Your message dated Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#489723: fixed in udev 0.125-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #489723,
regarding udev - dasd_id and rules removed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Your message dated Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#498504: fixed in udev 0.125-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #498504,
regarding udev - add s390 qeth devices again
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has bee
Your message dated Fri, 19 Sep 2008 01:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#498686: fixed in udev 0.125-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #498686,
regarding udev - generated initramfs have all binaries in /
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> found 498621 4:4.1.2-1
Bug#498621: PHP5 - ext/standard/rand.c is not dfsg conform
Bug marked as found in version 4:4.1.2-1.
> clone 498621 -1
Bug#498621: PHP5 - ext/standard/rand.c
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 476578 important
Bug#476578: php5-idn: php5 segfaults on excessive use of idn_to_ascii
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> forcemerge 491211 476578
Bug#491211: php5-
Package: llvm-examples
Version: 2.2-8
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The architecture-independent llvm-examples package is currently
uninstallable in fresh amd64 environments because it depends on an
identical version of the architecture-dependent llvm-dev package, but
the
* Jurij Smakov [Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:17:03 +0100]:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > It appears that pwlib-titan version currently in unstable got
> > > miscompiled on sparc somehow, that's cur
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:32:56AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Jurij Smakov [Mon, 25 Aug 2008 09:17:03 +0100]:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 07:50:17PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 08:14:10PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> > > > It appears that pwlib-titan versio
* Fabio Tranchitella [Mon, 15 Sep 2008 09:10:17 +0200]:
> Hello Thomas,
> * 2008-09-14 22:39, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > nginx has a four-month old RC bug #479185 that had some discussion where
> > the bug lies until beginning of July. After that, there is no visible
> > action. Maybe it is bette
fyi, I tested a modified version of Philippe's patch, but the issue
persists. I'll attach the exact patch I used which fixes #480794 and
drops the '-v' option from the sed call, which isn't a valid option.
The following output demonstrates the still-incorrect symlink:
$ dpkg -c libswt3.2-gtk-java
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Putzo wrote:
> If no one objects i would prepare a nmu [...]
News?
Kind regards
T.
--
Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:53:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line GPL-compatiblity of python licenses
has caused the Debian Bug report #498477,
regarding python2.5: readline.so is dynamically linked to GNU Readline which is
GPL
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Fri, 19 Sep 2008 00:53:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line GPL-compatiblity of python licenses
has caused the Debian Bug report #498857,
regarding python2.5: readline.so is dynamically linked to GNU Readline which is
GPL
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499201: fixed in libidn 1.10-2.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499201,
regarding libidn11-dev: Package fails to configure
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the proble
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:03:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499408: fixed in gallery2 2.2.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #499408,
regarding Gallery 2.2.6 Security Fix Release available
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the p
Asier ha scritto:
> Thu Sep 18 23:09:34 2008: A maintenance shell will now be started. CONTROL-D
> will terminate this shell and resume system boot. (warning).
> Thu Sep 18 23:09:34 2008: Give root password for maintenance
> Thu Sep 18 23:09:34 2008: (or type Control-D to continue):
Please, at t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 499201 + patch pending
Bug#499201: libidn11-dev: Package fails to configure
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
El Jueves, 18 de Septiembre de 2008, Giuseppe Iuculano escribió:
> Asier ha scritto:
> > Hmmm... no file is created under /root Perhaps I don't have some kernel
> > option enabled :-?
>
> I think something is broken in udev rule, please backup again your
> /etc/udev/rules.d/85_dmraid.rules and repl
tags 499201 + patch pending
thanks
Hi,
The following is the diff for my libidn 1.10-2.1 NMU with
the correct fix.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u libidn-1.10/debian/changelog libidn-1.10/debian/changelog
--- libidn-1.10/debian/changelog
+++ libidn-1.10/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+libidn (1.10-2
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.26-6
Severity: serious
This issue is related to CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME - disabling that config
option is a workaround. This is probably the same issue kyle describes
in his blog[1]. I'll test his patch[2] and, assuming it works, commit
it for the next release.
[1]http:
Ok, this is enough to be able to replay the journal log. I'm assuming *dip
was never updated through aliasing, but it would be good if someone could
double check that.
Running fsck -f still dies, but at least this should be enough to recover
from a power failure.
--
Ivandiff -ur jfsutils-1.1
On Monday 15 September 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> The changes have now been committed as revisions r55850 to r55856. The
> first commit is a semi-related bug fix. The second and last commits are
> basically your work with a few minor cleanups. The other commits are
> improvements by me created while
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:21:39PM +0200, Ferry Toth wrote:
> Thanks for fixing the bug.
>
> Is there is any chance of solving the problem behind the bug: Maestro3
> driver is not available after upgrading to linux 2.6.26?
>
> Will there be a package in non-free?
I don't think we have the manpow
Should a bug in a kernel/architecture that is not even supported by
Debian really be considered RC?
Most Probably not. However I currently suspect this bug to be a
duplicate Bug #498397. In that case, we would indeed have RC bug that
would affect both mips and mispel.
This patch was one of the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> forwarded 479185 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#479185: nginx_0.5.35-3(sparc/unstable): FTBFS on sparc, Error: Architecture
mismatch on "casa"
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarde
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 18:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#490305: fixed in ruby-gnome2 0.17.0~rc1-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #490305,
regarding kazehakase: Segfault on startup; ruby-related
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
It seems that somewhere around 0.5.35 a change in nginx's build system
make it fail while building on sparc machines with this error message:
- ---8<---
gcc -c -Wall -g -O2 -I src/core -I src/event -I src/event/modules -I
src/os/unix -I
tags 499408 + pending
kthxbye
Jan Wagner wrote:
> Package: gallery2
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
>
> A new version has been released which fixes the following bugs:
I'm finalizing the packaging of Gallery 2.2.6 and will be uploading it
later today.
--
Michae
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 499408 + pending
Bug#499408: Gallery 2.2.6 Security Fix Release available
Tags were: security
Tags added: pending
> kthxbye
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 499075 etch
Bug#499075: postfix security update FTBFS on mipsel
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: etch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Hey,
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 23:14:04 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> So I think there's two things to fix here, one is that the fseek() in
> createimptmp() should be done just before the fwrite() in
> modstatdb_note_core() to guarantee that we are going to be always at the
> beginning, and we make pr
Package: ttf-vlgothic
Version: 20080908-1
Severity: grave
When I configure VL Gothic use in ttf-japanese-gothic alternatives,
and have fontconfig cache updated, I have boxes in evince.
$ LC_ALL=C sudo update-alternatives --config ttf-japanese-gothic
There are 3 alternatives which provide `ttf-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 499276 normal
Bug#499276: Connection to bugs.debian.org being reset by peer
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 499276 +moreinfo
Bug#499276: Connection to bugs.debian.org being reset by peer
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinf
severity 499276 normal
tags 499276 +moreinfo
thanks
Can you run with debug options enabled and give the full output? --
errr. maybe not, wireshark output tells me there is some kind of TCP
layer problem. I'm not entirely sure of that. The BTS server has
closed connection (RST) for some reason a
Elimar,
Thanks for fixing the bug.
Is there is any chance of solving the problem behind the bug: Maestro3
driver is not available after upgrading to linux 2.6.26?
Will there be a package in non-free?
Best regards,
Ferry Toth
Exalon Delft BV
Radex Innovation Centre
Rotterdamseweg 183C
2629 HD De
On Sep 18, 2008, at 3:55 AM, maximilian attems wrote:
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:54:01PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Well...
I did another dist-upgrade tonite, and the problem went away. Go
figure...
Some one of the following list of upgrades (extracted from /var/log/
dpkg.log) fixed it.
200
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 499245 normal
Bug#499245: realtime-lsm: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> reassign 499245 ftp.debian.org
Bug#499245: realtime-lsm: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `realtime-ls
Package: gallery2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
A new version has been released which fixes the following bugs:
* Arbitrary file disclosure through archive upload module - Users with "add
item" permission could retrieve any file on the server that is owned by the
web server account. The prob
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> package aptitude
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: aptitude
> reassign 499322 apt 0.7.15~exp1
Bug#499322: aptitude: Segmentation fault + SIGABRT with experimental's apt
(0.7.15~exp1)
Hi Sebastian,
Today Sebastian Harl wrote:
[...]
> The attached patch should solve this issue. I've simply added a check if
> we're already passed the end of the file. Since I do not have access to
> a sparc box, I'd like to get some feedback if that really solves the
> issue. Also, I'd like Tobi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35
> severity 499060 grave
Bug#499060: dmraid: RAID not detected after upgrading to 1.0.0.rc14-3
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> tags 499060 - moreinfo
Bug#499060: dmraid: RAI
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 13:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#493397: fixed in zaptel 1:1.4.11~dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #493397,
regarding zaptel-source: Fails to build against 2.6.26
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 498213 important
Bug#498213: libmpich1.0gf: SIGSEV in MPI_Bcast when the size of the array
is>4
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Hi,
(This is a follow-up for Debian bug #498183 - see [1] for details.
Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc'ed when replying.)
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/498183
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 09:51:16PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> I don't have any problem reproducing it on sparc, so reopening. The
> segf
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 11:51:54PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 04, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I got a udev log. It gets 2 add and 1 change event. On the second add
> > event it cleans up the link and recreates it later. On the change event
> > it just removes it.
> Please
On Sep 18, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I intend to NMU this two bugs tomorrow if not fixed at this time.
Is there any hope you could provide me with the information needed to
fix #489230 and #489723 as well?
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 02:08:07PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 07, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The dasd_id tool and the corresponding rules got removed some time ago
> > without a proper upgrade path to a proper s390-tools version (which
> > does not yet exist in Debian).
>
Hi Vincent,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:59:31AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> With rrdtool 1.3.1-3, I can reproduce the bug mentioned on
>
> http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool-trac/ticket/178
>
> (see overlap.pl, which illustrates the RRA corruption).
>
> As http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool/ says:
>
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 09:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#499362: fixed in javascript-common 5
has caused the Debian Bug report #499362,
regarding fails to purge
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
Hi
I intend to NMU this two bugs tomorrow if not fixed at this time.
Bastian
--
Witch! Witch! They'll burn ya!
-- Hag, "Tomorrow is Yesterday", stardate unknown
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:44:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#498484: postfix: Postifx can't resolve hostnames
has caused the Debian Bug report #498484,
regarding postfix: Postifx can't resolve hostnames
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
# Bcc: control
tags 499347 + confirmed
thanks
On 08/09/18 00:37 +0200, Julien Cristau said ...
> elinks seems to want to have its doc dir as a symlink to elinks-data.
> It doesn't handle the transition from previous versions properly,
> though, so on upgrade you get an empty /usr/share/doc/elinks/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Bcc: control
> tags 499347 + confirmed
Bug#499347: empty /usr/share/doc/elinks
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 496411 20080831+dfsg-2
Bug#496411: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
packages
Bug marked as found in version 20080831+dfsg-2 and reopened.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assista
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:26:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: OPEN_MAX macro removed from linux/limits.h on amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #455429,
regarding OPEN_MAX macro removed from linux/limits.h on amd64
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Thu, 18 Sep 2008 10:26:09 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: FTBFS with GCC 4.3: uses (removed) pre-iso c++ headers
has caused the Debian Bug report #461706,
regarding FTBFS with GCC 4.3: uses (removed) pre-iso c++ headers
to be marked as done.
This
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:54:01PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
> Well...
>
> I did another dist-upgrade tonite, and the problem went away. Go
> figure...
>
> Some one of the following list of upgrades (extracted from /var/log/
> dpkg.log) fixed it.
>
> 2008-09-17 22:57:42 upgrade initramfs-too
Package: linux-headers-2.6.22-3-amd64
Version: 2.6.22-6.lenny1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
We want to use Lustre with lenny on amd64 and have the system running with
the package linux-patch-lustre applied to the lenny 2.6.22 kernel.
For building external modules I trie
58 matches
Mail list logo
