also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.19.1639 +0200]:
> One other thing to add... I went back and looked at the maildir
> manpage, and I believe that the OfflineIMAP implementation, even
> prior to your patch, is conformant to the spec.
Yes, it was.
> Ordinarily it would seem lik
Package: libsuitesparse-dev
Version: 3.0.0-6.1
Severity: grave
package is not installable together with libumfpack4-dev.
# apt-get install libsuitesparse-dev
[...]
Selecting previously deselected package libsuitesparse-dev.
Unpacking libsuitesparse-dev (from .../libsuitesparse-dev_3.0.0-6.1_i386
Package: mednafen
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Hi!
Your package fails to build from source on powerpc - just confirmed the
build log errors from the build network which you can take a look at the
logs here:
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=mednafen&arch=powerpc&ver=0.8.1-1
also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.10.19.1623 +0200]:
> It looks like your Maildir code may have introduced an infinite loop. Would
> you be able to look into this, or should I just revert the patch?
I don't know when I will get a chance to look at this in detail, so
for now, jus
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 423606 serious
Bug#423606: segmentation fault of k3dsurf on start up
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried "new" as in "newer than a month ago". I built 2.2.33.ds1-2.
Well, 2.5.139-1 is now available, please retest with that.
--
* Sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology (T.P) *
* PGP public key available @ http:/
Your message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444513: fixed in kazehakase 0.4.3-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443616: fixed in htp 1.16-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443711: fixed in d4x 2.5.7.1-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:55:29AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:44:50AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> > Package: d4x
> > Version: 2.5.7.1-4
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > d4x fails to build because it uses some deprecated GTK+ features and
> > defines GTK_DIS
Your message dated Mon, 22 Oct 2007 04:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385520: fixed in kxstitch 0.7-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:02:39PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> tag 444507 patch
> thanks
>
> Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/09/2007):
> > Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> it is sufficient to remove the macros set in DEPRECATION_FLAGS
> (configure{.ac,}) to fix that.
>
> You'
Hi Matt,
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 08:44:50AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote:
> Package: d4x
> Version: 2.5.7.1-4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: patch
>
> d4x fails to build because it uses some deprecated GTK+ features and
> defines GTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED:
>
> if i486-linux-gnu-g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:55:00AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: infon
> version: 0~r198-2
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tags: patch
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070928 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Hello,
Basically of what I have seen in the postinst script there are two
problems: 1) the shared/default-x-server is never set 2) if discover
is installed or not xserver-xorg/config/device/driver isn't set either.
Both values are mandatory for the dexconf script to work.
I have added an auto_ans
tags 385520 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my kxstitch 0.7-2.1 NMU.
Mike, nice work fixing the lintian warnings, I hope this stuff will be
addressed by the package maintainer. NMUs are supposed to fix only the
critical bug.
Ana
diff -u kxstitch-0.7/debian/changelog kxstitch-0.7/deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 385520 + patch
Bug#385520: FTBFS with GCC 4.2: uses removed minimum/maximum operator
Tags were: patch sid lenny
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
tags 444513 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my kazehakase 0.4.3-1.1 NMU.
Ana
diff -u kazehakase-0.4.3/debian/changelog kazehakase-0.4.3/debian/changelog
--- kazehakase-0.4.3/debian/changelog
+++ kazehakase-0.4.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+kazehakase (0.4.3-1.1) unstable; urge
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 444513 + patch
Bug#444513: kazehakase: FTBFS: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before
'GtkTooltips'
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> block 432431 with 432444
Bug#432444: libticables3: FTBFS: unmet build dep tidev-modules-source
Bug#432431: tiemu: FTBFS: unmet build dep tidev-modules-source
Was not blocked by any bu
Package: gammu
Version: 1.13.94-1
Severity: serious
Justification: I don't want this version to migrate to testing
I expect to upload new package in time, but just in case I won't manage
it, this bug should prevent current Gammu version from migration to
testing.
--
Michal Čihař | http:
Hello,
the problem with this bug is that it is not always reproducible,
particularly, I cannot reproduce it with a 2.6.18.8 kernel. The bug won't
probably be fixed till someone who can reproduce it debugs it.
Regards
Jiri Palecek
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Package: proftpd
Version: 1.3.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Trying to start proftpd fails if the latest release of OpenSSL is installed:
> # /etc/init.d/proftpd start
> Starting ftp server: proftpd - mod_tls/2.1.2: compi
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447297: fixed in d-shlibs 0.36
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
> d-shlibmove and d-devlibdeps rely on apt, but d-shlibs doesn't depend on
> it. I believe that this is causing the build failures of e.g.
> graphviz [0] and libgtkok [1] on hppa.
I'm not quite sure if it's really a bug, apt is 'Build-Essential:
yes'. Anyone care to comment on why hppa seems
On 10/21/07, gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alright, I've created a patch that for the moment fixes Build.PL;
> could someone please take a look at it (in pkg-perl's svn)?
Guys, you are really fast! I didn't even have the chance to read the
mails and try fixing it :) Thanks!!
--
M
tag 447465 confirmed
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (21/10/2007):
> cp shared_debug_obj/oolite oolite.debug
> cp: cannot stat `shared_debug_obj/oolite': No such file or directory
> make[1]: *** [after-all] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/user/oolite-1.65'
> make: *** [build
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 447465 confirmed
Bug#447465: oolite: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat `shared_debug_obj/oolite': No such
file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> # raising severity to prevent the new package to enter testing
> severity 444982 grave
Bug#444982: CVE-2007-5193 information disclosure in default configuration
Severity set to `grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
tags 446725 + pending
thanks
Hi Sam,
a few minutes ago the NMU of rcalc was uploaded to DELAYED/7. The final
patch is attached to this mail.
Have fun on the conference!
Cheers,
Bernd
- --
Bernd Zeimetz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 446725 + pending
Bug#446725: file conflicts between packages
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446726: fixed in radiance 3R8+20070924.dfsg-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
On Tue, 2007-10-16 at 19:17 +0200, Sven Mueller wrote:
> Package: lirc-modules-source
> Version: 0.80.0-13
This should probably be 0.8.0-13.
Anyway, I have 0.8.0-13 installed and the tarball
/usr/src/lirc-modules.tar.gz contains the following kernel specific
directories under modules/lirc/driver
Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/10/2007):
> This is not a bug in gtkmathview, but rather in t1lib. See #446864 for
> details. I've already NMUed t1lib, but I've uploaded it to the delayed
> 6 days queue some days ago (don't know how the upload should be
> visible ATM ...).
There: http:/
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443574: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444285: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446188: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446188: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444285: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443571: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443574: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446188: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443571: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418310: fixed in ossp-uuid 1.5.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443574: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443571: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:31 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418310: fixed in ossp-uuid 1.5.1-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444285: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
an bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libdevice-cdio-perl
version: 0.2.4-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your p
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444285: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446188: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443574: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:48:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#443571: fixed in gtk+2.0 2.12.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
acking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libobjc-lf2
version: 2.95.3r115-2
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:47:52 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#446785: fixed in apertium 3.0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Hi,
i tink it is an amd64 bug
i have a 32bit and a 64bit system and the bug is only on the 64bit system (sid)
the init on a clean homedir fail and eclipse crashes ;/
i add an error log from eclipse and a strace log and hoppe it help u
--
$ java --version
java version "1.5.0"
gij (GNU
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.9
> package gtk+2.0 gtk2.0-examples gtk2-engines-pixbuf libgtk2.0-0
> libgtk2.0-0-dbg libgtk2.0-bin libgtk2.0-common libgtk2.0-dev libgtk2.0-doc
> libgtk-directfb-2.0-0 libgtk-directfb-
tags 418310 patch
thanks
I've prepared a 0-day NMU to fix this bug, which is the principal blocker
for removing php4 from lenny. The patch is attached, and the NMU will be on
its way to incoming shortly.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Develo
Hi Kingsley,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:31:06 -0700, Kingsley G. Morse Jr. wrote:
> I should mention that Bug Buddy also reported
>
> ** (bug-buddy:14719): CRITICAL **: file bug-buddy.c: line 287
> (on_product_toggle_clicked): assertion `druid_data.state == STATE_PRODUCT'
> failed
> /us
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 19:47:21 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445779: fixed in rdesktop 1.5.0-3+cvs20071006
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 447468 + pending
Bug#447468: libobjc-lf2: FTBFS: mv: target
`/build/user/libobjc-lf2-2.95.3r115/debian/tmp/usr/lib//' is not a directory:
No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing
To clear up naming confusion libwebkitgdk has changed to libwebkitgtk
in the WebKit svn trunk. This needs to be updated in the
epiphany-browser-webkit source. The webkit svn package will build the
dependency with the new name. Epiphany is still looking for the
dependency with the old name.
--
Wil
Package: qingy
Version: 0.9.6-1
Severity: serious
Tags: upstream
qingy (compiled with X support) creates the directory /etc/X11/Sessions
(if doesn't exists) where it will save some data regarding X sessions.
That directory is defined with the x_sessions parameter in qingy
configuration file.
Si
reassign 447218 libcdio
retitle 447218 Please request bin NMUs for SONAME transition
forcemerge 447023 447218
stop
Am Donnerstag, den 18.10.2007, 22:57 -0400 schrieb Ben Bromley:
> Package: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good
> Version: 0.10.6-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:52:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#445785: gstreamer0.10: If rebuilt against current sid,
makes gst-plugins-base0.10 FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 447218 libcdio
Bug#447218: gstreamer0.10-plugins-good: Required dependency libcdio6 removed
from unstable
Bug reassigned from package `gstreamer0.10-plugins-good' to `libcdio'.
> retitle 447218 Please request bin NMUs for SONAME transition
Bu
I see the bug has been reopened by Hristo Vladimirov Hristov, but
sending this message for the search engines. So, the bug is still
present in ntp 1:4.2.4p4+dfsg-1 , just the error message in syslog has
slightly changed to:
ntpd: OpenSSL version mismatch. Built against 908070, you have 90807f
Package: amaya
Followup-For: Bug #414380
Hi.
I'm at a friend's computer, on debian unstable.
We ran into a problem looking all like #414380 in which amaya
did not start. Curious thig is that it worked over
freeNX (tried from 2 different clients, the remote amaya
opened fine). I tried disabling
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 20:49:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#444544: gst-plugins-base0.10: FTBFS:
/usr/bin/dh_gstscancodecs: gst-inspect-0.10 failed on
debian/gstreamer0.10-gnomevfs/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstgnomevfs. so: 65280
has caused the atta
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 18:57:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #447304,
regarding digikam is currently uninstallable on amd64 unstable
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) Nicolas DEGAND <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 21/10/07 at 16:16 +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
>
> Am Samstag, den 29.09.2007, 12:21 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> > Package: gst-plugins-base0.10
> > version: 0.10.14-4
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070928 qa-ftbfs
> > Justification: FTBFS on i38
On 21/10/07 at 16:52 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > OK, then can you see what happens if you use the pbuilder in the same
> > system? The error message is caused by the Java compiler trying to
>
> Also, did you really try to build the new 2.5.139 packag
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#439372: fixed in ocsinventory-server 1.01-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
> Bad news. I installed the gtk-theme-switch package as you suggested,
> ran switch2 and tried several theme and font combinations, none of
> which enabled xnec2c to run. I still receive the same failures as
> outlined in the bug report.
>
That's bad I will contact the upstram author, maybe
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 10:35:33 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447413: 'Rcmdr' is not a valid package -- installed <
2.0.0?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429205: fixed in moin 1.5.8-4.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:15:43 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > Seems that $cf->{cc} never gets set to $Config{cc}.
> Right, $cf is empty.
From libmodule-build-perl's Changes:
0.2805_01 [..]
* Instead of storing an entire dump of the Config.pm hash in the
_build/ directory upon startup, we no
tags 429205 patch
thanks
Hi
Attached you will find the uploaded NMU patch.
It should cover the major issue. For the other issues, I suggest filling a
normal bug and leaving it open, until someone definetely confirms that they
are fixed (I looked over them and a few seem to be fixed, others I co
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 429205 patch
Bug#429205: [CVE-2007-3163, CVE-2006-6978 etc.] FCKEditor issues
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administra
Le dimanche 21 octobre 2007, Mark Purcell a écrit :
> Hmm,
>
> This would be caused by your apt.sources having some funny entries, or
> not being uptodate.
>
> Could I ask you to run `apt-cache show digikam` and return the results.
apt-cache show digikam
Package: digikam
Priority: optional
Secti
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:26:08 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
> > i386.
> Works on etch, but fails on sid. Maybe a Module::Build version issue?
> Since that module copies some of the internal methods of Module::Build
> th
Am Samstag, den 29.09.2007, 12:21 +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> Package: gst-plugins-base0.10
> version: 0.10.14-4
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070928 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your packa
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 12:27 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: apertium-es-ca
> version: 1.0.5-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071021 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on i386
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 446710 !
Bug#446710: ntpd won't start up due to upgraded libssl
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug#446711: ntp: Please build against OpenSSL 908070
Bu
Luk Claes wrote:
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 03:21:36PM +0200, Bart Martens wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 08:24 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 08:11:07AM +0200, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Please remove dosemu-freedos version 1:0.0.b9r5a-3 from Stable.
http://bugs.de
tags 447456 pending
thanks
Fixed in svn revision 5400.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 447456 pending
Bug#447456: ack-grep: FTBFS: Can't locate File/Next.pm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Kalle Kivimaa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, then can you see what happens if you use the pbuilder in the same
> system? The error message is caused by the Java compiler trying to
Also, did you really try to build the new 2.5.139 package? I just
tried to get the jspwiki source package from ftp.
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No, it still fails.
OK, then can you see what happens if you use the pbuilder in the same
system? The error message is caused by the Java compiler trying to
compile Java 1.6 compatible source, although the JSPWiki build.xml
forces the source and class c
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447479: fixed in jack 3.1.1+cvs20050801-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi Sam,
On Mi, 17 Okt 2007, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>Okay, you make perfect sense. Can you suggest a strategy that lets
> me know the required font? Of course I can test packages one after the
> other but I'd like to understand what's going on if possible.
One way I did suggest somewhere else is t
* Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-21 14:16]:
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> cursesmodule/jack_cursesmodule.c:43:20: error: curses.h: No such file or
> directory
Gah.
Thanks for the report.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: scribus-ng
Version: 1.3.4.dfsg-1
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Scribus crashes while editing the textstyles, with the following output:
ASSERT: "di != -1"
in
/home/malex/debian/scribus/unstable/1.3.4/scribus-ng-1.3.4.dfsg/scribus/smtextstylewidgets.
David,
On 21 October 2007 at 14:03, David Andel wrote:
| Hi Dirk
|
| (you have replied to me privately, so I also do not cc DBTS)
My bad. It was late. I am adding the BTS back in, hope you don't mind.
| After installing car Rcmdr came up
Good!
How did you install car? How could it not hav
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 12:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#442165: fixed in apt-spy 3.1-17
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: jack
Version: 3.1.1+cvs20050801-17
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cursesmodule/jack_cursesmodule.c:43:20: error: curses.h: No such file or
directory
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe
On 21/10/07 at 13:57 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> The new version, 2.5.139 in unstable, compiles fine in my pbuilder
> clean chroot. Could you check that the package compiles in your
> environment too, and then close this bug?
No, it still fails.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http:/
Your message dated Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:32:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#447188: fixed in ghostscript 8.61.dfsg.1~svn8187-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Nicolas DEGAND wrote:
> > Also could you run ...
> > `dpkg -p digikam` and let me know what it states.
>
> dpkg -p digikam states that Package "digikam"
> is not available. Digikam is still uninstallable
Hmm,
This would be caused by your apt.sources having some funny entrie
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:32:54PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.
Works on etch, but fails on sid. Maybe a Module::Build version issue?
Since that module copies some of the internal methods of Module::Build
this wouldn'
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
