Bug#601305: kfreebsd-8: pseudofs null ptr dereference exploit

2010-10-24 Thread Petr Salinger
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Michael Gilbert wrote: package: kfreebsd-7 version: 7.3-7 severity: serious tags: security another freebsd privilege escalation has been disclosed: http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15206/ this seems different than the recent CVE advisories. i haven't checked any of this

Bug#601306: slicer: FTBFS: Base/GUI/vtkSlicerApplication.cxx:430: error: 'class vtkKWRegistryHelper' has no member named 'SetConfigurationDirectory'

2010-10-24 Thread Philipp Kern
Source: slicer Version: 3.6.2~svn15316-1 Severity: serious > > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on biber.debian.org > > ╔══╗ > ║ slicer 3.6.2~svn15316-1 (i386) 25 Oct 2010 > 00:09

Bug#601305: kfreebsd-8: pseudofs null ptr dereference exploit

2010-10-24 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: kfreebsd-7 version: 7.3-7 severity: serious tags: security another freebsd privilege escalation has been disclosed: http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15206/ this seems different than the recent CVE advisories. i haven't checked any of this, but they claim 7.0-7.2 are affected and don't

Processed: Re: Bug#600820: postgresql-common (version 111): init script returns exit code 1 when stopping non-existent/vanished cluster resource

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 600820 normal Bug #600820 [postgresql-common] postgresql-common (version 111): init script returns exit code 1 when stopping non-existent/vanished cluster resource Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > tag 600820 moreinfo Bug #600820

Bug#600820: postgresql-common (version 111): init script returns exit code 1 when stopping non-existent/vanished cluster resource

2010-10-24 Thread Martin Pitt
severity 600820 normal tag 600820 moreinfo thanks Hello Oliver, Oliver Schade [2010-10-20 12:59 +0200]: > Severity: grave Downgrading. This clearly doesn't break stuff for everyone, it's merely a corner case. > When attempting to stop a non-existent or vanished cluster resource > (like unmounte

Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-10-24 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 21:01:34 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > > Dear Marcus; > > I have been trying to follow up on a Debian Bug in your package: > > http://bugs.debian.org/591974 Oops, I forgot to ask, would it be reasonable to just disable swfuploader in MojoMojo? Sorry to bother you again,

Bug#594860: marked as done (hmmer: FTBFS (powerpc): altivec and cast errors)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:02:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#594860: fixed in hmmer 3.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #594860, regarding hmmer: FTBFS (powerpc): altivec and cast errors to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#591974: use of swfuploader in Mojo

2010-10-24 Thread David Bremner
Dear Marcus; I have been trying to follow up on a Debian Bug in your package: http://bugs.debian.org/591974 Can you tell me the source for the files in root/static/flash ? I have the impression they are related to http://code.google.com/p/swfupload/ but I would like to confirm. All t

Bug#601302: apiextractor: FTBFS: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file

2010-10-24 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: apiextractor Version: 0.8.1-1 Severity: serious Hi, apiextractor FTBFS on armel, sparc, mips, mipsel, sparc64 and sh4. from armel build log: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=apiextractor;ver=0.8.1-1;arch=armel;stamp=1287940197 - dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols app

Bug#601301: goffice: FTBFS: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file

2010-10-24 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Source: goffice Version: 0.8.11-2 Severity: serious Hi, goffice FTBFS on armel, hppa, mips, mipsel, armhf and sh4. from armel build log: https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=goffice;ver=0.8.11-2;arch=armel;stamp=1287251054 - env -u DH_OPTIONS dh_makeshlibs -s -plibgoffice-0.8-8 -V 'lib

Bug#601297: libcairo-ocaml-dev: Cannot compile programs due to outdated cairo-ocaml-dev

2010-10-24 Thread Chris King
Package: libcairo-ocaml-dev Version: 20090223-3+b2 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I cannot compile any programs which use libcairo-ocaml, due to the following error: Error on dynamically loaded library: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlcairo.so: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllml

Bug#601133: marked as done (Debian Ada policy violation: uintp.ali changed between 4.4.4-5 and 4.4.5-2)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:02:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601133: fixed in gnat-4.4 4.4.5-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #601133, regarding Debian Ada policy violation: uintp.ali changed between 4.4.4-5 and 4.4.5-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#594860: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#594860: Bug#594860: Workaround for #594860

2010-10-24 Thread Steffen Möller
Hi Gregor, have many thanks! I'll upload later tonight. Best, Steffen On 10/25/2010 12:25 AM, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:30:57 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Configuring the package with --enable-dummy works on powerpc (tested on pescetti.debian.org). >> On

Bug#594860: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#594860: Workaround for #594860

2010-10-24 Thread gregor herrmann
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:30:57 -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > >> Configuring the package with --enable-dummy works on powerpc (tested > >> on pescetti.debian.org). > On alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and sparc, the dummy > implementation is already automatically selected (can be

Bug#600015: marked as done (gextractwinicons: Fails to extract resources)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:56:47 +0200 with message-id <20101024215647.ga2...@belanna.comodo.priv.at> and subject line Manually closing has caused the Debian Bug report #600015, regarding gextractwinicons: Fails to extract resources to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#552183: Debian bug #552183: Should rcalc be removed?

2010-10-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 14:53:44 +0100, Tim Retout wrote: > tag 552183 sid > thanks > > Hi Sam, > > The reasons Simon outlined 12 months ago still stand, I believe. Since > then, rcalc was removed from testing. > > Could you reply and let us know what you think about removing rcalc from > unst

Bug#601173: marked as done ([qantenna] Needs package necpp in order to work)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 20:32:31 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601173: fixed in qantenna 0.2.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #601173, regarding [qantenna] Needs package necpp in order to work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Processed: Re: Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Setting user to debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org (was jw...@debian.org). > usertags 601259 + python2.5-removal Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: python

Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

2010-10-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
user debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org usertags 601259 + python2.5-removal severity 601259 important tags 601259 - pending thanks * Luke Faraone , 2010-10-24, 13:55: When attempting to build this package with pyversions of 2.6-, the package FTBFS because it expects there to be a "build/lib" direct

Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

2010-10-24 Thread Luke Faraone
On 10/24/2010 03:22 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote: > * Luke Faraone , 2010-10-24, 13:55: >> When attempting to build this package with pyversions of 2.6-, the >> package FTBFS because it expects there to be a "build/lib" directory. >> Versions of Python after 2.5.x do not create this directory. > > AFAIK

Bug#593652: grub-common: grub-probe still segfaults with 1.98+20100804-6

2010-10-24 Thread Vincent Danjean
Hi, 1.98+20100804-6 still suffer from this bug and the changelog of 1.98+20100804-7 does not show that the patch attached to this bug has been applied. Is there any reason ? Regards, Vincent On 10/10/2010 14:29, Vincent Danjean wrote: > tags 593652 +patch > thanks > > On 10/10/2010 13

Bug#588818: marked as done (sbuild: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive missing when using the aptitude resolver)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:32:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#588818: fixed in sbuild 0.60.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #588818, regarding sbuild: DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive missing when using the aptitude resolver to be marked as done. This means that you c

Bug#598305: teamspeak-server: diff for NMU version 2.0.24.1+debian-1.1

2010-10-24 Thread tony mancill
Dear maintainer, I've sponsored an NMU for teamspeak-server (2.0.24.1+debian-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer or remove it from the queue. Regards, tony mancill diff -u teamspeak-server-2.0.24.1+debian/debian/teamspeak-server.wrapper

Bug#584695: debootstrap: Failure while configuring required packages

2010-10-24 Thread Thorsten Glaser
I can indeed confirm that just adding the dependency to the util-linux binary package fixes this very error. (I can’t recompile util-linux on m68k at the moment, due to a gcc bug, so I had to hack the binary pak- kage to make cowbuilder work.) HTH & HAND, //mirabilos -- FWIW, I'm quite impressed

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Sun Oct 24 19:03:46 UTC 2010 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: mpich2 > tags 577638 + pending Bug #577638 {Done: Lucas Nussbaum } [mpich2] mpic

Bug#601186: #601186 - horde3: only shows php deprecations and a warning - no actual operational parts

2010-10-24 Thread Phil Reynolds
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:05:32PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote: > Hi, > > there are two ways of handling this. > > Either you set > $conf['debug_level'] = E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE & ~E_DEPRECATED; > in /etc/horde/horde3/conf.php, which will disable all Deprecation > warnings (warnings meant for developers

Processed: owner 601264, owner 601259, tagging 601259

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > owner 601264 ! Bug #601264 [python-keyczar] 0001-workaround-deprecated-interface causes the package to require PyCrypto >=2.1.0 Owner recorded as Luke Faraone . > owner 601259 ! Bug #601259 [python-keyczar] FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6 O

Processed: your mail

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 601259 + pending Bug #601259 [python-keyczar] FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 601259: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu

Bug#598305: teamspeak-server: diff for NMU version 2.0.24.1+debian-1.1

2010-10-24 Thread Etienne Millon
After a discussion with Jari, I updated the version at mentors.d.n : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/non-free/t/teamspeak-server/teamspeak-server_2.0.24.1+debian-1.1.dsc -- Etienne Millon diff -u teamspeak-server-2.0.24.1+debian/debian/changelog teamspeak-server-2.0.24.1+debian/debian/chan

Bug#601239: marked as done (grub-pc: 1.98+20100804-6 has problems with separate /boot partition)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:02:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601087: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100804-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #601087, regarding grub-pc: 1.98+20100804-6 has problems with separate /boot partition to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#601090: marked as done (grub-pc: grub-update generates wrong grub.cfg when /boot/ is on a separate partition)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:02:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601087: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100804-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #601087, regarding grub-pc: grub-update generates wrong grub.cfg when /boot/ is on a separate partition to be marked as done. This means

Bug#601087: marked as done (grub-pc: update-grub generates wrong grub.cfg file when /boot is a separate partition)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:02:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601087: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100804-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #601087, regarding grub-pc: update-grub generates wrong grub.cfg file when /boot is a separate partition to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#601084: marked as done (grub-pc: wrong path in generated grub.cfg)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:02:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#601087: fixed in grub2 1.98+20100804-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #601087, regarding grub-pc: wrong path in generated grub.cfg to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been de

Bug#598288: ember: diff for NMU version 0.5.7-1.1

2010-10-24 Thread Etienne Millon
tags 598288 + pending thanks Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for ember (versioned as 0.5.7-1.1) and uploaded it to mentors.d.n at the following address : http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/e/ember/ember_0.5.7-1.1.dsc Regards. -- Etienne Millon diff -u ember-0.5.7/debian/changelo

Processed: ember: diff for NMU version 0.5.7-1.1

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 598288 + pending Bug #598288 [ember] ember: CVE-2010-3355: insecure library loading Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 598288: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b

Bug#601259: FTBFS if only built with Python >=2.6

2010-10-24 Thread Luke Faraone
Package: python-keyczar Version: 0.6~b.061709-2 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) When attempting to build this package with pyversions of 2.6-, the package FTBFS because it expects there to be a "build/lib" directory. Versions of Pyt

Processed: your mail

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forcemerge 601087 601084 601239 Bug#601087: grub-pc: update-grub generates wrong grub.cfg file when /boot is a separate partition Bug#601084: grub-pc: wrong path in generated grub.cfg Bug#601239: grub-pc: 1.98+20100804-6 has problems with separat

Processed: limit source to tangerine, tagging 598302

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > #tangerine (0.3.2.2-6~1.gbp7c5366) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > # > # * [7c5366d] Fix security issue CVE-2010-3381 (insecure library > #loading) (Closes: 598302) - thanks to Etienne Millon > # > # > limit source tangerine Limiting to bugs wi

Bug#600578: More descriptions about this problem

2010-10-24 Thread Hans-Georg Bork
Hi, more reports about this problem can be seen within bug #601084 Regards -- hgb -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#552183: Debian bug #552183: Should rcalc be removed?

2010-10-24 Thread Tim Retout
tag 552183 sid thanks Hi Sam, The reasons Simon outlined 12 months ago still stand, I believe. Since then, rcalc was removed from testing. Could you reply and let us know what you think about removing rcalc from unstable? Regards, -- Tim Retout signature.asc Description: This is a digital

Processed: Re: Debian bug #552183: Should rcalc be removed?

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 552183 sid Bug #552183 [rcalc] Should rcalc be removed? Added tag(s) sid. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 552183: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552183 Debian Bug Tracking Sys

Bug#601225: marked as done (i915: Screen not refreshed with "GTT full, but LRU list empty" error)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:35:05 +0200 with message-id <20101024133505.gt2...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#601225: i915: Screen not refreshed with "GTT full, but LRU list empty" error has caused the Debian Bug report #601225, regarding i915: Screen not refreshed with "GTT full,

Bug#601225: i915: Screen not refreshed with "GTT full, but LRU list empty" error

2010-10-24 Thread Francesc Altisent
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel Version: 2:2.12.0+shadow-2 Severity: grave File: i915 Justification: renders package unusable i915 corrupts screen randomly by filling the dmesg log with the following error [ 2025.202526] [drm:i915_gem_object_bind_to_gtt] *ERROR* GTT full, but LRU list empty [ 2

Processed: Re: Bug#601209: libdspam7-drv-db4: empty binary package

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 601209 + pending Bug #601209 [libdspam7-drv-db4] libdspam7-drv-db4: empty binary package Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 601209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Bug#601209: libdspam7-drv-db4: empty binary package

2010-10-24 Thread Julien Valroff
tags 601209 + pending thanks Hi Luca, Le dimanche 24 oct. 2010 à 13:37:20 (+0200), Luca Falavigna a écrit : > Package: libdspam7-drv-db4 > Version: 3.6.8-9.3 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: empty-package > > > libdspam7-drv-db4_3.6.8-9.3 appears empty. This

Bug#601220: noip2: abuse of debconf

2010-10-24 Thread Jakub Wilk
Package: noip2 Version: 2.1.9-3 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 10.7 The only place noip2 store configuration data (apart from the debconf cache) is a binary blob in /var/lib/noip2/. This file will be happily overwritten on each upgrade using *only* values supplied by debconf. -- Jaku

Processed: your mail

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 588418 serious Bug #588418 [libatlas-test] libatlas-test: Empty package Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > severity 595396 serious Bug #595396 [libslepc3.0.0] libslepc3.0.0: empty package Severity set to 'serious' from 'importa

Bug#601211: mono-winforms-a11y: empty binary package

2010-10-24 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: mono-winforms-a11y Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: empty-package mono-winforms-a11y_1.0-2 appears empty. $ dpkg -c /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/m/mono-uia-winforms/mono-winforms-a11y_1.0-2_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 20

Bug#601210: libmono-windowsbase-cil-dev: empty binary package

2010-10-24 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: libmono-windowsbase-cil-dev Version: 1.0-2 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: empty-package libmono-windowsbase-cil-dev_1.0-2 appears empty. $ dpkg -c /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/m/mono-uia/libmono-windowsbase-cil-dev_1.0-2_all.deb drwxr-xr-x root

Bug#601209: libdspam7-drv-db4: empty binary package

2010-10-24 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: libdspam7-drv-db4 Version: 3.6.8-9.3 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: empty-package libdspam7-drv-db4_3.6.8-9.3 appears empty. $ dpkg -c /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/d/dspam/libdspam7-drv-db4_3.6.8-9.3_amd64.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 200

Bug#601208: fenics: empty binary package

2010-10-24 Thread Luca Falavigna
Package: fenics Version: 10.09-1 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: empty-package fenics_10.09-1 appears empty. $ dpkg -c /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/f/fenics/fenics_10.09-1_amd64.deb drwxr-xr-x root/root 0 2010-09-14 07:46 ./ drwxr-xr-x root/root

Bug#585142: twisted: Leaves dropin.cache lying around in python2.4/site-packages

2010-10-24 Thread Stefano Rivera
Hi Matthias (2010.07.26_14:00:42_+0200) >> 10.0.0 had them, 10.1.0 doesn't. > 10.0.0 was wrong. The dropin.cache files are in the symlink farm in 10.1.0-3. > For now, please re-install python-twisted-core 10.1.0-2, which should > remove the cache file. I know, not a perfect solution. Just re-te

Bug#577661: Status of DSPAM in Debian

2010-10-24 Thread Julien Valroff
Hi Thomas, Le dimanche 24 oct. 2010 à 12:58:58 (+0800), Thomas Goirand a écrit : > Hi, > > I've seen this: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577661 > > and I'm very surprised that, after such a discussion in last April, > there wasn't any new package for DSPAM in Debian. > >

Bug#601202: Fail to upgrade from lenny to squeeze

2010-10-24 Thread Roberto Ferrero
Sorry, I wrote: # aptitude safe-upgrade instead of, # aptitude dist-upgrade with dist-upgrade it upgrades smoothly. I'm sorry, Roberto.

Bug#601184: linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-amd64: Possible privilege escalation bug

2010-10-24 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:10:33AM +0100, Philip Ashmore wrote: > Package: linux-2.6 > Version: 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1 > Severity: critical > Tags: security > Justification: root security hole > > I'm not sure if I should include the steps to reproduxe here in case it's > visible to the > g

Bug#586540: kdm on initial start at kfreebsd bootup does not allow keyboard input

2010-10-24 Thread Modestas Vainius
Hello, On sekmadienis 24 Spalis 2010 13:15:29 Robert Millan wrote: > This suggests HAVE_VTS macro is not being set. Maybe this helps? > > --- kdm/backend/greet.h~2008-01-04 23:55:44.0 + > +++ kdm/backend/greet.h 2010-10-24 10:13:45.0 + > @@ -53,10 +53,8 @@ > # de

Bug#599523: [update-manager-gnome] wants to downgrade packages without any notice

2010-10-24 Thread Evgeni Golov
Hi, On 10/21/2010 11:25 PM, Zoran Dželajlija wrote: >> Candidate is 7.7.1-4, NOT your wanted 7.8.2-2. > > Indeed, but a downgrade must not be attempted at priority 700 or even 990. > The relevant passage from apt_preferences(5) seem to be: I know that part of apt_preferences(5) and your assumti

Bug#586540: kdm on initial start at kfreebsd bootup does not allow keyboard input

2010-10-24 Thread Robert Millan
2010/10/23, Modestas Vainius : > The bug we are facing here is that kdm starts on vt2 when it's not supposed > to > even bother with VTs below 7. ServerVTs=-7 setting in /etc/kde4/kdm/kdmrc > takes care of it (on Linux). However, apparently ServerVTs does not work on > kfbsd for some reason (nor it

Processed: Re: grub-pc: update-grub generates wrong grub.cfg file when /boot is a separate partition

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 601087 pending Bug #601087 [grub-pc] grub-pc: update-grub generates wrong grub.cfg file when /boot is a separate partition Bug #601090 [grub-pc] grub-pc: grub-update generates wrong grub.cfg when /boot/ is on a separate partition Added tag(

Bug#601087: grub-pc: update-grub generates wrong grub.cfg file when /boot is a separate partition

2010-10-24 Thread Robert Millan
tags 601087 pending thanks Hi, I will upload a fix this afternoon. -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#598305: teamspeak-server: NMU diff for 2.0.24.1+debian-1.1 (Intent to NMU)

2010-10-24 Thread Etienne Millon
Hello, I don't understand what your mean with your last message ; it corresponds to the former version of this package that I uploaded to mentors : http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598305#17 Regards -- Etienne Millon signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#600670: #600670 - libhpmud0 installs /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0 /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0.0.6 but sane needs /usr/lib/libhpmud.so that is in libhpmud-dev, not needed to scan

2010-10-24 Thread Evgeni Golov
tag 600670 + patch thanks On 10/24/2010 07:43 AM, Gianluigi Tiesi wrote: >> I've uploaded i386 .debs from my sid-cowbuilder at >> http://people.debian.org/~evgeni/tmp/hplip/ >> I think installing libsane-hpaio_3.10.6-1.1_i386.deb should be enough, >> but I have no real idea as I have no HP scanner

Processed: Re: Bug#600670: #600670 - libhpmud0 installs /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0 /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0.0.6 but sane needs /usr/lib/libhpmud.so that is in libhpmud-dev, not needed to scan

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 600670 + patch Bug #600670 [hplip] libhpmud0 installs /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0 /usr/lib/libhpmud.so.0.0.6 but sane needs /usr/lib/libhpmud.so that is in libhpmud-dev, not needed to scan Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. P

Bug#577638: marked as done (mpich2: conflict over the mpd binary)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:47:25 + with message-id and subject line Bug#577638: fixed in mpich2 1.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #577638, regarding mpich2: conflict over the mpd binary to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If t

Bug#601186: horde3: only shows php deprecations and a warning - no actual operational parts

2010-10-24 Thread Phil Reynolds
Package: horde3 Version: 3.3.8+debian0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This is a similar problem to #572265 which was in php-log, but appears to be happening again with horde3. On attempting to call up the horde3 homepage, whether my configuration or the supplied one, a

Bug#598305: teamspeak-server: NMU diff for 2.0.24.1+debian-1.1 (Intent to NMU)

2010-10-24 Thread jari . aalto
Update, according to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598305#29 lsdiff(1) of changes: teamspeak-server-2.0.24.1+debian/debian/changelog teamspeak-server-2.0.24.1+debian/debian/teamspeak-server.wrapper diffstat for teamspeak-server_2.0.24.1+debian-1 teamspeak-server_2.0.2

Bug#601184: linux-image-2.6.36-rc6-amd64: Possible privilege escalation bug

2010-10-24 Thread Philip Ashmore
Package: linux-2.6 Version: 2.6.36~rc6-1~experimental.1 Severity: critical Tags: security Justification: root security hole I'm not sure if I should include the steps to reproduxe here in case it's visible to the general population. Could someone email me directly so I can provide the details.

Bug#600530: marked as done (madplay needs rebuild, currently uninstallable due to dependency)

2010-10-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:31:34 +0200 with message-id <4cc3e0d6.7070...@climbing.nl> and subject line Re: Bug#600530: #600530 - madplay needs rebuild, currently uninstallable due to dependency has caused the Debian Bug report #600530, regarding madplay needs rebuild, currently uninsta