Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 524248 + moreinfo
Bug#524248: amide_0.9.1-5(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips: ocamlopt not found
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
tags 524248 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Peter!
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 10:21:18PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Package: amide
> Version: 0.9.1-5
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > Automatic build of amide_0.9.1-5 on mayr by sbuild/mips 99.999
Hey Barry,
On 07/04/2009 Barry deFreese wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 17 March 2009 18:29:14 Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> i'm willing to maintain it in debian, but some issues remain unclear for
>> me, and i'dd highly appreciate your options about them:
>>
>> - it seems like mimelib doesn't have any real upstre
Package: gnome-volume-manager
Version: 2.24.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
since the update from 2.2 to 2.24 gnome-volume-volume stops to work. No
errors in /var/log/messages or syslog.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT po
tags 523935 +patch
thanks
simply changing libgucharmap-dev to libgucharmap2-dev in build-depends
makes this package build successfully.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 523935 +patch
Bug#523935: gedit-plugins: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable Build-Depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(ad
Package: xpdf-reader
Version: 3.02-1.4
Severity: grave
Hi,
you're probably already aware of this, there's a new upstream release
and/or patch which fixes security issues.
See also:
http://www.h-online.com/security/Several-critical-vulnerabilities-in-Xpdf-patched--/news/113093
Thanks, Uwe.
--
tags 521922 +patch
thanks
from testing with pbuilder login it seems python is the only missing
build-dependency and adding it will fix this bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 521922 +patch
Bug#521922: freedoom: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Hi,
I did an upgrade from lenny to testing and I did not have
mysql-server installed, when i tried to install, i got
Setting up mysql-server-5.0 (5.0.51a-24) ...
* Stopping MySQL database server mysqld
...done.
invoke-rc.d: initscript mysql, action "stop" failed.
* Starting MySQL database
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 523271 important
Bug#523271: bloboats: segfault at start up
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forwarded 523271 http://bloboats.blobtrox.net/authors.php
Bug#523271: bloboats: segfault at start up
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://bloboats.blobtrox.net/authors.php.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:08:49AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> On Thursday 09 April 2009 10:25:29 Gonéri Le Bouder wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 09:59:19AM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Works fine here:
> [...]
> > I've the
> > feeling the problem come from your libgl1-mesa-glx from
Your message dated Sun, 19 Apr 2009 00:17:28 +0200
with message-id <49ea5178.1040...@bzed.de>
and subject line Closing bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #524208,
regarding gpsd_units() missing in headers
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524316: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524316,
regarding acpid fails to upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523449: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523449,
regarding udev not loading hardware modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524286: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524286,
regarding splashy prevents kernel modules to load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524286: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524286,
regarding general: kernel modules does not automatically load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523449: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523449,
regarding general: kernel modules does not automatically load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524317: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524317,
regarding acpid: Won't upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524433: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524433,
regarding [hal] Upgrade of hal fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524275: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524275,
regarding splashy: breaks init scripts
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523823: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523823,
regarding acpid fails to upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524276: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524276,
regarding udev not loading hardware modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#522104: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #522104,
regarding splashy locks system if run after startup
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524286: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524286,
regarding udev not loading hardware modules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524433: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524433,
regarding acpid fails to upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524316: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524316,
regarding acpid: fails to install on Debian testing, pre-removal and
post-installation scripts returned error exit status 1
to be ma
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524316: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524316,
regarding acpid: Won't upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524433: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524433,
regarding acpid: fails to install on Debian testing, pre-removal and
post-installation scripts returned error exit status 1
to be ma
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523187: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523187,
regarding acpid: fails to install on Debian testing, pre-removal and
post-installation scripts returned error exit status 1
to be ma
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523449: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523449,
regarding splashy prevents kernel modules to load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524433: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524433,
regarding invoke-rc.d: initscript, action "start" failed on install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523823: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523823,
regarding acpid: fails to install on Debian testing, pre-removal and
post-installation scripts returned error exit status 1
to be ma
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523187: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523187,
regarding [hal] Upgrade of hal fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524276: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524276,
regarding splashy prevents kernel modules to load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wi
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524317: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524317,
regarding acpid fails to upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523187: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523187,
regarding acpid: Won't upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523823: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523823,
regarding [hal] Upgrade of hal fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524317: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524317,
regarding [hal] Upgrade of hal fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524317: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524317,
regarding acpid: fails to install on Debian testing, pre-removal and
post-installation scripts returned error exit status 1
to be ma
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523187: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523187,
regarding invoke-rc.d: initscript, action "start" failed on install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523823: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523823,
regarding acpid: Won't upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524246: fixed in mpg123 1.7.2-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #524246,
regarding mpg123_1.7.2-2(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips: build system problem.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523823: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523823,
regarding invoke-rc.d: initscript, action "start" failed on install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524314: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524314,
regarding splashy causes init scripts to exit with error
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524316: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524316,
regarding [hal] Upgrade of hal fails
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524276: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524276,
regarding general: kernel modules does not automatically load
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has b
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524317: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524317,
regarding invoke-rc.d: initscript, action "start" failed on install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524433: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524433,
regarding acpid: Won't upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:35 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524316: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #524316,
regarding invoke-rc.d: initscript, action "start" failed on install
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:02:34 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523187: fixed in splashy 0.3.13-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #523187,
regarding acpid fails to upgrade
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> forcemerge 519112 524576
Bug#519112: pidgin crashes on XMPP sign-on
Bug#524576: pidgin crashes when verifying certs
Bug#522171: segfaults on startup
Bug#51: pidgin crashes on startup
Bug#522350: Pidgin Crashes Immediately on open
Bug#522610: p
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.11-11
Severity: grave
from http page:
**
Bug in Mailman version 2.1.11
We're sorry, we hit a bug!
Please inform the webmaster for this site of this problem. Printing of
traceback and other system information has been explicitly inhibited, but
the webmaster ca
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 524127 normal
Bug#524127: [uscan] 'x509_user' not valid URI scheme at /usr/bin/uscan line 389
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 524566 1.0.7a-1
Bug#524566: fluidsynth: sf2/COPYRIGHT is not DFSG
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.7a-1.
> found 524566 1.0.8-1.1
Bug#524566: fluidsynth: sf2/COPYRIGHT is not DFSG
Bug marked as found in version 1.0.8-1.1.
> stop
Stopping
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.4+1
Severity: serious
Justification: unknow
-- Package-specific info:
Contents of /var/lib/x11/X.roster:
xserver-xorg
/var/lib/x11/X.md5sum does not exist.
X server symlink status:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 avr 12 2008 /etc/X11/X -> /usr/bin/Xorg
-rwxr-xr-x
We already have a patch on our git repository. I cannot upload myself.
If somebody can NMU be my guest.
--
A bug magnet
On Apr 18, 2009, at 9:06, Michael Biebl wrote:
Khapin wrote:
I'm having exactly the same problem here with udev 0.125-7 on a
Testing...
If there is any info/test I could
Package: libogdi3.2-dev
Version: 3.2.0~beta2-2
Severity: serious
Preparing to replace libogdi3.2-dev 3.2.0~beta1-3.1 (using
.../libogdi3.2-dev_3.2.0~beta2-2_amd64.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement libogdi3.2-dev ...
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libogdi3.2-dev_3.2.0~beta2-2_amd64.d
The problem is one of wrong include paths getting passed to g++
sucessfull amd64 build:
g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -w -D_REENTRANT -fPIC -DNBREAKPAD
-DLINUX -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_GUI_LIB -DQT_NETWORK_LIB -DQT_CORE_LIB
-DQT_SHARED -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/linux-g++ -I.
-I/usr/include/qt4/Qt
+ Sjoerd Simons (Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:46:02 +0100):
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:12:30PM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> > Hey, Sjoerd.
> > Any plans to make an upload of pulseaudio to unstable (either 0.9.14-2,
> > or a 0.9.15 version), addressing some of its RC bugs? Particularly the
> > FTBFSes o
This seems like a workaround (worked for me):
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522669#25
--
___mail: alex at corcoles dot net
{~._.~} ICQ: 66791436
( Y )MSN: koalillo at fastmail dot fm
()~*~()Y!: koalillo
(_)-(_) http://eucaliptus.ath.cx/~alex
--
To UNSUBSC
I think I'm seeing this, I've narrowed it down to Jabber (and Gmail)
accounts.
Maybe it's related to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/libxml2/+bug/357949
--
___mail: alex at corcoles dot net
{~._.~} ICQ: 66791436
( Y )MSN: koalillo at fastmail dot fm
()~*~()Y!: koali
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> no; i'll have a look at it and upload it myself.
done; sitting in NEW now.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: daniel.baum...@panthera-systems.net
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 01:15:50PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> Package: exult
> Version: 1.2-14
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
> > CFLAGS="-I.. -DHAVE_CONFIG_H" gimptool-2.0 --build u7shp.c
> > Cannot run 'pkg-config --cflags gimpui-2.0
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # uploaded; sitting in NEW.
> tags 484041 +pending
Bug#484041: iceowl-l10n-pt-br: pt_BR language pack isn't compatible with iceowl
0.8
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 507033 +pending
Bug#507033: iceowl-l10n-de: outdated iceowl
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 07:12:30PM +0200, Adeodato Sim? wrote:
> Hey, Sjoerd.
>
> Any plans to make an upload of pulseaudio to unstable (either 0.9.14-2,
> or a 0.9.15 version), addressing some of its RC bugs? Particularly the
> FTBFSes on hppa (#520378) and with new libtool (#522716), and seeing
Hey, Sjoerd.
Any plans to make an upload of pulseaudio to unstable (either 0.9.14-2,
or a 0.9.15 version), addressing some of its RC bugs? Particularly the
FTBFSes on hppa (#520378) and with new libtool (#522716), and seeing
what’s up with #521282 would be nice too.
Thanks,
--
- Are you sure we
Noèl Köthe wrote:
> They can be found at http://people.debian.org/~noel/iceowl-l10n/
> The diff is attached.
thanks.
> Is it OK to upload this NMU to experimental?
no; i'll have a look at it and upload it myself.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 498389
Bug#498389: pulseaudio in testing is broken, needs rebuild
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Sebastian Siewior
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Hello,
because I need a translated iceowl I updated the package of iceowl-l10n
0.9 (right now in experimental).
They can be found at http://people.debian.org/~noel/iceowl-l10n/
The diff is attached.
Is it OK to upload this NMU to experimental?
--
Noèl Köthe
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
d
There are only a few minor changes between -1 and -2, and mips
successfully completed a bin-NMU of -1+b2 on March 11.
Here's the relevant snippet from the build of -1+b2:
> /usr/bin/uic-qt4 confirmdialog.ui -o ../../build/ui_confirmdialog.h
> g++ -c -pipe -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -w -D_REENTRANT -fPI
On Apr 18, "B. L. Jilek" wrote:
> and there are no *.rules files in the new package (udev_0.140-2_amd64.deb).
Check /lib/udev/rules.d/.
Anyway, downgrading udev has a very high probability to broke your system.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:02:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513424: fixed in kdebindings 4:4.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #513424,
regarding libqt4-ruby1.8: Conflicts with package libqt0-ruby1.8 because of
using the same file path
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:02:28 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#523784: fixed in kdebindings 4:4.2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #523784,
regarding kdebindings - FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
`debian/tmp/usr/lib/libsmokephonon.so.2': No such file or directory
to be marked
On 2009-04-18 17:44:45 (+0200), Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 06:28:36PM +0300, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> > On 2009-04-18 17:19:10 (+0200), Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > > That looks like mips behaves like most other architectures and does not
> > > allow to link sta
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 06:28:36PM +0300, Peter 'p2' De Schrijver wrote:
> On 2009-04-18 17:19:10 (+0200), Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > That looks like mips behaves like most other architectures and does not
> > allow to link static object compiled without -fPIC into shared objects.
> > Is that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge #524286 #523449
Bug#523449: splashy prevents kernel modules to load
Bug#524286: general: kernel modules does not automatically load
Bug#524276: udev not loading hardware modules
Merged 523449 524276 524286.
> thnaks
Unknown command or malfo
On 2009-04-18 17:19:10 (+0200), Sebastian Harl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for reporting this.
>
> On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 01:15:32PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link mips-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall
> > > -Werror -Wall -g -O2 -module -avoid-version -o netl
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this.
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 01:15:32PM +0300, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link mips-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -Werror
> > -Wall -g -O2 -module -avoid-version -o netlink.la -rpath /usr/lib/collectd
> > netlink_la-netlink.lo -lnetlink
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 524286 523449
Bug#524286: general: kernel modules does not automatically load
Bug#524276: udev not loading hardware modules
Bug reopened, originator set to 523449.
> #patrick, if you think merge with #524275 and #523187 is appropriate,
> #
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:35:37 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#517146: fixed in freej 0.10git20090312-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #517146,
regarding freej: FTBFS: error: ffmpeg/avcodec.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
I can confirm this bug.
It seems that *all* scripts in /etc/init.d/ exit with a status of 1,
regardless of whether an error has actually happened or not.
Moving /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh out of the way (ie. renaming or removing
it) solves the problem.
I am not sure, but is it sane to have any retu
Package: python-elementtree
Version: 1.2.6-13
Severity: normal
The bug is still there. Oddly, the problem directory
is a regular file that looks like a listing of a directory.
It starts like this:
> cat /usr/share/python-support/python-elementtree.public
> pyversions=2.4
>
> /usr/share/pyshare
Khapin wrote:
> I'm having exactly the same problem here with udev 0.125-7 on a
> Testing...
> If there is any info/test I could do to help fixing that bug, just ask.
>
> btw, this bug should have its severity set to "grave" or even "critical",
> as it prevents the system from working properly: no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign #524286 splashy
Bug#524286: general: kernel modules does not automatically load
Bug#524276: udev not loading hardware modules
Bug reassigned from package `general' to `splashy'.
> reassign #523449 splashy
Bug#523449: acpid fails to open
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
reassign #524286 splashy
reassign #523449 splashy
severity #524286 critical
merge #523449 #524286
retitle #523449 splashy prevents kernel modules to load
thanks
Hello,
I just read #524286 which has the same symptoms as my bug. Removing
splashy and re
Your message dated Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:17:11 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#524581: fixed in jabberd2 2.2.7.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #524581,
regarding jabberd2_2.2.7.1-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS on mips: missing
builddependency ?
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
severity 524607 important
tag 524607 unreproducible
reassign 524607 xserver-xorg-video-intel
kthxbye
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 14:24 +0200, alberto maurizi wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg
> Version: 1:7.3+18
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
yeah, right.
what's in the X l
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 524607 important
Bug#524607: xserver-xorg: Ctrl+Alt+F1 kills X rather to switch to console
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> tag 524607 unreproducible
Bug#524607: xserver-xorg: Ctrl+Alt+F1 kills X rather to switch to console
Package: xserver-xorg
Version: 1:7.3+18
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
The probles is exactly as described in the subject:
X is killed by the sequence Ctrl+Alt+F whichever .
This also affects "hibernate" becasue when hibernate wants to switch to
console while freezing
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 512498 = patch pending
Bug#512498: rhino: NPE at startup
Tags were: moreinfo
Tags set to: patch, pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
Ok, thanks.
// Ola
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 05:27:29PM -0400, John covici wrote:
> What I did was to run the sql script to upgrade from 2.1 to 2.2 and
> that fixed things, but the install should at least tell you that you
> need to do this. I also had to install a couple of things which were
> no
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 524596 important
Bug#524596: xen-linux-system-2.6.26-2-xen-amd64: big rsync run freezes xen DOM
0 kernel
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
owner 524569 Bart Martens
forcemerge 524578 524569
thanks
On 2009-04-18 Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Bart Martens (Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:01:46 +0200):
[...]
> > Good plan. I just uploaded pqiv
> Aha. I’m CCing Andreas Metzler, though he problably read your mail via
> -release or something: he manage
+ Bart Martens (Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:01:46 +0200):
> On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:09 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > I suggest somebody packages pqiv, we let it migrate to testing, and then
> > we remove imlib11 and qiv from testing once icewm has stopped using it.
> > I don’t mind that we leave qiv a
Bart Martens skrev:
> Package: fluidsynth
> Version: 1.0.8-2
> Severity: serious
>
> The file fluidsynth_1.0.8.orig.tar.gz in Debian contains these files:
>
> sf2/VintageDreamsWaves-v2.sf2
> sf2/Makefile.in
> sf2/Makefile.am
> sf2/COPYRIGHT
>
> The license in sf2/COPYRIGHT contains "It is not al
This is CVE-2009-1300.
Please add it in the relevant package changelog.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Fri, 2009-04-17 at 10:09 +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> + Bart Martens (Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:20:05 +0200):
>
> > At this point, the most recent upstream version of qiv still needs the
> > old imlib.
>
> > Where to go from here ? Possible options:
>
> > 1. Barry is working with upstream to get
Package: bastille
Version: 1:2.1.1-19
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
bastille -c says:
ERROR: 'DB5.0' is not a supported operating system.
Valid operating system versions are as follows:
'DB2.2' 'DB3.0' 'DB3.1' 'DB4.0' 'RH6.0'
'RH6.1' 'RH6.2'
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
