On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 21:31:55 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Is it possible that your definition of unstable include experimental? :-) > Oh, you meant that perl-modules (>> 5.10) | libversion-perl (>= 0.69) is > satisfiable by installing libversion-perl from unstable?
Yup. > sbuild doesn't > do that, unfortunately. Couldn't you write libversion-perl | > perl-modules, so that it works with sbuild? Thinking a bit more I think we could just write libversion-perl, because perl-modules 5.10 (since -3) provides libversion-perl. Dropping the version on the dependecy would mean that we have a problem in stable ... Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Flying Pickets: When Doves Cry
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
