Bug#588418: libatlas-test: Empty package

2010-11-23 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Uploaded. Thanks for the patch! S Le mardi 23 novembre 2010 à 01:04 +, Simon McVittie a écrit : > tags 588418 + patch > thanks > > On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 at 16:01:53 +0900, Ryo IGARASHI wrote: > > Today I found that current libatlas-test package is completely empty. > > It seems that doing `ma

Bug#588418: marked as done (libatlas-test: Empty package)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 24 Nov 2010 07:32:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#588418: fixed in atlas 3.8.3-29 has caused the Debian Bug report #588418, regarding libatlas-test: Empty package to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Processed: tagging 604748, severity of 604748 is important

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604748 - squeeze lenny Bug #604748 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx] linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx: kernel stack trace errors in pppol2tp.ko Removed tag(s) squeeze and lenny. > severity 604748 important Bug #604748 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx] li

Processed: your mail

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 603551 Bug #603551 {Done: Daniel Baumann } [plymouth] update theme for squeeze > retitle 603551 add plymouth theme Bug #603551 [plymouth] update theme for squeeze Changed Bug title to 'add plymouth theme' from 'update theme for squeeze' >

Bug#604748: linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx: kernel stack trace errors in pppol2tp.ko

2010-11-23 Thread Frank L
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-ixp4xx Version: 2.6.32-27 Severity: grave Tags: upstream squeeze lenny patch Justification: renders package unusable -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: armel (armv5tel) Kernel: Linux

Bug#603551: marked as done (update theme for squeeze)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:44:09 +0100 with message-id <4cec43b9.5080...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base has caused the Debian Bug report #603551, regarding update theme for squeeze to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the pr

Bug#546528: marked as done (dash's preinst shouldn't rely on /bin/sh)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:02:51 + with message-id and subject line Bug#546528: fixed in dash 0.5.5.1-7.3 has caused the Debian Bug report #546528, regarding dash's preinst shouldn't rely on /bin/sh to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi

Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base

2010-11-23 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2010-11-23 at 21:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 11/23/2010 08:39 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > Is that really a problem? > > yes. unrelated to that, there's gonna be a plymouth-themes-debian > package anyway (for other themes, analog to syslinux-themes-debian).. Hmhm, can you el

Processed: severity of 581460 is minor

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Only affects repackaging the source package, therefore does not cause > FTBFS. Thanks to jcristau for reminding me of that > severity 581460 minor Bug #581460 [src:wml] wml: bashism in debian/rules Severity set to 'minor' from 'serious' > than

Processed: severity of 581460 is serious

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Quoting jcristeau on #debian-release: bashisms in debian/rules are arguably > rc, since dash is the default sh > severity 581460 serious Bug #581460 [src:wml] wml: bashism in debian/rules Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > thanks Sto

Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base

2010-11-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 11/23/2010 08:39 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > Is that really a problem? yes. unrelated to that, there's gonna be a plymouth-themes-debian package anyway (for other themes, analog to syslinux-themes-debian).. > On the opposite, shipping the theme in plymouth means plymouth has to be > updated

Bug#603427: probable fix for rc bug #603427

2010-11-23 Thread Jan Wagner
Dear Release Team, On Sunday, 21. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Saturday, 20. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > > i did work on a fix for rc bug #603427[1], but before uploading i would > > like to get some feedback from you, if that would be sufficient, as it > > isn't a small fix. > >

Bug#604256: marked as done (xsd: FTBFS on armel, hppa, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc)

2010-11-23 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 12:21 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:17:07 + > with message-id > and subject line Bug#604256: fixed in xsd 3.3.0.1-1 > has caused the Debian Bug report #604256, > regarding xsd: FTBFS on armel, hppa, mips, powerpc, s390 a

Bug#594150: regression in apt-transport-https interop with apt-cacher

2010-11-23 Thread Johannes Ernst
Apologies that I didn't see this question earlier: http://apt-test.aviatis.com/ has now been updated with the Apache configuration. On Nov 21, 2010, at 15:31, Simon McVittie wrote: > Johannes, how exactly are you running apt-cacher? Is it running as a CGI > or a standalone server or what? Could

Bug#582581: marked as done (bristol doesn't start when using monobristol)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:47:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#582581: fixed in monobristol 0.60.1-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #582581, regarding bristol doesn't start when using monobristol to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base

2010-11-23 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2010-11-23 at 20:33 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > On 11/23/2010 08:22 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > By the way, it would be more consistent to ship the theme inside > > desktop-base and call plymouth-set-default-theme in posinst. > > no, because then you can't use the plymouth theme w

Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base

2010-11-23 Thread Daniel Baumann
On 11/23/2010 08:22 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > By the way, it would be more consistent to ship the theme inside > desktop-base and call plymouth-set-default-theme in posinst. no, because then you can't use the plymouth theme without desktop-base, or in other words, how desktop-base is structur

Bug#603551: Including theme in desktop-base

2010-11-23 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
By the way, it would be more consistent to ship the theme inside desktop-base and call plymouth-set-default-theme in posinst. If you have a working plymouth theme, maybe I should include it directly in desktop-base? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed m

Bug#594150: regression in apt-transport-https interop with apt-cacher

2010-11-23 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2010-11-22 Simon McVittie wrote: [...] > On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 at 17:07:24 +, Neil Williams wrote: > > gnutls-cli --insecure -p 443 > > --x509certfile /etc/apt/client-certs/test-client.apt-test.aviatis.com.crt > > --x509keyfile /etc/apt/client-certs/test-client.apt-test.aviatis.com.key > > ap

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

2010-11-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 17:50 +, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > > Oops, that version was not quite completely adjusted. Please test this > > instead. > > and I have no idea why I thought that, because the first version I sent > you was correct and the second was not. *sigh* OK, neither of them w

Processed: tagging 604457

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Third time's the charm > tags 604457 + patch moreinfo Bug #604457 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k" Bug #461644 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

2010-11-23 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2010-11-23 at 18:20 +0100, Wouter D'Haeseleer wrote: > Just a small question to be sure I patched it correctly this is what I > did > > cd /usr/src > apt-get build-dep linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 > apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 > cd linux-2.6-2.6.26 > > fakeroot debian/rul

Processed: tagging 604457

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604457 - patch moreinfo Bug #604457 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k" Bug #461644 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686: Exporting

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

2010-11-23 Thread Wouter D'Haeseleer
Just a small question to be sure I patched it correctly this is what I did cd /usr/src apt-get build-dep linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 cd linux-2.6-2.6.26 fakeroot debian/rules source fakeroot debian/rules setup cd debian/build/source_i386_xen # Getti

Bug#604705: PAM configuration syntax in /etc/pam.d/pwauth is not correct

2010-11-23 Thread Samuel Byeongjun Park
Package: pwauth Version: 2.3.8-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable PAM configuration file for pwauth, /etc/pam.d/pwauth has an incorrect syntax. Correct syntax is pam_succeed_if.so [FLAG] [CONDITION] and the items in Condition, such as fields and operator shoulc be separat

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

2010-11-23 Thread Wouter D'Haeseleer
I Spoke to soon, issue still present using the patch.

Bug#600320: Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.

2010-11-23 Thread Denis Laxalde
tags 600320 unreproducible thanks On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 06:55:05 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > In such case, it's perfectly OK for you to close it (send a mail - > bugnr-d...@bugs.d.o.sorry for being pedantic if you lready knew > this). Done. > If there's another issue, either clone the bu

Bug#600320: marked as done (Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:12:01 -0500 with message-id <20101123111201.70d9e...@gmail.com> and subject line Re: Bug#600320: Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot. has caused the Debian Bug report #600320, regarding Installation: se

Processed: Re: Bug#600320: Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 600320 unreproducible Bug #600320 [installation-reports] Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot. Added tag(s) unreproducible. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#604217: axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

2010-11-23 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 16:19:58 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > clone 604217 -1 > retitle -1 axiom-tex should depends on texlive-binaries > severity -1 normal > thanks > AIUI packages are not supposed to depend on texlive-binaries but on e.g. texlive-base. cc:ing the tex maintainers s

Bug#604217: axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

2010-11-23 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
clone 604217 -1 retitle -1 axiom-tex should depends on texlive-binaries severity -1 normal thanks Hi! * Lucas Nussbaum [101121 11:00]: > > -- Purging package: FAILED > > (Reading database ... 6495 files and directories currently installed.) > > Removing axiom-tex ... > > Purging configuration

Processed: Re: Bug#604217: axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 604217 -1 Bug#604217: axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails Bug 604217 cloned as bug 604697. > retitle -1 axiom-tex should depends on texlive-binaries Bug #604697 [axiom-tex] axiom-tex: package purge (after dependencie

Processed: severity of 603680 is normal

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 603680 normal Bug #603680 [apt] libnautilus-extension1: breaks nautilus-share upgrade from lenny Severity set to 'normal' from 'serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 603680: http://bu

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

2010-11-23 Thread Wouter D'Haeseleer
Oeps, please ignore my previous post, it seems I made a mistake with the patch files. I have re-compiled the kernel. I can say that after running now almost 3 hours I don't see the error anymore. Therefore I can say this bug is resolved. When will this patch make it into the normal updates? Tha

Bug#604256: marked as done (xsd: FTBFS on armel, hppa, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:17:07 + with message-id and subject line Bug#604256: fixed in xsd 3.3.0.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #604256, regarding xsd: FTBFS on armel, hppa, mips, powerpc, s390 and sparc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

Bug#591206: License updated (flvplayer)

2010-11-23 Thread Frank Habermann
Hi, >> $ find . -name "*swf*" >> ./jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/media/img/flv_player.swf >> ./examples/media/sample.swf >> >> How important are those files? Could those be replaced or removed without >> affecting application functionality? > I found nothing about using the flv_player.swf in sources.

Bug#604208: autolog: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

2010-11-23 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:18:26 +0100 Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > I haven't checked it, but guessing that the PATH is set on purpose, > wouldn't a better (and less introsive) fix be, to add /sbin to PATH? Its postrm script is simple one, so I think it wouldn't need to specify PATH. How

Bug#604208: autolog: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

2010-11-23 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Hideki Yamane [101123 07:13]: > I fixed this bug as below and test with piuparts is fine. > Please apply it, thanks. [..] > --- autolog-0.40/debian/postrm2010-11-11 14:06:32.0 +0900 > +++ autolog-0.40/debian/postrm2010-11-23 15:09:34.0 +0900 > @@ -1,6 +1,5

Processed: Re: Bug#604604: qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0xffffffff; kvm_run returned -22

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604604 - moreinfo Bug #604604 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0x; kvm_run returned -22 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > tags 604604 + confirmed upstream patch Bug #604604 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0xff

Bug#604604: qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0xffffffff; kvm_run returned -22

2010-11-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
tags 604604 - moreinfo tags 604604 + confirmed upstream patch reassign 604604 linux-image-2.6.32-5-i686 2.6.32-27 severity 604604 normal thanks 23.11.2010 01:20, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Package: qemu-kvm > Version: 0.13.0+dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > After 0.

Bug#604457: linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686: Raid10 exporting LV to xen results in error "can't convert block across chunks or bigger than 64k"

2010-11-23 Thread Wouter D'Haeseleer
Hi Ben, Thanks for the quick response. I'm trying the patch you send me but it seems to be a huge difference from what I get using the source. This is what i did: apt-get source linux-image-2.6.26-2-xen-686 cd linux-2.6-2.6.26 fakeroot debian/rules source fakeroot debian/rules setup cd debian/bui

Bug#604212: capi4hylafax: installation fails

2010-11-23 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, I cannot reproduce it with piuparts. > >> Setting up hylafax-server (2:6.0.5-3) ... > >> invoke-rc.d: policy-rc.d denied execution of stop. > >> awk: cmd. line:1: fatal: cannot open file `/etc/mtab' for reading (No such > >> file or directory) > >> dpkg: error processing hylafax-server (--c

Bug#577062: marked as done (junior-toys: missing /etc/blends/blends.conf breaks dist-upgrade)

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 23 Nov 2010 08:47:13 + with message-id and subject line Bug#577062: fixed in debian-junior 1.20 has caused the Debian Bug report #577062, regarding junior-toys: missing /etc/blends/blends.conf breaks dist-upgrade to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#601859: wesnoth-1.9: Bad error handling in postinst script

2010-11-23 Thread Gerfried Fuchs
Hi, * PJ Weisberg [2010-11-23 06:06:37 CET]: > There was a 1.9.1-1 when I made the earlier report. I've since > upgraded to 1.9.2-1. In order to do so, I had to install > wesnoth-1.8-core. :-) Right - just stating that it won't be needed for the next upgrade because I fixed it in my codebase

Bug#604472: firmware-b43-installer but after reboot I got a black screen!

2010-11-23 Thread Alexander Kurtz
Hi, This might be a known kernel bug[1] which got fixed recently. The problem is somewhere in the b43/ssb driver, which won't get activated until you install the necessary firmware files. Could you try the latest linux kernel from experimental? I'm having this problem (black screen, machine freeze

Bug#604626: Acknowledgement (libmedc-dev and libmed-dev: error when trying to install together)

2010-11-23 Thread Ralf Treinen
This also applies to: Package: libmed-dev,libmedimport-dev Version: libmed-dev/2.3.6-4 Version: libmedimport-dev/2.3.6-4 Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by both packages (according to the Contents file for sid/amd64, which may be slightly out of sync): /usr/include/MEDimpor

Bug#603882: util-vserver: startup script breaks boot (on sparc)

2010-11-23 Thread Ivan Jager
Ok, so I started looking at the internals of dietlibc, and I noticed the data returned by getdents64 looks as I would expect, but the struct dirent64 does not match it. Apparently the way these things are being compiled it ends up with sizeof(uint64_t) = 4, so the struct fields don't line up.

Bug#604209: ident2: package purge (after dependencies removal) fails

2010-11-23 Thread Hideki Yamane
tags 604209 patch thanks Hi, I created a patch for this bug - just ignore error. Please check and apply if it's okay. --- diff -u ident2-1.07/debian/postrm ident2-1.07/debian/postrm --- ident2-1.07/debian/postrm +++ ident2

Processed: Re: Bug#604604: qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0xffffffff; kvm_run returned -22

2010-11-23 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 604604 + moreinfo Bug #604604 [qemu-kvm] qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0x; kvm_run returned -22 Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 604604: http://bugs.debia

Bug#604604: qemu-kvm: vm entry failed with error 0xffffffff; kvm_run returned -22

2010-11-23 Thread Michael Tokarev
tags 604604 + moreinfo thanks 23.11.2010 01:20, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Package: qemu-kvm > Version: 0.13.0+dfsg-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > After 0.12.5+dfsg-5 -> 0.13.0+dfsg-2 upgrade kvm doesn't start anymore. > I get an error immediately: > > $ kvm > kvm: vm

Bug#600320: Installation: set password for root; did not create a user; could not login after 1st reboot.

2010-11-23 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Denis Laxalde (dlaxa...@gmail.com): > I would then say that this bug is not reproducible and its severity In such case, it's perfectly OK for you to close it (send a mail - bugnr-d...@bugs.d.o.sorry for being pedantic if you lready knew this). > may be downgraded. The partition forma