G'day.
Forgive me if it is not, but I feel this may be important to this bug.
Today I upgraded the cups & libcups packages on my system from 1.4.4-3
to 1.4.4-7 and found to my amazement that the above symptoms have
disappeared! Previously I too could not print from any gnome-based app
or from
On So, 26 Dez 2010, Norbert Preining wrote:
> So that means we only have to adapt the trigger action of tex-common.
> What do you say about that one:
Tested that code:
...cowbuilder
...
Setting up texlive-base (2009-11) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --al
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 607857 tex-common
Bug #607857 [texlive-base] postinst script of texlive-base creates
/usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R
Bug reassigned from package 'texlive-base' to 'tex-common'.
> severity 607857 serious
Bug #607857 [tex-common] postinst scri
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 09:52:59PM -0500, trang luoi wrote:
> Reading package lists...
> E: Encountered a section with no Package: header
> E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/dpkg/status
> E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
Please send the contents of your /etc
Package: clisp-module-clx
Version: 1:2.49-1
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
I noticed this when running stumpwm, it would not run with clisp anymore after
upgrading to clisp 2.49.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testi
Julien Cristau dixit:
>The gcc -mcpu=v9 option (which, aiui, triggers the __sparc_v9__
>define) is orthogonal to -m32/-m64, it specifies the target
>instruction and register set, not the size of longs/pointers.
AFAICT, a 32-bit v9 target is called v8+ not v9.
And besides, there’s Debian/sparc64
On Sun, 26 Dec 2010 02:04:55 you wrote:
> Source: lrzip
> Version: 0.551-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
>
> Hi,
>
> your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
> | g++ -o lrzip main.o rzip.o runzip.o stream.o util.o 7zCrc.o
Source: gnome-keyring
Version: 2.91.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package no longer builds:
| configure: error: No such directory '/etc/ssl/certs'. Use
--with-root-certs=path to set, or --without-root-certs to disable
| checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
| checking location
tags 605357 fixed-upstream
thanks
Applied with some differences (e.g. error message capitalisation) to
upstream.
Greetings from Fribourg and Zürich
On 12/15/2010 09:22 PM, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> tags 605357 patch
> thanks
>
> I can reproduce the segfault in a virtual machine by creating multiple
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 605357 fixed-upstream
Bug #605357 [grub-common] grub-common: grub-probe segfault in
grub_disk_adjust_range
Added tag(s) fixed-upstream.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
605357: http://bugs.deb
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 607938 important
Bug #607938 [xserver-xorg] xserver-xorg: X randomly freezes on Samsung Q20, the
system is still alive
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> tag 607938 = moreinfo
Bug #607938 [xserver-xorg] xserver-xorg: X randomly
severity 607938 important
tag 607938 = moreinfo
kthxbye
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 19:22:03 +0200, Andrew Osnach wrote:
> Kernel version (/proc/version):
> Linux version 2.6.30-2-686 (Debian 2.6.30-8squeeze1) (da...@debian.org) (gcc
> version 4.3.4 (Debian 4.3.4-6) ) #1 SMP Fri Dec 4 00:53:20 UTC 2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> user release.debian@packages.debian.org
Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was
jcris...@debian.org).
> usertag 607267 squeeze-can-defer
Bug#607267: /usr/bin/scp: fails to notice close() errors
There were no usertags set.
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertag 607267 squeeze-can-defer
tag 607267 squeeze-ignore
kthxbye
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 13:40:30 +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Package: openssh-client
> Version: 1:5.5p1-5+b1
> Severity: grave
> File: /usr/bin/scp
> Justification: causes non-seriou
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 17:16:46 +, Chris Butler wrote:
> If it's any use, I ran a quick "git bisect" on the upstream source, and
> discovered the commit which seems to have fixed the problem:
>
> https://github.com/flori/json/commit/dd06e48aa414674f52e81f9cdc7836b6456c04f8
>
> However, this
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604219: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604219,
regarding isdnvboxserver: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604216: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604216,
regarding ipppd: installation fails on testing.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604216: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604216,
regarding ipppd: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604216: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604216,
regarding ibod: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604211: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604211,
regarding ipppd: installation fails on testing.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604211: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604211,
regarding ibod: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604211: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604211,
regarding ipppd: installation fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:47:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597926: fixed in isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-4.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597926,
regarding /var/lib/dpkg/info/isdnvboxserver.postinst: 21: MAKEDEV: not found
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 20:13:53 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Julien Cristau dixit:
>
> >> Unlike reverting patch 0013, this should work even when compiling
>
> >Do you plan on NMUing with this patch?
>
> I still think this is wrong, and the other patch must be reverted
> instead, even if th
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607751: fixed in snort 2.8.5.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607751,
regarding snort: Update gives "current Snort configuration is invalid" error
and it will not start
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607951: fixed in snort 2.8.5.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607951,
regarding Snort-common: error in preinst script generates improper config files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:35:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607678: fixed in snort 2.8.5.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #607678,
regarding snort-pgsql: Error in postinst near line 125
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 545414 important
Bug #545414 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap: sudo fails with "sudo:
setreuid(ROOT_UID, user_uid): Operation not permitted" for ldap users
Bug #368297 [libldap-2.4-2] sudo-ldap failes when you change uri to ldaps
Severity set t
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 22 not upgraded.
8 not fully installed or removed.
After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
Setting up python (2.6.6-3+squeeze4) ...
Linking and byte-compiling packages for runtime python
severity 545414 important
kthxbye
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:49:21 +0800, David Adam wrote:
> severity 545414 grave
> thanks
>
Reverting unexplained severity change.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 607958 apt
Bug #607958 [apt-get] E: Encountered a section with no Package: header
Warning: Unknown package 'apt-get'
Bug reassigned from package 'apt-get' to 'apt'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA384
Julien Cristau dixit:
>> Unlike reverting patch 0013, this should work even when compiling
>Do you plan on NMUing with this patch?
I still think this is wrong, and the other patch must be reverted
instead, even if this may fix Ivan’s symptoms. I a
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 02:12:54 -0500, Ivan Jager wrote:
> tags 604717 patch
> severity 604717 critital
> thanks
>
> Ok, after reading these FAQ entries, I am more convinnced this is
> the right solution.
>
> >Q: Can you please port the diet libc to FreeBSD/Solaris/Windows?
> >A: No.
> >
> >Q:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 05:19:39 +1100, david b wrote:
> Package: python2.6
> Version: 2.6.6-6
> Severity: critical
>
> The latest update is totally broken and can't byte compile *modules*
> (squeeze).
>
It works for everyone else. Please provide some details...
Cheers,
Julien
signature.as
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (20/04/2010):
> tags 578462 + experimental
Why? BTS does version tracking…
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Source: mutter
Version: 2.91.3-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package FTBFS:
| /bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2
-Wchar-subscripts -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs
-Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare -Werror -o w
Source: refdbg
Version: 1.2+git20101215+aa5cb3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
What about proper build-deps?
| ./autogen.sh: 4: libtoolize: not found
KiBi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
Source: nautilus
Version: 2.91.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package FTBFS:
| gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I.. -I../cut-n-paste-code
-I../libnautilus-private -DGSEAL_ENABLE -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-3.0
-I/usr/lib/gtk-3.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/ca
Source: mrpt
Version: 1:0.9.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
looks like your package became x86-only all of a sudden. Example on
sparc:
|
/build/buildd-mrpt_0.9.3-1-sparc-MP0iHr/mrpt-0.9.3/otherlibs/eigen3/Eigen/src/Core/util/Memory.h:
| In function 'void Eigen::internal::queryCach
Package: python2.6
Version: 2.6.6-6
Severity: critical
The latest update is totally broken and can't byte compile *modules* (squeeze).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: L
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:17:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#605584: fixed in mercurial-server 1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #605584,
regarding mercurial-server: leaves unowned files on purge
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:17:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#604213: fixed in mercurial-server 1.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #604213,
regarding mercurial-server: installation fails with aptitude
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
On Sat, 2010-12-25 at 14:07 +0100, Marc Dirix wrote:
> I'm trying to build "xserver-xfbdev", therefor I gave the following
> commands:
>
> #apt-get source xserver-xorg
> #apt-get build-de xserver-xorg
Your commands don't follow from your stated goal. The xserver-xfbdev
binary package is built fr
close 606343 2.8-1
thanks
--
--
,''`. Bastian Kleineidam
: :' :GnuPG Schlüssel
`. `'gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 32EC6F3E
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 606343 2.8-1
Bug#606343: libpam-mount: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: insufficient build-deps
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 2.8-1, send any further explanations to Cyril
Bruleb
Source: midish
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| cc -Wl,--as-needed -o midish builtin.o cons.o conv.o data.o dbg.o ev.o
exec.o filt.o frame.o lex.o main.o mdep.o mdep_ra
Source: lrzip
Version: 0.551-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
Hi,
your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-*:
| g++ -o lrzip main.o rzip.o runzip.o stream.o util.o 7zCrc.o zpipe.o
Threads.o LzFind.o LzFindMt.o LzmaDec.o LzmaEnc.o Lzm
retitle 607921: freevo messes with /home
clone 607921 -1
severity -1 important
retitle -1 freevo: doesnt cleanup on purge
thanks
Hi,
On Freitag, 24. Dezember 2010, A Mennucc wrote:
> tag 607921 +wontfix
sigh.
But tagging it "wontfix" will not prevent the release manager to remove your
packag
Hi all,
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 20:17, florian wrote:
> Package: subdownloader
> Version: 2.0.14-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> When launched from commandline, this message appears for all selected subtitle
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/
Hi Sebastian,
Thanks for reporting the bug.
Do you (or anyone else) know how can I test if patch fixes the issue
without having to go through an FTP master? Something like launching
"test builds"?
If that doesn't exist, I'll just try patches in the next "-2" version of
the package.
Thanks in adv
I'm trying to build "xserver-xfbdev", therefor I gave the following
commands:
#apt-get source xserver-xorg
#apt-get build-de xserver-xorg
Then it says,
-- Picking 'xorg' as source package instead of 'xserver-xorg'
for which all the build dependencies are met.
Then using "debian/rules binary" it
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:47:58 +0100
Marc Dirix wrote:
> I explicitely deleted libudev-dev,x11proto-gl-dev and x11proto-xf86dri-dev.
Because xorg package doesn't depend on such packages.
Its debian/control file says
In lenny,
>>Build-Depends: dpkg (>= 1.7.0), po-debconf, debhelper (>= 4.1
Package: src:cdebconf-terminal
Version: 0.12
Tags: d-i
Severity: serious
Your package FTBFS on almost all architectures (it built fine on
hppa)[0]. Here is a snippet from alpha[1].
|[ -e configure ] || ./autogen.sh
|autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
|autoreconf: configure.ac: not using Gettext
|
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfixed 605996 1:0.9.3-1
Bug #605996 {Done: Jose Luis Blanco (University of Malaga)
} [src:mrpt] mrpt: FTBFS on powerpc, s390 and sparc
Bug No longer marked as fixed in versions mrpt/1:0.9.3-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
notfixed 605996 1:0.9.3-1
thanks
I've been looking at the build log of powerpc[0] and it is not fixed the
error message is the same. Sparc, s390 complains about "impossible
register constraint" and mips does not understand "cpuid". It built only
on amd64.
[0]
https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?p
Your message dated Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:32:13 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#607922: fixed in libxml2 2.7.8.dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #607922,
regarding CVE-2010-4494: memory corruption (double-free) in XPath processing
code
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: cdebconf-entropy
Severity: serious
Version: 0.19
Tags: d-i
Your package FTBFS on all architectures[0]. Here is a snippet from i386[1]:
|dh build
| dh_testdir
| debian/rules override_dh_auto_configure
|make[1]: Entering directory
`/build/
On 12/25/2010 10:37 AM, Joost van Baal wrote:
>
>> As for the current bug, I'd like to point out that noip2 configuration and
>> runtime state has always been kept in a binary "configuration" file.
>> This doesn't match the Debian policy, and the current "abuse" of debconf
>> is the result of a ou
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 09:04:49PM -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> This solution will fail if /var/www/squid-reports/* ever expands to
> more than 1 file; e.g.
>
> test -f /usr/lib/lib*.so
> bash: test: too many arguments
Hmpf. Indeed.
> One simple answer is to just ignore the error:
>
>
> It should be "apt-get build-dep xorg". Could you check it, again?
> I could build packages with pbuilder.
Nope not on my machine.
I explicitely deleted libudev-dev,x11proto-gl-dev and x11proto-xf86dri-dev.
Then "apt-get build-dep xorg" (which I think is the same as "apt-get
build-dep xserver
Hi,
Op Sat 25 Dec 2010 om 09:38:19 +0200 schreef Avi Rozen:
> On 12/25/2010 08:21 AM, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > Andres Mejia wrote:
> >
> >> this package should be orphaned.
> >
> >
> > Is Avi Rozen no longer interested in working on the noip2 Debian package?
>
> Not really.
> > If so, it shou
61 matches
Mail list logo
