Processed: Fwd: Bug#494643: jags: should this package be removed?

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 494643 normal Bug#494643: jags: should this package be removed? Severity set to `normal' from `serious' > reassign 494643 ftp.debian.org Bug#494643: jags: should this package be removed? Bug reassigned from package `jags' to `ftp.debian.o

Bug#494544: debroster: arch-indep data in /usr/lib

Chris Lamb writes: > tags 494544 + patch > thanks Thanks for a very swift patch :) Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsub

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:51:31PM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > Robert: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Paul Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > >>> I j

Bug#494340: fslview: FTBFS in lenny: CMake errors

Le Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:41:56AM -0300, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > During a rebuild of all packages in a lenny chroot, your package failed > > > > CMake Error: Error required internal CMake variable not set, cmake may be > > not be built correctly. > > Missing variable is: > > QT_MOC_EXECUTA

Processed: Segmentation fault xmlroff --backend cairo

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > reassign 494227 xmlroff Bug#494227: refcard: FTBFS: /bin/sh: line 17: 29301 Segmentation fault xmlroff --backend cairo -o refcard-en-a4.s.pdf refcard-en-a4.fo Bug reassigned from package `refcard' to `xmlroff'. > retitle 494227 xmlroff: Segmentat

Bug#494227: Segmentation fault xmlroff --backend cairo

Because it's xmlroff that is segfaulting, I'm reassigning the bug (hope, that's OK). xmlroff should not segfault - less on valid input. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: fixed 490335 in 3.2.0.0-3

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > fixed 490335 3.2.0.0-3 Bug#490335: haskell-hgl: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libghc6-x11-dev(inst 1.4.2-1 ! = wanted 1.4.1-1) libghc6-x11-doc(inst 1.4.2-1 ! = wanted

Bug#485846: Fwd: [VAC] July-September 08 Re: Bug#485848: Bugs confirmed, thanks

FYI --- Begin Message --- Hello, I'm on [VAC]ation from July to September. I will *not* have any Internet connection, so don't expect any reply from me. I might have a connection on weekends, and that would mean that I might reply to your mail in "batch mode". If you're writing regarding my Debian

Bug#488082: Unable to reproduce

Yes, I have /tmp mounted with 'noexec' to prevent executables being run directly from that partition. You can close this I guess but I'm keeping the noexec on /tmp. Thanks. --- Jurij Smakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > tags 488082 unreproducible > thanks > > Hi, > > I've tried reproducing this

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

Fabio Tranchitella wrote: Thanks, we'll prepare a new release which disables the slapd.conf mangling and provides documentation within README.Debian. I agree with this approach. If slapd.conf needs to be modified, it should not happen automatically. Rather the administrator needs to be told

Bug#494643: jags: should this package be removed?

Package: jags Version: 0.22.1-2.1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Dear Maintainer, While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * Long standing RC bug that even caused removal

Bug#485846: Bug#485848: Bugs confirmed, thanks

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 09:08:30PM +0200, Mirco Bauer wrote: > On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 09:05 +0200, David Paleino wrote: > > Hi Mirco, > > I'm tagging theses bugs so that you know I've acknowledged them :) > > I won't be at home for two days (I'll be back tomorrow night), so I > > don't expect to do

Bug#463277: marked as done (afnix: FTBFS on arm with segfault)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 04:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#463277: fixed in afnix 1.5.2-3.2 has caused the Debian Bug report #463277, regarding afnix: FTBFS on arm with segfault to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has b

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

Robert: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Paul Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: >>> I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that >>>

Bug#494385: marked as done (prerm doesn't work if openct isn't running)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 02:32:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494385: fixed in openct 0.6.14-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #494385, regarding prerm doesn't work if openct isn't running to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#493277: Original bug in gdc fixed; binary rebuilds probably need to be requested for broken powerpc packages

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:34:04AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > The original bug which caused all of these blocking bugs has been > fixed; rebuilds probably need to be requested for all of these > packages. BinNMUs scheduled: nmu a7xpg . powerpc . -m 'rebuild against an updated gdc-4.1 (Closes: #

Processed: Re: Bug#494385: prerm doesn't work if openct isn't running

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 494385 patch Bug#494385: prerm doesn't work if openct isn't running There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#494385: marked as forwarded (prerm doesn't work if openct isn't running)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 21:58:41 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has caused the report #494385, regarding prerm doesn't work if openct isn't running to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software author(s) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NB: If you are a system administ

Bug#494544: debroster: arch-indep data in /usr/lib

tags 494544 + patch thanks Patch attached. Regards, -- Chris Lamb, UK [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 0x634F9A20 diff -urNad debroster-1.15.orig/debian/dirs debroster-1.15/debian/dirs --- debroster-1.15.or

Processed: Re: debroster: arch-indep data in /usr/lib

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 494544 + patch Bug#494544: debroster: arch-indep data in /usr/lib There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator

Bug#494633: openafs modules don’t build with etch kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64

> (Telling the BTS that this bug doesn't exist in the current unstable or > lenny release.) Ah, you'd already done that and I did so redundantly. Sorry, I'd missed that. Thank you for taking care of it! -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To

Bug#481378: marked as done (Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures))

Your message dated Mon, 11 Aug 2008 01:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#481378: fixed in guile-1.8 1.8.5+1-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #481378, regarding Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures) to be marked as done. This means that you claim th

Bug#481378: Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures)

reopen 481378 thanks It looks like this isn't fixed yet, since hppa is still having trouble. However, I should be uploading a new version later today which will include a patch from Neil that may fix the remaining problem. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.u

Processed: notfound 473167 in 4.1.2-22, closing 473167

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35.1 > notfound 473167 4.1.2-22 Bug#473167: string concatenation segfaults Bug no longer marked as found in version 4.1.2-22. > close 473167 Bug#473167: string concatenation segfaul

Processed: Re: Bug#481378: Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > reopen 481378 Bug#481378: Guile-1.8 FTBFS on mips (and other architectures) 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > than

Bug#494633: marked as done (openafs modules don’t build with etch kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:05:14 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#494633: openafs modules don’t build with etch kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 has caused the Debian Bug report #494633, regarding openafs modules don’t build with etch kernel 2.6.24-etc

Bug#494415: aswiki: package is completely unusable

Hi Michael, At Sat, 9 Aug 2008 11:18:01 +0200, Michael Schutte wrote: > > [1 ] > Package: aswiki > Version: 1.0.4-5 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > Hi, > > aswiki is broken. When running it as a CGI script, the following > exception is shown: > > wrong n

Processed: your mail

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > fixed 494633 1.4.7.dfsg1-5 Bug#494633: openafs modules don’t build with etch kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64 Bug marked as fixed in version 1.4.7.dfsg1-5. > # This only affects etch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#494633: openafs modules don’t build with etch kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64

Package: openafs-modules-source Version: 1.4.2-6etch1 Severity: grave Tags: etch The new release of etch includes a new default kernel 2.6.24-etchnhalf.1-amd64, and the etch openafs-modules-source package doesn’t build against it: CC [M] /usr/src/modules/openafs/src/libafs/MODLOAD-2.6.24-etch

Bug#494337: marked as done (guile-1.8: FTBFS in lenny: :1536: error: 'input' defined but not used)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:05:49 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#494337: guile-1.8: FTBFS in lenny: :1536: error: 'input' defined but not used has caused the Debian Bug report #494337, regarding guile-1.8: FTBFS in lenny: :1536: error: 'input' define

Bug#494140: sshfs-fuse 2.1

i downloaded the sshfs-fuse 2.1 tarball, built debian packages (only adding a new entry in debian/changelog) and installed them, and it seems to work, although i haven't done extensive testing. live well, vagrant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe".

Processed: Issue related to the kernel headers from 2.6.26

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 494223 upstream Bug#494223: xorp: FTBFS: ../../../mrt/include/netinet/pim.h:93:1: error: "PIM_REGISTER" redefined There were no tags set. Tags added: upstream > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Deb

Bug#494223: Issue related to the kernel headers from 2.6.26

tags 494223 upstream thanks This looks like a problem with the Linux kernel headers. In my i386 environment I have linux-libc-dev version 2.6.25-6, which does *not* provide a /usr/include/linux/pim.h file. However, linux-libc-dev version 2.6.26-2 does include it, and its definitions do contradict

Bug#494294: marked as done (dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation))

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494294: fixed in dfo 0.7+svn51-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #494294, regarding dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation) to be marked as done.

Bug#451303: suggestions?

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:38, Eric Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ Aren Olson ] >> Packaging them raises a few problems, namely >> >> 1) our current architecture isn't designed to support this >> 2) we can't distribute updates to plugins quickly if, for example, the >> API for a particular we

Bug#494622: emdebian-rootfs: two suite scripts force installation of conflicting packages

Package: emdebian-rootfs Version: 1.4.1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 7.4 emdebian-rootfs includes multiple suite scripts for root filesystem generation using debootstrap --foreign and two of these suite scripts (the two related to the smallest installations) have not been updated to ref

Bug#494508: marked as done (FTBFS: No rule to make target `for')

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:17:07 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494508: fixed in scheme2c 1993.3.15.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #494508, regarding FTBFS: No rule to make target `for' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the prob

Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation)

tags 494294 + patch thanks Hi, On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Jo Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shipping binary-only copies of libraries violates §2 of the Debian Free > Software Guidelines [0]. Also, binary-only distribution makes security > support impossible. Thus I am filing a Serious

Processed: Re: Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 494294 + patch Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation) Tags were: confirmed Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tr

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

Sorry; I meant "build-arch". But the point stands: if you know that you're building everything, both -arch and -indep, why not just pull in the -indep build dependencies and actually solve the problem? --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 22:34:47 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > This is ridiculous. If the buildds do "debian/rules binary" they They don't. They use 'clean', 'build' and 'binary-arch'. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Processed: tagging 494294

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.34 > tags 494294 + confirmed Bug#494294: dfo: includes binary-only copy of FlickrNet in source tarball (DFSG §2 violation) There were no tags set. Tags added: confirmed > End of m

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

This is ridiculous. If the buildds do "debian/rules binary" they should first install both build-depends and build-depend-indep. As your own arguments show, this would cost very little since few packages actually have build-depend-indep. But those that do, in anticipation of a world in which bui

Bug#493711: Debian unifont Bug #493711

Yes, in the thread http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.general/130808 talks about the problem. OK, thanks. > Paul Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you both for your diagnostic information on this bug record. > Thank you also for your interest in this package, which I'

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

* 2008-08-10 22:25, Peter Palfrader wrote: > The submitter is right. > > | Packages must not modify other packages' configuration files > | except by an agreed upon APIs (eg, a /usr/sbin/update-foo > | command). > > http://release.debian.org/lenny/rc_policy.txt section 3. Thanks, we'll prepare a

Bug#483989: xserver-xorg-video-savage: system freeze while starting X

You listed 5 reverted commits above. Did you try to narrow down which ones you need to revert? Or are they all broken by the 02_temporary_revert_pciaccess.diff? You can also try to start the server with "sudo strace Xorg" from another machine, or "sudo gdb Xorg". Sometimes the debugging makes the

Processed: sorry typo

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > #typo in my previous request > notfixed 426306 2.2.10-3 Bug#426306: Suspend function in laptop broken Bug no longer marked as fixed in version 2.2.10-3. > #request to change a build dependency, current lenny/sid version has the > #change > close 4

Bug#494025: FTBFS: ../../../../src/util/time.h:44: error: expected ')' before 'n'

# reduce priority because it is a build with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and since # this bug (on 0.11.1-1.2etch1) would block 0.11.4-2 from entering testing. severity 494025 important tags 494025 + moreinfo thanks On 08/08/06 21:46 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors said ... > from ../../../../sr

Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails (was: sshfs silently truncates files...)

clone 494112 -1 reassign 494112 autoconf 2.61-7 retitle 494112 autoconf: should close its output before calling File::Copy::move() on it tag 494112 patch fixed-upstream retitle -1 perl: document that File::Copy::move() doesn't flush open files severity -1 wishlist thanks On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 1

Processed: Re: Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails (was: sshfs silently truncates files...)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > clone 494112 -1 Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails Bug 494112 cloned as bug 494590. > reassign 494112 autoconf 2.61-7 Bug#494112: File::Copy::move truncates open file when rename fails Bug reassigned from package `p

Processed: Re: Bug#494025: FTBFS: ../../../../src/util/time.h:44: error: expected ')' before 'n'

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # reduce priority because it is a build with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS and since > # this bug (on 0.11.1-1.2etch1) would block 0.11.4-2 from entering testing. > severity 494025 important Bug#494025: FTBFS: ../../../../src/util/time.h:44: error: expected ')

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > I need some help regarding #493781: the submitter reported the bug as grave > because he thinks that modifying slapd.conf to include an extra LDAP schema > from the maintainer scripts of a package (phamm-ldap in this case) is > against the Debian po

Bug#493714: openttd: Network exploitable buffer overrun

Hi Moritz, * Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-10 20:42]: > R. Bijker wrote: > > Therefore the best way to fix this is by upgrading to 0.6.2, also in lenny. > > I agree, can you upload 0.6.2 to unstable? I got a private mail by the maintainer stating: "New version should be uploaded

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

* 2008-08-10 21:09, Carsten Hey wrote: > | 11.7.4 Sharing configuration files > | > | ... > | > | The maintainer scripts must not alter a conffile of any package, > | including the one the scripts belong to. > > It is not a conffile, so this is not a problem. This is the exact sentence which keep

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 20:11:24 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > (a) My debian/rules is a standard debhelper default in this regard. > > (b) Debian policy section 7.7 says: > > The `Build-Depends-Indep' and `Build-Conflicts-Indep' fields > must be satisfied when any of the follo

Bug#494585: /usr/bin/plasma: Drag and drop of email attachment to folder icon copies 0 length file

Package: libplasma2 Version: 4:4.0.98-1 Severity: serious File: /usr/bin/plasma Justification: 4 Drag included file from a kmail email to a desktop icon for a folder (icon as opposed to a folder-view plasmoid). Choose copy (probably does not matter). A zero length file of the target name is create

Bug#493714: openttd: Network exploitable buffer overrun

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: I agree, can you upload 0.6.2 to unstable? Cheers, Moritz I have absolutely no influence over getting OpenTTD 0.6.2 physically uploaded to Debian-unstable. Regards, Remko Bijker -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

> buildds use debian/rules build, and your debian/rules has build > depend on build-indep. So you either need to move the > build-depends-indep to regular build-deps, or make sure that > debian/rules build doesn't need them. Wait a second! (a) My debian/rules is a standard debhelper default in t

Bug#480154: FTBFS on mips (cgiupload tests fail)

tag 480154 patch thanks On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 05:15:32PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 03:22:55PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 02:09:10PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > > Package: libapache2-mod-perl2 > > > Version: 2.0.4-1 > > > Severity: serious >

Processed: Re: Bug#480154: FTBFS on mips (cgiupload tests fail)

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tag 480154 patch Bug#480154: non-determistic FTBFS: cgiupload tests fail There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrat

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

RFC 2119 says: | 3. SHOULD This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there |may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore |a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and |carefully weighed before choosing a different course. Debian Pol

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:53:32PM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote: > But the whole procedure is valid since it is only a recommendation by > the policy, so this is IMHO not a release critical bug. If the consensus on this will be that this bug is RC then there is also a bug in the policy and the wording

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: >> I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that >> installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for >> testing, /us

Processed: Unable to reproduce

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > tags 488082 unreproducible Bug#488082: cxref: Install preconfiguration fails There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator

Bug#488082: Unable to reproduce

tags 488082 unreproducible thanks Hi, I've tried reproducing this bug and the package installed just fine for me (and for some other people who I asked to check). Can you please verify that you do not have the /tmp partition mounted with noexec option (post the output of 'mount' command if in

Processed: bugzilla upgrade deletes /etc/bugzilla3/params then fails when it isn't there

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 493286 normal Bug#493286: bugzilla upgrade deletes /etc/bugzilla3/params then fails when it isn't there Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

Robert: On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sure, I'll sponsor it right away. > > Done. I noticed a Replaces is missing on the unifont-bin versions that used > to include unifont.hex (this is always needed when moving files between > packages). Since we

Bug#494493: marked as done (Broken for any real world use)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:17:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494493: fixed in acerhk 0.5.35-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #494493, regarding Broken for any real world use to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#485909: marked as done (fuse-source fails to build with linux-source-2.6.25)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:17:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#485909: fixed in fuse 2.7.3-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #485909, regarding fuse-source fails to build with linux-source-2.6.25 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that th

Bug#494515: Script, full crash info

Here's the script leading to the above crash, as well as the full output from bug-buddy. Nope, no Cairo (at least not directly). Some other Gnome related things though (see script source code). Cheers //Johan System: Linux 2.6.25-2-686 #1 SMP Fri Jul 18 17:46:56 UTC 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.O

Bug#494572: /etc/init.d/ski: bashism (use of "function") in /bin/sh script

Package: ski Version: 1.3.2-2.1 Severity: serious File: /etc/init.d/ski Justification: Policy 10.4 Despite specifying /bin/sh as its interpreter, /etc/init.d/ski makes use of the bashism "function" when defining verify_binfmt_mnt. Could you please fix it to use portable function-definition syntax

Processed: Re: Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 494447 important Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug trac

Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel

severity 494447 important thanks On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:22:22PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > The error is a buildtime check for the size of ino_t. This is 32 bit on > > all s390 types but the code expects it to be equal to the word size. > Should I simply remove the check? I can't tes

Processed: Re: try again...

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # yay bts breakage > merge 494349 494555 494556 Bug#494349: libqt3-mt: throws errors and sometimes crashes X Bug#494555: libqt3-mt: throws errors and sometimes crashes X Bug#494556: libqt3-mt: throws errors and sometimes crashes X Merged 494349 494

Bug#488696: Fixing 488696

Hi, Are there any plans to fix bug 488696? The comedi-source package is now affected by a freeze, so the chances to get a fix in are quickly diminishing with time. Please let me know if you would like me or someone else to prepare an NMU, if you don't have the time to do it. Thanks. -- Jurij

Processed: tagging 494416, severity of 494416 is important

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > tags 494416 moreinfo Bug#494416: xserver-xorg-video-intel: no other resolution than 640x480 with latest version at X startup There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > sev

Processed: Marking 393970 as fixed in the latest version

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > fixed 393970 chiark-tcl/1.1.0 Bug#393970: chiark-tcl - FTBFS: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t' Bug marked as fixed in version chiark-tcl/1.1.0. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

su, 2008-08-10 kello 19:34 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella kirjoitti: > Considering that slapd.conf is not (anymore) a conffile, in my opinion this > behaviour is not forbidden from the Debian policy and thus the bug report > could be closed without any change to the phamm-ldap package. > > Of course, h

Bug#494473: marked as done (unifont.hex gone away but needed by GRUB)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 17:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#494473: fixed in unifont 1:5.1.20080808-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #494473, regarding unifont.hex gone away but needed by GRUB to be marked as done. This means that you claim that t

Bug#493781: Can a package modify slapd.conf in its maintainer script?

Hello all, I need some help regarding #493781: the submitter reported the bug as grave because he thinks that modifying slapd.conf to include an extra LDAP schema from the maintainer scripts of a package (phamm-ldap in this case) is against the Debian policy. Considering that slapd.conf is not (a

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 17:36:44 +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > > fails to build on all buildd's: > > > > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=scheme2c > > Just Looked at the i386 log. It appears that the autobuilder is > attempting to build the binary-indep

Bug#494447: aufs-source - FTBFS: Fails to build against s390x (64-bit s390) kernel

Am Samstag, den 09.08.2008, 16:05 +0200 schrieb Bastian Blank: > Package: aufs-source > Version: 0+20080719-2 > Severity: serious > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > Automatic build of linux-modules-extra-2.6_2.6.26-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by > > sbuild/s390 98 >

Bug#494515: Crash: "object allocation during garbage collection phase"

Hi Johan, On 10/08/08 at 11:35 +0200, Johan Walles wrote: > Package: ruby1.8 > Version: 1.8.7.22-2 > Severity: grave > Justification: causes non-serious data loss > > > I've written a ruby program using Gtk that crashes the Ruby VM every time I > run it. > > If the ruby VM crashes when you hav

Bug#494246: Problem caused by dot in option name

Hi, This failure is caused by the presence of the dots in one of the options (--pack-0.92) in doc/en/user-reference/bzr_man.txt. Removing the dots manually resulted in successful package build. Unfortunately, this file itself is machine-generated using the command python generate_docs.py -o do

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 07:05:46PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:56:07AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > > > # introduces re

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 09:04:34AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that > installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for > testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the > "unifont" package, not the

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 08:56:07AM -0700, Paul Hardy wrote: > On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 6:23 AM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > > # introduces regressions in other packages > > severity 494473 serious > > > > Robert

Bug#494561: marked as done ([linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fails)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:58:49 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Re: Bug#494561: [linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fails has caused the Debian Bug report #494561, regarding [linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fai

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 05:30:33PM +0100, Barak A. Pearlmutter wrote: > I don't understand. That was generated by building on an alpha, which > is not a supported architecture. > $ egrep '(Source|Package|Arch)' debian/control > Source: scheme2c > Package: scheme2c > Architecture: i386 amd

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > fails to build on all buildd's: > > http://buildd.debian.org/~jeroen/status/package.php?suite=unstable&p=scheme2c Just Looked at the i386 log. It appears that the autobuilder is attempting to build the binary-indep package without first satisfying

Bug#494508: FTBFS: No rule to make target `for'

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I don't understand. That was generated by building on an alpha, which is not a supported architecture. $ egrep '(Source|Package|Arch)' debian/control Source: scheme2c Package: scheme2c Architecture: i386 amd64 Package: scheme2c-doc Archit

Bug#494493: Autodetection is broken

Adam Cécile (Le_Vert) a écrit : Peter 'p2' De Schrijver a écrit : The module probably works if you force the model as mentioned in #473671, but autodetection is broken. The patch fixes this. Tested on Medion MD97600. Cheers, Peter. Hello Peter, I just had a look at your patch but I th

Bug#494493: Autodetection is broken

Peter 'p2' De Schrijver a écrit : The module probably works if you force the model as mentioned in #473671, but autodetection is broken. The patch fixes this. Tested on Medion MD97600. Cheers, Peter. Hello Peter, I just had a look at your patch but I think it's wrong. Looks at the orig

Bug#494561: [linux-kbuild-2.6.26] Scripts missing, module compilation fails

Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.26 Version: 2.6.26-2 Severity: serious --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Trying to build the nvidia module it complains about missing scripts, it seems version 2.6.26-2 doesn't package the scripts in subdirectories. After building these scripts from the

Bug#494558: monotone-viz: incompatible with monotone 0.40; new upstream version available; please update

Package: monotone-viz Version: 0.15-3 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable I'm sorry to report that monotone-viz does not work with monotone 0.40 databases. This is probably due to the new storage mechanism used for hashes (binary instead of hex-encoded; see monotone's NEWS file

Bug#494473: severity of 494473 is serious

I just saw from reading about Bug #494460 that it was unifont-bin that installed unifont.hex. With the package I put together last night for testing, /usr/share/unifont/unifont.hex is put in place by the "unifont" package, not the "unifont-bin" package. Will that still be okay for GRUB? Paul Ha

Processed: tagging 494408

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > # help appreciated > tags 494408 help Bug#494408: linux-patch-exec-shield: Outdated kernel patch There were no tags set. Tags added: help > End of message, stopping processing

Processed: found 473167 in gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 > found 473167 gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22 Bug#473167: string concatenation segfaults Bug marked as found in version gdc-4.1/4.1.2-22. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please co

Bug#451303: suggestions?

[ Aren Olson ] > Packaging them raises a few problems, namely > > 1) our current architecture isn't designed to support this > 2) we can't distribute updates to plugins quickly if, for example, the > API for a particular web service is changed > > in discussion of this bug in launchpad, we came u

Processed: using unclutter does has some side-effects

Processing commands for controlbugs.debian.org: > severity 227800 important Bug#227800: libsdl1.2debian: penguin-command: randomly, mouse goes to screen centre Bug#237319: unclutter: Causes periodic displacement of mouse pointer Bug#413282: libsdl1.2debian: Mouse pointer periodically snaps to wro

  1   2   >