Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 676061 dpkg
Bug #676061 [src:doc-base] doc-base: FTBFS: nsgmls:_build/doc-base.sgml:5:0:E:
reference to entity "DEBIANDOC" for which no system identifier could be
generated
Bug reassigned from package 'src:doc-base' to 'dpkg'.
No longer
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 06:02:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675991: fixed in openbox 3.5.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #675991,
regarding openbox 3.5 crashes xorg server with gtk3 apps
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -f debian/rules
> ./configure --pr
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 06:03:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675222: fixed in viewpdf.app 1:0.2dfsg1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #675222,
regarding Maintainer or uploader address bounces
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 666583 3.1.0+dfsg-1
Bug #666583 [src:sdcc] sdcc: FTBFS: ../../../src/support/Systemcall.cpp(270):
Systemcall: 'latex "sdccman.tex"' finished with exit code 1
Marked as fixed in versions sdcc/3.1.0+dfsg-1.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 675276
Bug #675276 {Done: Andreas Tille } [wnpp] ITP: quazip --
Qt/C++ wrapper for ZIP/UNZIP package
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add th
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 05:47:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#667867: fixed in cynthiune.app 0.9.5-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #667867,
regarding cynthiune.app: FTBFS with GCC-4.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 05:48:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597933: fixed in sdcc 3.1.0+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597933,
regarding Non-free files distributed in sdcc
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
> mkdir -p "."
> touch
Dear Stefano,
> *** Processing account Upsilon
> Establishing connection to upsilon.:993
> Creating folder .[UpsilonImaps]
> ERROR: Creating folder on repository UpsilonImaps
> Folder '.'[UpsilonImaps] could not be created. Server responded: ('NO',
> ['Empty mailbox name.'])
> ERR
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 676041 python-pip 1.1-1
Bug #676041 [src:zope2.12] zope2.12: FTBFS: ImportError: No module named pip.req
Bug reassigned from package 'src:zope2.12' to 'python-pip'.
No longer marked as found in versions zope2.12/2.12.22-1.
Ignoring reques
ty: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
> ghc Setup.hs -o debian/mighttpd2.setup
>
reassign 676041 python-pip 1.1-1
thanks
Hello,
Lucas Nussbaum writes:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
>
> Relevant part:
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/«PKGBUILDDIR»'
>> Cleaning...
>> rm -rf ./build
>> find ./source/ -maxdepth 2 -type d -n
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:02:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#669246: fixed in zfs-fuse 0.7.0-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #669246,
regarding zfs-fuse: fails to install due to insserv rejecting the script header
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: ruby-romkan
Version: 0.4-8
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
romkan.rb seems need encoding header for Ruby 1.9 series.
# ruby -rromkan -e "nil"
/usr/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:36:in `require':
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/romkan.rb:29: invalid multibyte char (US-
On 4 June 2012 at 22:33, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
| Hi,
|
| All these `cannot load such file -- mkmf` bugs are caused by
| ruby-pkg-tools calling /usr/bin/ruby instead of /usr/bin/ruby1.8
| explicitly. I've just uploaded a fixed version to unstable.
Darn. I just fixed mine by no longer relying on
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/excellent-bifurcation/excellent-bifurcation_0.0.20071015-5.dsc
> tag 676026 + pending
Bug #676026 [src:excellent-bifurcation] excellent-bifurcation: FTBFS: ld:
cannot find -lalleg-4.2.2
Added tag(s) p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # since the bug is intermittent on reporter's system and unreproducible
> # elsewhere, the package is still usable
> severity 673176 important
Bug #673176 {Done: Albin Tonnerre } [chromium] chromium:
Chromium is locking up entire Gnome-Shell regu
ssage ---
Source: quantlib-swig
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package fail
Hi,
All these `cannot load such file -- mkmf` bugs are caused by
ruby-pkg-tools calling /usr/bin/ruby instead of /usr/bin/ruby1.8
explicitly. I've just uploaded a fixed version to unstable.
Many of the other bugs associated with the switch to Ruby 1.9 [1] may
also be caused by this.
[1]
http://
s
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> gcc -g -O2 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -lxml2 -lz -lm -o zomghe
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:17:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#675204: fixed in asterisk 1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #675204,
regarding asterisk: AST-2012-007 (CVE-2012-2947): crash on IAX receiving HOLD
without MOH class
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Tue, 05 Jun 2012 01:17:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#606959: fixed in asterisk 1:1.8.13.0~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #606959,
regarding logrotate script should set correct owner/group
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: smartmontools
Version: 5.42+svn3539-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
the current version fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD.
It needs extra includes, see bellow.
Thanks in advance
Petr
--- smartmontools-5.4
Package: rt4-extension-assettracker
Version: 2.0.0~b2-4
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from
'wheezy'.
It installed fine in 'wheezy', then the upgrade to 'sid' fails.
>From the attached
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 593139
Bug #593139 {Done: Antonio Terceiro } [src:ruby1.9.1]
ruby1.9.1: FTBFS on kfreebsd: test suite segfaults
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need t
reopen 593139
reopen 593141
thanks
These bugs have been closed by mistake. The test suite is disabled on
ia64 and kfreebsd, so before closing these bugs we need to try building
with the test suite enabled.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 675921 normal
Bug #675921 [mc] mc: FTP shows bad filenames, and they are not accessible
Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
675921: http://bugs.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #eris (1.3.19-4) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * fixed symbols for GCC 4.7 (closes: #671950) (closes: #675291)
> #- incorporates and acknowledges NMU from Matthias Klose
> #
> limit source eris
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing
Package: alacarte
Version: 0.13.4-1
Severity: serious
Alacarte is supposed to edit ~/.config/menu/gnome-applications.menu when
running under GNOME but the latest update uses
~/.config/menu/applications.menu
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (5
Package: evolution
Version: 3.2.2-1+b1
Severity: grave
File: /usr/bin/evolution
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I run into problems a couple of weeks ago when my Debian testing
system was
updated. After that evolution has not started at all. The only reopnse I
can get
On 06/04/12 15:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: autogen
Version: 1:5.12-0.1
Severity: serious
Going out on a limb, I am going to guess that when the ia64 issue is fixed,
this will be fixed, too:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=103593&aid=3531608&group_id=3593
autogen 5.16 F
in Message ---
Source: gnome-python-desktop
Version: 2.32.0+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant pa
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/gcc log.o xmlparser.o main.o -o ramond -fPIE -pie -Wl,-z,relro
> -Wl,-z,now -lpcap `apr-1-config --link-ld --libs `
Cyril Brulebois (05/06/2012):
> That should help get ecore and friends into testing (graphviz dependency
> graph attached).
For real now.
Mraw,
KiBi.
15.dot
Description: MS-Word document
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:32:38 +0200
with message-id <20120604233238.gg20...@mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#673167: ecore: FTBFS[kfreebsd] testsuite failure
has caused the Debian Bug report #673167,
regarding ecore: FTBFS[kfreebsd] testsuite failure
to be marked as done.
This mean
Version: 1.2.0-2
Christoph Egger (16/05/2012):
> Package: src:ecore
> Version: 1.2.0-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid wheezy
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:25:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#655245: fixed in vim-addon-manager 0.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #655245,
regarding vim-addon-manager: Does not work with Ruby 1.9 as default
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Mon, 04 Jun 2012 23:25:44 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#655245: fixed in vim-addon-manager 0.5.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #655245,
regarding vim-addon-manager: fatal Ruby error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Source: ices2
Version: 2.0.1-11
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules build
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #ramond (0.5-4) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Add explicit build-depends on zlib1g-dev (Closes: #676011)
> #- Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum for the report and rebuilds
> #
> limit source ramond
Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at
Hello.
I came from the 1.2.3-313-ge5c4657-1 version and go to the
1.2.3-348-g317f5a0-1.
I tried to install it on 3 differents debian wheezy and I've the same error
message.
I tried : upgrade from 1.2.3-313-ge5c4657-1 to 1.2.3-348-g317f5a0-1
install mumble-server on a fresh debian wheezy install (
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 676107 dpkg
Bug #676107 [debiandoc-sgml] debian-faq: FTBFS: nsgmls:0:6:0:E: reference
to entity "DEBIANDOC" for which no system identifier could be generated
Bug reassigned from package 'debiandoc-sgml' to 'dpkg'.
Ignoring request to alt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 676107 debiandoc-sgml
Bug #676107 [src:debian-faq] debian-faq: FTBFS: nsgmls:0:6:0:E: reference
to entity "DEBIANDOC" for which no system identifier could be generated
Bug reassigned from package 'src:debian-faq' to 'debiandoc-sgml'.
No
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 676026 + patch
Bug #676026 [src:excellent-bifurcation] excellent-bifurcation: FTBFS: ld:
cannot find -lalleg-4.2.2
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
676026: http://bugs.debi
To solve this, please link against -lalleg, instead of -lalleg-4.2.2 -
Simple patch against Makefile applied.
/Andreas
--- a/src/Makefile
+++ b/src/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
PKGCONFIG_FILES=libxdg-basedir
PKGCONFIG_CFLAGS= `pkg-config $(PKGCONFIG_FILES) --cflags`
PKGCONFIG_LDFLAGS= `pkg-config $
Source: god
Version: 0.7.18-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Source: ocamlviz
Version: 1.01-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: netsed
Version: 1.00b-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: dh-make-drupal
Version: 0.9-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> fakeroot deb
Source: uima-as
Version: 2.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: jed
Version: 1:0.99.19-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Enter
Source: debian-history
Version: 2.16
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: tupi
Version: 0.1+git12-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: treil
Version: 1.8-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Source: elinks
Version: 0.12~pre5-7
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: sgml-base-doc
Version: 1.99.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
Source: mustache.js
Version: 0.4.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: mlpost
Version: 0.8.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Entering direct
Source: autogen
Version: 1:5.12-0.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: wordnet
Version: 1:3.0-27
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: langscan
Version: 1.2+cvs20070125-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Source: quantlib-swig
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: jblas
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: rhash
Version: 1.2.9-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: zonecheck
Version: 3.0.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: migemo
Version: 0.40-10
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: debian-faq
Version: 5.0
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[1]: Entering direct
Source: gonzui
Version: 1.2+cvs20070129-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Source: rbbr
Version: 0.6.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Source: liblastfm
Version: 0.4.0~git20090710-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Source: sbcl
Version: 2:1.0.57.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> make[2]: Enter
Source: xmms2
Version: 0.8+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: libfam-ruby
Version: 0.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: graphviz
Version: 2.26.3-11
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: sword
Version: 1.6.2+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> /usr/bin/ld: CMakeFi
Source: scim-prime
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> x86_64-linux-gn
Source: comedilib
Version: 0.8.1-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: geos
Version: 3.3.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
Source: libzoom-ruby
Version: 0.4.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: libwebapp-ruby
Version: 0.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: shoes
Version: 0.r396-5.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: liblockfile-ruby
Version: 1.4.3-2.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Source: libpdf-writer-ruby
Version: 1.1.8+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Source: posixlock
Version: 0.0.1-1.1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: ruby-prof
Version: 0.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: libnet-irc-ruby
Version: 0.14-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Source: qpid-cpp
Version: 0.16-5
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: obexftp
Version: 0.23-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
hi,
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds:
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/build/buildd-hyperestraier_1.4.13-4-kfreebsd-amd64-n8scIZ/hyperestraier-1.4.13/rubynative19'
> perl -p -i -e 's@^#! /usr/bin/ruby1\.8 -w@#! /u
Source: quickfix
Version: 1.13.3+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Source: ecasound
Version: 2.8.1-8
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: rrdtool
Version: 1.4.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: ohcount
Version: 3.0.0-6
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: merb
Version: 1.0.12+dfsg-4
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Source: libimlib2-ruby
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed
Source: raspell
Version: 1.2-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
Source: rubyluabridge
Version: 0.7.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
User: debian-r...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default19
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 655245 675986
Bug #655245 [vim-addon-manager] vim-addon-manager: Does not work with Ruby 1.9
as default
Bug #675986 [vim-addon-manager] vim-addon-manager: fatal Ruby error
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
Added tag(s) pending a
Source: java-gnome
Version: 4.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Tags: wheezy sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120604 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part:
> debian/rules bu
1 - 100 of 265 matches
Mail list logo
