I've upgraded three systems to use 2.6.26 kernels. (2.6.26-5 or 2.6.25-6) and see this
problem on all of them. (One has a P2, another a P3, and the last a P4 CPU.)
Booting an old 2.6.25-5 kernel from grub makes the problem go away.
The insert key is a mode.. On odd presses it disables the key
Package: coco-cpp
Version: 20081001-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of coco-cpp_20081001-1 on schroeder by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20081003-1631
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 500420 important
Bug#500420: Segmentation fault running kismet_server
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 07:25:37AM +, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 492778 + pending
What's the status? This is marked pending for nearly two months now.
Is there any way people can help to resolve this?
Cheers,
Mor
That's odd, I can't even get that binary to run on the wrt54g i have remote
access to. I'll be able to test this further in a few weeks. In the meantime
I'll change the severity to important as the kismet package is still usable in
other configurations
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:27:21PM -
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499945: fixed in lynx-cur 2.8.7dev10-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499945,
regarding Segfault in asn1_get_tag_der().
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 499569 gnupg-agent: modifies SigBlk mask of all processes spawned in
> the X session breaking unrelated software [i386 only?]
Bug#499569: gnupg-agent: modifies SigBlk mask of all processes spawned in the X
session breaking unrelated software
C
tags 499945 + patch
thanks
Hi,
here is the lynx-cur 2.8.7dev10-2.1 NMU.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u lynx-cur-2.8.7dev10/debian/changelog
lynx-cur-2.8.7dev10/debian/changelog
--- lynx-cur-2.8.7dev10/debian/changelog
+++ lynx-cur-2.8.7dev10/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+lynx-cur (2.8.7dev10-2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 499945 + patch
Bug#499945: Segfault in asn1_get_tag_der().
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
retitle 499569 gnupg-agent: modifies SigBlk mask of all processes spawned in
the X session breaking unrelated software [i386 only?]
Hi again,
Thomas Viehmann was so nice and contacted me about this issue on IRC.
He could _not_ reproduce the issue on his amd64 system.
Someone else (Ingo) could r
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 21:17:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494221: fixed in netmrg 0.20-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #494221,
regarding netmrg: FTBFS: *** [zero.rrd] Segmentation fault
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:48 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> I didn't wait at all, I informed maintainers at the beginning of the
s/maintainers/& of multiple version library packages/
>> cycle, though if at the end of the cycle there are too much versions (5
>> in this case
tags 494221 + patch pending
thanks
Hi Uwe,
here is my netmrg NMU (version 0.20-2.1), bumping the
build-dependency to the fixed rrdtool.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u netmrg-0.20/debian/control netmrg-0.20/debian/control
--- netmrg-0.20/debian/control
+++ netmrg-0.20/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
S
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 494221 + patch pending
Bug#494221: netmrg: FTBFS: *** [zero.rrd] Segmentation fault
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:48 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>
> I didn't wait at all, I informed maintainers at the beginning of the
> cycle, though if at the end of the cycle there are too much versions (5
> in this case) of a library we can either remove the whole lot that
> depends on them or make them
(Cc-ing the nfs-utils maintainers, perhaps they have some insight that
could solve this)
On Sat, 2008-10-04 at 09:52 +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > My guess is that name lookups are cached in idmapd. Can you check that
> > by restarting idmapd (/etc/init.d/nfs-common restart) the problem goe
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 22:47:11 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#499898: ntfs-3g: Files copied not complete
has caused the Debian Bug report #499898,
regarding ntfs-3g: Files copied not complete
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that th
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 07:56 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
>> tags 500615 + patch
>> thanks
>>
>> Dear maintainer,
>>
>> I've prepared an NMU for mmorph (versioned as 2.3.4.2-11.1) and uploaded it
>> to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
>
> Y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 499740 -unreproducible
Bug#499740: libwx-perl - FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9 subtests failed.
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug t
tags 499740 -unreproducible
thanks
-=| Bastian Blank, Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 05:26:52PM +0200 |=-
> found 499740 0.86-2
Sad, but true. The package fails on numerous architectures, in three
different ways:
* arm: the first test fails (wstat 11)
* alpha, armel, hppa, mips, mipsel, s390, sparc: th
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 09:48:08AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Also, can you point me to a comprehensive statement of the interface
> changes in the db library which may affect mmorph? I'm sure you have
> that right at hand because I'm sure you went through it carefully before
> making an
I can have libtidy-ruby work correcly at least on some cases. So this
probably needs more information on how to reproduce.
Typically, in the source package, running test/usage.rb instanciates a
Tidy object and does not raise any security exception.
--
Arnaud Cornet
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:21:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line lcap has been removed from Debian, closing #491101
has caused the Debian Bug report #491101,
regarding lcap: doesn't work with linux 2.6.25
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that t
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:24:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line realtime-lsm has been removed from Debian, closing #425942
has caused the Debian Bug report #425942,
regarding realtime-lsm-source: Doesn't compile with linux 2.6.21
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:24:45 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line realtime-lsm has been removed from Debian, closing #462180
has caused the Debian Bug report #462180,
regarding realtime-lsm: debian/copyright doesn't provide correct/full Copyright
information
t
Thomas Viehmann schrieb:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> it seems that without more info (unless you are able to get some
> hardware to reproduce this to someone who wants to debug this, but you
> don't seem to live near Bonn, Germany ;) ), we would have difficulties
> to fix this bug.
>
> Could you try to b
Package: jetty
Severity: serious
When browsing through open security issues in Lenny I noticed that several
Jetty security fixes have been unfixed for quite some time (#454529),
although upstream has posted a patch in July.
Since it's only in contrib, outdated (current upstream releases are 6 and
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442664: fixed in qtstalker 0.32-3.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #442664,
regarding qtstalker: newer BDB
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499841: fixed in libpam-mount 0.44-1+lenny1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499841,
regarding CVE-2008-3970: does not verify mountpoint and source ownership before
mounting a user-defined
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#500909: fixed in libxpp3-java 1.1.3.4.O-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #500909,
regarding libxpp3-java: includes javax.xml.namespace.QName class
to be marked as done.
This means that yo
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 20:14:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#493040: iceweasel: keep generating segfault when
opening gmail
has caused the Debian Bug report #493040,
regarding iceweasel: keep generating segfault when opening gmail
to be marked as
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 501048 +patch
Bug#501048: coco-cpp - FTBFS: rm: cannot remove `Coco': No such file or
directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
tags 501048 +patch
thanks
this bug is trivial to fix, just change "rm Coco" to "rm -f Coco" in the
clean target in the Makefile
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Am Montag, den 29.09.2008, 00:45 +0200 schrieb ziborski.net admin:
> No, there are no removed devices, all are "active sync".
> Please note that /dev/md3 is a RAID0 built on top of two RAID1
> (md1 and md2) which causes md2 - and its underlying partitions
> sdc3 and sdd3 to start with the second 1
Hi,
I simply asked to upstream for a clarification on the use of the Xen
trademark, and received two unambiguous answers.
From Citrix:
Actually, for the community, you can do whatever you like. The
FIT test only applies to commercially distributed Xen products -
and is a
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#500692: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #500692,
regarding [firmware-nonfree] FTBFS: depends on linux-support-2.6.25-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#494936: fixed in firmware-nonfree 0.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #494936,
regarding bnx2 fails to load on bootup, succeeds on manual load
to be marked as done.
This means that you cl
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 07:56 +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> tags 500615 + patch
> thanks
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for mmorph (versioned as 2.3.4.2-11.1) and uploaded it
> to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
Yes, please remove it from the upload q
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 485489 apt 0.6.46.4-0.1
Bug#485489: synaptic: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or
opened
Bug reassigned from package `synaptic' to `apt'.
> forcemerge 4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 499458 500956
Bug#499458: [hppa] kernel no longer boots on an A500
Bug#500956: unable to boot on a500 (hppa)
Forcibly Merged 499458 500956.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 07:20:35AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * dann frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 17:55]:
> > Are you sure the installer is using 2.6.26-6? This looks a lot like
> > #499458 which should've been fixed in 2.6.26-6 (fixed it for me, at
> > least).
>
> Note that he wr
Hi,
according to the dmesg logs posted by the submitter to the ntfs-3g
forum, it seems clear the issue is caused by I/O errors.
I guess this bug should simply be closed.
Cheers,
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardwar
found 499740 0.86-2
thanks
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libwx-perl_0.86-2 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> make[4]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd/libwx-perl-0.86/ext/pperl/splashfast'
> PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/p
Package: libcaca
Version: 0.99.beta15-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of libcaca_0.99.beta15-1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
> -
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 499740 0.86-2
Bug#499740: libwx-perl - FTBFS: Failed 2/4 test scripts. 6/9 subtests failed.
Bug marked as found in version 0.86-2 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Package: coco-cpp
Version: 20081001-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of coco-cpp_20081001-1 on debian-31.osdl.marist.edu by
> sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> /usr/bin/make clean
> make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/coco-cpp-20081001'
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 12:43:39PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
> usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
> maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
> initial maintai
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 16:11 +0200, Stefan Hornburg (Racke) a
écrit :
> > I find it annoying that after the sympa-drama before the etch release,
> > we are now likely to run into another sympa-drama. Sympa is not an
> > unmaintained software package: upstream is active, responsive and AFAIK
Hi,
There have not been any updates to the status of this bug for several
months, although this is definitely something that should be fixed for
lenny.
Is there anything that is possible to help fixing this before the
release? I see you consider entirely dropping these declarations, do you
need f
Package: wmibam
Version: 0.0.1-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
wmibam uses old library on ibam.* files. That makes it unuseful because
it can't check the sensors.
You can get the ibam.* files from the ibam package and replace the old
ones on the wmibam packa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 500781 + patch
Bug#500781: CVE-2008-4297: privilege escalation
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
tags 500781 + patch
thanks
Hi Vincent,
* Vincent Danjean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-03 12:15]:
> Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > Hi,
> > the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
> > published for mercurial.
> >
> > CVE-2008-4297[0]:
> > | Mercurial before 1.0.2 does not enforce t
On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> In #354355 (the "etch sympa-drama bug"), Stefan Hornburg refused several
> times to consider co-maintainance for sympa. I'm not sure if Jean
> Charles Delepine is still interested in co-maintaining it, but maybe we
> should try
Hi,
sbackup has an RC bug without maintainer response for two months
(#493840). The submitter (mind you, a Debian developer) still owes a
mail about whether he can give some hints how to reproduce, but really,
a sufficiently interested maintainer would have processed it somewhat
(either determined
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 03/10/08 at 15:21 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 12:43 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
It does not seem to have reverse dependencies. There are a few users
(double digit popcon), but not exceedingly many.
As it is on the servers, I assume
Hi,
I’ve successfully configured several Heartbeat clusters using version
2.0.7-2, and I never met the error you mention. Maybe you should send
your configuration if you want help with debugging.
In all cases, I don’t think this should be a RC bug. Furthermore, there
is no evidence that it applie
Package: oolite
Version: 1.65-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This happens every time, with a just-installed oolite:
--- snip ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ oolite
oolite: Uncaught exception NSInvalidArgumentException, reason: Tried to add
nil to array
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ec
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#500657: fixed in gammu 1.21.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #500657,
regarding gammu_1.20.94-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): atgen.c:4016: error:
format '%zd' expects type 'signed si
On 03/10/08 at 15:21 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 12:43 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
> > It does not seem to have reverse dependencies. There are a few users
> > (double digit popcon), but not exceedingly many.
> >
>
> As it is on the servers, I assume a single
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 500657 +pending
Bug#500657: gammu_1.20.94-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): atgen.c:4016:
error: format '%zd' expects type 'signed size_t', but argument 3 has type 'int'
Tags were: pending fixed-upstream upstream experimental
Tags added: pending
tags 500657 +pending
thanks
Hi,
The following change has been committed for this bug, and so the
fix will be in the next upload.
===
Changeset [216] by nijel, 2008-10-03 15:38:52 +0200 (Fri, 03 Oct 2008)
* New upstream version.
-
Hi,
thanks for providing the backtrace, it helps a lot in understanding what
happens.
#0 0x41276968 in g_markup_escape_text () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#1 0x41277ab7 in g_markup_vprintf_escaped () from
/usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x41277bd8 in g_markup_printf_e
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:26:17 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #500644,
regarding nvidia-kernel-source: Cannot build on 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the prob
Le vendredi 03 octobre 2008 à 12:43 +0200, Thomas Viehmann a écrit :
> It does not seem to have reverse dependencies. There are a few users
> (double digit popcon), but not exceedingly many.
>
As it is on the servers, I assume a single mailing-list manager may have
thousands of users... so popula
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial maintainer response "will investigate, also happen
Hi,
thanks for the swift response!
Stefan Hornburg (Racke) wrote:
> Applying the patch from
> http://sourcesup.cru.fr/cgi/viewvc.cgi/branches/sympa-5.4-branch/src/tools.pl?r1=4943&r2=5124
> should solve issue #496520, is that right?
As I said, I'd personally prefer to have the example/POD code
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1:1.7.2+fp10.20080811
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I upgraded from the version of the package in unstable to the version in
experimental, and Flash would no longer work.
The symlink in /etc/alternatives/flash-mozilla.so pointes to
/
Your message dated Fri, 3 Oct 2008 15:00:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the Debian Bug report #495214,
regarding CVE-2008-3651: memory leak
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Thomas Viehmann wrote:
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial maintainer response "will investigate, also happen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 500910 + patch
Bug#500910: CVE-2008-4194 denial of service
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
tags 500910 + patch
thanks
Hi,
* Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-10-02 21:43]:
> On Thu, Oct 02, 2008 at 04:25:54PM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Quoting Nico Golde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Package: pdnsd
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Tags: security
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > the follo
Package: ipsec-tools
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was
published for ipsec-tools.
CVE-2008-3652[0]:
| src/racoon/handler.c in racoon in ipsec-tools does not remove an
| "orphaned ph1" (phase 1) handle when it has been initiated
Package: jasper
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) ids were
published for jasper.
CVE-2008-3522[0]:
| Buffer overflow in the jas_stream_printf function in
| libjasper/base/jas_stream.c in JasPer 1.900.1 might allow
| context-dependent a
Hi Janusz, Olivier,
thanks for taking interest in the Debian packaging of sympa.
Olivier Salaün wrote:
> As far as we're concerned all reported bugs, regarding insecure usage of
> tmp, have been fixed in Sympa. It's now up to the Debian maintainer to
> apply the patches to the Debian package.
Yea
I am a dedicated sympa user too -- it would be a real shame if this
couldn't be brough up to date.
-A
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 13:36 +0200, Janusz S. Bień wrote:
> On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #4965
I'm another Olivier, but I can provide some feedback still.
As far as we're concerned all reported bugs, regarding insecure usage of
tmp, have been fixed in Sympa. It's now up to the Debian maintainer to
apply the patches to the Debian package.
If we've missed something, please let us know...
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489044: fixed in foomatic-gui 0.7.9
has caused the Debian Bug report #489044,
regarding printconf: Tries to invoke wrong init script
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Daniel Glassey wrote:
> Yes, I made a mess of that not updating the bug. I've checked with
> upstream and they have some ideas to try (incidentally it is a firefox
> bug that leads down the bad code path, but still a bug that needs
> fixed in graphite/pango-graphite). If I can get a fixed package
>
On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
> usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
> maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
> initial
Your message dated Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#500991: fixed in multipath-tools 0.4.8-13
has caused the Debian Bug report #500991,
regarding multipath-tools: Multipath-tools uses invalid scsi_id option, breaks
multipath
to be marked as
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 01:12:16PM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> I won't need cciss support in the near future as I will be connecting FC
> disks to the server. I will test the new version of multipath-tools
O.k., this should work without problems then.
> (with cciss blacklisted), if you give me t
Guido Günther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:50:01AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
The machine is an HP DL380G5 with an HP smart array P400i raid
controller. I was just testing the multipath support because I will need
it later on. The RAID disk is not available using multiple paths, but
multi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> tags 496954 + patch
Bug#496954: bind9: Fails to start due to SIGSEGV
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
2008/10/2 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> * Thomas Viehmann [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 08:59:38 +0200]:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> pango-graphite "owns" a critical bug, #471642 and dupes, since April
>> with no visible maintainer activity.
>> As it's not been released with stable before and has no reverse
>> depend
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:50:01AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> The machine is an HP DL380G5 with an HP smart array P400i raid
> controller. I was just testing the multipath support because I will need
> it later on. The RAID disk is not available using multiple paths, but
> multipath should sti
Hi,
for me it worked to generate version.h and utsrelease.h in include/linux
manually. Maybe you want to try it.
For 2.6.26.5 you'll need the following in version.h:
#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132634
#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))
(The LINUX_VERSION_CODE is calcula
Hi,
sympa has two RC bugs open for about one month, #496520 about insecure
usage of tmp (which looks at least partially fixed upstream, but has no
maintainer response) and #498144 about problems on upgrade (with an
initial maintainer response "will investigate, also happened to people
at the last
Guido Günther wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:56:16AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
devnode "^cciss!c[0-9]d[0-9]*(p[0-9]*)?"
instead of
devnode "^cciss!c[0-9]d[0-9]*[p[0-9]*]
The partition on the cciss disks should be optional?
I'd say you don't multipath partitions at all but only the disks but
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 500956 linux-2.6
Bug#500956: unable to boot on a500 (hppa)
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6.26-1-parisc64' to `linux-2.6'.
> forcemerge 499458 500956
Bug#499458:
The appended patch fixes the root cause. gcc -O2 optimizes out some
tests.
Thiemo
--- libcaca-0.99.beta15/configure.ac~ 2008-09-27 19:11:55.0 +0100
+++ libcaca-0.99.beta15/configure.ac2008-10-03 10:21:19.0 +0100
@@ -112,13 +112,13 @@ AC_TRY_COMPILE([#include ],[S
[AC_MSG
severity 500991 normal
retitle 500991 cciss not well supported
thanks
Hi Rik,
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:32:44AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
[..snip..]
> cciss!c0d0: getuid = /lib/udev/scsi_id -n -g -u -d /dev/%n (controller
> setting)
> /lib/udev/scsi_id: invalid option -- n
> error calling out /li
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:56:16AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> devnode "^cciss!c[0-9]d[0-9]*(p[0-9]*)?"
>
> instead of
>
> devnode "^cciss!c[0-9]d[0-9]*[p[0-9]*]
>
> The partition on the cciss disks should be optional?
I'd say you don't multipath partitions at all but only the disks but
then I don't
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed 400066 0.5.2-1.2
Bug#400066: lcdproc_0.5.1-2(powerpc/unstable): FTBFS: impossible constraint in
asm
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.5.2-1.2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
e trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> Automatic build of openturns_0.12.1-5 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
>> Build started at 20081003-0210
>
> [...]
>
>> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
>> Build-Depends: cdbs (>= 0.4.51), quilt (>= 0.46
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:47:55AM +0200, Rik Theys wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems the -n option is only applied to "LOGICAL VOLUME" products,
> according to a strings on /sbin/multipath.
>
> When I add a device section for 'LOGICAL VOLUME' and specify a
> getuid_callout, it uses that one.
>
> I wou
Package: openturns
Version: 0.12.1-5
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of openturns_0.12.1-5 on lebrun by sbuild/sparc 98
> Build started at 20081003-0210
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-D
Package: axiom
Version: 20050901-10.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of axiom_20050901-10.1 on spontini by sbuild/sparc 99.99
> Build started at 20081002-2320
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends
Hi,
I think the default regular expression for cciss devices in
/etc/multipath.conf (and the built-in defaults) should be:
devnode "^cciss!c[0-9]d[0-9]*(p[0-9]*)?"
instead of
devnode "^cciss!c[0-9]d[0-9]*[p[0-9]*]
The partition on the cciss disks should be optional?
Regards,
Rik
--
Rik
Hi,
It seems the -n option is only applied to "LOGICAL VOLUME" products,
according to a strings on /sbin/multipath.
When I add a device section for 'LOGICAL VOLUME' and specify a
getuid_callout, it uses that one.
I would expect multipath to use the defaults unless explicitely
configured in
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.4.8-12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I've installed multipath-tools on lenny, but it fails to find any multipath
devices. I've run multipath -v3 and it gives the following error:
cciss!c0d0: getuid = /lib/udev/scsi_id -n -g -u -
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo