As discussed with upstream (see below), the intention was really to
license libnatpmp under a BSD revised license. Upstream will clarify
this in his source files, and I will upload an update when his done.
Thomas
Original Message
Subject: Re: License de libnatpmp
Date: Tue, 12 J
Source: swiginac
Version: 1.5.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
swiginac FTBFS on latest unstable. I confirmed in amd64/cowbuilder.
-
swig -python -c++ -o swiginac_wrap.cpp swiginac.i
matrix.i:48: Warning 314: 'lambda' is a python keyword, renaming to '_lambda'
matrix.i:48: Warning 314: 'lambda' i
Source: ntfs-3g
Version: 1:2011.4.12AR.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
ntfs-3g FTBFS on sid.
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ntfs-3g
-
checking for mv... /bin/mv
checking for rm... /bin/rm
checking for sed... (cached) /bin/sed
checking for ldconfig... /sbin/ldconfig
ch
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 01:47:38 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633696: fixed in steadyflow 0.1.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #633696,
regarding steadyflow: FTBFS: depends on non-existing libappindicator-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:18:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#622012: fixed in ptlib 2.10.1~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #622012,
regarding ptlib: FTBFS: ptclib/pssl.cxx:810:27: error: 'SSLv2_method' was not
declared in this scope
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:18:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598986: fixed in ptlib 2.10.1~dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #598986,
regarding ptlib: FTBFS on armel: hello → Segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Package: src:steadyflow
Version: 0.1.7-1
Severity: serious
Tags: sid wheezy
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi!
Your package failed to build on the buildds:
E: Unable to locate package libappindicator-dev
Note: to make package builds reproducible t
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:34:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#626020: fixed in zookeeper 3.3.3+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #626020,
regarding zookeeper: incorrect dependency information
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:34:31 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#625441: fixed in zookeeper 3.3.3+dfsg1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #625441,
regarding zookeeper: ftbfs with gcc-4.6 -Werror
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Package: skrooge
Version: 0.7.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to save anything from Skrooge, our little friend DrKonqi shows up
saying that Skrooge just crashed.
There is no specific configuration done, because I could never go over the step
of saving.
Fo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 633669 CVE-2011-2527: qemu-kvm -runas does not clear supplementary
> groups
Bug #633669 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm -runas does not clear supplementary groups
Changed Bug title to 'CVE-2011-2527: qemu-kvm -runas does not clear
supplementary grou
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 630973 0.6.6-3
Bug #630973 {Done: Jakub Wilk } [src:sphinx] sphinx: no
source for jquery.js
Bug Marked as found in versions sphinx/0.6.6-3.
> found 630973 0.4.2-1
Bug #630973 {Done: Jakub Wilk } [src:sphinx] sphinx: no
source for jquery.js
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:48:22 +0100
with message-id <1310500103.24036.7.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#633663: pbuilder thinks I did not run pbuilder create
when I did
has caused the Debian Bug report #633663,
regarding pbuilder thinks I did not run pb
Package: vlc-nox
Version: 1.1.10-1+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
See upstream advisory for details:
http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1106.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable')
Package: vlc-nox
Version: 1.1.10-1+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
See upstream advisory for details:
http://www.videolan.org/security/sa1105.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (100, 'unstable')
Package: renpy
Version: 6.12.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
your package currently fails to build in Debian/unstable:
dh_testdir
export RENPY_DEPS_INSTALL="/usr"; cd module && python2.6 setup.py build
Foun
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 632287 scrub/2.4-2
Bug #632287 [scrub,ucommon-utils] ucommon-utils and scrub: error when trying to
install together
Bug Marked as found in versions scrub/2.4-2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 632287 ucommon-utils/5.0.3-1
Bug #632287 [scrub,ucommon-utils] ucommon-utils and scrub: error when trying to
install together
The source ucommon-utils and version 5.0.3-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Bug Marked as found in ve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 632287 ucommon-utils/5.0.4-1
Bug #632287 [scrub,ucommon-utils] ucommon-utils and scrub: error when trying to
install together
The source ucommon-utils and version 5.0.4-1 do not appear to match any binary
packages
Bug Marked as found in ve
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:47:54 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#632500: fixed in ocaml-extunix 0.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #632500,
regarding ocaml-extunix: FTBFS (!llinux): Test failures
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
hi,
I have update this plugin from previus version of squeeze to wheezy, and
in nautilus don't start the window of seahorse 2.30.1-2 installed for
the cryption of file.
If I downgade seahorse-plugin and seahorse of wheezy, all run well.
Regards.
Alien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b
Package: qemu-kvm
Version: 0.12.5+dfsg-5
Severity: serious
Tags: patch squeeze sid upstream security
qemu-kvm does not clear list of supplementary groups
when processing -runas argument which supposed to tell
it to drop as much privileges as possible.
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807893 fo
> anything other than GPL-1
Pardon me, that should read "anything other than GPL-2"
stew
pgp2z1IzSCAwf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Source: tumgreyspf
Version: 1.35-7
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
As discussed offline in email with maintainer, this package claims that the
software is GPL-2+, when it seems that there is no reason to believe it is
anything other than GPL-1
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Debia
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 632655 normal
Bug #632655 [src:conky] Invalid maintainer email address
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> retitle 632655 'O: conky -- highly configurable system monitor'
Bug #632655 [src:conky] Invalid maintainer email address
Cha
severity 632655 normal
retitle 632655 'O: conky -- highly configurable system monitor'
reassign 632655 wnpp
thanks
As stated in Bug #628997, #632653, #632654, #632655, the maintainer of
conky package is giving up all his packages in Debian, I hereby orphan
this package.
Package: conky
Priority: o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 628997 normal
Bug #628997 [src:gecko-mediaplayer] gecko-mediaplayer: maintainer address does
not accept mail
Bug #632652 [src:gecko-mediaplayer] Invalid maintainer email address
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
Severity set to 'n
severity 628997 normal
retitle 628997 'O: gecko-mediaplayer -- Multimedia plug-in for Gecko
browsers'
reassign 628997 wnpp
thanks
As stated in Bug #628997, #632653, #632654, #632655, the maintainer of
gecko-mediaplayer package is giving up all his packages in Debian, I
hereby orphan this package.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 633600 upstream
Bug #633600 [src:nova] nova: inadequate copyright file
Added tag(s) upstream.
> tags 633643 upstream
Bug #633643 [src:libnatpmp] libnatpmp: missing license in copyright file
Added tag(s) upstream.
>
End of message, stopping pr
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.200
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Here are some self-explanatory outputs:
deniz@debian:/tmp/wine-1.3.24/wine-1.3.24$ sudo rm -rf /var/cache/pbuilder;sudo
apt-get install --reinstall pbuilder;sudo apt-get pbuilder create
--distribution whee
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:50:08 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#633587: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #619576,
regarding [openerp-server] The Company OpenERP states that there will be no
upgrade module to version 6
to be marked as done.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 633658 wnpp
Bug #633658 [pyelemental] pyelemental: Please update the Uploaders field or
orphan this package
Bug reassigned from package 'pyelemental' to 'wnpp'.
> severity 633658 normal
Bug #633658 [wnpp] pyelemental: Please update the U
reassign 633658 wnpp
severity 633658 normal
retitle 633658 O: pyelemental -- Python bindings for liblemental
thanks
* Aron Xu , 2011-07-12, 23:29:
As stated in Bug #628997, #632653, #632654, #632655, the only uploader
of pyelemental package is giving up his maintenance of all his packages
in D
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 632653 normal
Bug #632653 [src:gnome-mplayer] Invalid maintainer email address
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign 632653 wnpp
Bug #632653 [src:gnome-mplayer] Invalid maintainer email address
Bug reassigned from package 's
severity 632653 normal
reassign 632653 wnpp
thanks
I intend to adopt gnome-mplayer, as the original maintainer has
expressed he'd give up this package in last message.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 632654 normal
Bug #632654 [src:tolua++] Invalid maintainer email address
Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious'
> reassign 632654 wnpp
Bug #632654 [src:tolua++] Invalid maintainer email address
Bug reassigned from package 'src:tolua++'
severity 632654 normal
reassign 632654 wnpp
thanks
As stated in Bug #628997, #632653, #632654, #632655, the maintainer of
tolua++ package is giving up all his packages in Debian, I hereby
orphan this package.
--
Regards,
Aron Xu
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian
Package: pyelemental
Severity: serious
As stated in Bug #628997, #632653, #632654, #632655, the only uploader
of pyelemental package is giving up his maintenance of all his
packages in Debian, I hereby request Debian Python Modules Team, as in
the Maintainer field, to remove him from the Uploaders
>I'll orphan all your packages after 10 days if I can't get a reply.
Please
do!
Cheers,
C.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 17:04:27 +0200
with message-id <20110712150427.GB2418@aenima>
and subject line Closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #633637,
regarding Exploitable remotely: SQL injection
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
I
Salut Thomas,
Est-ce que tu peux plus clairement explique quel est la license de
libnatpmp? Car cela ne semble pas tres clair. Voire ceci:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633643
J'attends ta reponse avant de modifier le debian/copyright du paquet.
Merci de laisser le bug en copi
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:25:37 +0200
with message-id <4e1c5961.6050...@bzed.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#633655: debian-maintainers: drbd seems to be
inconsistent in modern Debian distributions
has caused the Debian Bug report #633655,
regarding debian-maintainers: drbd seems to be i
Maybe it would be a good idea to provide a set of packages with different
versions of userspace utilities.
--
Админ
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:43:02 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 08:43 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> > Source: libnatpmp
> > Version: 20101211-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Justification: Policy 12.5
> >
> >
> > Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned in
> >
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:47:05 +0300, Alexander Kedrik
wrote:
> Package: p7zip-rar
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> p7zip-rar depends on 9.04~ <= p7zip-full << 9.05~.
> There is only p7zip-full 9.20.1 in sid repository.
My (grave) mistake. I'll fix that asap.
--
Ad
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Drbd seems not to be usable in all modern debian distributions
In stable there is no kernel with built-in drbd modules and no drbd source
package (as in oldstable)
In testing and above there drbd kernel module and
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:47:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#629000: fixed in enna 0.4.1~r3557-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #629000,
regarding enna: uninstallable - depends on nonexistent libevas-svn-06-engines-x
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:47:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#628999: fixed in enna 0.4.1~r3557-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #628999,
regarding enna: FTBFS - missing libs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:47:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#618201: fixed in enna 0.4.1~r3557-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #618201,
regarding enna: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: 'libcurl4-dev'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:47:39 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#615014: fixed in enna 0.4.1~r3557-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #615014,
regarding enna: cannot be built on kfreebsd-*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
On 07/12/2011 08:43 PM, Mike O'Connor wrote:
> Source: libnatpmp
> Version: 20101211-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.5
>
>
> Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned in
> the
> package copyright file
>
> bye,
> stew
Would you mind to be a little
Package: taxbird
Version: 0.16-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for taxbird (versioned as 0.16-1.1) and
uploaded it to debian-mentors. Please feel free to tell me if I
should withdraw it.
Regards, Olaf
diff -u taxbird-0.16/debian/control taxbird-0.16/d
Package: libgeier
Version: 0.12-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libgeier (versioned as 0.12-1.1) and
uploaded it to debian-mentors. Please feel free to tell me if I
should withdraw it.
Regards, Olaf
diff -u libgeier-0.12/debian/changelog libgeier-
Package: tomcat6-common
Version: 6.0.28-9+squeeze1
Severity: grave
Tags: squeeze
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.
Source: libnatpmp
Version: 20101211-2
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
Some of the source files carry a MIT like license which is not mentioned in the
package copyright file
bye,
stew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (600, 'unst
Package: p7zip-rar
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
p7zip-rar depends on 9.04~ <= p7zip-full << 9.05~.
There is only p7zip-full 9.20.1 in sid repository.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i
Package: libapache2-mod-authnz-external
Version: 3.2.4-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
According to
http://code.google.com/p/mod-auth-external/issues/detail?id=5 there's a
possible remote sql injection bug. The fix is a two liner:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 633533 important
Bug #633533 [savi] [savi]: does not start up. Missing binary executable.
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
633533: http://bugs.debi
severity 633533 important
thanks
Sorry, my bad.
Best Regards,
--
Manolo Díaz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
>
> SaVi 1.4.5-2
>
> I can confirm that the problem related to oogl files IS fixed, but
> still depends on the existence of /vmlinuz or /boot/vmlinuz file to
> start up. If that file MUST exist in a standard Debian installation
> (I'm not sure, think of the multi-kernel systems) I sh
package
severity 633533 important
thanks
On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:53:50 +0800
YunQiang Su wrote:
> here, on Debian, the $ARCH is "ubuntu", not "unknown", so it
> *redefine* SAVIBIN.
> > the working directory is /usr/lib/savi. Changing this line to
> > SAVIBIN=${SAVI}/bin/SaVi fix things for me.
>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 632999 633629
Bug#632999: eclipse-platform: sat4j dependency unsatisfiable in sid
Bug#633629: eclipse-platform: sat4j dependency issue when installing eclipse
Forcibly Merged 632999 633629.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Tue Jul 12 08:03:09 UTC 2011
> # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW
> # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
> #
> # Source package in NEW: libpar2
> tags 532041 + pending
Bug #532041 [libpar2-0] libpar2 exposes wrong da
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 627299 + pending
Bug #627299 [libkarma] libkarma: Please use debians default csharp compiler
Added tag(s) pending.
> tags 632770 + pending
Bug #632770 [libkarma] libkarma: FTBFS on non-mono architectures (mips/mipsel)
Added tag(s) pending.
>
tags 627299 + pending
tags 632770 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libkarma (versioned as 0.1.2-2.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/4. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards.
diff -Nru libkarma-0.1.2/debian/changelog libkarma-0.1.2/debian/changelog
65 matches
Mail list logo
