Bug#661216: Uninstallable: xulrunner-9.0 went away

2012-02-24 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Source: tuxguitar Version: 1.2-12 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Hi, iceweasel is now at version 10, so this no longer works: | Package: tuxguitar | Architecture: all | Section: sound | Depends: [...] | xulrunner-9.0 | xulrunner-8.0 | xulrunner-7.0 | xulrunner-6.0 | xul

Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed

2012-02-24 Thread David Griffith
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Carlos Laviola wrote: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 21:10, David Griffith wrote: On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing

Bug#633297: funguloids: FTBFS everywhere: error: reference to 'map' is ambiguous

2012-02-24 Thread Paul Wise
The FTBFS bug and the other RC bugs have been open for a long time. There is no point in fixing the FTBFS bug without fixing the crashes that prevent the game from working at all. The package is not in testing or stable anyway so it can basically be considered a new package. To fix the crashes you

Bug#646449: marked as done (libosip2: FTBFS: osip_message_parse.c:850:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-security])

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:02:15 + with message-id and subject line Bug#646449: fixed in libosip2 3.3.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #646449, regarding libosip2: FTBFS: osip_message_parse.c:850:5: error: format not a string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=format-sec

Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed

2012-02-24 Thread Carlos Laviola
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 21:10, David Griffith wrote: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Abou Al Montacir wrote: > >> Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix >> of >> Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are >> missing? >> Aptitude will give you the f

Bug#646449: libosip2 upload to unstable

2012-02-24 Thread peter green
Thanks Peter. That upload is OK. Thanks Since i'm not yet a DD could one of you guys please sponsor it? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#641873: closed by Michael Gilbert (Bug#641873: fixed in xpdf 3.03-9)

2012-02-24 Thread sacrificial-spam-address
Thanks, I'll test it as soon as it reaches the FTP site. Sorry I haven't been following all the activity this last month... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#646449: libosip2 upload to unstable

2012-02-24 Thread Mark Purcell
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:44:17 peter green wrote: > peter green wrote: > > Would you object to a NMU based on the version currently in unstable > > that just fixes the FTBFS? > > I have now prepared a NMU based on the version currently in sid that > only fixes the FTBFS. The debdiff is attatched. >

Processed (with 2 errors): libnss3-1d: Still happens

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Package: libnss3-1d Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'libnss3-1d' Limit currently set to 'package':'libnss3-1d' > Version: 3.13.3-1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > Followup-For: Bug #661201 Un

Bug#661201: libnss3-1d: Still happens

2012-02-24 Thread Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
Package: libnss3-1d Version: 3.13.3-1 Followup-For: Bug #661201 reopen 661201 thanks > apt-get upgrade fixed it. Which upgrade? It still happens to me. Reopening the bug. -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'),

Bug#653437: marked as done (xpdf: type1 fonts not rendered)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:47:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641873: fixed in xpdf 3.03-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #641873, regarding xpdf: type1 fonts not rendered to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#647576: marked as done (can't read pdfs any more)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:47:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641873: fixed in xpdf 3.03-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #641873, regarding can't read pdfs any more to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not th

Bug#646223: marked as done (cannot read timetables anymore)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:47:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641873: fixed in xpdf 3.03-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #641873, regarding cannot read timetables anymore to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#641873: marked as done (xpdf doesn't display text in many PDF files)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:47:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641873: fixed in xpdf 3.03-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #641873, regarding xpdf doesn't display text in many PDF files to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

Bug#645108: marked as done (http://portal.gsdi.org/files/?artifact_id=928 unreadable)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 01:47:52 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641873: fixed in xpdf 3.03-9 has caused the Debian Bug report #641873, regarding http://portal.gsdi.org/files/?artifact_id=928 unreadable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Bug#646449: libosip2 upload to unstable

2012-02-24 Thread peter green
peter green wrote: Would you object to a NMU based on the version currently in unstable that just fixes the FTBFS? I have now prepared a NMU based on the version currently in sid that only fixes the FTBFS. The debdiff is attatched. libosip2 maintainers are you ok with this NMU? diff -u libosip

Bug#661201: marked as done (relocation error)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:13:43 +0800 with message-id <87pqd3lnp4@jidanni.org> and subject line apt-get upgrade fixed it has caused the Debian Bug report #661201, regarding relocation error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#661196: marked as done (relocation error)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 25 Feb 2012 09:13:43 +0800 with message-id <87pqd3lnp4@jidanni.org> and subject line apt-get upgrade fixed it has caused the Debian Bug report #661196, regarding relocation error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#633297: funguloids: FTBFS everywhere: error: reference to 'map' is ambiguous

2012-02-24 Thread peter green
Back in august pabs tagged this bug as pending, Looking at the SVN (which took a while to find since the PTS still points at the git repo) it seems he did commit it to the repo but soon afterwards put a notice in the changelog saying. * DO NOT UPLOAD, needs to reimplement the mpak.py from arc

Bug#658341: marked as done (upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy))

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:29:39 -0800 with message-id <20120225002939.gb30...@rzlab.ucr.edu> and subject line Re: Bug#658341: Conclusion: upload multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time for wheezy) has caused the Debian Bug report #658341, regarding upload of multi-arch enabled dpkg (in time

Bug#607368: Call for Vote: Kernel ABI numbering policy

2012-02-24 Thread Bdale Garbee
<#part sign=pgpmime> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:04:55 -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > I call for a vote on the kernel ABI numbering policy bug with the > following ballot: > > A) The technical committee declines to override the kernel maintenance > team's ABI numbering policy. > > B) Further discussio

Bug#661196: can't figure out how to back out

2012-02-24 Thread jidanni
clone 661196 -1 reassign -1 libnss3-1d found -1 3.13.3-1 thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Processed: can't figure out how to back out

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 661196 -1 Bug#661196: relocation error Bug 661196 cloned as bug 661201. > reassign -1 libnss3-1d Bug #661201 [iceweasel] relocation error Bug reassigned from package 'iceweasel' to 'libnss3-1d'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions 12.

Bug#660857: marked as done (owfs: FTBFS(kfreebsd): libow.so: undefined reference to `w1_bind')

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:18:36 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660857: fixed in owfs 2.8p14-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #660857, regarding owfs: FTBFS(kfreebsd): libow.so: undefined reference to `w1_bind' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pro

Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed

2012-02-24 Thread David Griffith
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Abou Al Montacir wrote: Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing? Aptitude will give you the full dependency tree, can you please provide this? I'm using Squeeze

Bug#661197: CVE-2012-0270: buffer overflows

2012-02-24 Thread Raphael Geissert
Package: csound Severity: grave Tags: security Hi, Two vulnerabilities have been found in csound. Please refer to the following page for more information: http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2012-3/ Regards, Raphael Geissert -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org

Processed: user debian...@lists.debian.org, usertagging 661013, affects 661013

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian...@lists.debian.org (was deb...@abeckmann.de). > usertags 661013 piuparts Bug#661013: qmail: fails to purge Usertags were: piuparts. Usertags are now: piuparts. > affects 661013 + qmail-run Bu

Bug#661196: relocation error

2012-02-24 Thread jidanni
Package: iceweasel Version: 12.0~a2+20120217042010-1 Severity: grave $ firefox http://www.couchsurfing.org/home.html /usr/lib/iceweasel/firefox-bin: relocation error: /usr/lib/xulrunner-12.0/libxul.so: symbol SSL_RestartHandshakeAfterAuthCertificate, version NSS_3.13.2 not defined in file libssl3.

Processed: your mail

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 641873 653437 Bug#641873: xpdf doesn't display text in many PDF files Bug#653437: xpdf: type1 fonts not rendered Bug#645108: http://portal.gsdi.org/files/?artifact_id=928 unreadable Bug#646223: cannot read timetables anymore Bug#647576:

Bug#660864: marked as done (gtk2hs-buildtools: FTBFS with ghc 7.4.1)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:02:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660864: fixed in gtk2hs-buildtools 0.12.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #660864, regarding gtk2hs-buildtools: FTBFS with ghc 7.4.1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#588588: aircrack-ng: debian/copyright is missing information for src/sha1-sse2.*

2012-02-24 Thread intrigeri
Pablo Santamaria wrote (10 Feb 2012 14:43:28 GMT) : > Is anyone working on this? Yes: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642934 http://trac.aircrack-ng.org/ticket/953 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Bug#607368: Call for Vote: Kernel ABI numbering policy

2012-02-24 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Don Armstrong wrote: > I call for a vote on the kernel ABI numbering policy bug with the > following ballot: > > A) The technical committee declines to override the kernel maintenance > team's ABI numbering policy. > > B) Further discussion > > END. I vote AB. Don Armstro

Bug#626019: hang even on amd64 with backtrace

2012-02-24 Thread Willi Mann
Hi! I was able to reproduce the hang on amd64. Attached is a backtrace, unfortunately from an optimized build but maybe it gives someone a quick idea what's going on. WM #0 __lll_lock_wait_private () at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/lowlevellock.S:97 #1 0x2b8ad36223f8 in _L_lo

Bug#607368: Call for Vote: Kernel ABI numbering policy

2012-02-24 Thread Don Armstrong
I call for a vote on the kernel ABI numbering policy bug with the following ballot: A) The technical committee declines to override the kernel maintenance team's ABI numbering policy. B) Further discussion END. Don Armstrong -- Who is thinking this? I am. -- Greg Egan _Diaspora_ p38 http:/

Bug#646480: marked as done (lde: FTBFS: (.text+0x95): undefined reference to `_nc_screen_of')

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:45:16 + with message-id and subject line Bug#650824: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #646480, regarding lde: FTBFS: (.text+0x95): undefined reference to `_nc_screen_of' to be marked as done. This means that you claim tha

Bug#634288: marked as done (libgtfb0: Royally broken symlinks - refers to the build system)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:43:20 + with message-id and subject line Bug#660916: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #634288, regarding libgtfb0: Royally broken symlinks - refers to the build system to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#646449: libosip2 upload to unstable

2012-02-24 Thread peter green
We are currently awaiting a transition slot via debian-release. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=656839 Understood According to the endorsed workflow, we should not upload to unstable without approval from the release team: http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transiti

Processed: severity of 649038 is important

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Not an RC bug in this package > severity 649038 important Bug #649038 [elfutils] elfutils FTBFS on kfreebsd Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 649038: htt

Bug#659687: Multiple security issues

2012-02-24 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > Package: mysql-5.1 > Severity: grave > Tags: security > > Multiple security issues have been announced in MySQL: > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2012-366304.html#AppendixMSQL > > Unfortunately Oracle r

Bug#661092: marked as done (mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together)

2012-02-24 Thread Paul van Tilburg
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 07:04:05PM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/24/2012 04:51 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > Changes: > > mcrl2 (201202.0-2) unstable; urgency=low > > . > >[ Jeroen Keiren ] > >* Bugfix upload (closes: #661092). > > Would you please next time w

Bug#661161: dh-apparmor: is not co-installable with current debhelper

2012-02-24 Thread intrigeri
intrig...@debian.org wrote (24 Feb 2012 16:27:24 GMT) : > (As a side note, it's not clear to me what's the point of this package > at all. [...] By chance, I eventually found #649784, so it's now clear to me. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#661092: marked as done (mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together)

2012-02-24 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, On 02/24/2012 04:51 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Changes: > mcrl2 (201202.0-2) unstable; urgency=low > . >[ Jeroen Keiren ] >* Bugfix upload (closes: #661092). Would you please next time write what you actually did? The fact the you fixed a bug is already there via the "

Bug#661074: marked as done (isdnlog.postinst: 73: /var/lib/dpkg/info/isdnlog.postinst: cannot open /usr/share/isdn/default/isdnlog.DEVICE: No such file)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#661074: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #661074, regarding isdnlog.postinst: 73: /var/lib/dpkg/info/isdnlog.postinst: cannot open /usr/share/isdn/default/isdnlog.DEV

Bug#656204: marked as done (libcapi20-dev: conflict when overwriting `/usr/lib/libcapi20.so` during upgrade)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:33:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#656204: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.3-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #656204, regarding libcapi20-dev: conflict when overwriting `/usr/lib/libcapi20.so` during upgrade to be marked as done. Thi

Bug#648892: marked as done (TypeError: integer argument expected, got float)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:32:41 + with message-id and subject line Bug#648892: fixed in gnome-osd 0.12.2-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #648892, regarding TypeError: integer argument expected, got float to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has be

Processed: retitle 432899 to rc: tab completion broken for files with special characters ...

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 287828 rc: please add command completion Bug #287828 [rc] rc doesn't have command completion Changed Bug title to 'rc: please add command completion' from 'rc doesn't have command completion' > retitle 367004 rc: upstream homepage is 404

Bug#641358: marked as done (sary-ruby FTBFS on Ubuntu)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:33:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652800: fixed in sary-ruby 1.2.0-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652800, regarding sary-ruby FTBFS on Ubuntu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#652800: marked as done (sary-ruby: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:33:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#652800: fixed in sary-ruby 1.2.0-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #652800, regarding sary-ruby: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Bug#641358: marked as done (sary-ruby FTBFS on Ubuntu)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:33:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641358: fixed in sary-ruby 1.2.0-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #641358, regarding sary-ruby FTBFS on Ubuntu to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this

Bug#652800: marked as done (sary-ruby: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop.)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 16:33:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#641358: fixed in sary-ruby 1.2.0-3.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #641358, regarding sary-ruby: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `distclean'. Stop. to be marked as done. This means that you clai

Processed: severity of 643084 is serious

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > severity 643084 serious Bug #643084 [src:cutter-testing-framework] cutter-testing-framework: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b cutter-testing-framework-1.1

Bug#661161: dh-apparmor: is not co-installable with current debhelper

2012-02-24 Thread intrigeri
Package: dh-apparmor Severity: grave Version: 2.7.0-1 Hi, Package: dh-apparmor Replaces: debhelper (<< 9.20120115ubuntu2) Breaks: debhelper (<< 9.20120115ubuntu2) Given current sid has debhelper 9.20120115, this makes dh-apparmor not co-installable with it. As a result, dh-apparmor is not

Bug#661092: marked as done (mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:47:35 + with message-id and subject line Bug#661092: fixed in mcrl2 201202.0-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #661092, regarding mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#661150: dropbear: CVE-2012-0920 SSH server use-after-free vulnerability]

2012-02-24 Thread Nico Golde
Source: dropbear Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hey, below is a forwarded report describing a vulnerability in dropbear. Cheers Nico - Forwarded message from Danny Fullerton - Dropbear SSH server use-after-free vulnerability Impact: A remote authenticated user can execute arbitra

Processed: retitle 659899 to CVE-2012-0790: XSS

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 659899 CVE-2012-0790: XSS Bug #659899 {Done: Antoine Beaupré } [smokeping] CVE-2011-0790: XSS Changed Bug title to 'CVE-2012-0790: XSS' from 'CVE-2011-0790: XSS' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistanc

Bug#659899: CVE-2011-0790: XSS

2012-02-24 Thread Nico Golde
Hi, * Moritz Muehlenhoff [2012-02-14 18:11]: > This has been assigned CVE-2011-0790: Just to make sure there is no confusion, this should've been CVE-2012-0790. Cheers Nico pgpsedVHOKbzT.pgp Description: PGP signature

Processed: Re: Bug#657410: libcheese-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ...

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 657410 + patch Bug #657410 [libcheese-dev] libcheese-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ... Added tag(s) patch. > affects 657942 + src:cheese Bug #657942 [frei0r-plugins] frei0r-plugins: Cannot install Added indication t

Bug#657410: libcheese-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite ...

2012-02-24 Thread gregor herrmann
tag 657410 + patch affects 657942 + src:cheese thanks On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:29:07 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > >>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): > > Selecting previously unselected package libcheese-dev. > Unpacking libcheese-dev (from .../libcheese-dev_3.2.2-1+b1_amd64

Bug#659899: CVE-2011-0790: XSS

2012-02-24 Thread Antoine Beaupré
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:39:05 -0500, Antoine Beaupré wrote: > Here's a debdiff to fix this issue. I can upload this to stable-security > if it is okay for you guys. > > I had to fiddle a bit with the patch to make it fit with 2.3, but I > think it will work. Not sure it is *complete* however, the

Bug#659994: [regression] icedove: symbol lookup error: [...]/libdbusservice.so: undefined symbol: NS_Alloc

2012-02-24 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
Hi, Am 21.02.2012 19:46, schrieb Christoph Goehre: On Mi, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:34:45 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: since the last security update for icedove, the program does not start on several computers here. Instead the following error message is displayed: /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: s

Bug#661145: psmisc: killall can't find processes with long names

2012-02-24 Thread Chris Boot
Package: psmisc Version: 22.15-2 Severity: critical Justification: breaks unrelated software The killall command in psmisc 22.15-2 is broken: it can't find processes with long names. The version in 22.13-1 works fine. I first saw this on a VM cluster which uses pacemaker and DLM. Pacemaker's DLM

Bug#661092: mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together

2012-02-24 Thread Roland Stigge
On 02/24/2012 12:33 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Ralf Treinen , 2012-02-24, 05:53: >> /usr/include/scan.h > > I sincerely hope it'll be renamed in both packages. It's way too generic. Well, agreed. (Paul?) Thanks, Roland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org wit

Bug#661092: mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together

2012-02-24 Thread Paul van Tilburg
Hey, On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 09:57:17AM +0100, Roland Stigge wrote: > On 02/24/2012 05:53 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages > > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be > > slightly out of sync): > > > > /usr/incl

Processed: tag 661092 wheezy sid

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Neither libowfat-dev nor mcrl2 contain /usr/include/scan.h in squeeze, so > ... > tag 661092 wheezy sid Bug #661092 [libowfat-dev,mcrl2] mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together Added tag(s) sid and wheezy. > -- Stopping p

Bug#657478: marked as done (biomaj-watcher: doesn't use invoke-rc.d)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:32:22 + with message-id and subject line Bug#657478: fixed in biomaj-watcher 1.2.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #657478, regarding biomaj-watcher: doesn't use invoke-rc.d to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dea

Processed: Re: libstdc++6 4.6.1-4 breaks libstdc++6-4.4-dev 4.4.5-8 but doesn't "conflict" with it

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # breaks partial upgrades (policy §3.5) > severity 651550 serious Bug #651550 [libstdc++6] libstdc++6 4.6.1-4 breaks libstdc++6-4.4-dev 4.4.5-8 but doesn't "conflict" with it Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > tags 651550 + patch Bug #65

Bug#661092: mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together

2012-02-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Ralf Treinen , 2012-02-24, 05:53: /usr/include/scan.h I sincerely hope it'll be renamed in both packages. It's way too generic. -- Jakub Wilk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or

Processed: notfound 661088 in 0.29-1, found 661088 in 29:0.29-1

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Correct version information: > notfound 661088 0.29-1 Bug #661088 {Done: Mark Brown } [src:intercal] intercal: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/intercal/usr/share/info/dir': ENOENT The source intercal and version do not appear to match any bin

Bug#661064: marked as done (movabletype-opensource: Multiple security issues)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 11:17:58 + with message-id and subject line Bug#661064: fixed in movabletype-opensource 5.1.3+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #661064, regarding movabletype-opensource: Multiple security issues to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#661122: FTBFS

2012-02-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: cqrlog Version: 1.2.2-2 Severity: serious Your package fails to build from source: Compiling synaser.pas 100 150.481/164.032 Kb Used 200 150.516/164.032 Kb Used 300 150.572/164.032 Kb Used 400 150.653/164.032 Kb Used 500 150.721/164.032 Kb Used 600 150.780/164.032 Kb Used 700 150.799/164

Bug#611661: Advertencia final de cuentas de usuario

2012-02-24 Thread Raquel Rocha
Advertencia final de cuentas de usuario Su buzón ha superado una o más limitaciones tamaño determinado por el administrador. El tamaño del buzón es 78944 KB. los límites de tamaño de buzón: 7 KB Esta es una advertencia de que sus mailboxletters alcanzó 70.000 KB.Il puede no ser capaz d

Bug#661099: fpc depends on packages that can't be installed

2012-02-24 Thread Abou Al Montacir
Can you please clarify more the situation? You are using Squeeze or a mix of Squeeze and other repositories? What are the dependencies that are missing? Aptitude will give you the full dependency tree, can you please provide this? Cheers, signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

Bug#661092: mcrl2 and libowfat-dev: error when trying to install together

2012-02-24 Thread Roland Stigge
Hi, On 02/24/2012 05:53 AM, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages > (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be > slightly out of sync): > > /usr/include/scan.h Considering that libowfat-dev has this file for quite a while no

Bug#661088: marked as done (intercal: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/intercal/usr/share/info/dir': ENOENT)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:49:01 + with message-id and subject line Bug#661088: fixed in intercal 29:0.29-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #661088, regarding intercal: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `debian/intercal/usr/share/info/dir': ENOENT to be marked as done. This means that yo

Bug#661000: marked as done (undefined symbol: nomgc)

2012-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:12:55 +0100 with message-id <4f474687.9010...@progress-technologies.net> and subject line Re: Bug#661000: undefined symbol: nomgc has caused the Debian Bug report #661000, regarding undefined symbol: nomgc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that