Processed: Fw: Some cleanup for gthumb

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 404643 Bug#404643: symlink /usr/lib/libgthumb.so points to non-existant file 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions. Bug reopened, originator not changed. > c

Bug#457503: gnumail.app: segfault on selecting preferences

On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 13:06:55 +0100 Xavier Brochard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:55:49 -0700, > Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > > I run "debugapp GNUMail", here's the backtrace: > > > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > [Switching

Bug#458295: nvidia-kernel-source: does not build using amd64 kernel using 32-bit userland

Package: nvidia-kernel-source Version: 100.14.19-1 Severity: critical Justification: breaks the whole system When running module-assistant update,build,install nvidia, the ld complains that it can't put an elf32 object in an elf64 kernel module. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid

Bug#439962: fail2ban security upload

Thank you guys for your time. Let me drop few comments > > + * Propagated fix for not closed log files from 0.7.8-1 > > +(closes: #439962,434368) > > + * Propagated fix for "reload" bug which is as sever as #439962 and just > > +never was hit by any Debian user yet > > As you said in you

Bug#457753: marked as done (loadcpufreq does nothing by default, cpufrequtils unusable)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457753: fixed in cpufrequtils 002-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#457931: marked as done (/etc/init.d/cpufrequtils fails because of translations)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457931: fixed in cpufrequtils 002-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#457905: marked as done (Loadcpufreq do nothing)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:32:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457753: fixed in cpufrequtils 002-7 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#457760: marked as done (perl_5.10.0-1(experimental/i386/demosthenes): test suite failure in ext/Sys/Syslog/t/syslog)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 03:02:15 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457760: fixed in perl 5.10.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#458284: scm installation failed: error in /usr/share/doc-base/scm

Package: scm Version: 5e4-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable When upgrading scm: Setting up scm (5e4-1) ... Error in `/usr/share/doc-base/scm', line 9: `Index' value missing for format `info' dpkg: error processing scm (--configure): subprocess post-installation script re

Bug#456880: Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 456880 patch thanks I added one patch to fix this RC bug: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libbulmalib.so.1 needed by debian/bulmacont/usr/lib/bulmages/plugins/libregistroiva.so (its RPATH is ''). The problem was related to

Processed: found 454770 in 3.0.27a-1, notfound 454770 in 3.0.27a-2

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > found 454770 3.0.27a-1 Bug#454770: schannel_store.tdb should not be kept in /etc/samba Bug marked as found in version 3.0.27a-1. > notfound 454770 3.0.27a-2 Bug#454770: schannel_sto

Processed: Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 456880 patch Bug#456880: bulmages: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: couldn't find library libbulmalib.so.1 needed by debian/bulmacont/usr/lib/bulmages/plugins/libregistroiva.so (its RPATH is ''). There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks

Bug#458083: marked as done (audacious: missing dependency: gtk2-engines-pixbuf)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458083: fixed in audacious 1.4.5-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#453795: Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 tags 453795 patch thanks I added one patch to fix this RC bug: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for debian/libamu4/usr/lib/libamu.so.4 (used by debian/am-utils/usr/sbin/amd). The problem was related to the building pac

Processed: Patch to fix the FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps RC bug

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 453795 patch Bug#453795: am-utils: FTBFS: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: no dependency information found for debian/libamu4/usr/lib/libamu.so.4 (used by debian/am-utils/usr/sbin/amd). There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping process

Bug#458275: warzone2100: SVN snapshots should not migrate to testing

Package: warzone2100 Version: 2.1.0~0.svn1436-1 Severity: serious I'll be uploading a new SVN snapshot soon and I wanted to be sure that warzone2100 does not migrate to testing until we upload a stable release. Upstream says they will have a feature freeze for the release of 2.1 in about 2 weeks o

Bug#458006: marked as done (gnumeric: uninstallable on sid)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:47:17 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458006: fixed in gnumeric 1.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now y

Bug#446824: CVE-2007-5448 remote denial of service via crafted beacon frame

Faidon Liambotis wrote: > Luk Claes wrote: >>> CVE-2007-5448[0]: >>> | Madwifi 0.9.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial >>> | of service (panic) via a beacon frame with a large length value in the >>> | extended supported rates (xrates) element, which triggers an assertion >>>

Bug#446824: CVE-2007-5448 remote denial of service via crafted beacon frame

Luk Claes wrote: >> CVE-2007-5448[0]: >> | Madwifi 0.9.3.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial >> | of service (panic) via a beacon frame with a large length value in the >> | extended supported rates (xrates) element, which triggers an assertion >> | error, related to net80211/ie

Bug#410580: (CVE-2007-0855) Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

Touko Korpela wrote: > On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:33:16PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> On Sun May 20, 2007 at 17:29:19 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: >>> Unrar (source package unrar-nonfree) has CVE-2007-0855 (Stack-based buffer >>> overflow) bug in etch and sarge. It has debian bug #410580 >>>

Bug#453615: marked as done (Bus error)

Your message dated Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:06:02 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453615: It's better now... but still useless has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#457717: closed by Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#457717: fixed in gxine 0.5.900-dev-20071222-1)

I demand that Brian Sammon may or may not have written... > It still crashes after I upgrade to 0.5.900-dev-20071222-2: > # gxine > gtkvideo: failed to get a proxy for gnome-screensaver > gxine has suffered a fatal internal error. > To get a backtrace, run gxine in a debugger such as gdb.

Bug#454602: marked as done (nice: postinst failure while compiling file with xemacs21)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#454602: fixed in nice 0.9.13-3 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#430310: marked as done (ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 23:29:05 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#430310: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is

Bug#458267: why: FTBFS: configure: error: Cannot find ocamldep.

Package: why Version: 2.10.dfsg-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build with the following error: checking for ocamlc... ocamlc ocaml version is 3.10.0 ocaml library path is /usr/lib/ocaml/3.10.0 checking for ocamlopt... ocamlopt checking ocamlopt version... ok checking for ocaml

Bug#458266: siege: FTBFS: missing: line 46: aclocal-1.9: command not found

Package: siege Version: 2.66-1 Severity: serious Hi, Your package is failing to build. After configure it's doing: /usr/bin/make -C . make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/siege-2.66' cd . && /bin/sh /build/buildd/siege-2.66/utils/missing --run aclocal-1.9 /build/buildd/siege-2.66/utils/mis

Bug#457758: marked as done (libbeagle: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 22:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457758: fixed in libbeagle 0.3.0-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#439962: fail2ban security upload

Hi Yaroslav, On Saturday 29 December 2007 21:23, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I'm sorry for the delay in taking this issue on. Here's my response to your > patch. In short, I think most issues are more relevant to a stable update > than to a security update. As you've seen Moritz has commented aswell

Bug#439962: fail2ban security upload

Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Concluding: please prepare a package for stable with the two mentioned issues > fixed (please include relevant CVE id and bug numbers in the changelog) and > send us the debdiff for a last review. Then, if all is right, put the rest of > the changes into a new version a

Bug#458145: xscreensaver: "webcollage" installed without prompting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 severity 458145 wishlist quit Thomas Koenig wrote: > Subject: "webcollage" installed without prompting > Package: xscreensaver > Version: 5.04-2 > Severity: grave > > Hi, > > I just found that "webcollage" had been installed on my system > with the l

Processed: Re: Bug#458145: xscreensaver: "webcollage" installed without prompting

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 458145 wishlist Bug#458145: xscreensaver: "webcollage" installed without prompting Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave' > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (a

Bug#458084: FTBFS: bashism in debian/rules

* Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-28 18:29]: > On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:53:35PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > With /bin/sh being dash this package fails to build due to a bashism in line > > 51 of debian/rules: > > cp $${f/libmtp$(SOVERSION)/libmtp} $$f ;\ > > >

Bug#457717: closed by Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Bug#457717: fixed in gxine 0.5.900-dev-20071222-1)

It still crashes after I upgrade to 0.5.900-dev-20071222-2: # gxine gtkvideo: failed to get a proxy for gnome-screensaver gxine has suffered a fatal internal error. To get a backtrace, run gxine in a debugger such as gdb. Then, when the error occurs: (gdb) thread apply all bt gxine

Bug#458237: marked as done (tomcat5.5: CVE-2007-5342 unauthorized modification of data because of too open permissions)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:32:22 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458237: fixed in tomcat5.5 5.5.25-4 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#439962: fail2ban security upload

Hi Yaroslav, On Saturday 29 December 2007 04:01, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > I would like to pursue security upload of security-related fixes to etch's > version of fail2ban. > > I am attaching tentative diff on top of etch's version. > > Thijs already had a look and raised his concern about few c

Processed: setting package to libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps, tagging 458237

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5 tomcat5.5-admin tomcat5.5-webapps Ignoring bugs not assigned to: tomcat5.5-admin libtomcat5.5-java tomcat5.5-webapps tomcat5.5 > tags 458237 + p

Bug#441148: marked as done (FTBFS: missing build dependency on texlive-latex-base)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427266: fixed in avr-libc 1:1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#458181: marked as done (slib: tries to replace a directory with a symlink by just having the symlink in the package)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 19:02:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458181: fixed in slib 3a5-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your re

Bug#439420: marked as done (avr-libc: FTBS Fails to build documentation)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427266: fixed in avr-libc 1:1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#427266: marked as done (avr-libc: FTBFS: failed to install build-deps)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:47:02 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#427266: fixed in avr-libc 1:1.4.7-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#458237: tomcat5.5: CVE-2007-5342 unauthorized modification of data because of too open permissions

Package: tomcat5.5 Version: 5.5.20-2 Severity: grave Tags: security patch Hi, the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id was published for tomcat5.5. CVE-2007-5342[0]: | The default catalina.policy in the JULI logging component in Apache | Tomcat 5.5.9 through 5.5.25 and 6.0.0 thro

Bug#458149: deeply disturb udev

reassign 458149 libsane-extras 1.0.18.13 close 458149 1.0.18.14 thanks Yannick Roehlly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I removed libsane-extras and upgraded libsane to -2 and the problem did not > reappear. > > So you can reassign the bug to the bad guy. And close the bug as it's already fixe

Processed: Re: Bug#458149: deeply disturb udev

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 458149 libsane-extras 1.0.18.13 Bug#458149: deeply disturb udev Bug reassigned from package `libsane' to `libsane-extras'. > close 458149 1.0.18.14 Bug#458149: deeply disturb udev 'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer

Bug#455698: marked as done (ampache: contains a non-free font)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:32:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#455698: fixed in ampache 3.3.3.5-dfsg1-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it i

Processed: setting package to srtp, tagging 439976

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package srtp Ignoring bugs not assigned to: srtp > tags 439976 pending Bug#439976: FTBFS on mips in test/srtp_driver.c:315 Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > End of message, st

Bug#458082: dictionaries-common: version in etch (0.70.10) fails to install

found458082 0.70.10 closed 458082 0.81.1 severity 458082 normal thanks On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:04:24PM +0100, Karol Langner wrote: > Package: dictionaries-common > Version: 0.90.0 > Severity: grave > Justification: renders package unusable > > > Due to a dependency issue or other proble

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#458082: dictionaries-common: version in etch (0.70.10) fails to install

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > found458082 0.70.10 Bug#458082: dictionaries-common: version in etch (0.70.10) fails to install Bug marked as found in version 0.70.10. > closed 458082 0.81.1 Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 458082 normal Bug#458082

Bug#458150: marked as done (asterisk server doesn't start anymore)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458022: fixed in asterisk 1:1.4.16.2~dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#458022: marked as done (asterisk: Initscript always reports that Asterisk is already running, hence never starts Asterisk )

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#458022: fixed in asterisk 1:1.4.16.2~dfsg-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case i

Bug#457951: marked as done (fp-compiler: fpc fails to build lazarus)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:17:16 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457951: fixed in fpc 2.2.0-dfsg1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#455261: marked as done (Please provide transitional empty package aqbanking-tool depending on package aqbanking-tools)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:02:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#455261: fixed in libaqbanking 3.0.1-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is n

Bug#458149: deeply disturb udev

Le samedi 29 décembre 2007, Julien BLACHE a écrit : > Do you have libsane-extras installed ? Yes, and _it_ is the culprit! I removed libsane-extras and upgraded libsane to -2 and the problem did not reappear. So you can reassign the bug to the bad guy. Yannick

Bug#457467: failures due to changed kernel interfaces is a feature, not a bug

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package netatalk severity 457467 normal block 457467 by 457177 tags 457467 fixed thanks Yaird tries very hard to only only build initial ramdisks that it is confident will work. This causes failure each time the kernel changes its boot-related hints

Processed: setting package to yaird, severity of 457467 is normal, block 457467 with 457177, tagging 457467

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package yaird Ignoring bugs not assigned to: yaird > severity 457467 normal Bug#457467: yaird: breaks on evey new kernel due to hardcoded parsing Severity set to `normal' from `seri

Processed: setting package to yaird, severity of 457466 is wishlist

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.11 > package yaird Ignoring bugs not assigned to: yaird > severity 457466 wishlist Bug#457466: yaird: no usplash support Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious' > End of message, stop

Bug#457466: no usplash support is severity wishlist only

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package netatalk severity 457466 wishlist thanks Builtin support for usplash would be nice to have, but is an added feature, not an error in current implementation, so lowering severity. If someone wants to help with this, the first step is probably

Bug#435535: iceowl - FTBFS: error: nsContentUtils.h: No such file or directory

severity 435535 important thanks Bastian ... this is _not_ serious ... please don't bump severity again. (read below). Dropping severity _again_. On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:15:08PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote: > severity 435535 important > thanks > > afaik, iceowl never build on that arch befor

Processed: Re: Bug#435535: iceowl - FTBFS: error: nsContentUtils.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 435535 important Bug#435535: iceowl - FTBFS: error: nsContentUtils.h: No such file or directory Severity set to `important' from `serious' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking syste

Bug#453179: marked as done (icedove: FTBFS: nsCanvasRenderingContext2D.cpp:568: undefined reference to `XFreePixmap')

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453179: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#448873: marked as done (iscsitarget: ietd.conf public readable and contains passwords)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:47:03 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#448873: fixed in iscsitarget 0.4.15-4+lenny1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case

Bug#453365: marked as done (icedove: Missing copyright file)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:02:08 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#453365: fixed in icedove 2.0.0.9-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now

Bug#457800: marked as done (libgphoto2-2: Package does not install)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 13:49:42 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#457800: libgphoto2-2: Package does not install has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the cas

Bug#457800: libgphoto2-2: Package does not install

Le Wednesday 26 December 2007 11:34:09 Frederic Peters, vous avez écrit : > Yves Caniou wrote: > > During the post-install step, I obtain a segfault with the following > > message: > > > > Paramétrage de libgphoto2-2 (2.4.0-8) ... > > /var/lib/dpkg/info/libgphoto2-2.postinst: line 13: 20760 Erreur

Bug#452389: marked as done (rawstudio: Segfaults at startup)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 12:32:09 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#452389: fixed in rawstudio 0.6+20071101-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it

Bug#413762: marked as done (database files being created in the root ('/') directory)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Dec 2007 11:32:06 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#413762: fixed in onak 0.3.4-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#458181: slib: tries to replace a directory with a symlink by just having the symlink in the package

Package: slib Version: 3a5-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package uninstallable As the policy says: A directory will never be replaced by a symbolic link to a directory or vice versa; instead, the existing state (symlink or not) will be left alone and dpkg will follo

Bug#458149: Broken setup

Same broken setup as Yannick after libsane upgrade, and again, one night trying to fix my setup. I think this bug is very critical, and should be fixed as soon as possible. Having a broken computer after installing a scanner software is not something intended, and it's not easy to track for users.

Bug#458149: Broken setup

Matthieu Baechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > Same broken setup as Yannick after libsane upgrade, and again, one night > trying to fix my setup. Then, same question: do you have libsane-extras installed ? > I think this bug is very critical, and should be fixed as soon as > possible. Havin

Bug#458149: deeply disturb udev

Yannick Roehlly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > When I install the 1.0.19~cvs20071213-2 package, udev behave very weirdly: Do you have libsane-extras installed ? JB. -- Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Public key available on -

Bug#410580: (CVE-2007-0855) Preparation of the next stable Debian GNU/Linux update

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 08:33:16PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Sun May 20, 2007 at 17:29:19 +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > > Unrar (source package unrar-nonfree) has CVE-2007-0855 (Stack-based buffer > > overflow) bug in etch and sarge. It has debian bug #410580 > > Maintainer didn't ask f