Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:02:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#512839: fixed in xine-ui 0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1~lenny2
has caused the Debian Bug report #512839,
regarding xine-ui: xdg-screensaver broke XVDR plugin
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> #xine-ui (0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1~lenny2) testing; urgency=medium
> #
> # * Update screensaver control code to match version 0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1
> #as intended, fixing process and file handle leak (Closes: #512839)
> #
> package xine-consol
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 02:25 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Just as a remark regarding your intended fix: I haven't yet seen the
> > place where xine does a wait() or waitpid() for those forked childs to
> > clean up the zombies. If there is a place, ok, I just havn't seen it
> > yet.
>
> I added
gark...@mailueberfall.de wrote
> I understand that you don't agree with the bug being grave. The point is
> that I use it mainly for watching TV.
> This is practically not possible anymore now since the VDR playback
> breaks on every channel switch due to xdg-screensaver hogging the audio
> handle.
2009/1/30 Raphael Geissert :
[...]
>
> [1]http://cognifty.com/blog.entry/id=6/addslashes_dont_call_it_a_comeback.html
Here's[2] another reference as to what mysql_real_escape_string does.
On a side note, while the conclusion in [1] "partially" true, it
misses the part of real input encoding, which
On Friday 30 January 2009 15:09:34 Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> * Nelson A. de Oliveira [2009-01-30 19:06]:
> > glpi versions prior to 0.71.4 are affected by a SQL injection
> > vulnerability. See the upstream announce [1] and SecurityFocus [2].
> >
> > [1]
> > http://www.glpi-project.org/spip.php
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 23:02:26 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513531: fixed in vnc4 4.1.1+X4.3.0-31
has caused the Debian Bug report #513531,
regarding CVE-2008-4770: Arbitrary code execution via crafted RFB protocol data
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:17:12 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#495683: fixed in sshguard 1.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #495683,
regarding sshguard: Current implementation skip any other iptables rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:58:50 GMT
with message-id <200901302158.n0ulwoq7025...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line xmove has been removed from Debian, closing #442125
has caused the Debian Bug report #442125,
regarding xmove assert: SaveVisuals() couldn't find the default visual
to be
Ben,
I understand that you don't agree with the bug being grave. The point is
that I use it mainly for watching TV.
This is practically not possible anymore now since the VDR playback
breaks on every channel switch due to xdg-screensaver hogging the audio
handle. For that usage it is definately a g
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 21:17:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#506353: fixed in mailscanner 4.74.16-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #506353,
regarding CVE-2008-5312/3: mailscanner might allow local users to overwrite
arbitrary files via a symlink attack
to be marked a
Hi,
* Nelson A. de Oliveira [2009-01-30 19:06]:
> glpi versions prior to 0.71.4 are affected by a SQL injection vulnerability.
> See the upstream announce [1] and SecurityFocus [2].
>
> [1] http://www.glpi-project.org/spip.php?page=annonce&id_breve=161&lang=en
> [2] http://www.securityfocus.com/b
Package: glpi
Version: 0.71.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
Hi!
glpi versions prior to 0.71.4 are affected by a SQL injection vulnerability.
See the upstream announce [1] and SecurityFocus [2].
[1] http://www.glpi-project.org/spip.php?page=annonce&id_breve=16
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 17:47:03 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513594: fixed in libgsf 1.14.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #513594,
regarding invalid code in libgsf
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Package: linux-libc-dev
Version: 2.6.28-1~experimental.1~snapshot.12651
Severity: serious
Justification: undeclared file conflict
Hi,
the kernel started installing drm headers which previously came with
libdrm-dev. If we decide to do things this way for squeeze,
linux-libc-dev will need to Repla
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 513594 + upstream fixed-upstream pending
Bug#513594: invalid code in libgsf
Tags were: patch upstream
Tags added: upstream, fixed-upstream, pending
> forwarded 513594
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/libgsf?view=revision&revision=1039
Bug#5135
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 17:35 +0100, Claudio F Filho wrote:
> Package: compiz
> Version: 0.7.6-7
> Severity: serious
>
this is probably the wrong severity for this bug, but anyway..
> --- Please enter the report below this line. ---
> Hi
>
> I am using KDE 4.x and Debian Sid. I tried get some effe
Package: compiz
Version: 0.7.6-7
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi
I am using KDE 4.x and Debian Sid. I tried get some effects and could
change by compiz, but when tried to change got a error: a white screen.
I sent this doubt to debian-kde list, and others pe
notforwarded 513594
tags 513594 +patch
The patch from GCC upstream report:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17213&action=view
--- libgsf-1.14.11/gsf/gsf-output-csv.c.jj
+++ libgsf-1.14.11/gsf/gsf-output-csv.c
+0100
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ gsf_output_csv_quoting_mode_get_type (vo
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notforwarded 513594
Bug#513594: invalid code in libgsf
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR39015.
> tags 513594 +patch
Bug#513594: invalid code in libgsf
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
> The patch from G
gcc-4.3 4.3.3-3 does not expose this bug, GCC packages for lenny+1 will like to
expose it. patch is in the GCC upstream report.
Matthias
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> clone 513420 -1
Bug#513420: Breaks building libgsf from source
Bug 513420 cloned as bug 513594.
> reopen -1
Bug#513594: Breaks building libgsf from source
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to us
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:32:02 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513490: fixed in cdebootstrap 0.5.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #513490,
regarding cdebootstrap: version in Lenny needs to be able to bootstrap Squeeze
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim tha
Phil Miller (28/01/2009):
> Package: synaptic
> Version: 0.62.5
> Tags: confirmed
> Followup-For: Bug #495228
>
> I just tested this by forcibly removing hicolor-icon-theme, and can
> confirm that synaptic is drastically less usable under that condition.
Thanks Phil,
please maintainer & release
Hi,
as this bug _really_ should make it into Lenny, i am upgrading this bug
to RC again, thus release team keeps this issue on its radar.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas | Debian System Administrator
Debian & GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster
Public key http
On Fri, 2009-01-30 at 12:28 +0200, Jonathan Quick wrote:
> (re-sending with subject)
>
> Hi Ben
>
> I assume you're aware of the RC bug #512839 introduced by your NMU (and in
> testing) xine-ui/0.99.5+cvs20070914-2.1 ?
No, I missed that. The bug is clearly not grave; not sure whether it
should
reassign 513438 libarts1c2a
retitle 513438 please rebuild to drop reference on libjack.la
severity 513438 serious
stop
Justification: breaks unrelated packages.
Xavier Vello writes:
> Le jeudi 29 janvier 2009 22:11:08, vous avez écrit :
>> Xavier Vello writes:
>> > The current unstable package
Package: octave3.0
Version: 1:3.0.1-6lenny1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software (the package system)
Or Package: octave-symbolic
Version: 1.0.6-2
Not sure if the bug's in octave-symbolic or octave3.0, please
reassign if this is wrong.
octave-symbolic fails to either re
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> severity 513490 important
Bug#513490: cdebootstrap: version in Lenny needs to be able to bootstrap Squeeze
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
The problem is not with building other packages. the problem is building glibc
itself.
there is a cotradiction between the definition by gcc and the code used in
glibc assebler files.
On יום שישי 30 ינואר 2009 11:25:20 Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:37:57AM +0200, Yoram bar ha
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:17:05 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#513540: fixed in newpki-lib 2.0.0+rc1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #513540,
regarding newpki-lib: Does not properly check the result of X509_REQ_verify()
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Hi Kurt,
> I was looking at return codes for applications making use of
> openssl functions and found this in x509.c:
> if (X509_verify(cert, key) == -1) {
> log_print("x509_cert_validate: self-signed cert is bad");
> return 0;
> }
>
> X509_verify r
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:36:27 +0100
with message-id <20090130093627.ga11...@artemis.corp>
and subject line Re: Bug#513564: glibc: Please redefine __i686 to work-around
the infamous i686 compilation fail
has caused the Debian Bug report #513564,
regarding glibc: Please redefine __i6
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:37:57AM +0200, Yoram bar haim wrote:
> When compiling with gcc that uses march=i686 (or any sub-arch) gcc defines
> __i686 to be 1, that causes instructions such as
> ..ifndef __i686.get_pc_thunk.reg;
> to fail as syntax error (because the prefix is 1).
> if you force it
Package: glibc
Version: 2.7-18
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When compiling with gcc that uses march=i686 (or any sub-arch) gcc defines
__i686 to be 1, that causes instructions such as
..ifndef __i686.get_pc_thunk.reg;
to fail as syntax error (because the prefix is 1).
i
35 matches
Mail list logo
