Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#592961: fixed in dropbox 0.8.107-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #592961,
regarding dropbox: does not start after a reboot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:47:32 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#592961: fixed in dropbox 0.8.107-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #592961,
regarding dropbox: does not start after a reboot
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
isahib (21/09/2010):
> I am also experiancing the same problem after the update from
> testing with xserver-xorg-video-openchrome 1:0.2.904+svn842-1.
Hi,
does the issue indeed disappear if you go back to the previous
openchrome version? Checking whether that could be a consequence
of a collatera
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 598301 + patch
Bug #598301 [qtparted] qtparted: CVE-2010-3375: insecure library loading
Added tag(s) patch.
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598301: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
Package: gdm
Version: 2.20.11-2
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
after last update (28 september 2010) gdm crashes.
trouble maybe with "intel" driver (I did think that bug was closed?)
or xorg configuration. I include Xorg.0.log here:
X.Org X Server 1.7.7
Release Da
Julien Cristau (19/09/2010):
> There's not a whole lot of changes between the previous version and
> this one, it would be useful if you could figure out which one broke
> the driver for you.
First things first: does reverting to the previous openchrome version
actually makes X start again proper
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 598300 2.0.1-1
Bug #598300 [qtcreator] qtcreator: CVE-2010-3374: insecure library loading
Bug Marked as fixed in versions qtcreator/2.0.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598300: http://bug
Package: ust-bin
Version: 0.7-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced by
Package: vdr-dbg
Version: 1.6.0-18
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: tuxguitar
Version: 1.2-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: torcs
Version: 1.3.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced by
Package: tangerine
Version: 0.3.2.2-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introdu
Package: teamspeak-server
Version: 2.0.24.1+debian-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerabi
Package: teamspeak-client
Version: 2.0.32-3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is i
Package: tau
Version: 2.16.4-1.3
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced b
Package: qtparted
Version: 0.4.5-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: qtcreator
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduce
Package: mono-debugger
Version: 2.4.3-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is intro
Package: mn-fit
Version: 5.13-7
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced by
Package: mistelix
Version: 0.31-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: libvips-tools
Version: 7.22.2-2+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is i
Package: libroar-compat0
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is intro
Package: lastfm
Version: 1:1.5.4.26862+dfsg-4
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is
Package: ike-qtgui
Version: 2.1.5+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is intr
Package: ike
Version: 2.1.5+dfsg-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: hipo
Version: 0.6.1-2.2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced b
Package: henplus
Version: 0.9.7.ds1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introdu
Package: gnome-subtitles
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is intro
Package: ember
Version: 0.5.7-1+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: cowbell
Version: 0.2.7.1-5
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduce
Package: bristol
Version: 0.60.5-1+b1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introdu
Package: bareftp
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduced
Package: ardour
Version: 1:2.8.11-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is introduce
Package: ardour-i686
Version: 1:2.8.11-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
User: t...@security.debian.org
Usertags: ldpath
Hello,
During a review of the Debian archive, I've found your package to
contain a script that can be abused by an attacker to execute arbitrary
code.
The vulnerability is intr
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:17:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#593079: fixed in libstomp-ruby 1.0.4-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #593079,
regarding libstomp-ruby1.9.1: load error with ruby 1.9.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:47:15 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597368: fixed in schroot 1.4.13-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #597368,
regarding schroot: session handling broken with plain chroots (breaks sbuild)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 598274 0.9.5-1
Bug #598274 [icedove-bidiui] icedove-bidiui: Does not support icedove 3.x
(newer version avaialble)
Bug Marked as fixed in versions bidiui/0.9.5-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: icedove-bidiui
Version: 0.7.3-3
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream
Justification: renders package unusable
icedove-bidiui 0.7.3 doesn't support icedove 3.x
For that reason, there is no point to release it as part of Squeeze.
Two options:
1. Remove icedove-bidiui 0.7.3 from testing.
2. Let ic
Guillem Jover, el 15 de septiembre a las 12:20 me escribiste:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 21:40:43 -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote:
> > Package: glob2
> > Version: 0.9.4.4-2+b1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> I think this and the other segfault bugs shou
Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 14:50 -0700 schrieb Chris Taylor:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:58:16 +0200
> Hein-Pieter van Braam wrote:
>
> > I will perform a code audit of the audacious package and send a diff
> > for the debian/copyright as soon as I'm finished. Should be somewhere
> > this week.
>
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:58:16 +0200
Hein-Pieter van Braam wrote:
> I will perform a code audit of the audacious package and send a diff
> for the debian/copyright as soon as I'm finished. Should be somewhere
> this week.
>
>
>
I will also go through the code tonight, and will try fix up
debia
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:17:07 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#579483: fixed in acct 6.5.4-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #579483,
regarding couldn't open file '/var/account/pacct': No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 597932
> https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/016570.html
Bug #597932 [openocd] openocd FTBFS on armel and hurd
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/20
forwarded 597932
https://lists.berlios.de/pipermail/openocd-development/2010-September/016570.html
thanks
Tormod Volden scrisse:
> I can not talk for the maintainer, but I will encourage you to submit
> the patch on the upstream ML
> http://openocd.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=openocd/op
I will perform a code audit of the audacious package and send a diff
for the debian/copyright as soon as I'm finished. Should be somewhere this week.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 594519 multiple copyright problems make software non-redistributable
> as currently packaged
Bug #594519 [audacious-plugins] audacious-plugins contains (non-free) MAME
licensed code in the "psf2.so" plugin
Changed Bug title to 'multiple
retitle 594519 multiple copyright problems make software non-redistributable as
currently packaged
thanks
I encouraged the submitter to submit this bug after he raised concerns
on IRC about some of software in this package. I thought that I'd
better take a closer look at this source myself, and
On 27.09.2010 19:17, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 03:06:27 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
2.6 used 4.8. an option would be a backport of the 2.6 module
including the patches to the 2.5 package; such a patch should only
be applied after 2.6 is the default.
I tried to do this, c
Package: pacemaker
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
unable to install pacemaker, corosync or heartbeat. (sources.list configured to
use backports)
aptitude install -t lenny-backports pacemaker heartbeat
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Readi
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 596891 pending
Bug #596891 {Done: Christian Perrier } [samba] samba:
CVE-2010-3069: buffer overrun vulnerability Available
Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #596891 to the same tags previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Plea
Am 25.09.2010 10:04, schrieb Daniel Baumann:
> On 09/25/2010 09:23 AM, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> however, when pressing 'u' for actually doing the upgrade, a screen
>>> session gets started and apt-dater hangs.
>>>
>>> disabling screen didn't help, see the previous bug report.
>>>
>>
>> You don't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # (the lenny permissions problem)
> forcemerge 595728 596066
Bug#595728: git-core: permissions of templates too restrictive
Bug#596066: wrong mods for files in /usr/share/git-core/templates
Bug#595965: git-core: users can not read some files in te
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 14:59 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 27/09/10 14:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > gnome-system-tools (2.30.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> > .
> >* debian/control.in:
> > - Remove cracklib2-dev from Build-Depends, it's not used since 2003.
> >
Hi,
On 27/09/10 20:21, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> gnome-python-desktop (2.30.0-3) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* debian/patches/01_wnck_enums.patch:
> - Patch from upstream bugzilla, fix flags in the wnck module that were
>declared as enums. Closes: #597414.
Please unblo
Hi,
sorry for the long silence. The workaround suggested above:
-) login as root to a console
-) aticonfig --set-pcs-str=DDX,ForceXAA,TRUE
-) logout from X and login again (restart the X server)
solved the problem.
Thanks !
Julien
--
Dr Julien Tailleur
Department of Physics & Astronomy
Un
Hi!
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Configuring the package with --enable-dummy works on powerpc (tested
>> on pescetti.debian.org).
On alpha, armel, hppa, ia64, mips, mipsel, s390 and sparc, the dummy
implementation is already automatically selected (can be seen on the
Hi folks,
Déjà vu: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=566947
just reared its ugly head again. :-(
On 2010-09-28 03:27 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: emacs23-nox
> Version: 23.2+1-4
> Severity: serious
>
> The following partially installed packages will be configured:
>
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:18:22 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597414: fixed in gnome-python-desktop 2.30.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #597414,
regarding python-wnck: constants defined as enum instead of flags
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hello Stef,
On 22/09/10 21:53, stef louise wrote:
> I may have some time to check it by the end of the week. I know how to
> compile stuff, even quite complex projects, but I'm quite unfamiliar
> with git (even though I shouldn't), and I don't know
On 27 September 2010 at 19:31, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
| reopen 598221 1.6.4-5
| thanks
|
| Dirk Eddelbuettel (27/09/2010):
| > Looks like I did something silly by flipping to 'Arch:
| > any'. Reverted -- and thanks for catching this!
|
| Hmmm? Still failing, the same way. Looking at the diff, o
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:48:06 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598221: fixed in nwsclient 1.6.4-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #598221,
regarding nwsclient: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list
file: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:44:10 +0200
with message-id <20100927174410.gt21...@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597945: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#597945: fontforge: Bus
error on sparc when building lilypond
has caused the Debian Bug report #597945,
regarding lilypond: FTBFS o
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 598221
Bug #598221 {Done: Dirk Eddelbuettel } [src:nwsclient]
nwsclient: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such
file or directory
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you ma
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:44:10 +0200
with message-id <20100927174410.gt21...@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#597945: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#597945: fontforge: Bus
error on sparc when building lilypond
has caused the Debian Bug report #597945,
regarding fontforge: Bus er
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 560528
Bug#560528: am-utils: FTBFS: mountutil.c:283: error: 'NFS_MOUNT_VERSION'
undeclared (first use in this function)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Lu
Package: emacs23-nox
Version: 23.2+1-4
Severity: serious
The following partially installed packages will be configured:
emacs23-nox
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B of archives. After unpa
reopen 598221 1.6.4-5
thanks
Dirk Eddelbuettel (27/09/2010):
> Looks like I did something silly by flipping to 'Arch:
> any'. Reverted -- and thanks for catching this!
Hmmm? Still failing, the same way. Looking at the diff, only the
changelog changed…
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Di
Can you additionally check what "which mono" reports? If you've had any
kind of non-Debian Mono in your $PATH, it would cause the error you
reported.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Typo in the changelog, sorry. Of course this bug has nothing to do with
libwnck.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
`-[…] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
signature.asc
Description: This is a d
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:18:24 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598221: fixed in nwsclient 1.6.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #598221,
regarding nwsclient: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list
file: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Th
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:17:38 +0200
with message-id <20100927161738.ga22...@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#598175: gdata-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: No assemblies
specified.
has caused the Debian Bug report #598175,
regarding gdata-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: No assemblies specified.
to be ma
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:18:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597540: fixed in libwnck 2.30.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597540,
regarding [SECURITY] [DSA-2112-1] CVE-2010-0405 integer overflow
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:18:16 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#597540: fixed in libwnck 2.30.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #597540,
regarding bzip2: is recommended to be updated immediately to 1.0.6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
reassign 597978 fontforge
forcemerge 597945 597978
affects 594629 lilypond
affects 597945 lilypond
thanks
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> your package repeatedly FTBFS on sparc. Latest run:
[...]
This is actually a combination of bugs #597945 and #594629 in
fontforge, not a bug in
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 598175 1.4.0.2-4
Bug #598175 [src:gdata-sharp] gdata-sharp: FTBFS: mdoc: No assemblies specified.
Bug Marked as fixed in versions gdata-sharp/1.4.0.2-4.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598175
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 597978 fontforge
Bug #597978 [src:lilypond] lilypond: FTBFS on sparc: Bus errors
Bug reassigned from package 'src:lilypond' to 'fontforge'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions lilypond/2.12.3-7.
> forcemerge 597945 597978
Bug#597945
On 27 September 2010 at 16:56, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
| Hi,
|
| your package FTBFS everywhere:
| | dpkg-genchanges -B
| | dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent
packages
| | dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or
directory
| | dpkg-b
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 15:59:07 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> @release team: Please remove helium from testing, as its build
> dependency is RC buggy and we don’t want to hold up the release by
> uploading new versions.
>
Removal hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Source: nwsclient
Version: 1.6.4-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Hi,
your package FTBFS everywhere:
| dpkg-genchanges -B
| dpkg-genchanges: arch-specific upload - not including arch-independent
packages
| dpkg-genchanges: error: cannot read files list file: No such file or directory
| d
> "Martin" == Martin Pitt writes:
Martin> Hello Sam, Debian Bug Tracking System [2010-09-26 13:33
Martin> +]:
>> #596678: libkrb5-3: Not co-installable with libkrb53, thus
>> breaking upgrades from Lenny
Martin> Much appreciated, thank you!
Well, let's see how the un
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was preparing an NMU for #579483 (which consists just in doing
> an autoreconf, as suggested) and already tagged it as pending when I
> discovered that you, the maintainer of the package, had raised the
> severity. Hence, I stopped s
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:02:29 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#594478: fixed in kvm 72+dfsg-5~lenny6
has caused the Debian Bug report #594478,
regarding CVE-2010-2784: insufficient constraints checking in
exec.c:subpage_register()
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 09:36 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Seg Set 27 09:05:06 -0300 2010:
> (...)
> > helium is in testing but not buildable:
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598174
> > due to uuagc missing the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 597723 + pending
Bug #597723 [system-config-printer] Missing python-libxml2 dep
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
597723: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=5
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 598201 moreinfo
Bug #598201 [software-center] software-center: application will not start /
cursor just spins
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> severity 598201 important
Bug #598201 [software-center] software-center: application will not start /
curs
tag 598201 moreinfo
severity 598201 important
thanks
On Mo, 2010-09-27 at 08:40 -0400, bill wrote:
> Package: software-center
> Version: 2.0.7debian5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> /usr/bin/software-center
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/ls
>If the license statement is moot and there are no valid copyrights, >where are
>we getting the right to distribute the files from? > >Regards, > >Adam
that is indeed a problem, both upstream and myself are currently in the process
of trying to contact the copyright holders of the offending fi
Hi,
On 27/09/10 14:51, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> gnome-system-tools (2.30.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* debian/control.in:
> - Remove cracklib2-dev from Build-Depends, it's not used since 2003.
>Closes: #598172.
Please unblock gnome-system-tools 2.30.2-2. It fixe
Your message dated Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:47:47 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#598172: fixed in gnome-system-tools 2.30.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #598172,
regarding gnome-system-tools: FTBFS: Unable to locate package cracklib2-dev
to be marked as done.
This means that you clai
Package: update-manager-gnome
Version: 0.200.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/update-manager
[ ERROR:UpdateManager.BugHandler] No exception handler installed.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/update-manager", line 37, in
app = Applicati
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 598134 0.4.1-1
Bug #598134 {Done: Jakub Wilk } [ocrodjvu] ocrodjvu: insecure
use of temporary files
Bug Marked as found in versions ocrodjvu/0.4.1-1.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598134:
Hi Joachim.
Excerpts from Joachim Breitner's message of Seg Set 27 09:05:06 -0300 2010:
(...)
> helium is in testing but not buildable:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598174
> due to uuagc missing there. Uuagc has an RC bug:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=53
Package: software-center
Version: 2.0.7debian5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
/usr/bin/software-center
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/lsb_release", line 96, in
main()
File "/usr/bin/lsb_release", line 60, in main
distinfo = lsb_release.get_d
Hi,
helium is in testing but not buildable:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598174
due to uuagc missing there. Uuagc has an RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=536905
Looking at the hackage page, uuagc is actively maintained, but does not
seem to have any ues
This bug can be fixed easily by changing Build-Depends from cracklib2-dev to
libcrack2-dev.
Regards
Jan Dittberner
--
Jan Dittberner - Debian Developer
GPG-key: 4096R/558FB8DD 2009-05-10
B2FF 1D95 CE8F 7A22 DF4C F09B A73E 0055 558F B8DD
http://ddportfolio.debian.net/ - http://people.d
reopen 598174
thanks
On 27/09/10 at 13:49 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 27/09/10 at 12:32 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > > I’m a bit surprised by this erorr:
> > >
> > > Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 09:36 +0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 598174
Bug #598174 {Done: Lucas Nussbaum } [src:helium]
helium: FTBFS: Unable to locate package uuagc
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
598174: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
Hi again,
Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 13:17 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 27/09/10 at 12:32 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > I’m a bit surprised by this erorr:
> >
> > Am Montag, den 27.09.2010, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > > > Checking for source dependency conflicts...
> > > >
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Luca Bruno wrote:
>
> Moreover, the patch for armel should really be sent upstream.
> Would you take care of this (if you are in touch with authors) or should
> I do it?
Hi Luca,
I can not talk for the maintainer, but I will encourage you to submit
the patch on th
On 25/09/10 19:04, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> 2) "balsa depends on libesmtp5 (<=0.8.8) BUT libesmtp5 does not appear to
>> be available (no install package)"
>
> This does not seem to have been reported, so I'm reassigning this bug
> report to balsa. I guess it just needs a binNMU against a newer
> l
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
