Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464303: fixed in ipe 6.0pre30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2008 07:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426539: fixed in ifrench 1.4-21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:20:40 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463184: security.debian.org: wasn't CVE-2007-2645 fixed in
DSA-1310-1?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with
I had the same problem upgrading slib (3b1-1) for gnucash.
Creating directory "/usr/share/guile/site" manually solved the problem.
--
Thierry
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 6:08 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If you want to ask me something, please put me in to "To:" or "Cc:", or
>> use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Submitters don't receive answers
>> automatically.
>
> Gah, sorry, I always forget which bug aliases map
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> severity 464478 wishlist
Bug#464478: libntfs10 won't install over libntfs9-knoppix
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2008 06:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#458657: fixed in drapes 0.5.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:25:47 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Invalid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462861 wnpp
Bug#462861: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-random' to `wnpp'.
> severity 462861 normal
Bug#462861: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> retitle 462
reassign 462861 wnpp
severity 462861 normal
retitle 462861 O: libapache-mod-random -- Create random ads, quotes and
redirects
thanks
The current maintainer of libapache-mod-random, Paweł Więcek
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, is apparently not active anymore.
Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462860 wnpp
Bug#462860: should this package be orphaned?
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-layout' to `wnpp'.
> severity 462860 normal
Bug#462860: should this package be orphaned?
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> retitle 462
reassign 462178 wnpp
retitle 462178 O: ipxripd -- IPX RIP/SAP daemon
thanks
The current maintainer of ipxripd, Eloy A. Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a package requires time and skills. Please only adopt this
package
reassign 462860 wnpp
severity 462860 normal
retitle 462860 O: libapache-mod-layout -- Apache web page content wrapper
thanks
The current maintainer of libapache-mod-layout, Preston Smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
is apparently not active anymore. Therefore, I orphan this package now.
Maintaining a p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 462178 wnpp
Bug#462178: ipxripd: should this package be removed?
Bug reassigned from package `ipxripd' to `wnpp'.
> retitle 462178 O: ipxripd -- IPX RIP/SAP daemon
Bug#462178: ipxripd: should this package be removed?
Changed Bug title to `O: i
Package: libntfs10
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello,
> apt-get install libntfs10
reports:
dpkg: error processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libntfs10_2.0.0-1_i386.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/libntfs.so.10.0.0', which is also in package
libntfs9-knoppix
Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2008 04:33:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464304: fixed in openoffice.org 1:2.3.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi Dmitry ,
Thanks for your valuable input/patch, Sorry for delay i was quite busy and
some net problem
was there so will see and if it works fine i will apply soon.
Thanks for support.
--
Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
Hi Dmitry ,
Thanks for your valuable input/patch, Sorry for delay i was quite busy and
some net problem
was there so will see and if it works fine i will apply soon.
Thanks for support.
--
Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:32:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464316: fixed in soap-lite 0.70.04-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080203-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
The If-statement 00_header writes to grub.cfg is malformed, and causes grub2
to get stuck in an infinite loop of syntax errors.
This code breaks the system:
if font (hd0,5)/usr/share/grub/unico
Your message dated Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464270: fixed in bzip2 1.0.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Feb 6, 2008 6:08 PM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you want to ask me something, please put me in to "To:" or "Cc:", or
> use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Submitters don't receive answers
> automatically.
Gah, sorry, I always forget which bug aliases map to what :)
> On 06/02/08 at 10:3
Package: slib
Version: 3b1-1
Followup-For: Bug #464143
Installing g-wrap also brings in dependencies, one
of which includes /usr/share/guile/site/slibcat, so
that installation proceeds without problems.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'u
Followup-For: Bug #462648
Package: menu
Version: 2.1.37
*** Please type your report below this line ***
More ways update-menus doesn't work:
Update-menus no longer understands custom (any?) menufiles.
To reproduce:
Make a custom menu file (such as the lyx menufile from the
/usr/share/menu direct
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:47:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403658: fixed in purelibc 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464310: fixed in icepick 0.01-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464290: fixed in ironpython 1.1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#454876: fixed in lwipv6 1.1a-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
> did that upload of libexif actually address both CVE-2006-4168 and
> CVE-2007-2645? if so, then the DSA should be updated to indicate that
> this is the case. if not, then
> http://idssi.enyo.de/tracker/status/release/unstable needs to be
> updated to indicate that the CVE-2007-2645 vulnerabili
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463484: fixed in rbot 0.9.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463484: fixed in rbot 0.9.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 463184
Bug#463184: security.debian.org: wasn't CVE-2007-2645 fixed in DSA-1310-1?
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
reopen 463184
thanks
> I've verified it in the source code:
> The correct patch was used to address CVE-2006-4168, only the wrong
> bug number was added to the DSA. Instead of #424775 this should've
> read #430012.
ok. so, was the security issue described in bug #424775 actually ever
fixed? loo
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:17:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464286: fixed in saxonb 9.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463847: fixed in jsch 0.1.37-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:05:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464356: fixed in ccache 2.4-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> close 438538
Bug#438538: mpop: version 1.0.5-1etch1 uninstallable on Etch
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> tags 438538 - sarge
Bug#438538: mpop: version 1.0.5-1etch1 uninstallable on Etch
Tags were: sarge security
Tags removed: sarge
> tags 438538 + etch
Bug#438538: mpop: version 1.0.5-1
--- Begin Message ---
Laurent Fousse wrote:
Hello,
* Neil McGovern [Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:42:23AM +]:
Package: megahal
Version: 9.1.1a-1
Followup-For: Bug #454212
Confirmed using etch i386 (though an amd64 processor). Attached output
of megahal and strace.
Could you try a version with
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> merge 463444 463484
Bug#463444: rbot is uninstallable due to dependecy on "ruby" << 1.9
Bug#463484: rbot: uninstallable (depends on ruby << 1.9)
Merged 463444 463484.
>
End of messa
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:32:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#463974: fixed in gnome-pilot-conduits 2.0.15-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:32:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464308: fixed in libtie-toobject-perl 0.03-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:02:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464346: fixed in gfpoken 0.31-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:31:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Is it possible that your definition of unstable include experimental? :-)
> Oh, you meant that perl-modules (>> 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69) is
> satisfiable by installing libversion-perl from unstable?
Yup.
> sbuild doesn't
>
Em Qua, 2008-02-06 às 20:49 +0100, Pierre Habouzit escreveu:
>
> e, you know, a .dsc comes with the files it references usually …
> namely an orig.tar.gz and a .diff.gz …
Hehehe, now I know.
Thank you,
Felipe Roquette
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:08:06 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > > Build-Depends-Indep: liblocale-maketext-simple-perl,
> > > libmodule-load-perl, libparams-check-perl, perl (>= 5), perl-modules (>>
> > > 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69)
> >
> > > > perl: already installed (5.8.8-12 >= 5 is s
On 06/02/08 at 21:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> If you want to ask me something, please put me in to "To:" or "Cc:", or
> use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Submitters don't receive answers
> automatically.
>
> On 06/02/08 at 10:39 -0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On Feb
Package: vflib3
Version: 3.6.14-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: nonfree-doc rfc
Hi!
This report is a duplicate of #393418, but that one was fixed, closed
and archived, but the bug re-appeared with this version, so I'm filing a
new bug.
This source package contains the follo
Hi Felipe,
* Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-06 18:26]:
> On 04-02-2008 10:16, Nico Golde wrote:
> > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 12:56]:
[...]
> >> $tmpdir = $ENV{'TMPDIR'} || '/tmp';
> >> $tmpfile = $tmpdir . "/ipp.$$.tmp";
> >> unlink($tmpfil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Package: bzip2
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: bzip2
> tags 464270 + confirmed
Bug#464270: bzip2: FTBFS: chmod: cannot operate on dangling symlink
`debian/tmp-dev64/usr/lib64/libbz2.so'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping p
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464274: fixed in openafs 1.4.6.dfsg1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: bzip2
tags 464270 + confirmed
thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Martin,
If you want to ask me something, please put me in to "To:" or "Cc:", or
use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Submitters don't receive answers
automatically.
On 06/02/08 at 10:39 -0200, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 6:02 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 393420 1.5.5-4.2
Bug#393420: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Bug marked as found in version 1.5.5-4.2.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admini
On 06/02/08 at 19:45 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Martín Ferrari wrote:
> > Hi Lucas,
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2008 6:02 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Package: libmodule-load-conditional-perl
> >
> >> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> >> i386.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 01:32:54PM +, Felipe Roquette wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-02-05 às 14:54 +0100, Pierre Habouzit escreveu:
> > I can do that as well, though I'd _really_ like if you can point me to
> > a .dsc ready to be dget'ed and built please, I don't have the time to
> > guess how to bui
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 08:00:44PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > > Is it clear at all yet whether the ABI breakage is in the C++ wrapper
> > > libpcrecpp0 or in the main library?
> > Yes, it's in the C++ wrapper.
> That limits the problem a lot. (Etch has only a single external rdev to
> it.)
The patch 043-recode_size_t.patch is broken.
req_len and str_len should be integers, but are size_t
(zend_parse_parameters wants pointers to int). This is a problem for 64
bits arches since a part of the variables is not initialized
(sizof(size_t) != sizeof(int)), and recode_buffer_to_buffer is ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 464414 normal
Bug#464414: Does not install. Stays on "empty".
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bu
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464271: fixed in acon 1.0.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package libtie-toobject-perl
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: libtie-toobject-perl
> tags 464308 + pending
Bug#464308: libtie-toobject-perl: FTBFS: Can't locate ok.pm in @INC
There we
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:03:46 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e"
> "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
> > t/tieCan't locate ok.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /build/user/libtie-toobject-perl-0.03/blib/lib
> /build/use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package libsoap-lite-perl soap-lite
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: soap-lite libsoap-lite-perl
> tags 464316 + pending
Bug#464316: soap-lite: FTBFS: Error while loading SOAP::Transp
On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:13:28 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
> > t/06-modules...# Failed test 3 in t/06-modules.t at line
> 27 fail #3
> > # t/06-modules.t line 27 is: ok(!$@) or warn "\nError wh
On 2008-02-06 Mark Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:54:47PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > It simple rebuild would still break partial upgrades.
> Yes, I agree. I don't think rebuilding the reverse dependencies is the
> right solution.
> The changelog suggests tha
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
>> reassign 418318 ftp.debian.org
> Bug#418318: Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal
> Bug reassigned from package `php4-ps' to `ftp.debian.org'.
Shouldn't you just remove the php4-ps binary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 464274 pending
Bug#464274: openafs: FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
`debian/openafs-dbg/usr/lib/debug/sbin': No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 6:02 AM, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Package: libmodule-load-conditional-perl
>
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>> i386.
>>
>> Relevant part:
>>
>> > ** Using build dependencies sup
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 18:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464287: fixed in nis 3.17-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Subject: flashplugin-nonfree: Does not install. Stays on "empty"
Package: flashplugin-nonfree
Version: 1.3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Last version does not install under my i386-chroot.
Lastminute script just stays on this line:
empty -w "To install Adobe Flash Player
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:54:47PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> It simple rebuild would still break partial upgrades.
Yes, I agree. I don't think rebuilding the reverse dependencies is the
right solution.
The changelog suggests that the ABI change is un-necessary (it was an
attempt to fix a p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> severity 464353 important
Bug#464353: xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver is very unstable using the 2.2.x
version of the driver
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of mes
Package: python-migrate
Version: 0.2.2-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The migrate version 0.2.2 stopped working at the release of sqlalchemy
0.3.10. There is some ongoing effort to make it work again. Support for
sqlalchemy >= 0.3.10 and <0.4 is restored at the new proje
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.14
> package nis
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: nis
> tags 464287 + pending
Bug#464287: nis: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: need at least one executable
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pendi
On 2008-02-06 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please schedule binNMUs for all reverse dependencies of libpcre3 on all
> architectures. There seems to be an ABI change in the last upstream:
> dep-wait (libpcre3-dev >= 7.6-1)
> Original Message
> Subject: Bug#463413: problem
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 463907 + confirmed
Bug#463907: Creates tempfiles in a unsafe way
Tags were: security
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
tags 463907 + confirmed
thanks
On 04-02-2008 10:16, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-04 12:56]:
>> Package: wml
>> Version: 2.0.11-1
>> Severity: serious
>> Tags: security
>>
>> The following code in wml_backend/p1_
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:47:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464378: fixed in liquidsoap 0.3.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 464261 + confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
Right.
This would be due to >= 2.6.24 linux-kernel-headers, I guess.
Upstream SVN has a patch for this.
--
Rémi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 464261 + confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#464261: ndisc6: FTBFS: netlink.c:46: error: redefinition of 'struct
nduseroptmsg'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, upstream, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.13
> reopen 464334
Bug#464334: octave2.1: installation fails
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
reopen 464334
thanks
On 06/02/08 at 16:37 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > On 06/02/08 at 10:59 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > > package: octave2.1
> > > tags 464334 unreproducible
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 464378 serious
Bug#464378: liquidsoap: always raises ladspa-related exception
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
Your message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:35:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464268: gcj-4.2: FTBFS:
../../src/gcc/config/i386/crtfastmath.c:96: error: size of array 'st_space' is
too large
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
On Wed, 06 Feb, 2008 at 03:22:32PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 06/02/08 at 14:53 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > tag 464290 + unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > does work for me on current sid on i386 and amd64.
>
> I can reproduce it.
>
> > > > ** (/usr/lib/mono/2.0/gmcs.exe:19404):
Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 15:28 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 06/02/08 at 10:59 +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > package: octave2.1
> > tags 464334 unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, den 06.02.2008, 09:44 +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > > Package: octave2.1
> > > Version: 1:2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 464374 normal
Bug#464374: no postgresql-8.3-slony1 aviable
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 418318 ftp.debian.org
Bug#418318: Don't build a php4-specific package because of php4's removal
Bug reassigned from package `php4-ps' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tr
severity 464374 normal
stop
Am Mittwoch, 6. Februar 2008 schrieb Ruben Puettmann:
> My system told me on distupgrade that I must switch to postgresql 8.3
Tell your system to shut up. :)
> but I can't find any slony package for it.
There is no slony release yet that works with 8.3. The same is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 464321 libxine-dev 1.1.10-1
Bug#464321: xine-plugin: FTBFS: checking for XINE-LIB version >= 1.0.0...
/usr/bin/xine-config: line 68: exec: pkg-config: not found
Bug reassigned from package `xine-plugin' to `libxine-dev'.
> notfound 464321 1.1
Hi,
Thanks for the bug report.
sort: open failed: +1nr: No such file or directory
The problem is that new coreutils' sort has finally deprecated the
sort +number syntax.
" On older systems, `sort' supports an obsolete origin-zero syntax
`+POS1 [-POS2]' for specifying sort keys. POSIX 10
Package: elinks
Version: 0.12~20080127-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Heya,
Building elinks failed on my amd64 buildd:
| Automatic build of elinks_0.12~20080127-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64
98-farm
| Build started at 20080204-1332
| ***
Your message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:04:36 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464263: acpitail: FTBFS: emit.c:77: error: too few
arguments to function 'read_acpi_acstate'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the probl
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#462845: fixed in python-debian 0.1.9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
I am acknowledging the security vulnerability report against ICU.
This has caught me at an unusually busy time, so I have not been able
to meet my general policy of same-day response to security bugs. I
will endeavor to upload a new version to unstable with urgency "high"
within the next two or t
Your message dated Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#464064: fixed in postgresql-common 85
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: bongoproject
Version: 0.3.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: experimental
Heya,
Building of bongoproject failed on my amd64 buildd:
| Automatic build of bongoproject_0.3.0-1 on xenophanes by sbuild/amd64 98-farm
| Build started at 20080203-1334
| ***
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 464263 libacpi 0.2-3
Bug#464263: acpitail: FTBFS: emit.c:77: error: too few arguments to function
'read_acpi_acstate'
Bug reassigned from package `acpitail' to `libacpi'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Your message dated Wed, 6 Feb 2008 15:28:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [Pkg-octave-devel] Bug#464334: octave2.1: installation fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
On 06/02/08 at 14:53 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> tag 464290 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> does work for me on current sid on i386 and amd64.
I can reproduce it.
> > > ** (/usr/lib/mono/2.0/gmcs.exe:19404): CRITICAL **: _wapi_shm_file_open:
> > shared file
> > [/nonexistent/.wapi/shared_dat
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
