Bug#666044: python-ecore: not installable in sid (depends on ibecore-evas-svn-06)

Package: python-ecore Version: 0.5.0+r49824-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Tags: fixed-in-experimental Hi, python-ecore is not installable on amd64 and i386 (and possibly others), at least since May 18, 2011. The reason is that it depends on libecore-ev

Bug#665007: RE : Bug#665007: CVE-2012-1185 / CVE-2012-1186: incomplete ImageMagick fixes for CVE-2012-0247 / CVE-2012-0248

Thanks, Patch are under git My usual mentors may apply tomorrow or saturday Bastien Le 22 mars 2012 12:09, "Giuseppe Iuculano" a écrit : Package: imagemagick Severity: serious Tags: security -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The original fixes for the ImageMagick issues CVE

Bug#665189: [petitboot] You can't remove package.

Hi, On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 15:37 +0100, Karol Kozłowski wrote: > Removing petitboot ... > postrm called with unknown argument `remove' > dpkg: error processing petitboot (--purge): > subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 1 > Errors were encountered while processing:

Bug#611698: any progress

I wondered if there is any progress on this issue Cheers -- =--= Keep in touch www.onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Processed: scute: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-1.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 662941 + patch Bug #662941 [scute] scute: FTBFS Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 662941: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=662941 Debian Bug Tracking System C

Bug#662941: scute: diff for NMU version 1.4.0-1.1

tags 662941 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for scute (versioned as 1.4.0-1.1). The diff is attached to this message. I've not uploaded this NMU as I'm not a DD but I hope it is useful for you. This NMU also fixes some lintian warnings. Regards. diff -Nru scute-1.4.0/debi

Bug#665266: marked as done (ruby-prawn: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/pdf/reader/standard_security_handler.rb:26:in `require': no such file to load -- rc4 (LoadError))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:21:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665266: fixed in ruby-pdf-reader 1.0.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #665266, regarding ruby-prawn: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/pdf/reader/standard_security_handler.rb:26:in `require': no such file

Bug#612961: marked as done (aptitude update doesn't display errors that apt-get update does (hash sum mismatch))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:17:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#451137: fixed in aptitude 0.6.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #451137, regarding aptitude update doesn't display errors that apt-get update does (hash sum mismatch) to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#451137: marked as done ("aptitude update" succeeds despite hash sum mismatch, etc.)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:17:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#451137: fixed in aptitude 0.6.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #451137, regarding "aptitude update" succeeds despite hash sum mismatch, etc. to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#457372: marked as done (aptitude: fails with code 255 without outputting any "E: Error description" line, and without stopping)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:17:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#451137: fixed in aptitude 0.6.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #451137, regarding aptitude: fails with code 255 without outputting any "E: Error description" line, and without stopping to be marked as done

Bug#563887: marked as done (update doesn't alert user of the errors that apt-get update does)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:17:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#451137: fixed in aptitude 0.6.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #451137, regarding update doesn't alert user of the errors that apt-get update does to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Processed: Missing dependency on ruby-rc4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 665266 ruby-pdf-reader 1.0.0-1 Bug #665266 [src:ruby-prawn] ruby-prawn: FTBFS: /usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/pdf/reader/standard_security_handler.rb:26:in `require': no such file to load -- rc4 (LoadError) Bug reassigned from package 'src:r

Bug#665266: Missing dependency on ruby-rc4

reassign 665266 ruby-pdf-reader 1.0.0-1 thanks As of 1.0.0-1, ruby-pdf-reader build-depends on ruby-rc4, but as it does not depend on it, it fails to run. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debi

Bug#665808: gnome-shell: Segfault on startup (sid)

Installing network-manager fixed it for me too. Thanks, - B

Bug#661799: marked as done (libcvs-perl: FTBFS)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:20:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#661799: fixed in libcvs-perl 0.07-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #661799, regarding libcvs-perl: FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not t

Bug#659827: marked as done (ices2: libroar API/ABI update)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:19:19 + with message-id and subject line Bug#659827: fixed in ices2 2.0.1-11 has caused the Debian Bug report #659827, regarding ices2: libroar API/ABI update to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this i

Bug#666030: digikam: rotating photos corrupt jpeg files

Package: digikam Version: 4:2.6.0~beta1-1 Severity: serious Hi, I upgraded digikam from 4:2.5.0-1 to 4:2.6.0~beta1-1 a few days ago. My camera does not record the orientation of the photos. So, after importing them, I always rotate the photos that require it. I do it by selecting the photo (u

Processed: tagging 665902

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # not failing on squeeze > tags 665902 + wheezy sid Bug #665902 [fso-config-gta01] fso-config-gta*: uninstallable in sid Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665902: http://

Bug#665842: marked as done (tremulous: [CVE-2010-5077] traffic amplification via getstatus requests)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:52:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665842: fixed in tremulous 1.1.0-8 has caused the Debian Bug report #665842, regarding tremulous: [CVE-2010-5077] traffic amplification via getstatus requests to be marked as done. This means that you claim t

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libcvs-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 661799 + pending Bug #661799 [libcvs-perl] libcvs-perl: FTBFS Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661799 Debian Bug Tr

Bug#661799: FTBFS

On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:09:14 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > And now I built it (from git) on a fast amd64 machine (so far I tried > > only old i386 boxen) -- and now it builds - ?! > I can reproduce it easily by putting some load on the build host > during the test suite. Just a "find /" in another w

Bug#661799: Pending fixes for bugs in the libcvs-perl package

tag 661799 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libcvs-perl package are closed in revision 3c5c6cb3e8dc20f05bc4841027f2bfbcc833cc96 in branch 'master' by gregor herrmann The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libcvs-perl.git;a=commitdiff;h=3c5c6cb Commit

Bug#624578: Bug#666011: libembperl-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1)

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:41:52PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > It fails to build since (at least) April 2011: #624578 For the record, there has been some recent discussion on the upstream mailing list which suggests that progress has been made, although nothing particularly definitive yet. It

Bug#655019: marked as done (GFDL docs in main)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 23:20:39 +0200 with message-id <4f722f27.6090...@debian.org> and subject line Fixed has caused the Debian Bug report #655019, regarding GFDL docs in main to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#666009: marked as done (libafs-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:15:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666014: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #666009, regarding libafs-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#665037: marked as done (octave-msh: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: octave-pkg-dev (>= 0.7.0))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:11:50 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665858: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #665037, regarding octave-msh: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: octave-pkg-dev (>= 0.7.0) to be marked as done. This means tha

Bug#665025: marked as done (octave-bim: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: octave-pkg-dev (>= 0.7.1), octave-msh (>= 0.1.1-2))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:13:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665860: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #665025, regarding octave-bim: FTBFS: unsatisfiable build-dependencies: octave-pkg-dev (>= 0.7.1), octave-msh (>= 0.1.1-2) to be marked

Bug#623924: marked as done (libafs-perl: FTBFS with perl 5.12.3: non-numeric version)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:15:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666014: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #623924, regarding libafs-perl: FTBFS with perl 5.12.3: non-numeric version to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#621999: marked as done (libafs-perl: FTBFS: :0:1: error: macro names must be identifiers)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:15:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#666014: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #621999, regarding libafs-perl: FTBFS: :0:1: error: macro names must be identifiers to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#664935: marked as done (octave-ad: FTBFS: ov-grad.cc:74:41: error: no matching function for call to 'octave_value::print_with_name(std::ostream&, const char [6], bool) const')

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:08:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665855: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #664935, regarding octave-ad: FTBFS: ov-grad.cc:74:41: error: no matching function for call to 'octave_value::print_with_name(std::ostr

Processed: Re: Bug#666011: libembperl-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 666011 with 624578 Bug #666011 [libembperl-perl] libembperl-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1) 666011 was not blocked by any bugs. 666011 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 666011: 624578 > thanks Stop

Bug#666011: libembperl-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1)

block 666011 with 624578 thanks On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:45:48 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: libembperl-perl > Version: 2.3.0-2 > Severity: serious > User: trei...@debian.org > Usertags: edos-uninstallable > > Hello, > > libembperl-perl depends on perlapi-5.10.1 which does not or no longe

Bug#666018: grub-efi-amd64: fails to boot linux with initrd

Package: grub-efi-amd64 Version: 1.98+20100804-14+squeeze1 Severity: critical Tags: squeeze Justification: breaks the whole system Hi, this my first bug report, so I'd appreciate any hints, how I can do better. BTW sorry for my english. I installed squeeze on a computer with an uefi firmware. An

Bug#662025: foomatic-filters: Fails to print if 4.0.12-1 or 4.0.13-1 is installed

On 03/27/2012 09:28 PM, Helge Kreutzmann wrote: Thanks again for your help. I rebuild cups-filters 1.0.7-1 in testing (and the required dependencies from sid, where necessary) and now printing on the queue you asked me to set up (with the PPD file from you) works again as expected. Great, then

Bug#666009: libafs-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1)

Ralf Treinen writes: > libafs-perl depends perlapi-5.10.1 which seems not (or no longer) to exist. Thanks; I just requested that it be removed from the archive. It isn't maintainable currently; significant upstream work has to happen with the OpenAFS libraries to make them use pthreads first.

Bug#666011: libembperl-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1)

Package: libembperl-perl Version: 2.3.0-2 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hello, libembperl-perl depends on perlapi-5.10.1 which does not or no longer exist, which makes the package not installable. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-req

Bug#665886: dnet-progs: uninstallable on kfreebsd-*

reflum, On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 21:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Hi, > > dnet-progs is uninstallable on kfreebsd-* as it depends on kmod, which > is linux-only. Thanks for your report. The package is 'all' not 'any'. I think it needs to be changed to 'any' to solve this problem. Will discuss

Bug#661658: cctools: FTBFS on kfreebsd

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:50:14 +0200, Michael Hanke wrote: > Hi, > > [sorry for the delay] > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:13:17AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Source: cctools > > Version: 3.4.2-1 > > Severity: serious > > Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in

Bug#666009: libafs-perl: not installable in sid (depends on perlapi-5.10.1)

Package: libafs-perl Version: 2.6.2-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hello, libafs-perl depends perlapi-5.10.1 which seems not (or no longer) to exist. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsub

Bug#666007: golang-weekly-go: fails to install - command in postinst not found: golang-weekly-tools/dashboard

Package: golang-weekly-go Version: 2012.03.22-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a release, thus the severity.

Bug#662854: strace

Also, sometimes I get a SIGSEGV where the whole process exits (instead of just that session closing). Not sure if this is the same thing, or even a remmina bug (might be GTK?) (gdb) continue Continuing. [New Thread 0xab688b70 (LWP 6095)] [New Thread 0xaa7ccb70 (LWP 6096)] Program received signal

Bug#665656: marked as done (openarena-server: [CVE-2010-5077] traffic amplification via getstatus requests)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:32:10 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665656: fixed in openarena 0.8.5-5+squeeze2 has caused the Debian Bug report #665656, regarding openarena-server: [CVE-2010-5077] traffic amplification via getstatus requests to be marked as done. This means

Bug#662025: foomatic-filters: Fails to print if 4.0.12-1 or 4.0.13-1 is installed

Hello Till, On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 08:42:16PM +0100, Till Kamppeter wrote: > The problem should be fixed by the recent fixes in cups-filters, > version 1.0.5 or later. Thanks again for your help. I rebuild cups-filters 1.0.7-1 in testing (and the required dependencies from sid, where necessary) a

Bug#666006: gauche-gtk: uninstallble in sid (depends on libgauche0)

Package: gauche-gtk Version: 0.4.1-13 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-uninstallable Hi, gauche-gtk depends on libgauche0 (>= 0.9), however libgauche0 only lives in squeeze: % rmadison libgauche0 libgauche0 | 0.9-16 | squeeze | amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64,

Bug#665842: Ready for testing tremulous

Hi, i think i could help you with testing the new packages. My server seems to be the perfect place. Could you upload them to experimental or something else? Regards Markus signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: affects 665895

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > affects 665895 gadmin-tools Bug #665895 [gadmintools] gadmintools: uninstallable due to dependency on removed gadmin-squid Added indication that 665895 affects gadmin-tools > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assista

Processed: block 664078 with 660717

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 664078 with 660717 Bug #664078 [release.debian.org] transition: tokyocabinet 664078 was blocked by: 665363 620647 640602 664078 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 664078: 660717 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please con

Processed: block 664078 with 665363

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 664078 with 665363 Bug #664078 [release.debian.org] transition: tokyocabinet 664078 was blocked by: 620647 640602 664078 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 664078: 665363 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me

Bug#665363: sqlite3: [3.7.9-3 -> 3.7.10-1 regression] bogofilter-sqlite tests fail on 64-bit arches

Package: src:sqlite3 Followup-For: Bug #665363 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raising severity to RC as this bug is blocking the transistion of libtokyocabinet [1]. (As this bug is failing reason for bogofilter, which blocks the transition) [1] http://release.debian.org/transiti

Processed: severity of 665363 is serious

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 665363 serious Bug #665363 [src:sqlite3] sqlite3: [3.7.9-3 -> 3.7.10-1 regression] bogofilter-sqlite tests fail on 64-bit arches Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed: Re: Bug#661799: FTBFS

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 661799 patch Bug #661799 [libcvs-perl] libcvs-perl: FTBFS Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 661799: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=661799 Debian Bug Tracking

Bug#661799: FTBFS

tag 661799 patch thanks On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 08:41:17PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:19:11 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > I can reproduce the error, both with the version from the archive and > > > with the package in git (funnily the first error is differ

Processed: bug 665063 is forwarded to Markus Forsberg , Aarne Ranta

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 665063 Markus Forsberg , Aarne Ranta > Bug #665063 [src:bnfc] bnfc: FTBFS: Could not find module `Char' Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'Markus Forsberg , Aarne Ranta '. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#666000: marked as done (bzr-rewrite: needs migration to bzr 2.6)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665949: fixed in bzr-rewrite 0.6.3+bzr256-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #665949, regarding bzr-rewrite: needs migration to bzr 2.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#665949: marked as done (bzr-rewrite: Update for 2.6)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:47:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665949: fixed in bzr-rewrite 0.6.3+bzr256-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #665949, regarding bzr-rewrite: Update for 2.6 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#658276: marked as done (libcurl3: No more compatible with older SSL implementations)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:48:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#658276: fixed in curl 7.25.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #658276, regarding libcurl3: No more compatible with older SSL implementations to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem h

Bug#666002: josm-plugins: not installable due to inconsistent meta-data

Package: josm-plugins Version: 0.0.svn27676+ds1-1 Severity: serious User: trei...@debian.org Usertags: edos-outdated Hi, josm-plugins is not installable, due to conflicting meta-data: Depends: josm (>= 0.0.svn4878), ... Breaks: josm (>= 0.0.svn4879) -Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-

Processed: severity of 665949 is grave

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 665949 grave Bug #665949 [bzr-rewrite] bzr-rewrite: Update for 2.6 Bug #666000 [bzr-rewrite] bzr-rewrite: needs migration to bzr 2.6 Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing

Processed: forcibly merging 666000 665949

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 666000 665949 Bug #666000 [bzr-rewrite] bzr-rewrite: needs migration to bzr 2.6 Bug #666000 [bzr-rewrite] bzr-rewrite: needs migration to bzr 2.6 Added tag(s) pending. Bug #665949 [bzr-rewrite] bzr-rewrite: Update for 2.6 Severity set t

Bug#665922: wheezy bitcoind way too old/unmaintained

On 12-03-27 at 02:12pm, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:00:52 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Being old is not a bug in itself, however: Please file individual > > bugreports for each, well, bug, instead of a single giant one. > > That's much easier to handle. > > Being unmaintaine

Bug#665922: wheezy bitcoind way too old/unmaintained

On Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:00:52 PM Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Being old is not a bug in itself, however: Please file individual > bugreports for each, well, bug, instead of a single giant one. That's > much easier to handle. Being unmaintained means there is nobody tracking which bugs affect it

Bug#664900: marked as done (libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:02:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#664900: fixed in libio-socket-ssl-perl 1.61-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #664900, regarding libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#665922: wheezy bitcoind way too old/unmaintained

On 12-03-26 at 09:54pm, Luke-Jr wrote: > bitcoind 0.3.24 has been unmaintained for a long time, and has many > known bugs Thanks for your concern. Being old is not a bug in itself, however: Please file individual bugreports for each, well, bug, instead of a single giant one. That's much easie

Bug#665999: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: procproperties.cpp:27:23: fatal error: asm/param.h: No such file or directory

Source: gnome-system-monitor Version: 3.4.0-1 Severity: serious User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: kfreebsd gnome-system-monitor 3.4.0 (currently in experimental) FTBTFS g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DPROCMAN_DATADIR=\""/usr/share/procman/"\" -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\""/usr/share/locale"\" -DD

Bug#664900: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test

Ciao Alessandro On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:53:19PM +0200, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:45:18PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > > Hi Alessandro > > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39:20PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19:47PM +

Bug#662585: marked as done (FTBFS)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:22:09 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662585: fixed in qd 2.3.11.dfsg-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #662585, regarding FTBFS to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Processed: fixed

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed #665207 3.1.2+dfsg1-3 Bug #665207 [otrs2] otrs2: fails to upgrade from testing Marked as fixed in versions otrs2/3.1.2+dfsg1-3. > severity #665445 serious Bug #665445 [otrs2] otrs2: upgrade fail when using PostgreSQL Severity set to 'serious

Bug#665982: marked as done (pmx: postinst failure (pmx.tex not found))

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:03:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665982: fixed in pmx 2.6.18-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #665982, regarding pmx: postinst failure (pmx.tex not found) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.

Bug#665922: mips & big endian

To address the mips/powerpc/s390/sparc/sparc64 concerns... bitcoind has never been supported on big-endian architectures, even in 0.3.x, and even if it used to build, there's almost no chance it works at all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject o

Processed: bug 665922

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 665922 grave Bug #665922 [bitcoind] wheezy bitcoind way too old/unmaintained Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > tag 665922 + security confirmed fixed-upstream wheezy Bug #665922 [bitcoind] wheezy bitcoind way too old/unmaintained Add

Bug#663510: marked as done (python-factory-boy and factory-boy: error when trying to install together)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 18:55:30 +0200 with message-id and subject line has caused the Debian Bug report #663510, regarding python-factory-boy and factory-boy: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Processed: Re: Bug#665772: grub2: FTBFS[sparc mipsel kfreebsd-i386]: gcc-4.6 failed to produce assembly code

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 665772 -1 Bug #665772 [src:grub2] grub2: FTBFS[sparc mipsel kfreebsd-i386]: gcc-4.6 failed to produce assembly code Bug 665772 cloned as bug 665993 > retitle 665772 grub2: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: gcc-4.6 failed to produce > assembly code Bug

Bug#665772: grub2: FTBFS[sparc mipsel kfreebsd-i386]: gcc-4.6 failed to produce assembly code

clone 665772 -1 retitle 665772 grub2: FTBFS[kfreebsd-i386]: gcc-4.6 failed to produce assembly code retitle -1 grub2: FTBFS[sparc mipsel]: __ctzsi2/__ctzdi2 in lzopio is not defined thanks On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 11:25:17PM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote: > checking whether options required for ef

Bug#665233: marked as done (libanyevent-perl: FTBFS: tests failed)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:48:47 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665233: fixed in libanyevent-perl 6.140-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #665233, regarding libanyevent-perl: FTBFS: tests failed to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: approx: diff for NMU version 5.1-1.2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 656791 + patch Bug #656791 [approx] approx: should depend on system-log-daemon Added tag(s) patch. > tags 656791 + pending Bug #656791 [approx] approx: should depend on system-log-daemon Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here

Bug#656791: approx: diff for NMU version 5.1-1.2

tags 656791 + patch tags 656791 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for approx (versioned as 5.1-1.2) and uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649

Bug#662854: strace

Sorry for the delay. Here's the bt: (gdb) continue Continuing. [New Thread 0xab60ab70 (LWP 3947)] [New Thread 0xaa74eb70 (LWP 3948)] [New Thread 0xa92ffb70 (LWP 4332)] [New Thread 0xa8233b70 (LWP 4333)] Program received signal SIGPIPE, Broken pipe. 0xb76fb424 in __kernel_vsyscall () (gdb) bt #0

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libio-socket-ssl-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 664900 + pending Bug #664900 [src:libio-socket-ssl-perl] libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 664900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Bug#665877: ncurses-term: /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-256color confilcted with file from suckless-tools

On 2012-03-27 14:49 +0200, Michael Stummvoll wrote: >> Michael (as the prospective suckless-tools maintainer), what is your >> opinion on that? I noticed that the version on mentors.debian.net has >> already dropped the terminfo entry, but that may have been >> unintentional. > > this file was pa

Bug#664900: Pending fixes for bugs in the libio-socket-ssl-perl package

tag 664900 + pending thanks Some bugs in the libio-socket-ssl-perl package are closed in revision a77b633d502b4e85b07e4beece142149e46827af in branch 'master' by Alessandro Ghedini The full diff can be seen at http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-perl/packages/libio-socket-ssl-perl.git;a=commit

Bug#665982: pmx: postinst failure (pmx.tex not found)

Package: pmx Version: 2.6.18-1 Severity: serious Hi, here is the problem: Setting up pmx (2.6.18-1) ... /usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/mktexupd: /usr/share/texlive/texmf/tex/musixtex/pmx/pmx.tex not a file. dpkg: error processing pmx (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation scrip

Bug#622628:

> To sum up, those are waiting to be review/uploaded : > git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-inherits.git (debian native) > git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-block-stream.git > git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-rimraf.git > git://git.debian.org/collab-maint/node-fstream.git > git://git

Bug#665832: gnuplot: Crashes with "Segmentation fault" on every command

Package: gnuplot Version: 4.6.0-1 Followup-For: Bug #665832 Hi, as an additional data point, I see exactly the same behaviour. Cheers Detlev -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'

Processed: terminatorx: diff for NMU version 3.82-7.6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 663053 + patch Bug #663053 [terminatorx] terminatorx: FTBFS with current zlib Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 663053: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=66305

Bug#663053: terminatorx: diff for NMU version 3.82-7.6

tags 663053 + patch thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for terminatorx (versioned as 3.82-7.6). The diff is attached to this message. I've not uploaded this NMU as I'm not a DD but I hope it is useful for you. However, this package is not usable until #637007 is not fixed. Regards. di

Bug#662067: marked as done (glance-api: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:02:17 + with message-id and subject line Bug#662067: fixed in glance 2012.1~rc1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #662067, regarding glance-api: prompting due to modified conffiles which where not modified by the user to be marked as done. This means t

Bug#665877: ncurses-term: /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-256color confilcted with file from suckless-tools

Hi, > Michael (as the prospective suckless-tools maintainer), what is your > opinion on that? I noticed that the version on mentors.debian.net has > already dropped the terminfo entry, but that may have been > unintentional. this file was part of the terminal emulator 'st', which is maintained i

Bug#665968: jquery: distfile does not contain complete source code

Source: jquery Version: 1.7.2-1 Severity: serious Justification: violates source requirement Hi, the jquery distfile (jquery_1.7.2.orig.tar.gz) does not contain complete source code required for regenerating the dist/jquery.js file as shipped. Indeed, it only contains a part of the main git check

Bug#642747: wss4j: Patch to resolve FTBFS

Package: wss4j Version: 1.5.8+svntag-1 Followup-For: Bug #642747 User: ubuntu-de...@lists.ubuntu.com Usertags: origin-ubuntu precise ubuntu-patch -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Dear Maintainer, In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following: * Fix FTBFS (L

Bug#665739: marked as done (keystone: fails to install)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 12:02:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#665739: fixed in keystone 2012.1~rc1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #665739, regarding keystone: fails to install to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Processed: limit source to bzr-rewrite, tagging 665949

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #bzr-rewrite (0.6.3+bzr255-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * New upstream snapshot. > # + Fixes compatibility with bzr 2.6. Closes: #665949 > # > limit source bzr-rewrite Limiting to bugs with field 'source' containing at least one of 'bzr-r

Bug#665949: [Pkg-bazaar-maint] Bug#665949: bzr-rewrite: Update for 2.6

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:30:32PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > Package: bzr-rewrite > Version: 0.6.3-1 > Severity: grave > > Since the upload of 2.6 pre-releases of bzr to unstable, the bzr-rewrite > package is not installable anymore. So, please update the package. Thanks, I'll have a loo

Bug#665832: gnuplot: Crashes with "Segmentation fault" on every command

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:43:48PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > I confirm the bug on i386. > > = > gnuplot > > G N U P L O T > Version 4.6 patchlevel 0last modified 2012-03-04 > Build System: Linux i686 > > Copyright (C) 1986-1993, 1998, 2004, 2007-20

Processed: arghh

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 665957 grave Bug #665957 [libzip1] libzip1: CVE-2012-1162/CVE-2012-1163 PRE-SA-2012-02 Incorrect loop construct and numeric overflow in libzip Severity set to 'grave' from 'important' > merge 664990 665957 Bug #664990 [libzip1] libzip1:

Processed (with 1 errors): argh

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 664990 665957 Bug #664990 [libzip1] libzip1: CVE-2012-1162 CVE-2012-1163 Incorrect loop construct and numeric overflow Unable to merge bugs because: severity of #665957 is 'important' not 'grave' Failed to merge 664990: Did not alter merged

Bug#645190: marked as done (postler: doesn't contain source for waf binary code)

Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:02:54 + with message-id and subject line Bug#645190: fixed in postler 0.1.1+dfsg-0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #645190, regarding postler: doesn't contain source for waf binary code to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#665808: gnome-shell: Segfault on startup (sid)

Hi, As somebody gave me the advice, I tried to install network manager : gnome-shell isn't crashing anymore if network manager is running (stopping it with /etc/init.d/network-manager stop causes gnome-shell to crash). I don't know if this can help solve this problem. Regards, Sebastien

Bug#664900: libio-socket-ssl-perl: FTBFS, failing test

On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:45:18PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Hi Alessandro > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39:20PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:19:47PM +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:37PM +0100, Salvatore Bonacco

Bug#665877: ncurses-term: /usr/share/terminfo/s/st-256color confilcted with file from suckless-tools

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 09:47:23PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > # reassign to ncurses-term only, since we're the ones who introduced > # the file conflict > reassign 665877 ncurses-term 5.9-5 > clone 665877 -1 > reassign -1 suckless-tools 38-1 > severity -1 wishlist > retitle -1 suckless-tools: sto

Processed: Pending fixes for bugs in the libanyevent-perl package

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 665233 + pending Bug #665233 [src:libanyevent-perl] libanyevent-perl: FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 665233: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

  1   2   >