On 29 September 2010 22:01, Adam C Powell IV <hazel...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 21:07 +0000, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Would a secure change omit the former LD_LIBRARY_PATH? That is, would
> it fix this in runSalome to say:
>
> export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${prefix}/lib:${libdir}:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
> ?
You could do that, or use the following:
export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${prefix}/lib:${libdir}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH}
(note the ${VAR:+foo} construct, which is what makes the shell only
expand to the latter part when VAR is set and non-empty. The colon
_before_ the plus sign is important.)
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
