On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 20:13:53 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Julien Cristau dixit: > > >> Unlike reverting patch 0013, this should work even when compiling > > >Do you plan on NMUing with this patch? > > I still think this is wrong, and the other patch must be reverted > instead, even if this may fix Ivan’s symptoms. I also believe that > this bug is the cause of mksh, built with dietlibc on sparc, seg- > faulting. If reverting this fixes Ivan’s problem, I think that’s > the way to go instead (and reopen the bug on libowfat, and fix it > there). > Your objections seem to not be based on reality. The gcc -mcpu=v9 option (which, aiui, triggers the __sparc_v9__ define) is orthogonal to -m32/-m64, it specifies the target instruction and register set, not the size of longs/pointers.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
