Bug#472957: A bug for tracking Tcl/Tk 8.3 removal

2010-09-22 Thread Sergei Golovan
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Luca Falavigna wrote: > Hi Sergei, > > should tk8.3 be removed too? Yes, it should. I didn't create a separate bug for Tk because Tcl and Tk always go together. So, please, remove Tk 8.3 also. -- Sergei Golovan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ

Processed: imapd_ulimit has patch

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 597434 patch Bug #597434 [courier-imap] The /etc/courier/imapd IMAP_ULIMITD is too small Added tag(s) patch. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#597434: Fixe for courier IMAP_ULIMITD

2010-09-22 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Here's a patch to fix the issue. Do you agree that is the way to fix it, and would you accept that I NMU this fix, so that it has a chance to get into Squeeze soon? Thomas Goirand (zigo) --- courier-0.65.0.orig/debian/rules 2010-09-23 04:48:42.0 + +++ courier-0.65.0/debian/rules 2

Bug#597478: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#597478: fails to build kernel module on amd64

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:42:45 -0500 Chris Lawrence wrote: > Package: fglrx-source > Version: 1:10-9-2 > Severity: normal > > I am experiencing the same problem with fglrx-source 1:10-9-2; here's > the log from my build using module-assistant: > > === LOG SNIPPET BEGINS === > Extracting the packag

Bug#597783: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#597783: fglrx-source: fails to build with locally built kernel

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Gilbert
severity 597783 grave thanks On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 01:00:38 +0200 Michel Casabona wrote: > Package: fglrx-source > Version: 1:10-9-2 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > Thanks for the fix to #597478. However the module fails to build using a > locally built kernel because there is no file > /usr/src/

Processed: Re: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#597783: fglrx-source: fails to build with locally built kernel

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 597783 grave Bug #597783 [fglrx-source] fglrx-source: fails to build with locally built kernel Severity set to 'grave' from 'normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597783: http://bugs.d

Bug#525549: Difficult to see how this could occur

2010-09-22 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Sam Morris wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 23:38 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Can you try this with a more recent version of gnucash (at least > > 2.2.9-6), and also with --debug on? (You should see output like > > "unlink lock file: blah", etc.) > > This has remained quite

Bug#597478: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#597478: fglrx-modules-dkms: fails to build kernel module on amd64

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Gilbert
> I still have a FTBFS problem with this update. > > When doing the dkms thing with the new package it first reported: > > Error! Your kernel headers for kernel amd64 cannot be found at > /lib/modules/amd64/build or /lib/modules/amd64/source. > [...] > make KERNELR

Bug#597478: [Pkg-fglrx-devel] Bug#597478: fglrx-modules-dkms: fails to build kernel module on amd64

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Gilbert
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 16:35:29 -0700 Sean Kellogg wrote: > I still have a FTBFS problem with this update. > > When doing the dkms thing with the new package it first reported: > > Error! Your kernel headers for kernel amd64 cannot be found at > /lib/modules/amd64/build or /lib/modu

Processed: framebuffer gone for intel i915 starting 2.6.32-21

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 595103 framebuffer gone for intel i915 starting 2.6.32-21 Bug #595103 [linux-2.6] xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21 Changed Bug title to 'framebuffer gone for intel i915 starting 2.6.32-21' from 'xwindows gone starting at 2.6.32-21' > s

Bug#525549: Difficult to see how this could occur

2010-09-22 Thread Sam Morris
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 23:38 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > Can you try this with a more recent version of gnucash (at least > 2.2.9-6), and also with --debug on? (You should see output like > "unlink lock file: blah", etc.) This has remained quite reproducible for me with 2.2.9-7~squeeze1. The tric

Bug#597789: osynctool unconditionally uses vi as editor

2010-09-22 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Package: osynctool Version: 0.39-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 11.4 osynctool --configure seems to have vi hardcoded. Section 11.4 of the Debian Policy Manual states that "every program that launches an editor or pager must use the EDITOR or PAGER environment variable to determine t

Bug#597478: fglrx-modules-dkms: fails to build kernel module on amd64

2010-09-22 Thread Sean Kellogg
I still have a FTBFS problem with this update. When doing the dkms thing with the new package it first reported: Error! Your kernel headers for kernel amd64 cannot be found at /lib/modules/amd64/build or /lib/modules/amd64/source. So, I decided to see what would

Processed: your mail

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 591995 + pending Bug #591995 [babiloo] babiloo: insecure downloading and unpacking of dictionary files Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 591995: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-

Bug#597755: scilab: Not binNMU-able

2010-09-22 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 22 septembre 2010 à 20:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > Package: src:scilab > Version: 5.2.2-6 > Severity: serious > scilab-include, scilab-minimal-bin and scilab-full-bin are all > architecture-dependent, which means their version will change on > binNMUs, rendering all of the ab

Processed: Re: Bug#595830: gnat-4.4: FTBFS in squeeze: xref_lib.o: file not recognized: File truncated

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 595830 unreproducible moreinfo Bug #595830 [gnat-4.4] gnat-4.4: FTBFS in squeeze: xref_lib.o: file not recognized: File truncated Added tag(s) unreproducible and moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need ass

Bug#595830: gnat-4.4: FTBFS in squeeze: xref_lib.o: file not recognized: File truncated

2010-09-22 Thread Ludovic Brenta
tags 595830 unreproducible moreinfo thanks I just rebuilt successfully on sid. I suspect your disk became full suring compilation? -- Ludovic Brenta. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian

Bug#597778: schroot: Stupid name restrictions is breaking existing setups for no good reason.

2010-09-22 Thread Len Sorensen
Package: schroot Version: 1.4.12-1 Severity: grave I just upgraded schroot to the current version in testing, and now I can't use it anymore because someone got the bright (not) idea that only alphanumeric, dashes and underscores should be allowed in chroot names. It was annoying enough when a whi

Bug#597707: cron: Cron segfaults while executing jobs

2010-09-22 Thread Igor Stroh
Hi Christian, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 6:21 PM, Christian Kastner wrote: > Are you by chance using libpam-mount? It was the cause for #401761 and > #484122, for example, which exhibited the same symptoms. > Yeah, it was a libpam-mount, sorry for the noise :( I realized it a couple of minutes af

Bug#595677: marked as done (Uninstallable because of conflict with llvm-2.7-dev: /usr/share/vm/vimcurrent)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:02:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#593188: fixed in llvm-2.7 2.7-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #593188, regarding Uninstallable because of conflict with llvm-2.7-dev: /usr/share/vm/vimcurrent to be marked as done. This means that you cl

Bug#593604: marked as done (file conflict with llvm-2.7-dev)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:02:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#593188: fixed in llvm-2.7 2.7-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #593188, regarding file conflict with llvm-2.7-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If th

Bug#593286: marked as done (vim-common 7.3.000+hg~ee53a39d5896-1 conflicts with llvm-2.7-dev)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:02:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#593188: fixed in llvm-2.7 2.7-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #593188, regarding vim-common 7.3.000+hg~ee53a39d5896-1 conflicts with llvm-2.7-dev to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#593188: marked as done (vim-common: ..tries to overwrite '/usr/share/vim/vimcurrent', which is also in package llvm-2.7-dev 2.7-4)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:02:26 + with message-id and subject line Bug#593188: fixed in llvm-2.7 2.7-5.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #593188, regarding vim-common: ..tries to overwrite '/usr/share/vim/vimcurrent', which is also in package llvm-2.7-dev 2.7-4 to be marked as d

Processed: tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Wed Sep 22 20:03:16 UTC 2010 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: ukopp > tags 597683 + pending Bug #597683 [wnpp] ITP: ukopp -- Full and incremen

Bug#592768: complementary information

2010-09-22 Thread stef louise
I may have some time to check it by the end of the week. I know how to compile stuff, even quite complex projects, but I'm quite unfamiliar with git (even though I shouldn't), and I don't know where to find your git repository (googled a lil' bit but wrong keywords, I guess). Stéphane 2010/9/17 P

Bug#591197: #591197: phpwiki RC bug

2010-09-22 Thread Matt Brown
Yes it is in the pipes. Unfortunately my signing subkey expired so I'm waiting for a letting update before I can upload it. On 22 Sep 2010 18:41, "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" wrote: > Hi Matt, > > it's been more than one month that this RC bug (#591197) is marked "pending". Is > your upload fixing it in

Bug#597755: scilab: Not binNMU-able

2010-09-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Package: src:scilab Version: 5.2.2-6 Severity: serious Hi, Somewhere between scilab 5.2.2-3 and -6, the following changes were made to debian/control: Package: scilab-cli Architecture: all -Depends: scilab-minimal-bin (>= ${source:Version}), +Depends: scilab-minimal-bin (= ${source:Version}),

Bug#595200: Parts of the firefox/iceweasel window are completely black

2010-09-22 Thread Tomasz Kaźmierczak
I can confirm that the bug is gone after upgrading fglrx to 10.9 (from sid) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#570662: powertop: FTBFS: error: '__NR_perf_event_open' undeclared

2010-09-22 Thread Andreas Mohr
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=570662 > # still fails on alpha and ia64: > # https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=powertop Confirmed, dito on Git MIPSEL (WL-500gPv2 OpenWrt 2.6.34.5 Debian stable extroot). Would have tried to fix it myself (patch --> upstream), but sa

Bug#590382: marked as done (gelemental: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `html/*.dot': No such file or directory)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:17:29 + with message-id and subject line Bug#590382: fixed in gelemental 1.2.0-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #590382, regarding gelemental: FTBFS: /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `html/*.dot': No such file or directory to be marked as done. This mean

Bug#590382: [Debichem-devel] Bug#590382: #590382: gelemental RC bug

2010-09-22 Thread Michael Banck
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 05:45:41PM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > It's been more than 3 weeks since this gelemental RC bug (#590382) has been > tagged both +pending and +patch. On the 28. August 2010, you asked Joachim to > not NMU. Is your upload really in the pipes towards unstable ?

Processed: Re: Bug#597739: Salome: cannot load module salomeloader

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 597739 normal Bug #597739 [salome] Salome: cannot load module salomeloader Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597739: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bug

Bug#597739: Salome: cannot load module salomeloader

2010-09-22 Thread Adam C Powell IV
severity 597739 normal thanks Thank you for your report. The program should be started with the command runSalome not salomeloader, so the package is usable. Also, 5.1.3-9 and newer versions should not have /usr/bin/salomeloader but /usr/lib/salome/bin/salomeloader. Please check the location of

Processed: r1333 - openldap/trunk/debian

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 597704 pending Bug #597704 [slapd] On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system! Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597704: http://bugs.

Processed: severity of 592885 is important, severity of 593140 is important

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # hppa-specific bugs are no longer R-C; see > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/09/msg8.html > severity 592885 important Bug #592885 [src:atlas] FTBFS [hppa]: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output Severity se

Bug#584383: Not pending, disappeared from NEW ?

2010-09-22 Thread Luca Falavigna
Il 22/09/2010 17:55, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud ha scritto: > My RSS tells me that "titantools 4.0.11-7 left NEW" on 04.09.2010 02:00, but > I > can't get a trace of that anywhere on the packages.qa.d.o, on the buildd or > on > the archive (CC'ing ftpmaster to get a enlightening on that). It has bee

Processed: Re: Bug#596573: [openoffice.org] crash with X-Error if KDE file selector tries to show preview of a Gimp file

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 596573 + unreproducible Bug #596573 [openoffice.org-kde] KDE Filepicker crashes Added tag(s) unreproducible. > severity 596573 important Bug #596573 [openoffice.org-kde] KDE Filepicker crashes Severity set to 'important' from 'grave' > thanks

Bug#575536: [Enthought-Dev] Bug#575536: mayavi2 segfaults under VNC

2010-09-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
actually rushed too much -- it still persists in clean sid (which is now not that much different from squeeze). SO I guess something on my local system (outdated package, configuration?) makes it work fine... uff -- any clues may be from the straces? On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:

Bug#596573: [openoffice.org] crash with X-Error if KDE file selector tries to show preview of a Gimp file

2010-09-22 Thread Rene Engelhard
tag 596573 + unreproducible severity 596573 important thanks Hi, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:48:27PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Othewise: simply no idea, and as long as it doesn't happen on "normal" > systems (asked SuSE to try it too > and it worked for them too) I would just tag this + unre

Processed: Re: Bug#562568: 562568: Symbol conflict with libcdio10

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 597731 mpd Bug #597731 [libmpd] Symbol conflict with libcdio10 Bug reassigned from package 'libmpd' to 'mpd'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597731: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#597731: Bug#562568: 562568: Symbol conflict with libcdio10

2010-09-22 Thread Matthias Klose
reassign 597731 mpd thanks On 22.09.2010 18:09, Max Kellermann wrote: On 2010/09/22 18:03, Matthias Klose wrote: clone 562568 -2 reassign -2 libmpd How is this bug related to libmpd? Did you mean "mpd" instead? yes, you are right. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@list

Bug#597739: Salome: cannot load module salomeloader

2010-09-22 Thread M.
Package: salome Version: 5.1.3-10 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When trying to start the program with the command salomeloader The following error is returned: :~$ salomeloader Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/salomeloader", line 20, in impor

Bug#584383: Not pending, disappeared from NEW ?

2010-09-22 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
tags 584383 -pending thanks Hi dear titantools maintainers, From what I could gather from the "NEW" log, it seems that there was "once" a "titantools 4.0.11-7" in NEW, that was supposed to fix this RC bug: * Makefile.linux: Do not build noshell as a static binary as this does not gain any

Processed: Not pending, disappeared from NEW ?

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 584383 -pending Bug #584383 [src:titantools] titantools: FTBFS: dynamic STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol `strcmp' with pointer equality in `/usr/lib/libc.a(strcmp.o)' can not be used when making an executable; recompile with -fPIE and relink with -pie

Bug#531546: Bug #531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread sean finney
hiya, i'll group two replies together here. On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:57:10AM +0300, Teodor MICU wrote: > >  * does the schema seem correct (i.e. a disabled column in the host table)? > > I don't know anything related to a 'schema', so probably not the > issue. If you can tell me what to check,

Bug#472957: A bug for tracking Tcl/Tk 8.3 removal

2010-09-22 Thread Luca Falavigna
Hi Sergei, should tk8.3 be removed too? -- .''`. : :' : Luca Falavigna `. `' `- signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: retitle 472957 to RM: tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 472957 RM: tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream Bug #472957 [ftp.debian.org] RM tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream Changed Bug title to 'RM: tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream' from 'RM tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream' >

Processed: Re: Bug#597707: cron: Cron segfaults while executing jobs

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 597707 597705 Bug#597705: cron: Cron segfaults while executing jobs Bug#597707: cron: Cron segfaults while executing jobs Merged 597705 597707. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597705: http:/

Bug#597731: Bug#562568: 562568: Symbol conflict with libcdio10

2010-09-22 Thread Max Kellermann
On 2010/09/22 18:03, Matthias Klose wrote: > clone 562568 -2 > reassign -2 libmpd How is this bug related to libmpd? Did you mean "mpd" instead? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#597707: cron: Cron segfaults while executing jobs

2010-09-22 Thread Christian Kastner
merge 597707 597705 thanks Hi Igor, On 09/22/2010 01:08 PM, jen...@debian.org wrote: > Each time cron tries to execute a job from /etc/cron.d (or any other crontab) > I see syslog entries like these: > > some-machine:~# grep 'segfault at 0 ip 0 sp' /var/log/syslog > Sep 22 07:17:01 some-machine

Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Yaroslav Halchenko | 2010-09-22 12:09:42 [-0400]: >> Yes, I tested it on mipsel. It is still not working on Lenny [0] so it >> is unusable and it matches grave. The maintainer could close it in >> unstable if he trusts me with this information so it will not remain >> release critical for Squeez

Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >current in lenny 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 > You want to double check this? According to PTS stable is still 0.8-6. oops - sorry, I meant squeeze ;-) bug indeed might still be present in lenny (and could be tagged as such I guess) > Yes, I tested it

Bug#590382: #590382: gelemental RC bug

2010-09-22 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi Daniel, It's been more than 3 weeks since this gelemental RC bug (#590382) has been tagged both +pending and +patch. On the 28. August 2010, you asked Joachim to not NMU. Is your upload really in the pipes towards unstable ? Thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian M

Processed (with 5 errors): Re: 562568: Symbol conflict with libcdio10

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 562568 -1 Bug#562568: Symbol conflict with libcdio10 Bug 562568 cloned as bug 597730. > reassign -1 libcdio Bug #597730 [libcue1] Symbol conflict with libcdio10 Bug reassigned from package 'libcue1' to 'libcdio'. Bug No longer marked as fou

Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread Teodor MICU
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:48 PM, Stephane Dudzinski wrote: > I have just upgraded to 0.8.7g-1, backed up the DB before doing so then > did the web interface upgrade steps, it said there was no SQL upgrade. > And it is still happily graphing. > > So I am guessing your problem is probably with

Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread Stephane Dudzinski
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 18:57 +0300, Teodor MICU wrote: > Yes, it was working for me too (happily graphing) if I used 'cmd.php' > which you also use. But also, check the 'cacti.log' file for SQL > errors. I get no error on my side. Just to add to this, my install was a fresh install of Lenny from la

Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Yaroslav Halchenko | 2010-09-22 10:20:07 [-0400]: >it was reported against elderly now iceowl/0.8-6 > >current in lenny 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 You want to double check this? According to PTS stable is still 0.8-6. >Sebastian has confirmed that he could start 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 (on >mipsel?) without problem

Processed: severity of 597723 is serious

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 597723 serious Bug #597723 [system-config-printer] Missing python-libxml2 dep Severity set to 'serious' from 'normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597723: http://bugs.debian.o

Bug#591197: #591197: phpwiki RC bug

2010-09-22 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi Matt, it's been more than one month that this RC bug (#591197) is marked "pending". Is your upload fixing it in the pipes towards unstable ? Thanks in advance for informing, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM). CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#597704: similar bug in test script

2010-09-22 Thread Carsten Hey
./tests/scripts/startup_nis_ldap_server.sh:rm -f $DBDIR/[!C]* Possible fix: rm -f "${DBDIR:?}"/[!C]* Regards Carsten -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#531978: libgphoto2: Any update on that RC bug ?

2010-09-22 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Hi KiBi, It's been more than one month since you tagged that RC bug "pending". Is your upload fixing #531978 really in the pipes towards unstable? Thanks in advance, cheers, OdyX -- Didier Raboud, proud Debian Maintainer (DM). CH-1020 Renens did...@raboud.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de

Bug#592243: marked as done (rmail and masqmail: error when trying to install together)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:02:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#592243: fixed in sendmail 8.14.3-9.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #592243, regarding rmail and masqmail: error when trying to install together to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the probl

Bug#596637: marked as done (fakechroot: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test failures)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:02:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#596637: fixed in fakechroot 2.11-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #596637, regarding fakechroot: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: test failures to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been d

Bug#597654: [Fwd: Re: Bug#597654: postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts]

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Heath
--- Begin Message --- Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello Adam, > > Adam Heath [2010-09-22 8:13 -0500]: >> Note, that this affects the version in testing. > > Yep, known. I mailed -release@ and got it unblocked for migration, and > it's urgency=high. > >> If insserv doesn't support multiple scripts all

Processed: [ow...@bugs.debian.org: Processed (with 1 errors): Time to remove tcl 8.3?]

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 472957 ftp.debian.org Bug #472957 [tcl8.3] RM tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream Bug reassigned from package 'tcl8.3' to 'ftp.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 472957: http:

Processed (with 1 errors): Time to remove tcl 8.3?

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > assign 472957 ftp.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > retitle 472957 RM tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated; dead upstream Bug #472957 [tcl8.3] A bug for tracking Tcl/Tk 8.3 removal Changed Bug title to 'RM tcl8.3 -- RoM; outdated

Bug#559352: is it still worth holding the bug open at grave level?

2010-09-22 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
it was reported against elderly now iceowl/0.8-6 current in lenny 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 Sebastian has confirmed that he could start 1.0~b1+dfsg1-1 (on mipsel?) without problems, so problems seems not to be grave imho in the light of Release-Criticality -- .-. =--

Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread Stephane Dudzinski
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:09 +0300, Teodor MICU wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Stephane Dudzinski > wrote: > > We did upgrade a box from Lenny to Squeeze and it indeed kept all its > > graphs this time, this is what we are currently using: > > > > ii rrdtool

Bug#597719: [kchmviewer] must depend on okular-extra-backends

2010-09-22 Thread Vedran Furač
Package: kchmviewer Version: 5.1-1 Severity: grave Package okular-extra-backends must be installed because it contains /usr/lib/kde4/kio_msits.so which is used by kchiviewer to read chm files. Otherwise user gets: "Unknown protocol 'ms-its'" error message when attempts to open chm file. Regards

Bug#597654: postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts

2010-09-22 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Adam, Adam Heath [2010-09-22 8:13 -0500]: > Note, that this affects the version in testing. Yep, known. I mailed -release@ and got it unblocked for migration, and it's urgency=high. > If insserv doesn't support multiple scripts all providing the same > thing, then it is buggy. Only throu

Bug#597654: closed by Martin Pitt (Bug#597654: fixed in postgresql-common 111)

2010-09-22 Thread Adam Heath
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: >* debian/rules: Put init script priority back to S29/K21 to match the > previous postgresql-8.4 init script. Fix the priorities on upgrade in > debian/postgresql-common.preinst. (Closes: #597654) s/S29/S19/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-b

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
On Sep 22, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 09/22/2010 02:39 PM, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: >> This shouldn't happen in the first place, because the ldap backend is >> not a supported backend to upgrade from. > > That doesn't make a difference. Such things can always happen, so you need

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 09/22/2010 02:39 PM, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > This shouldn't happen in the first place, because the ldap backend is > not a supported backend to upgrade from. That doesn't make a difference. Such things can always happen, so you need to check for them, even if you fix the real reason. -- B

Processed: Re: Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 597704 - moreinfo Bug #597704 [slapd] On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system! Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597704: http://

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
tag 597704 - moreinfo thanks On Sep 22, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > On 09/22/2010 01:41 PM, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: >> Can you supply a configuration file (/etc/ldap/slapd.conf) ? >> Make sure there is no confidential information in that file. > > Although it might make sense to ch

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 09/22/2010 01:41 PM, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote: > Can you supply a configuration file (/etc/ldap/slapd.conf) ? > Make sure there is no confidential information in that file. Although it might make sense to check *why* the variable was empty, you need to make sure never to call something like rm $

Bug#597706: marked as done (linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Kernel panic during net initialization)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:15:21 +0200 with message-id <87pqw6m0ti@mirexpress.internal.placard.fr.eu.org> and subject line Re: Bug#597706: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Kernel panic during net initialization has caused the Debian Bug report #597706, regarding linux-image-2.6.32-5-

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Joerg Friedrich
Matthijs Mohlmann schrieb am Wednesday, 22. September 2010 um 13:41:52 +0200: > tags + moreinfo > thanks > Can you supply a configuration file (/etc/ldap/slapd.conf) ? > Make sure there is no confidential information in that file. > > Furthermore, can you supply the debconf information ? # debconf

Bug#592245: libestraier-ruby1.9.1 and libestraier-ruby1.8: error when trying to install together

2010-09-22 Thread KURASHIKI Satoru
hi, At Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:11:08 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > automatic installation tests of packages that share a file and at the > same time do not conflict by their package dependency relationships has > detected the following problem: > Here is a list of files that are known to be shared by

Processed: tagging for moreinfo

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tag 597704 + moreinfo Bug #597704 [slapd] On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system! Added tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597704: http://bu

Bug#591401: hyperestraier: FTBFS: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException

2010-09-22 Thread KURASHIKI Satoru
hi, At Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:34:23 -0400, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > your package no longer builds on hppa as well: > | > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:..:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib:/build/buildd-hyperestraier_1.4.13-1-hppa-vYujl2/hyperestraier-1.4.13/junkhome/lib:/usr/local/lib::/usr/lib > java -cp estraier.jar e

Bug#597706: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Kernel panic during net initialization

2010-09-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:35:31 +0200, Roland Mas wrote: > Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel. > [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset > [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu > [0.00] Linux version 2.6.32-5-kirkwood (Debian 2.6.32-21) > (b...@decadent.org.

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Matthijs Mohlmann
tags + moreinfo thanks On Sep 22, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Joerg Friedrich wrote: > Package: slapd > Version: 2.4.23-5 > Severity: critical > > After the last upgrade of slapd my complete sytem was unusable because > the update ran a rm -f /*. > > this fortunatly was not able to delete the directory b

Bug#591399: hyperestraier: FTBFS: can't modify frozen string (RuntimeError)

2010-09-22 Thread KURASHIKI Satoru
hi, At Mon, 02 Aug 2010 15:33:19 -0400, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > your package no longer builds on kfreebsd-* and ia64: > | > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.:..:/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/lib:/build/buildd-hyperestraier_1.4.13-1-kfreebsd-amd64-hlF86v/hyperestraier-1.4.13/junkhome/lib:/usr/local/lib::/usr/lib > /usr/bi

Bug#597706: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood: Kernel panic during net initialization

2010-09-22 Thread Roland Mas
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-5-kirkwood Severity: grave Version: 2.6.32-23 The latest kernel upgrade to my Sheevaplug this morning (from 2.6.32-20 to 2.6.32-23) ends up with the box not booting any longer. The box runs Squeeze, but I hadn't rebooted since upgrading to -20 (so maybe -21 was affecte

Bug#597705: cron: Cron segfaults while executing jobs

2010-09-22 Thread jenner
Package: cron Version: 3.0pl1-105 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Each time cron tries to execute a job from /etc/cron.d (or any other crontab) I see syslog entries like these: some-machine:~# grep 'segfault at 0 ip 0 sp' /var/log/syslog Sep 22 07:17:01 some-machine kernel

Bug#592443: hyperestraier: can't install package

2010-09-22 Thread KURASHIKI Satoru
hi, At Tue, 10 Aug 2010 21:56:16 +0900 (JST), Tatsuya Kinoshita wrote: > > > > I can't install this package becase the preinst script retrun error, > > This bug is really `serious'. Thank you for your patch, which will be applied for next upload. regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#597704: On upgrade to 2.4.23-5 an rm -f /* has been executed and crashed my whole system!

2010-09-22 Thread Joerg Friedrich
Package: slapd Version: 2.4.23-5 Severity: critical After the last upgrade of slapd my complete sytem was unusable because the update ran a rm -f /*. this fortunatly was not able to delete the directory bin, sbin, home, var, ... but it deleted the symlink lib64 -> lib (amd64 system) and then the

Processed: tagging 596453

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7 > tags 596453 + pending Bug #596453 [linux-image-2.6.32-5-686] 855GM: X hard locks system on startup Added tag(s) pending. > End of message, stopping processing here. Plea

Bug#597654: marked as done (postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:17:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#597654: fixed in postgresql-common 111 has caused the Debian Bug report #597654, regarding postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

Bug#597097: marked as done (pg_createcluster acts as pg_dropcluster)

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:17:14 + with message-id and subject line Bug#597097: fixed in postgresql-common 111 has caused the Debian Bug report #597097, regarding pg_createcluster acts as pg_dropcluster to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been deal

Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread Stephane Dudzinski
On Wed, 2010-09-22 at 12:09 +0300, Teodor MICU wrote: > This was not purged, so I guess you are running Debian 5.0 (lenny). no, -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > > > > We don't use cacti-spine

Processed: tagging 597654

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 597654 + pending Bug #597654 [postgresql-common] postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597654: http://bugs.debian.

Processed: Fixed in sid

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > package chiark-tcl Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'chiark-tcl' Limit currently set to 'package':'chiark-tcl' > tag 595861 - sid Bug #595861 [chiark-tcl] chiark-tcl: FTBFS in squeeze: Nonexistent build-dependency

Bug#595861: Fixed in sid

2010-09-22 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
package chiark-tcl tag 595861 - sid fixed 595861 1.1.0+nmu2 thanks Hi. This bug was fixed in sid by upload 1.1.0+nmu2, which currently cannot migrate to testing because of another RC bug. Giovanni. -- Giovanni Mascellani Pisa, Italy Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani Jabber: g.masce

Processed: tagging 597097

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 597097 + pending Bug #597097 [postgresql-common] pg_createcluster acts as pg_dropcluster Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 597097: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread Stephane Dudzinski
> > There were no sql upgrade scripts from 0.8.7e-4 to 0.8.7g-1. The > > upgrade says clearly that there are no scripts to run. We did upgrade a box from Lenny to Squeeze and it indeed kept all its graphs this time, this is what we are currently using: ii rrdtool 1.4.

Bug#531546: empty graphs due to 'A DB Exec Failed' Poller[0] ERROR

2010-09-22 Thread Teodor MICU
Hi, On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Stephane Dudzinski wrote: > We did upgrade a box from Lenny to Squeeze and it indeed kept all its > graphs this time, this is what we are currently using: > > ii  rrdtool                             1.4.3-1 > ii  cacti                               0.8.7e-4

Processed: Re: Bug#597654: postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 597654 postgresql-common 109 Bug #597654 [postgresql-8.4] postgresql-8.4 8.4.4-2 breaks start ordering of init scripts Bug reassigned from package 'postgresql-8.4' to 'postgresql-common'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions postgre

Processed: Re: Bug#597097: pg_createcluster acts as pg_dropcluster

2010-09-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 597097 critical Bug #597097 [postgresql-common] pg_createcluster acts as pg_dropcluster Severity set to 'critical' from 'normal' > tag 597097 confirmed Bug #597097 [postgresql-common] pg_createcluster acts as pg_dropcluster Added tag(s)

  1   2   >