Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> severity 470234 important
Bug#470234: xcruise: should this package be removed?
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Package: firebird2.0-super
Version: 2.0.3.12981.ds1-2
Severity: grave
-=| marius popa, Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:32:42PM +0200 |=-
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > -=| marius popa, Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:52:58AM +0200 |=-
> > > Setting up firebird2.0
Your message dated Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470148: fixed in foomatic-db 20080211-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #470148,
regarding foomatic-db: openprinting-ppds conflicts against its transitional
package linuxprinting.org-ppds
Package: xcruise
Version: 0.30-8
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: proposed-removal
Dear Maintainer,
While reviewing some packages, your package came up as a possible
candidate for removal from Debian, because:
* Package is buggy (Serious bug for 4 years, even if unreproducibl
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 08:00:59AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > Vagrant, since the ldm source package is not present in Etch, does
> > this not affect stable at all or has the code been moved between
> > packages?
>
> th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:57:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429126: fixed in libapache-mod-layout 5.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #429126,
regarding please update/request removal of your package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: gitosis
Version: 0.2+20080118-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
gitosis_0.2+20080219-1 now has a file conflict with python-setuptools,
makingit uninstallable. gitosis now depends on python-pkg-resources,
which itself suggests python-setuptools.
-
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#468792: fixed in xgalaga 2.1.0.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #468792,
regarding xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access
`/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such file or directory
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:57:25 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429085: fixed in libapache-mod-random 2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #429085,
regarding please update/request removal of your package
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 19:56:11 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#468792: xgalaga: diff for NMU version 2.1.0.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #468792,
regarding xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access
`/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such f
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 468792 + patch
Bug#468792: xgalaga - FTBFS: chmod: cannot access
`/usr/share/man/man6/xgalaga.6x.gz': No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance
tags 468792 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The following is the diff for my xgalaga 2.1.0.2-1.1 NMU.
diff -u xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in
--- xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in
+++ xgalaga-2.1.0.2/Makefile.in
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
for i in levels/*.xgl; do $(INSTALL) $$i $(DESTDIR)$(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 429085 pending
Bug#429085: please update/request removal of your package
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> tags 429126 pending
Bug#429126: please update/request removal of your package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> forcemerge 466624 467271
Bug#466624: libtest-exception-perl: FTBFS: Test failures
Bug#467271: libtest-exception-perl: FTBFS with Perl 5.10 (test failures)
Forcibly Merged 466624 46
ibrary v3
ii libxml++2.6-2 2.20.0-1 A C++ interface to the GNOME XML l
ii libxml2 2.6.31.dfsg-1GNOME XML library
subtitleeditor recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
reportbug-subtitleeditor-20080309-31314-52_vgl
Description: Binary data
Thomas Viehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 2008-03-09 16:02:37.00 Frank Terbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> The new package is ready and I will ask my mentor to upload it as soon
>> as the fixed tdb-dev package hits the mirrors and I can run some
>> tests.
>
> It would be helpful if you coul
Ar 07/10/2007 am 23:03, ysgrifennodd Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo:
> Package: libjinglebase0.3-0
> Version: 0.3.11-1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.3
>
> In the copyright file of libjinglebase, the Affine code is said to be
> licensed under the GPL version 2 or later. OpenSSL licen
Package: amanda-server
Version: 1:2.5.2p1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading from 2.5.1, my "amcheck -c" now fails with:
WARNING: paris: selfcheck request failed: error sending REQ: send REQ to
paris.ram.loc failed: Socket operation on non-socket
I did not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package gxine
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: gxine
> tag 457717 pending
Bug#457717: gxine: Segfault on start
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tag 462101 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#462101: gxine: problem when other windows open in front
T
Could you check gxine 0.5.901-1 (which should shortly be available in
unstable for i386) and let me know whether that segfault has gone?
--
| Darren Salt| linux or ds at | nr. Ashington, | Toon
| RISC OS, Linux | youmustbejoking,demon,co,uk | Northumberland | Army
| + Buy less an
Package: libuconv-ruby1.8
Version: 0.4.12-2+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
uconv.so should be installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux-eabi/ so that
ruby can find it. Currently it's installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux/
where ruby won't search fo
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:32:16PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:47:25 +0100 (CET), Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>
> >> Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> >> Also seen on the amd64 buildd for apertium.
>
> Can a mini
Package: libintl-gettext-ruby1.8
Version: 0.11-10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
intl.so should be installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux-eabi/ so that
ruby can find it. Currently it's installed into /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/arm-linux/
This breaks e.g. apt-listbugs:
strace a
clone 469513 -1
reassign -1 cacti
retitle -1 Do not call db_stop before calling ucf, since ucf uses debconf
reassign 469513 ocsinventory-agent
retitle 469513 Do not call db_stop before calling ucf, since ucf uses debconf
thanks
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:57:52 +0200, Niko Tyni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said
Hi,
On Sun Mar 09, 2008 at 20:09:19 +0200, Jaakko Niemi wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > tags 455262 + patch
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached is the diff for my tftp-hpa 0.48-1.1 NMU uploaded to delayed-3.
>
> Thanks,
>
> I'm going to upload new version wit
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 03:36:27AM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:08:23PM +0200, joy wrote:
> > Is the mod_auth_radius-2.0.c supposed to work properly with Apache 2.2.x?
> >
> > I can compile it just fine, but can't get it to work on runtime.
> >
> > Maybe, like LDAP, this
On Sun 09 Mar 2008, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > $ flex -i -p -B -F -8 -s -Phtml_yy html.l flex: fatal internal error,
> > bad transition character detected in sympartition()
>
> Could you upload this file to the bug, or, better, a minimal
> version that displays this problem? That would
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008 17:47:25 +0100 (CET), Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
>> Also seen on the amd64 buildd for apertium.
Can a minimum input flex file be generated that demonstrates
this issue?
>> But there are
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 19:02:43 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469823: fixed in pound 2.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #469823,
regarding pound: FTBFS with C compiler cannot create executables
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 469979 + moreinfo
Bug#469979: amd64 build of flex 2.5.34-3 defective
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
tags 469979 + moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 13:24:00 +0100, Paul Slootman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Package: flex Version: 2.5.34-3 Severity: important
> When building wwwoffle 2.9d (which had failed on most buildds due to
> the 2.5.34-2 problem; those buildds that succeeded had a diffe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 466643 important
Bug#466643: please increase number of package names
Bug#400768: apt: Returns "E: Wow, you exceeded the number of versions this APT
is capable of"
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Pl
Package: atlantikdesigner
Version: 4:3.5.9-1
Severity: serious
The atlantikdesigner has a dependency on atlantik (>= 4:3.5.9) but there
is only 4:3.5.8-1 in unstable.
Regards
Artur
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Arc
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:14:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: ucf
> Version: 3.005
> Severity: important
> ucf blocks on ocsinventory-agent(1:0.0.8-1) and cacti (0.8.7b-1)
> installation process. Quick solution was to downgrade ucf to version
> 2.0020 (stable).
This is also #46810
Package: dbmail
Version: 2.2.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Attempting to install this package produces the following output:
dbmail:/# apt-get install dbmail
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
dbmail is already the
Package: gnunet-server
Version: 0.8.0~pre0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
gnunet-server from experimental fails to install. Looks like you need a
versioned dependency on gnunet-common.
| Automatic build of gnunet-gtk_0.8.0~pre0-1 on lofn by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20080308-1444
| ***
Hi,
On Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:36:54 +0100, Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> fvwm and fvwm-gnome have got their dependencies slightly wrong:
> a) fvwm-gnome should depend on the right replacement version of fvwm,
> which is `fvwm (>= 1:2.5.24), not `fvwm (>= 2.5.24)'.
This is a
Hello,
I would like to keep you informed about the status of this bug.
The bad news is that available "support for audacious patch" was written
long time ago for an old version of audacious. So it requires a lot of
changes. I still work on it (dont remove the package from unstable), but
because it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400768 grave
Bug#400768: apt: Returns "E: Wow, you exceeded the number of versions this APT
is capable of"
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> forcemerge 400768 466643
Bug#400768: apt: Returns "E: Wow, you exceeded the number of versio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 469855 + pending
Bug#469855: postinst fails if udev is not running
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags 469855 + pending
thanks
Hello again,
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 11:17:42AM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:41:05AM +, Joseph Nahmias wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 08:07:14PM +0100, Sebastian Harl wrote:
> > --- postinst2008-02-08 10:13:24.0 -05
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> tags 455262 + patch
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Attached is the diff for my tftp-hpa 0.48-1.1 NMU uploaded to delayed-3.
Thanks,
I'm going to upload new version with few other fixes tomorrow. Same
patch is already included into it. So, if you haven't
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#461774: fixed in amule 2.1.3-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #461774,
regarding amule-daemon 2.1.3-4+b1 upgrade crash in lenny
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pr
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470111: fixed in libmail-listdetector-perl 1.01+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #470111,
regarding libmail-listdetector-perl: package has no Perl in it
to be marked as done.
This me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> severity 469668 serious
Bug#469668: dspam-webfrontend: Error configuring - unable to link into
/usr/share/dspam/templates
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 10:07:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: FTBFS on sparc: testsuite fails: FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused
modules are removed
has caused the Debian Bug report #460617,
regarding FTBFS on sparc: testsuite fails: FAIL: gc.test: gc: Unused
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
> #
> # libmail-listdetector-perl (1.01+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
> #
> # * Change the target directory of 'make install' to fix an empty package.
> #(Closes: #470111).
> #
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1
#
# libmail-listdetector-perl (1.01+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
#
# * Change the target directory of 'make install' to fix an empty package.
#(Closes: #470111).
#
package libmail-listdetector-perl
tags 470111 + pending
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:00:13PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>On 21/02/08 at 22:55 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> I am working on fixing this, for uw-imap and 30-40 other packages :-)
>No need to. The change in grep was reverted, so your usage i
On 2008-03-09 16:02:37.00 Frank Terbeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
There has been a new upstream release recently, for which I got an
appropriate package which includes exactly the same fix for #456871.
The new package is ready and I will ask my mentor to upload it as
soon
as the fixed tdb-
Package: icedove
Version: 2.0.0.9-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
icedove (and iceweasel) crashed. Any of them would start again. I decided to
reboot.
After a reboot, /home filesystem was corrupted. Attached fsck report. fsck
fixed a lot of
bad things that I don't know
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:12:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#466883: uw-imap: FTBFS: Finds new copyright statements
has caused the Debian Bug report #466883,
regarding uw-imap: FTBFS: Finds new copyright statements
to be marked as done.
This means
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #467586,
regarding libmesh: FTBFS: checking for C++ compiler default output file name...
configure: error: C++ co
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #464291,
regarding mailutils: FTBFS: ERROR: Cannot create
/build/user/mailutils-1.2+dfsg1/imap4d/testsuite/data/s
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:38:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#422654: galago-gtk-sharp: diff for NMU version
0.5.0-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #422654,
regarding FTBFS: System.IO.FileNotFoundException: Could not find file
"/usr/lib/pkgcon
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #467605,
regarding stringtemplate: FTBFS: The import junit cannot be resolved
to be marked as done.
This means th
On 21/02/08 at 22:55 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 12:23:40PM -0500, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> >>From my pbuilder build log:
>
> >find: cat terminated by signal 13
> >find: cat terminated by signal 13
> >find: cat terminated by signal 13
> >...
> >find: cat terminated by
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #464277,
regarding xfmail: FTBFS: ldap.cpp:166: error: 'ldap_init' was not declared in
this scope
to be marked as
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #460354,
regarding haskell-cabal: FTBFS: Could not find module `Text.PrettyPrint':
to be marked as done.
This mea
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #462856,
regarding xfmail - FTBFS: error: 'ldap_init' was not declared in this scope
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #460385,
regarding haskell-opengl: FTBFS: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.ln.text'
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:35:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#453159: capisuite: FTBFS: /usr/include/capi20.h:65:
error: 'size_t' has not been declared
has caused the Debian Bug report #453159,
regarding capisuite: FTBFS: /usr/include/capi20.h:65:
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #460372,
regarding python-imaging: FTBFS: dh_movefiles:
debian/python-imaging-dbg/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #458876,
regarding libopensync-plugin-gpe: b-dep on libopensync1exp2-dev, which is only
in experimental
to be mar
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 17:03:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line failure not reproducible in the same conditions
has caused the Debian Bug report #445756,
regarding haskell-arrows: FTBFS: multiple definition of
`arrowszm0zi2zi1_DataziStream_shd_closure'
to be
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#460302: fixed in tdb 1.1.1~svn26294-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #460302,
regarding usr/include/tdb.h uses sig_atomic_t without including signal.h
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#456871: fixed in fdm 1.4-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #456871,
regarding fdm: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: expected ';', ',' or ')'
before '*' token
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:19:55 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: retchmail: FTBFS: unmet dep libwvstreams-dev(inst
4.2.2-2.3 ! >= wanted 4.4)
has caused the Debian Bug report #458706,
regarding retchmail: FTBFS: unmet dep libwvstreams-dev(inst 4.2.2-2.3
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> The following is the diff for my fdm 1.4-1.1 NMU.
Okay, but see below
> The fixed tdb-dev has just been uploaded.
I know, I was subscribed to that bug.
> --- fdm-1.4/debian/control
> +++ fdm-1.4/debian/control
[...]
> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 5), libssl-dev, zlib1g-dev
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 02:52:01PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 01:29:35PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> > JFYI: http://bugs.debian.org/469462 may need security updates for
> > Etch...
>
> Axel, thanks for bringing this our attention.
>
> Vagrant, since the ldm sourc
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.15.0
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
>From my build log:
| On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 01:23:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Automatic build of dpkg_1.15.0 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 98
| Build started at 20080309-1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 456871 + patch
Bug#456871: fdm: FTBFS: /usr/include/tdb.h:150: error: expected ';', ',' or ')'
before '*' token
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
tags 456871 + patch
thanks
Hi,
The following is the diff for my fdm 1.4-1.1 NMU.
The fixed tdb-dev has just been uploaded.
Kind regards
T.
diff -u fdm-1.4/debian/control fdm-1.4/debian/control
--- fdm-1.4/debian/control
+++ fdm-1.4/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Section: mail
Priority: optio
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 14:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439527: fixed in libapache-mod-auth-radius 1.5.7-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #439527,
regarding libapache2-mod-auth-radius works with Apache 2.0, not 2.2
to be marked as done.
This m
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 15:30:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#470078: singularity: contains a non-free font
has caused the Debian Bug report #470078,
regarding singularity: contains a non-free font
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464285: fixed in rails 2.0.2-1.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #464285,
regarding rails: FTBFS: private method `cp' called for File:Class
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:02:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470129: fixed in iceape 1.1.8-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #470129,
regarding xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 13:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470127: fixed in iceweasel 2.0.0.12-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #470127,
regarding xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 469882 normal
Bug#469882: virtualbox-ose-source: cannot build with 2.6.24 kernel on amd64
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
severity 469882 normal
thanks
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> last time i took a more active role, you were even rambling that i shall
> not upload a package. guess what i'm doing since? taking care about the
This was part of the arrangement. It's not that you sh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 464285 + patch
Bug#464285: rails: FTBFS: private method `cp' called for File:Class
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administ
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 470051 confirmed
usertags 470051 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 470051 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 23:51:11 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> The .deb has no Perl in it. Nor SPAM, for that matter.
Confirmed:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/all/libmail-listdetector-perl/filelist
I guess there was some problem due to te repackaged tarball with the
dfsg version; my local .deb h
tags 464285 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my rails 2.0.2-1.1 NMU.
diff -u rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile
--- rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile
+++ rails-2.0.2/railties/Rakefile
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@
end
task :generate_app_doc do
- File.cp "doc/README_FOR_
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 470051 confirmed
Bug#470051: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 470051 - intend-to-nmu
Bug#470051: sylpheed-claws to be
Your message dated Sun, 9 Mar 2008 13:38:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#468664: claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops
has caused the Debian Bug report #468664,
regarding claws-mail: SEGFAULTs causing a kernel Oops
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:17:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470094: fixed in xulrunner 1.8.1.12-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470094,
regarding xulrunner: FTBFS with libnss3-dev=3.12.0~beta2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 470050 confirmed
Bug#470050: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 470050 - intend-to-nmu
Bug#470050: sylpheed-claws to be
Package: fvwm
Version: 1:2.5.24-1
Severity: serious
Manoj,
fvwm and fvwm-gnome have got their dependencies slightly wrong:
a) fvwm-gnome should depend on the right replacement version of fvwm,
which is `fvwm (>= 1:2.5.24), not `fvwm (>= 2.5.24)'.
b) fvwm must not as a package with priority
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 470052 confirmed
Bug#470052: sylpheed-claws to be removed from testing
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 470052 - intend-to-nmu
Bug#470052: sylpheed-claws to be
Hi Nikodemus,
"Nikodemus Siivola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm not sure what is The Right Thing here, though. Should SBCL (and
> _any_ program that ever sets DF!) save, clear, and restore DF in its
> signal handlers? Should libc/kernel do that? Should signals be blocked
> before ever setting
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 470052 confirmed
usertags 470052 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 470052 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 463369 confirmed
usertags 463369 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 463369 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
> tags 463369 confirmed
Bug#463369: sylpheed-claws: ldap_get_values, ldap_init, ldap_open implicitly
converted to pointers
Tags were: patch
Tags added: confirmed
> usertags 463369 -
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.16
tags 470050 confirmed
usertags 470050 - intend-to-nmu
# please do not NMU, go ahead and remove it
usertags 470050 + remove-from-testing
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have uploaded a updated version 1.3.4-3 to fix this bug.
It closes RC bug #406036, and also closes #419366, #420504, and #436914.
The only one lintian warning is:
"W: gcin: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libgcin-im-client1"
"libgcin-im-client1"
Package: foomatic-db
Version: 20080211-1
Severity: serious
foomatic-db provides a transitional package linuxprinting.org-ppds but
depends on openprinting-ppds which conflicts with it.
a) Conflicts of packages with priority: optional must not conflict
with other packages out of optional (amon
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#311843: fixed in dpkg 1.15.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #311843,
regarding debsig-verify: Completely breaks installation of standard sarge
packages
to be marked as done.
This means t
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:32:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#469900: fixed in mlt 0.2.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #469900,
regarding mlt - FTBFS: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lsfx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:02:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#470138: fixed in samba 3.0.28-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #470138,
regarding /usr/share/samba/smb.conf.etch missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
