Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:47:41 +
with message-id <61c4be8ac2a12f81f98d8954f0857...@imap.dd24.net>
and subject line fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #598432,
regarding python-apt: upgrade fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:46:50 +0200
with message-id <20100930064650.ga8...@vernstok.nl>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #577880,
regarding samba4: FTBFS: configure: error: Unable to find external LIBLDB
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 598432 0.7.98.1
Bug #598432 [python-apt] python-apt: upgrade fails
Bug Marked as fixed in versions python-apt/0.7.98.1.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "
On 29 September 2010 22:01, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:07 +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Would a secure change omit the former LD_LIBRARY_PATH? That is, would
> it fix this in runSalome to say:
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${prefix}/lib:${libdir}:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
>
Hello,
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:07 +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Package: salome
> Version: 5.1.3-9
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> User: t...@security.debian.org
> Usertags: ldpath
>
> Hello,
>
> During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
> contain a script that c
Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 02:48:33 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#596453: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.32-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #596453,
regarding gdm crashes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:57:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#534982: fixed in squid 2.7.STABLE3-4.1lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #534982,
regarding squid - DoS in external auth header parser
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:56:04 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#596891: fixed in samba 2:3.2.5-4lenny13
has caused the Debian Bug report #596891,
regarding samba: CVE-2010-3069: buffer overrun vulnerability Available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
severity 595613 whishlist
thanks
Le Wed, iSep 29, 2010 at 04:47:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau a écrit :
> reopen 595613
> kthxbye
>
> jcris...@franck:~$ dpkg -I
> /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/ftp/pool/main/e/emboss/emboss-lib_6.3.1-6_amd64.deb
> shlibs
> libnucleus 6 emboss-lib
> libensembl 6 emboss
On 28 September 2010 16:15, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>
>> The vulnerability is introduced by an insecure change to
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH, an environment variable used by ld.so(8) to look for
>> libraries on a directory other than the standard paths.
> OK. I will fix that asap (today or tomorrow)
> To y
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 566072 +patch
Bug #566072 [util-linux] fsck now failing hard for unavailable filesystems
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
566072: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
tags 566072 +patch
thanks
Hi,
According to the v2.17-ReleaseNotes, this is a feature, and the recommended
way of dealing with potentially nonexistent filesystems is to use the nofail
option.
related commit:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=utils/util-linux-ng/util-linux-ng.git;a=commitdiff;h=1bb516c34bf
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:02:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#591995: fixed in babiloo 2.0.11-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #591995,
regarding babiloo: insecure downloading and unpacking of dictionary files
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Hello,
I attempted a succesfull build of `wordnet' in abel (armel) porterbox.
Could you please give back `wordnet' in armel?
Attached build.log
Best regards,
-- Hector Oron
dpkg-buildpackage: export CFLAGS from dpkg-buildflags (origin: vendor): -g -O2
dpkg-buildpackage: export CPPFLAGS
Hi!
The error that the user is seeing is this:
http://people.debian.org/~naoliv/misc/597158.png
It happens when libvirt-bin is not installed, indeed, but virt-manager should
fail more gracefully if no local connection is available.
Since it can be used to manage remote machines, there is no need
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:58:10PM +0900, Jun Kaneko wrote:
> Dominic,
>
> Sorry to keep you waiting,
> I'm talking with the author again.
> Please wait for a while for the response.
Hi,
Okay, I will upload to non-free in one week if as solution isn't
available then.
Cheers,
Dominic.
--
Domini
"Moritz Muehlenhoff" wrote:
>On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:14:34AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> In unstable Moritz wanted to file some general removal requests...
>> python-clamav: python-clamav
>
>The status is unclear to me, should we go ahead with removal?
>
There's a diff for a maintainer ch
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:14:34AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> In unstable Moritz wanted to file some general removal requests, but
> currently it's this list:
>
> # Broken Depends:
> c-icap: c-icap
We should keep this for now, Jochen wrote that it will be rewritten
to no longer use libclamav.
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:21 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 25/09/10 19:04, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >> 2) "balsa depends on libesmtp5 (<=0.8.8) BUT libesmtp5 does not appear to
> >> be available (no install package)"
> >
> > This does not seem to have been reported, so I'm reassigning thi
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:59:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#535159: fixed in ser2net 2.5-1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #535159,
regarding ser2net: fix use after in control port handling
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Il 29/09/2010 19:51, Piotr Ozarowski ha scritto:
> Luca: If python-apt maintainers will decide to use my patch, please
> fast-process it in NEW if possible (it's part of the python3 in Squeeze
> goal we talked about before, TIA)
I've processed it just now.
--
.''`.
: :' : Luca Falavigna
On ons, 2010-09-29 at 18:46 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Lars,
>
> On Monday, 3. May 2010, Lars Volker wrote:
> > I've uploaded the new packages to m-d-n and I'd be glad, if one of you
> > could have a look at them. Especially I'm looking forward to hear from
> > Peter again.
>
> even if it woul
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:09:14PM +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Piotr Ozarowski, 2010-09-29]
> > attached
>
> here's a version of the patch that also uses dh_python2 (so that
> python-central is not needed anymore)
Many thanks for that patch! I commited it to bzr and uploaded a new
version :)
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 18:19:02 +0200, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-07-25 at 15:08 +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
>
> > Can you provide me with a backtrace (using gdb, with the "bt full" command)
> > when it does crash?
>
> I will not be able to do so until september when I have physical a
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:22:56PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 19:51 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> > tags 598432 + patch
> > thanks
> >
> > [Piotr Ożarowski, 2010-09-29]
> > > I'll try to send you a patch this evening
> >
> > attached
> >
> > Luca: If python-apt ma
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 598528 important
Bug #598528 [xserver-xorg-video-intel] unstable on GNU/kFreeBSD
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598528: http://bugs.debian.org/cg
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:22:22 +0200
with message-id <877hi49zq9@turtle.gmx.de>
and subject line emacs22-non-dfsg removed from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #596052,
regarding emacs22-non-dfsg: Should not be in Squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 19:51 +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> tags 598432 + patch
> thanks
>
> [Piotr Ożarowski, 2010-09-29]
> > I'll try to send you a patch this evening
>
> attached
>
> Luca: If python-apt maintainers will decide to use my patch, please
> fast-process it in NEW if possible (it's
[Piotr Ozarowski, 2010-09-29]
> attached
here's a version of the patch that also uses dh_python2 (so that
python-central is not needed anymore)
diff -Nru python-apt-0.7.98/debian/changelog python-apt-0.7.98+nmu1/debian/changelog
--- python-apt-0.7.98/debian/changelog 2010-09-28 15:47:51.0
Package: xserver-xorg-video-intel
Version: 2:2.9.1-4
Severity: grave
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: kfreebsd
This driver behaves unreliably on GNU/kFreeBSD. After a while of running it
(usually 1 or 2 h) screen stops updating (I didn't determine whether X
crashed, but disk and networ
Hi Andris,
2010/9/29 Andris Kalnozols :
> the "apt-get autoremove" command now considers the running
> kernel and other essential packages as removable:
Thanks for your detailed bugreport!
Its true that apt 0.8.5 wants to remove packages which should
be protected by the APT::NeverAutoRemove sett
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 598432 + patch
Bug #598432 [python-apt] python-apt: upgrade fails
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598432
Debian Bug
tags 598432 + patch
thanks
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2010-09-29]
> I'll try to send you a patch this evening
attached
Luca: If python-apt maintainers will decide to use my patch, please
fast-process it in NEW if possible (it's part of the python3 in Squeeze
goal we talked about before, TIA)
diff -Nru py
Hi Lars,
On Monday, 3. May 2010, Lars Volker wrote:
> I've uploaded the new packages to m-d-n and I'd be glad, if one of you
> could have a look at them. Especially I'm looking forward to hear from
> Peter again.
even if it would be too late for squeeze, is there any progress on the
packaging? I
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:19:28 +0200
with message-id <20100929161928.gb13...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: bzip2 1.0.6 still needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #597540,
regarding [SECURITY] [DSA-2112-1] CVE-2010-0405 integer overflow
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:19:28 +0200
with message-id <20100929161928.gb13...@inutil.org>
and subject line Re: bzip2 1.0.6 still needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #597540,
regarding bzip2: is recommended to be updated immediately to 1.0.6
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Roland Mas writes:
> Indeed. My previous fix to bug #596929 was wrong. I have committed a
> new one that should work. I can't do the upload right now (and I want
> to fix some other bugs in the next upload), but a temporary workaround
Thanks a lot, the workaround indeed equipped me with an wor
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.7.98
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dpkg: error processing python-apt (--purge):
Package is in a very bad inconsistent state - you should
reinstall it before attempting a removal.
configured to not write apport reports
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 18:25:03 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 21:48:49 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
> > please check this at least on sparc, maybe asking the sparc port
> > maintainers for assistance? that was the platform with most of the
> > troubles.
> >
> I have
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:02:23 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#590810: fixed in xmpi 2.2.3b8-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #590810,
regarding xmpi: Maintainer address seems to bounce
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 595728 1.5.6.5
Bug #595728 [git-core] git-core: permissions of templates too restrictive
Bug #595965 [git-core] git-core: users can not read some files in template dir
Bug #596066 [git-core] wrong mods for files in /usr/share/git-core/tem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 595613
Bug #595613 {Done: Charles Plessy } [emboss-lib] emboss-lib:
improper shared library packaging
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
> kthxbye
reopen 595613
kthxbye
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 06:18:07 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the emboss-lib package:
>
> #595613: emboss-lib: improper shared library packaging
>
> It has been closed by Ch
Hi Moritz,
I'll check.
Greetings,
Raphael
2010/8/31 Moritz Muehlenhoff :
> Package: bugzilla
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Four security issues are unfixed in the version
> currently in squeeze/sid:
> http://www.bugzilla.org/security/3.2.7/
>
> At lea
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:33:49 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598387: fixed in dtc-xen 0.5.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #598387,
regarding dtc-xen statslogger breaks and dtc-xen leaks memory after a xm
start/stop
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Am Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:36:28 +0200
schrieb Julian Andres Klode :
> On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 15:12 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> > [CCed debian-python]
> >
> > AFAIK, /usr/lib/python3 is the new location.
> >
> > Dear debian-python subscribers, could someone please propose a fix for
> > python-
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 15:25:23 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Package: bugzilla
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
> Justification: user security hole
>
> Four security issues are unfixed in the version
> currently in squeeze/sid:
> http://www.bugzilla.org/security/3.2.7/
>
> At least CBE-
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 597995 + sid
Bug #597995 [balsa] balsa: uninstallable due to old libesmtp5
Added tag(s) sid.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
597995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597995
Deb
Source: libktorrent
Version: 1.0.3-1
Severity: serious
> sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.60.0 (23 Feb 2010) on biber.debian.org
>
> ╔══╗
> ║ libktorrent 1.0.3-1 (i386) 28 Sep 2010
> 22:16 ║
> ╚══
erpc-9A9nz1/linux-2.6-2.6.36~rc5'
> make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>
> Build finished at 20100929-0417
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage die
On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 15:12 +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> [CCed debian-python]
>
> On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Stefan Fleischmann wrote:
> > Just to clarify, the "quick fix" I posted here was supposed to help people
> > to
> > get rid of the buggy package. It doesn't fix the actual pac
[Julian Andres Klode, 2010-09-29]
> Dear debian-python subscribers, could someone please propose a fix for
> python-apt? I do not intent to drop Python 3 support, but considering
> that there is a new RC bug each month because python3 packaging changes
> I start to wonder whether this is worth the
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:32:10 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598285: fixed in bristol 0.60.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #598285,
regarding bristol: CVE-2010-3351: insecure library loading
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
[CCed debian-python]
On Mi, 2010-09-29 at 14:31 +0200, Stefan Fleischmann wrote:
> Just to clarify, the "quick fix" I posted here was supposed to help people to
> get rid of the buggy package. It doesn't fix the actual package.
>
> Like I said before, the problem is not only the version number ha
Phillip,
There is a new upstream release. If I do the upgrade can you try it
out on powerpc?
Nicholas
<>
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
> severity 598492 important
Bug #598492 [linux-2.6] linux-image-2.6.35-trunk-amd64: suspend/hibernate is
totally fucked up
Severity set to 'important' from 'grave'
>
End
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.7.98
Severity: normal
Hi
For additional information I also recieve this problem.
Ben
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CP
Just to clarify, the "quick fix" I posted here was supposed to help people to
get rid of the buggy package. It doesn't fix the actual package.
Like I said before, the problem is not only the version number handling by
pycentral but also the path of the installed files! If you have look at the
pack
Hello,
case "$suite" in
sid_amd64) cat <
main()
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 2328, in main
rv = action.run(global_options)
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1481, in run
pkg.read_version_info()
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 899, in read_version_info
self.version_info = p
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.35-1~experimental.3
Severity: grave
With the 2.6.35 kernel, suspend and hibernation result is various kind
of issues on a random basis at "exit" time, meaning that sometimes the
suspend/hibernation doesn't put the machine to sleep, but instead I've
gotten:
- 100%
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:21:21 +0200
with message-id <20100929122121.ga32...@bogon.sigxcpu.org>
and subject line Closing since no feedback
has caused the Debian Bug report #597158,
regarding libvirtd is not starting and virt-manager is unusable
to be marked as done.
This means that y
On 2010-09-12 12:22 +0200, Kel Modderman wrote:
> On Saturday 04 September 2010 06:39:49 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Package: insserv
>> Version: 1.14.0-2
>> Severity: critical
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> during boot /etc/rcS.d/S13checkfs.sh starts a filesystem check (hasn't
>> been checked for 197 days)
> Hi!
>
> I encountered this bug, too.
>
>>How does changing /etc/init.d/rc with the below patch modify behaviour?
> No, Kel, nothing changed. Sorry.
When I observed boot after modifying the signal trap, CTRL-C did not truncate
startpar's execution of boot scripts in runlevel S. I wonder why you
c
python-central doesn't support Python 3, please use dh_python3
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl www.griffith.cc www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
We manage the server that was making the requests. I'm happy to provide
any configuration details, logs, etc, that may be required.
The version of apt-cacher-ng in question is 0.4-1 (originally from
testing), which was built and installed on a Lenny system. I see that
0.5.1-2 is now available in
I also faced the same problem as Cameron after modifying
/usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py to allow single digit version
numbers with this patch:
--- /usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py.orig2010-09-29
12:10:27.0 +0200
+++ /usr/share/pycentral-data/pyversions.py 2010-
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:29:17 +0200
with message-id <201009291229.18322.did...@raboud.com>
and subject line #585477 is not RC as it is ~bpo
has caused the Debian Bug report #585477,
regarding mysql-server-5.1: mysqld can't start [initgroups()] with libnss-mysql
enabled
to be marked
Package: atftpd
Version: 0.7.dfsg-9
Severity: grave
Switched server from Debian GNU/Linux to Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (both squeeze,
running
atftpd 0.7.dfsg-9, using same configuration), then atftpd stops working. Client
is stuck on "TFTP", server lists the following in daemon.log:
Sep 29 12:07:
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:17:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598285: fixed in bristol 0.60.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #598285,
regarding bristol: CVE-2010-3351: insecure library loading
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 598469 apt-cacher-ng
Bug #598469 [apt-cacher] apt-cacher: excessive connections launched at server
Bug reassigned from package 'apt-cacher' to 'apt-cacher-ng'.
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reassign 598469 apt-cacher-ng
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:14:52AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> I run ftp.uk.debian.org, and recently noticed that I was getting hourly
> spikes of connections. On investigation, it seems that a particular
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:47:09 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597977: fixed in fluidsynth 1.1.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597977,
regarding fluidsynth: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: fluid_rtkit.c: error: storage size
unknown
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
Package: apt-cacher
Severity: serious
Hi,
I run ftp.uk.debian.org, and recently noticed that I was getting hourly
spikes of connections. On investigation, it seems that a particular IP
address is launching what ammounts to a low-grade DoS, trying to get
the same files thousands of times a day, m
Same on gabrielli.d.o (mips):
| sid
|
| Get:1 http://mirrors.ece.ubc.ca sid Release.gpg [835B]
| Ign http://mirrors.ece.ubc.ca/debian/ sid/contrib Translation-de
| Ign http://mirrors.ece.ubc.ca/debian/ sid/contrib Translation-en
| Ign http://mirrors.ece.ubc.ca/debian/ sid/contrib Translation-es
|
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 597977 pending
Bug #597977 [src:fluidsynth] fluidsynth: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: fluid_rtkit.c:
error: storage size unknown
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
597977: http://bu
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.7.98
Severity: grave
Hi,
interestingly here (sid/amd64) it does not fail because of python3 or
python3.1 but because of python2.7:
Setting up python-apt (0.7.98) ...
INFO: using unknown version '/usr/bin/python2.7' (debian_defaults not
up-to-date?)
Traceback (most
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:32:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598282: fixed in ardour 1:2.8.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #598282,
regarding ardour: CVE-2010-3349: insecure library loading
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:32:18 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598282: fixed in ardour 1:2.8.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #598282,
regarding ardour-i686: CVE-2010-3349: insecure library loading
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
>> Stefan Fleischmann wrote:
>> > Change the 3rd line in the file '/usr/share/pyshared-data/python-apt' to
>> > "python-version = 2.6, 3.1, 2.5"
>
>> That doesn't work for me. [...]
>
>If I read Stefan's message further:
>> Then you're able to remove the package or replace it with version
>> 0.7.97
I doubt this upload fixed this bug. This but is not about
QTC_MODIFY_MOZILLA (which, apparently, is off by default anyway) but about
the code I've mentioned in http://bugs.debian.org/590521#10 which can't
be disabled in the compile-time.
--
WBR, wRAR (ALT Linux Team)
signature.asc
Description:
Hi Norbert,
It's been almost two months since you tagged the RC bug #577720 as "pending"
and
it seems that more changes are ready on the VCS.
Is the upload fixing this bug in the pipes towards unstable or would you like
me
(or anyone) to prepare and upload an NMU (based on the svn commit 189
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Roland Mas wrote:
> ,
> | v=0 ; invoke-rc.d postgresql restart || v=$?
> `
Ouch, sorry. My bad. Thanks Roland for spotting this.
//mirabilos
--
tarent Gesellschaft für Softwareentwicklung und IT-Beratung mbH
Geschäftsführer: Boris Esser, Elmar Geese
HRB AG Bonn 5168
Hi!
I encountered this bug, too.
>How does changing /etc/init.d/rc with the below patch modify behaviour?
No, Kel, nothing changed. Sorry.
--
Regards,
Alexander Batischev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
Package: python-libcloud
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
libcloud fails to perform ssl validation on https connections.
This means that users of this module, who which perform api requests using
https urls / connections are at risk to mitm attacks.
See http://gith
Dominic,
Sorry to keep you waiting,
I'm talking with the author again.
Please wait for a while for the response.
Jun Kaneko
jkan...@sixapart.com
On 2010/09/27, at 2:57, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 06:40:20PM +0900, Jun Kaneko wrote:
I confirmed with the plugin author
86 matches
Mail list logo
