severity 469882 normal thanks On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:45:14PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote: > last time i took a more active role, you were even rambling that i shall > not upload a package. guess what i'm doing since? taking care about the
This was part of the arrangement. It's not that you should not, but that you should not without a prior consensus amongst those on the list. Keep in mind that the same holds for Patrick. > things you don't, and stick with that for the moment. Well there are more ways to contribute than uploading. > apart from that, from all the people which are listed in uploaders, i'm > clearly one of the active ones, although i don't do that much. your > 'blame' is totally unappropriate here. The 'blame' was just a reaction to your 'blame'. > > How about giving the world an l-m-e-2.6 version that actually tries to > > build amd64 packages? > > for your information because you're implying things you have not enough > ... You got me wrong on this one. I was under the impression that you knew it was amd64 only which then means you had a l-m-e-2.6 with amd64 vbox to notice the bug. But if you weren't how did you manage to a) think it came from the patch and b) conclude it was a serious bug? I take it this was a misinterpretation and downgrade the bugs again, ok? Michael -- Michael Meskes Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
