2012/2/22 Hector Oron :
> tags 634240 + patch
> tags 634240 + pending
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for squeak-vm (versioned as 1:4.4.7.2357-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>
It's fine for me. Thanks for your
On Feb 21, 2012, at 3:40 AM, Pino Toscano wrote:
> Hi,
>
> (greetings from your favourite Hurd porter)
>
> Alle lunedì 13 febbraio 2012, Tim Kientzle ha scritto:
>> So on hurd, I see a couple of interesting failures for bsdtar:
>> [...]
>
> Actually, libarchive is pretty fine on Hurd, as it wa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Not reproducible in squeeze, so ...
> tag 660716 wheezy sid
Bug #660716 [btscanner] FTBFS
Added tag(s) sid and wheezy.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660716: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
Hector Oron writes:
> I've prepared an NMU for guile-1.6 (versioned as 1.6.8-10.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
>From a quick look, this seems fine.
(I think it might also also be OK to just drop the lt_preloaded_symbols
declaration
tags 634240 + patch
tags 634240 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for squeak-vm (versioned as 1:4.4.7.2357-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Hector Oron
diff -Nru squeak-vm-4.4.7.2357/debian/changelog
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 634240 + patch
Bug #634240 [squeak-vm] FTBFS (arm/unstable): error: unrecognized command line
option '-mno-fused-madd'
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 634240 + pending
Bug #634240 [squeak-vm] FTBFS (arm/unstable): error: unrecognized command line
Package: guile-1.6
Version: 1.6.8-10
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for guile-1.6 (versioned as 1.6.8-10.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Hector Oron
reverted:
--- guile-1.6-1.6.8
For the sake of getting my fellow packages/translations maintainers to
get the whole picture since you insist so much on proposing a wrong
solution and calling mine “papering over the bug”, I'll reply anyway.
Goswin von Brederlow (22/02/2012):
> Now my patch (attached) fixes this problem by only
Goswin von Brederlow (22/02/2012):
> Cyril and I disagree about the cause for the missing description and
> the fix for it.
Wrong, again. Please stop harrassing me, pretty fucking please.
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 660730 + confirmed
Bug #660730 [bzr-svn] FTBFS
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660730: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660730
Debian Bug Tracking Syste
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 660721 + confirmed
Bug #660721 [bzr-builddeb] FTBFS
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660721: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660721
Debian Bug Tracking
On 19.02.2012 14:11, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Vedran,
Hey,
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:18:52 +0100, Vedran Furač wrote:
>
>> On 12.01.2012 11:21, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
>>
Hey, since you're DD, and I am not, would you be so kind and sponsor the
upload?
>>>
>>> I am and I
Package: www.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #657557
Hi,
Cyril and I disagree about the cause for the missing description and
the fix for it. So someone impartial please look over both out patches
and see which makes more sense. In both cases the english translations
must be added to ddtplangs [Patc
tags 654285 + patch
tags 654285 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for isakmpd (versioned as 20041012-7.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
Hector Oron
diff -Nru isakmpd-20041012/debian/changelog isakmpd-20
Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:47:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#643393: fixed in gnome-scan 0.6.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #643393,
regarding gnome-scan: FTBFS: gnome-scan-dialog.c:565:13: error: format not a
string literal and no format arguments [-Werror=form
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 654285 + patch
Bug #654285 [isakmpd] isakmpd: FTBFS on armhf/s390x, reproduced on sid amd64:
needs fix for multiarched gmp
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 654285 + pending
Bug #654285 [isakmpd] isakmpd: FTBFS on armhf/s390x, reproduced on sid amd
Philippe De Swert writes:
> Attached patch fixes the debian build dir with all the necessary patches
> to build guile-1.6 succesfully on amd64 and armhf. So both the build
> fix and the documentation build fix. It also cleans up the package a
> bit.
I appreciate the help, though I'm actually pla
Package: libdispatch0
Severity: serious
libdispatch0 uses SSE2 instructions ("MFENCE") which are not available
on a Pentium 3.
According to http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch02s01.html.en
Pentium 3 has to be supported; so at least the user should get more than
a "Illegal instruction"
Package: wims
Followup-For: Bug #656113
Hi Georges,
I'm attaching a new logfile. In this logfile the error was leaving
around running processes.
Now I think I might have an idea whats going on:
* postinst configure starts something in the background
* immediately after the package was installed t
Your message dated Wed, 22 Feb 2012 00:37:35 +0100
with message-id <20292.10943.9330.670...@kueppers.informatik.uni-koeln.de>
and subject line
has caused the Debian Bug report #657754,
regarding dracut: fails to install when no kernel available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
As described in the upstream bug report, this can likely be fixed by
creating the /usr/share/aclocal directory in the automake package
(which was added to automake's install target at around the same time
the change was made).
--
Tim Retout
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # the bug here was calling it by the wrong path, not shipping it in /sbin
> close 238261 2.85-11
Bug#238261: sysv-rc: /sbin/runlevel still called by invoke-rc.d
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 660590 !
Bug #660590 [apt-build] apt-build: prompting due to modified conffiles which
where not modified by the user
Owner recorded as Dominique Lasserre .
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
66
Hi,
Attached patch fixes the debian build dir with all the necessary patches
to build guile-1.6 succesfully on amd64 and armhf. So both the build
fix and the documentation build fix. It also cleans up the package a
bit.
Regards,
Philippe
guile-1.6.patch
Description: Binary data
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:36:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658695: fixed in udev 175-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658695,
regarding Debian installation bug report
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:36:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658695: fixed in udev 175-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658695,
regarding Graphical install does not detect keyboard and mouse in weekly-build
image
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:36:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#658695: fixed in udev 175-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #658695,
regarding udev-udeb: missing call to input_id
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:36:46 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#652660: fixed in udev 175-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #652660,
regarding udev: 70-persistent-net.rules is not generated
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 658715 1.5.4-2~exp2
Bug #658715 [openmpi-checkpoint] openmpi-checkpoint: fails to upgrade from
'sid' - trying to overwrite ...
Bug Marked as found in versions openmpi/1.5.4-2~exp2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> unmerge 659838
Bug#659838: kmod: v5 acts like a fork bomb
Bug#659933: sysvinit: system locks up during boot
Disconnected #659838 from all other report(s).
> clone 659838 -1
Bug#659838: kmod: v5 acts like a fork bomb
Bug 659838 cloned as bug 66080
Package: mysql-5.5
Version: 5.5.17-4
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
Justification: Policy 4.2
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
I tried to build mysql-5.5 and I found that the main.openssl_1 test failed.
Even
Am 21.02.2012 21:21, schrieb Nate Bargmann:
My report 660348 is reporting the same issue. For the moment, this
needs to remain at Grave as the breakage is due to a package version
upgrade and no debconf configuration was provided. I presume this to be
a bug and should properly block the update
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:17:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#659838: fixed in kmod 5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #659838,
regarding sysvinit: system locks up during boot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:17:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#659838: fixed in kmod 5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #659838,
regarding kmod: v5 acts like a fork bomb
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 22:16:06 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 21, Joey Hess wrote:
>
> > and users are *still* reporting the bug. Is something preventing udev
> > from being uploaded to fix this?
> Yes, me being lazy.
> Feel free to NMU with urgency=high, but please fix #652660 too (by
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:02:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660661: fixed in gxine 0.5.907-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660661,
regarding gxine: FTBFS for the iceweasel 10 transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Hello,
Le 18 févr. 2012 à 09:25, Alessio Treglia a écrit :
> multicat 2.0 failed to build on all Debian non-Linux architectures,
> you may find more information at [1].
> Would you help us in solving this?
Considering the error message, I guess the simplest would be to add
#ifndef POLLRDHUP
#de
clone 659838 -1
submitter -1 !
retitle -1 stop using modprobe install directives
severity -1 important
reassign -1 alsa-base
clone -1 -2
reassign -2 oss-compat
thanks
On Feb 19, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Feb 19, Ingo Saitz wrote:
> > softdep snd post: snd-ioctl32 snd-seq
> > I think this change
On Feb 21, Joey Hess wrote:
> and users are *still* reporting the bug. Is something preventing udev
> from being uploaded to fix this?
Yes, me being lazy.
Feel free to NMU with urgency=high, but please fix #652660 too (by
adding the missing \).
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Package: publican
Version: 2.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
it seems that publican requires libfile-which-perl, but this package
is not a dependency. Without that package, the output of publican is:
$ publican
Can't locate File/Which.pm in @INC (@I
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:17:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#659294: fixed in libarchive 3.0.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #659294,
regarding libarchive: FTBFS on various architectures (hurd, mipsel, s390, s390x)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
From the bug log, the current consensus appears to be to not override
the kernel maintainer's policy with regards to ABI numbering. As such,
I suggest the following ballot:
A) The technical committee declines to override the kernel maintenance
team's ABI numbering policy.
B) Further discussion
I
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:51:27 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#643806: fixed in sssd 1.2.1-4.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #643806,
regarding sssd: FTBFS with -Werror=format-security
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:49:59 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660245: fixed in liblog4ada 1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #660245,
regarding liblog4ada: FTBFS when not building docs: pdflatex: Command not found
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:47:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#652244: fixed in basic256 0.9.6.66-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #652244,
regarding basic256: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b
basic256-0.9.6.66 gave error exit status 2
to be marked as d
My report 660348 is reporting the same issue. For the moment, this
needs to remain at Grave as the breakage is due to a package version
upgrade and no debconf configuration was provided. I presume this to be
a bug and should properly block the update from reaching Testing.
- Nate >>
--
"The o
Hi Gregor,
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:42:12PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for basic256 (versioned as 0.9.6.66-1.1) and
> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> should delay it longer.
Thanks for preparing this! Please feel free to move it to DELAYED/
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 652244 + patch
Bug #652244 [src:basic256] basic256: FTBFS: dpkg-buildpackage: error:
dpkg-source -b basic256-0.9.6.66 gave error exit status 2
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 652244 + pending
Bug #652244 [src:basic256] basic256: FTBFS: dpkg-build
tags 652244 + patch
tags 652244 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for basic256 (versioned as 0.9.6.66-1.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
--
.''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A6
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:32:51 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#638113: fixed in indicator-applet 0.4.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #638113,
regarding indicator-applet: needs porting to new libpanel-applet interface
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 19:17:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660396: fixed in kfreebsd-kernel-headers 0.74
has caused the Debian Bug report #660396,
regarding sane-backends: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Tue Feb 21 19:03:06 UTC 2012
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: gnuradio
> tags 645332 + pending
Failed to alter tags of Bug 645332: Not alterin
Hi Ansgar,
On Mi, Feb 15, 2012 at 05:34:45 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> since the last security update for icedove, the program does not
> start on several computers here. Instead the following error
> message is displayed:
>
> /usr/lib/icedove/icedove-bin: symbol lookup error:
> /usr/lib/ic
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:53:47AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Hi Moritz,
>
> Le jeudi 16 février 2012 19:42:09, Damien Raude-Morvan a écrit :
> > On 09/02/2012 21:16, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> > > There's a new issues, which affects 1.x:
> > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?nam
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:32:50 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#646647: fixed in latex-cjk-chinese-arphic 1.21+nmu1
has caused the Debian Bug report #646647,
regarding latex-cjk-chinese-arphic: FTBFS: The requested file, gbsn00lp.ttf,
does not exist
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 659994 660736
Bug#659994: [regression] icedove: symbol lookup error: [...]/libdbusservice.so:
undefined symbol: NS_Alloc
Bug#660736: Subject: icedove deads on undefined symbol
Forcibly Merged 659994 660736.
> thanks
Stopping processin
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:17:20 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#652242: fixed in jenkins-memory-monitor 1.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #652242,
regarding jenkins-memory-monitor: FTBFS:
test2(org.jvnet.hudson.MemoryMonitorTest): 'top' unavailable
to be marked as don
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 659659 + help
Bug #659659 [freebsd-net-tools-udeb] current version of ifconfig breaks D-I
Added tag(s) help.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
659659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:02:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#645544: fixed in bitcoin 0.5.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #645544,
regarding bitcoin/experimental: FTBFS: tries to write to $HOME during build
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 658272 installation-reports
Bug #658272 [cdrom] cdrom: testing image 64bit from 30.1.2012 crashed with
first login and corrupted grup2
Bug reassigned from package 'cdrom' to 'installation-reports'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Ple
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> in the regular udev package, 50-udev-default.rules has
> SUBSYSTEM=="input", ENV{ID_INPUT}=="", IMPORT{builtin}="input_id". This
> file (and rule) seem to be missing from the udeb, which breaks the gtk
> image (X doesn't get any input devices).
So, users hav
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:47:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#645493: fixed in postler 0.1.1-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #645493,
regarding Will FTBFS with libindicate 0.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 659116 grub-installer
Bug #659116 [debian-installer] debian-installer: GRUB fails to be installed on
machine with IDE and SATA disk
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'grub-installer'.
Bug No longer marked as found in vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
For information
- Message original
Sujet: pbuilder: pdebuild try to build indep package even with
- --binary-arch option
Date : Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:09:07 +0100
De : xavier
Pour : Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: pbuilder
Versio
Xavier Grave writes:
> Any idea of what I may have done wrong ?
Good question. My best guess offhand is that this technique only works
when using the dh sequencer rather than raw debhelper.
> if [ -e /usr/bin/pdflatex ]; then $(MAKE) -C doc; fi
That works too.
> But instead of closing
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:17:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625386: fixed in lsb-pkgchk3 3.2.1-1.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #625386,
regarding lsb-pkgchk3: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 15:53:34 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > It seems reasonable to me to try to climb up the process tree until we
> > meet a process with "sshd" in the command line (or, maybe better (?),
> > with "sshd" in the proc//exe symlink). Still not the cleanest of the
> > solutions
Hi Jan,
> I have no trouble printing at all. I am not sure but i guess your
> system has no valid configuration.
Do you have Postscript-printers? As said, I have no problem printing to
a PCL5e printer, apart from the same error-message, but the printouts
are ok.
And for the not readable cups
also sprach Ludovico Gardenghi [2012.02.19.1754 +0100]:
> It seems reasonable to me to try to climb up the process tree until we
> meet a process with "sshd" in the command line (or, maybe better (?),
> with "sshd" in the proc//exe symlink). Still not the cleanest of the
> solutions, but should be
Version: 3.2-2
Fixed since audacious-plugins 3.2-2:
audacious-plugins (3.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
[ Cyril Lavier ]
* debian/control:
+ Clean Build-deps. (Closes: #634505)
+ Removed the TTA support has it's not supported
anymore. (Closes: #650847)
* Performed review on
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 15:21:00 +0100
with message-id <20120221142100.GA19910@alessio-laptop>
and subject line Closing #660520
has caused the Debian Bug report #660520,
regarding audacious: Fails to start with "FATAL: No output plugin found." due
to plugins not in multiarch paths
to b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 660520 audacious-plugins
Bug #660520 [audacious] audacious: Fails to start with "FATAL: No output plugin
found." due to plugins not in multiarch paths
Bug reassigned from package 'audacious' to 'audacious-plugins'.
Bug No longer marked a
Hi,
I have no trouble printing at all. I am not sure but i guess your
system has no valid configuration.
> -- Configuration Files:
> /etc/cups/cupsd.conf [Errno 13] Keine Berechtigung: u'/et/cups/cupsd.conf'
Make sure the cups process can read the configuration files...
The bugs importance shoul
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 657281 https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52704
Bug #657281 [fop] src/java/org/apache/fop/pdf/ sRGB Color Space Profile.icm is
non-free
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:00:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#659308: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #557939,
regarding scim-python: uses pythonX.Y/site-packages for Python >= 2.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 620627
Bug #620627 {Done: Debian FTP Masters }
[liboss-salsa-dev] signature of 'snd_mixer_selem_set_playback_volume_range' is
incorrect
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' t
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:54:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660462: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #620627,
regarding signature of 'snd_mixer_selem_set_playback_volume_range' is incorrect
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
On 08-08-11 23:06, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Oxan van Leeuwen's message of Mon Aug 08 07:27:01 -0500 2011:
Hi Clint,
What's the current status of the updated python-gearman.libgearman package?
Hi Oxan.
This package has been waiting for sponsorship for some time now, and
fixes the bug
Hi,
(greetings from your favourite Hurd porter)
Alle lunedì 13 febbraio 2012, Tim Kientzle ha scritto:
> So on hurd, I see a couple of interesting failures for bsdtar:
> [...]
Actually, libarchive is pretty fine on Hurd, as it was after I fixed
libarchove 3.0.2 (and in 3.0.3 there are no change
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:32:42 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660371: fixed in libconfig-model-openssh-perl 1.220-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660371,
regarding libconfig-model-openssh-perl: FTBFS: failed tests
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:58:17 +0100
with message-id <4f4378c9.8060...@gmx.de>
and subject line Done with 7.0.15 or earlier
has caused the Debian Bug report #657750,
regarding boinc: FTBFS: error: storage size of 'sg' isn't known
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
On 2012-02-20 20:40, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Package 0.1.8-2 is broken (ie has the manpage in the lib package instead
> of the samplerate-programs package).
>
> What I was trying to fix was the upgrade from 0.1.7 to 0.1.8-3 which was
> working correctly.
>
> I suggest you try downgrading to
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:47:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660728: fixed in bzr-xmloutput 0.8.8+bzr160-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #660728,
regarding FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:32:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660399: fixed in nbd 1:3.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660399,
regarding FTBFS: FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLD undeclared
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
tags 660399 + upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 08:31:49PM +, Sam Morris wrote:
> make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/nbd-2.9.25'
> gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DSYSCONFDIR='"/etc"' -g -O2
> -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -g
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:17:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660725: fixed in bzr-cvsps-import 0.0.1~bzr69-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #660725,
regarding FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not th
Package: bzr-svn
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/testtools/runtest.py", line 169, in
_run_user
return fn(*args, **kwargs)
AssertionError: Different number of acquired and r
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660621: fixed in fex 20120215-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660621,
regarding multiple cross-site scripting issues in fup script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 660399 + upstream fixed-upstream
Bug #660399 [nbd-client] FTBFS: FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLD undeclared
Added tag(s) upstream and fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
660399: http://bugs.d
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:02:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660726: fixed in bzr-rewrite 0.6.2+bzr242-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #660726,
regarding FTBFS
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 20/02/2012 22:36, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
> Nicolas Boulenguez writes:
>
>> Do not worry about that. The Debian build daemons are affected by a
>> bug. They install both Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep, then
>> call
>>
>> "debian/rules bui
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:51:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660480: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #640592,
regarding sitebar: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:49:52 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660546: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #636888,
regarding ldapdns: yada modifies build-dependencies when rebuilding
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:51:56 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660548: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #334164,
regarding yada: Touches debian/control, first paragraph, modifies Build-Depends
on the fly
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:43:57 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#660589: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #629369,
regarding vloopback-source: Fails in driver's build on latest kernel
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Package: bzr-xmloutput
Version: 0.8.8+bzr160-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source:
raceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/bzrlib/commands.py", line 920, in
exception_to_return_code
return the_callable(*args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 20/02/2012 18:21, Nicolas Boulenguez a écrit :
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 12:37:54PM +0100, Xavier Grave wrote:
>
>> Do you think I should open a bug against pdebuild ?
>
> I think so.
May be I can reassign bug 660245 to pdebuild.
> $ cd .. && su
Package: bzr-rewrite
Version: 0.6.2+bzr238-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source:
10.750 opening working tree
'/tmp/testbzr-YPIyt5.tmp/bzrlib.plugins.rewrite.tests.test_rebase.ReplaySnapshotTests.test_two_revisions_no_renames/work/new'
10.765 preparing to commit
INFO
On 20.02.12 Rogério Brito (rbr...@ime.usp.br) wrote:
Hi,
> Package: texlive-binaries
> Followup-For: Bug #659907
>
> Hi there.
>
> I'm also seeing something which looks like this bug, but I am not sure if
> the symptoms are just the same, with a different cause.
>
This is probably #612924. For
Package: bzr-cvsps-import
Version: 0.0.1~bzr69-1
Severity: serious
Your package fails to build from source:
==
ERROR:
bzrlib.plugins.cvsps_import.test_cvsps_import.TestMinimalTreeWithBranch.test_commit_from_empty
---
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
