bug #617931 [gmsh] gmsh: multiple licensing issues Removed tag(s) pending. -- 617931: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617931 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#687925: diff for NMU version 1.4.20.2-10.1

2012-09-18 Thread Arne Redlich
2012/9/17 Ritesh Raj Sarraf : > Hello Arne / Ross, > > This debian bug, 687925, is release critical for the OpenStack suite. > OpenStack uses iscsitarget as its storage sub-module. > > As is explained in this bug report, the ietd daemon does not seem to be > releasing the sparse files that it expos

Bug#617931: gmsh: multiple licensing issues

2012-09-18 Thread Anton Gladky
Hi all! The upstream authors of GMSH kindly agreed to add an license exception for the OCTPL [1] (username: gmsh, password: gmsh). === The copyright holders of Gmsh give you permission to combine Gmsh with code included in the standard release of TetGen (from Hang Si), Netgen (from

Processed: [671fb32] Fix for Bug#617931 committed to git

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 617931 + pending Bug #617931 [gmsh] gmsh: multiple licensing issues Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 617931: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=617931 Debian

Bug#617931: [671fb32] Fix for Bug#617931 committed to git

2012-09-18 Thread Anton Gladky
tags 617931 + pending thanks Hello, The following change has been committed for this bug by Anton Gladky on Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:08:11 +0200. The fix will be in the next upload. Update copyright-file according to the last update of the corresponding f

Bug#685814: phpgacl: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user

2012-09-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 19:26:54 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > 1/ remove the file as conffile > > 2/ In case the file does not yet exist generate the file as shiped > in the package. > > 3/ If and only if dbc_install is set to true, then do the substitutions > on the configuration

Processed: gdal: diff for NMU version 1.9.0-3.1

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 684433 + pending Bug #684433 [gdal-bin] gdal-bin: FTBFS when ruby1.9.1 installed Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 684433: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=

Bug#684433: gdal: diff for NMU version 1.9.0-3.1

2012-09-18 Thread gregor herrmann
tags 684433 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for gdal (versioned as 1.9.0-3.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian

Bug#639565:

2012-09-18 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 19:49:43 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > So, to recap, IMO liboauth and bti (well, I'm not really sure about bti... > > but > > that doesn't hurt) should build-depend on libcurl4-gnutls-dev, which would > > fix > > #650138, and liboauth-dev should depend on libcurl4-gnutls-

Bug#652084: marked as done (gosmore use 100% CPU and does nothing)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:29:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652084: fixed in gosmore 0.0.0.20100711-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652084, regarding gosmore use 100% CPU and does nothing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Processed (with 5 errors): corosync: fails to install and remove: corosync-notifyd cannot start and stop

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 685060 Bug #685060 {Done: Guido Günther } [corosync] corosync: fails to install: postinst fails on update-rc.d call 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may ne

Bug#685060: corosync: fails to install and remove: corosync-notifyd cannot start and stop

2012-09-18 Thread Hiroyuki Yamamoto
reopen 685060 found 685060 1.4.4-2 retitle 685060 corosync: fails to install and remove: corosync-notifyd cannot start and stop severity 685060 grave Changing "default" to "defaults" in /var/lib/dpkg/info/corosync.postinst is completed, but solving the problem at corosync-notifyd which was repor

Processed: Re: dh_installcatalogs: "catalog is now a conffile prompt" if the old (pre-conffile) package was removed, but not purged

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notfound 681194 debhelper/9.20120830 Bug #681194 [debhelper] dh_installcatalogs: "catalog is now a conffile prompt" if the old (pre-conffile) package was removed, but not purged Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #681194 to the same values previously s

Processed: Re: dh_installcatalogs: "catalog is now a conffile prompt" if the old (pre-conffile) package was removed, but not purged

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > notfound 681194 debhelper/9.20120830 Bug #681194 [debhelper] dh_installcatalogs: "catalog is now a conffile prompt" if the old (pre-conffile) package was removed, but not purged No longer marked as found in versions debhelper/9.20120830. -- 680291: http://bugs.deb

Bug#680291: dh_installcatalogs: "catalog is now a conffile prompt" if the old (pre-conffile) package was removed, but not purged

2012-09-18 Thread Helmut Grohne
Control: notfound 681194 debhelper/9.20120830 On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 11:13:43AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > > Any opposition to closing the debhelper issue again? > > Tanks for te analysis. Please go aead! Done. > > In case of xml2rfc I see no other option that to forcefully remove the >

Bug#680145: php5-suhosin: With PHP 5.4, Suhosin doesn't actually load - Same here

2012-09-18 Thread Daniel Huhardeaux
Hi, I face the same problem after upgrading from squeeze to wheewy using php5-suhosin package Version : 0.9.33-3 from SID Regards -- Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#682256: Also breks prayer

2012-09-18 Thread Matthias Urlichs
This also breaks the prayer imap client. libc-client2007e is NOT in any way compatible to libc-client2007f !!! The clients complain and die when the version differs. -- -- Matthias Urlichs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Bug#687885: marked as done (opendnssec: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5))

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:43:00 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687885: fixed in opendnssec 1:1.3.9-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #687885, regarding opendnssec: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#687346: marked as done (krb5-sync-plugin: causes segfault on -randkey changes)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:41:44 + with message-id and subject line Bug#687346: fixed in krb5-sync 2.2-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #687346, regarding krb5-sync-plugin: causes segfault on -randkey changes to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#686174: marked as done (isc-dhcp: CVE-2012-3570 CVE-2012-3571 CVE-2012-3954)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 10:41:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#686174: fixed in isc-dhcp 4.2.2.dfsg.1-5+deb70u1 has caused the Debian Bug report #686174, regarding isc-dhcp: CVE-2012-3570 CVE-2012-3571 CVE-2012-3954 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#685470: (no subject)

2012-09-18 Thread Emmanuel Kasper
it seems the problem stems from the use of symbolic links in xmess-sdl, xmess-x, xmame-x. xmame-sdl in debian 6 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685653#25 details the same problem in another debian package on a debian 6 dpkg -L xmess-x | xargs file | grep "symbolic link" /usr/shar

Bug#685360: Logitech USB keyboard broken with Linux 3.2 (regression from 3.1)

2012-09-18 Thread Nestor Lopez Casado
Hello Josip, I am back at the office. Please let me know if applying the patch solved your problem. Thanks, Nestor. On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Josip Rodin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:57:06PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Nestor Lopez Casado wrote: > > > > > Ta

Bug#684818: marked as done (scilab-scimax: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `src/c/libmaxima.so': No such file or directory)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:53:48 +0200 with message-id <5058288c.1030...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #684818, regarding scilab-scimax: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `src/c/libmaxima.so': No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that y

Bug#684816: marked as done (scilab-overload: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `src/liboverload.so': No such file or directory)

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 18 Sep 2012 09:53:48 +0200 with message-id <5058288c.1030...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #684816, regarding scilab-overload: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `src/liboverload.so': No such file or directory to be marked as done. This means that

Processed: Fixed

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 684816 1.3.3-3 Bug #684816 [src:scilab-overload] scilab-overload: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `src/liboverload.so': No such file or directory Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #684816 to the same values previously set > fixed 6848

Processed: severity of 687885 is serious

2012-09-18 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 687885 serious Bug #687885 [opendnssec] opendnssec: copyright file missing after upgrade (policy 12.5) Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 687885: http