Package: eclipse
Version: 3.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Hi!
The 3.2.2-1 version of eclipse doesn't build on powerpc anymore it
seems. See [1]. As it did build on that architecture and a package of
it is in testing this is a regression.
Please fix it, or get the powerpc package dropped by t
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:17:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432544: fixed in libxml-atom-perl 0.25-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
severity #432551 normal
retitle #421551 exim4: after last upgrade i get: Bad destination system: [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
tags #432551 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 03:48:24PM +0300, alex bodnaru wrote:
> mail seems to be fetched by fetchmail, and headers rewritten to [EMAIL
> PROTECTED],
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity #432551 normal
Bug#432551: (no subject)
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> retitle #421551 exim4: after last upgrade i get: Bad destination system:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#421551: imget refuses to create maildir mailboxes, MH only
Change
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:02:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429073: fixed in request-tracker3.6 3.6.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
tags #432521 confirmed pending
thanks
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 02:05:02PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> which is going to be there ASAP) would be to change
> /usr/sbin/update-exim4.conf to generate MAIN_RELAY_TO_DOMAINS.
Committed to svn.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags #432521 confirmed pending
Bug#432521: exim4-config: Relaying broken: MAIN_RELAY_DOMAINS !=
MAIN_RELAY_TO_DOMAINS
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed, pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 432484 1.14-1
Bug#432484: libtest-www-mechanize-perl - FTBFS: 500 Can't connect to
localhost:13432 (connect: Connection refused)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.14-1, send
close 432484 1.14-1
thanks
-=| gregor herrmann, Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:16:25 +0200 |=-
> We have 1.14 in our svn repo with the following changelog entry:
>
> libtest-www-mechanize-perl (1.14-1) WAITSFORNEWlibwww-mechanize-perl;
> urgency=low
>
> * New upstream release
> * debian/control: libwww
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 430253 + pending
Bug#430253: ldbl128 transition for alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: pending
> tags 431495 + pending
Bug#431495: patch for gcc 4.3
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 432043
Bug#432043: ipe: incompatible with texlive2007
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 432043 serious
Package: libglib1.2ldbl
Version: 1.2.10-18
Severity: serious
As the subject says: the libglib1.2ldbl shlibs read
libglib-1.2 0 libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.10-18)
libgmodule-1.2 0 libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.10-18)
libgthread-1.2 0 libglib1.2 (>= 1.2.10-18)
which isn't even satisfiable.
--
Daniel Schepler
--
T
Package: esmtp
Version: 0.5.1-4.1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7.3
On first install of esmtp -- even when not installing esmtp-run, which
lets esmtp be the system MTA -- the postinst overwrites /etc/mailname,
even when answering the (default) "no" to "Automatically overwrite
configur
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432476: fixed in ipe 6.0pre28-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hey, Troy! I'd sorta forgotten you were on this team :).
Peter: sorry about the address mess; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' was what should
have been in my ~/.reportbugrc :(.
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Troy Heber]
This is the error you will get if you are behind a proxy and can not
access the machine dire
Your message dated Wed, 11 Jul 2007 04:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432578: fixed in gmpc 0.15.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Same here but using tesing with nvidia-graphics-drivers_100.14.11-1 compiled
from source to obtain packages installables in testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tag 432441 +pending
thanks
This has been fixed upstream, I am expecting them to release shortly
and this bug should be closed in the subsequent upload.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 432441 +pending
Bug#432441: heartbeat: FTBFS: unmet build dep modutils
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
On mar, 2007-07-10 at 21:06 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> libxml-libxml-perl and libxml2? That rings a bell; Florian had some
> "fun" with that package during Debconf.
>
> Here it is:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=430002
> http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27659
r by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070710-2302
| **
| Checking available source versions...
| Fetching source files...
| Reading package lists...
| Building dependency tree...
| Reading state information...
|
Package: swfdec-mozilla
Version: 0.4.5-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
# apt-get install swfdec-mozilla
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be ins
Package: mip6d
Version: 2.0.3~git20070417-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
this package doesn't build anymore because it depends on a now non-existant
package.
| Automatic build of mip6d_2.0.3~git20070417-2 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070711-0253
| *
Package: nautilus2-mozilla
Version: 1.1.2+cvs.2002.07.25-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package doesn't build anymore. Given the fact that it is from 2002
probably means that it was just forgotten to be removed from
experimental. In this case this bug should probably cloned against
ftp.debian.org
Package: psi
Version: 0.11~beta2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package build-depends on libqt4-debug-dev which doesn't exists
anymore.
| Automatic build of psi_0.11~beta2-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070711-0221
| ***
Package: qca
Version: 2.0~beta2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package build-depends on libqt4-debug-dev, which doesn't exist
anymore.
| Automatic build of qca_2.0~beta2-1 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070711-0220
| *
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 362114 pending
Bug#362114: ITP: scuttle -- Web-based social bookmarking system.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 407337 pending
Bug#407337: ITP: ampache -- For The Love Of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> forcemerge 410507 368620
Bug#410507: pike7.7_7.7.24-1(experimental/amd64/xenophanes): Depends on
non-existing package libmysqlclient10-dev
Bug#368620: pike7.7: Please upgrade build-d
severity 430463 wishlist
tag 430463 - moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:41:25PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:17:39AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > Since nobody so far seems to have encountered the same problem I'm
> > inclined to close th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 430463 wishlist
Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> tag 430463 - moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#430463: Directory /usr/share/doc/dpkg-dev is empty
Tags were: moreinfo unreproducible
T
[Troy Heber]
> This is the error you will get if you are behind a proxy and can not
> access the machine directly. From your ia64 box can you telnet to port
> 80 of llvm.org?
Or, if it's a transparent proxy, telnet won't necessarily reveal the
problem. What will show the problem is to try https,
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 12:17:39AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Since nobody so far seems to have encountered the same problem I'm
> inclined to close the bug report. If you still think there is really
As Raphaël pointed out, dpkg-dev probably contained a real directory
eons ago (I'm sure I m
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#404054: fixed in elfutils 0.128-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On 10 July 2007 at 17:13, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On 7/10/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > But look what the source has:
| >
| >
| > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep Depends
src/debian/CRAN/mvtnorm-0.7.5/debian/control
| > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.3.1), c
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432523: fixed in geda 1:1.0.1.20070626.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 03:58:20PM -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> Package: dpkg-dev
> Version: 1.14.4
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 12.5
>
> dpkg-dev only comes with an empty /usr/share/doc subdir, without any
> changelog or copyright. Was this meant to be a symlink to dpkg?
Hi.
The chroot probably has the newer "linux-libc-dev" installed instead
of "linux-kernel-headers". It looks like "linux-libc-dev" is missing
the usb.h file.
This package could do what libusb does, and just include its own
version of "usb.h". Or it could be rewritten to go through libusb
instead of
severity 432573 wishlist
retitle 432573 cowbuilder cross-arch building support.
thanks.
Hi,
> To start, I have a custom configuration for pbuilder which I tried to move
> over to cowbuilder. I am compiling packages for i386 on etch using AMD64 on
> Sid.
>
> I built the initial pbuilder enviro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 432573 wishlist
Bug#432573: cowdancer: cowbuilder fails on .ilist size unexpected error
Severity set to `wishlist' from `grave'
> retitle 432573 cowbuilder cross-arch building support.
Bug#432573: cowdancer: cowbuilder fails on .ilist size une
On 7/10/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But look what the source has:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep Depends src/debian/CRAN/mvtnorm-0.7.5/debian/control
Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.0), r-base-dev (>= 2.3.1), cdbs
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, r-base-core (>= 2.3.1)
[EMAIL PROTEC
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427687: fixed in monotone 0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 432603 util-linux_2.13~rc1-0(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: #error
> "Unsupported arch"
Bug#432603: util-linux_2.13~rc1-0(sparc/experimental): FTBFS: #error
"Unsupported arch"
Changed Bug title to `util-linux_2.13~rc1-0(hppa/experimental): FTBFS:
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 22:02:08 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425907: fixed in monotone 0.35-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
retitle 432603 util-linux_2.13~rc1-0(hppa/experimental): FTBFS: #error
"Unsupported arch"
thanks
Wrong arch in subject.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
On 10 July 2007 at 16:45, Chris Lawrence wrote:
| On 7/9/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > a) How do I fix the dh_shlibs call to get proper Depends? I do not
| >know how :-/
|
| I think dh_shlibs is getting the depends... the trouble is they're not
| making it into
Package: parmetis
Version: 3.1-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source. From a quick test on i386 the
error doesn't seem to be arch specific.
| Automatic build of parmetis_3.1-5 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070710
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:48:59 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430259: fixed in gsl 1.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
I'd like to check for a certain bug.
Does any ALSA expert happen to know whether
there's an easy way to compile ALSA with the
CONFIG_SND_DEBUG
and
CONFIG_SND_VERBOSE_PRINTK
debugging flags set, ideally so that
$ module-assistant a-i
uses them?
If so, how?
Thanks,
Kingsley
-
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:45:34 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430294: fixed in libpqxx 2.6.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: util-linux
Version: 2.13~rc1-0
Severity: serious
Hi,
your package failed to build from source.
| Automatic build of util-linux_2.13~rc1-0 on meitner by sbuild/hppa 98-farm
| Build started at 20070710-2305
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> reassign 432366 r-cran-mvtnorm
Bug#432366: r-cran-pscl: FTBFS: libgfortran.so.1: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory
Bug reassigned from package `r-cran-pscl' t
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:44:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#386491: fixed in openmpi 1.2.3-0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
On 7/9/07, Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a) How do I fix the dh_shlibs call to get proper Depends? I do not
know how :-/
I think dh_shlibs is getting the depends... the trouble is they're not
making it into the control file. In r-cran-mvtnorm's case, in
debian/contro
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:44:42 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430321: fixed in openmpi 1.2.3-0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:02:46 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432426: fixed in soya 0.13.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:02:13 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432343: fixed in
libbusiness-onlinepayment-transactioncentral-perl 0.04-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 432546 sid lenny
Bug#432546: gem: FTBFS: should switch to linux-libc-dev instead of
linux-kernel-headers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, lenny
>
End of message, stoppi
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:32:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423821: fixed in python-pygraphviz 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 20:32:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425864: fixed in python-pygraphviz 0.34-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
I have use the tomcat5.5-20-5 with the libtomcat5.5.20-5 and I installed
jsvc 1.0.2~... And still having the same problem.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 08:12:09PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Package: request-tracker3.6
> Severity: serious
> Version: 3.6.1-4
> rt3.6-apache (dependency): apache |apache-perl |apache-ssl
This has been fixed in the pkg-request-tracker alioth SVN since June 16th,
and 3.6.4-1 is currently wai
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:17:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432403: fixed in videolink 1.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> fixed 427220 1:20070409-3
Bug#427220: slime - FTBFS: /usr/bin/texi2dvi: etex exited with bad status,
quitting.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1:20070409-3.
> fixed 390967 6.5
Bug#390967: common-lisp-controller: File permission errors for .fasl files
B
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:56:03 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> There's a patch in rt.cpan.org #26602; the bug is fixed in upstream 1.14
> which builds OK for me.
We have 1.14 in our svn repo with the following changelog entry:
libtest-www-mechanize-perl (1.14-1) WAITSFORNEWlibwww-mechanize-perl;
urgenc
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#432174: fixed in flickrfs 1.3.9.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 21:26:12 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote:
> > Confirming this bug _does_ happen in i386 - But does _not_ on
> > AMD64. Looking a bit into it, it seems to be triggered by a different
> > format outputted by the new version of libxml-libxml-perl, which had a
> > new upload in Debian on Ju
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> forwarded 432544 http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=28082
Bug#432544: libxml-atom-perl: FTBFS: failed tests
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
http://rt.cpan.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:11:05AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Mon Jul 09, 2007 at 17:43:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Ok, uploading.
> > -- please kick this one out, I just noticed I built it with
> > stable-security as the target.
> I'd be happy to do that if you, or somebody else
Aha! I was checking
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/perl/libapache-request-perl . I knew
there must be a bug somewhere that I could read about, I just couldn't
locate it.
Thanks for the tip.
Charles
On 7/10/07, Lior Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quoting http://packages.qa.debian.org/l
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> notfixed 390429 4
Bug#390429: bcm5700-source: does not compile against 2.6.18
Bug marked as not fixed in version 4.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:54:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line maypole-plugin-upload: FTBFS: unmet build dep
libapache-mod-perl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:02:38AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> updated. The bad version still lives in lenny though, so I wonder
> what will happen if libc6 migrates to lenny before lib32z1. Also, on
That at least is unlikely - the only thing holding zlib out of testing
is glibc and manual ap
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 10:10:25AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Confirming this bug _does_ happen in i386 - But does _not_ on
> AMD64. Looking a bit into it, it seems to be triggered by a different
> format outputted by the new version of libxml-libxml-perl, which had a
> new upload in Debian on J
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Benjamin Seidenberg wrote:
> > And so will cyrus21-imapd. I am not rebuilding an ultra-stable application
> > with a non-ultrastable library.
>
> I think this is probably a good idea anyway. Upstream doesn't really do
> anything with 2.1, 2.2 is in maintenance mode, and they
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429254: fixed in freetype1 1.4pre.20050518-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> fixed 390429 8.3.14-4
Bug#390429: bcm5700-source: does not compile against 2.6.18
Bug marked as fixed in version 8.3.14-4.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> found 432441 1.2.5-3
Bug#432441: heartbeat: FTBFS: unmet build dep modutils
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.5-3 and reopened.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429254: fixed in freetype1 1.4pre.20050518-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429677: fixed in freetype1 1.4pre.20050518-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429677: fixed in freetype1 1.4pre.20050518-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432544 + patch
Bug#432544: libxml-atom-perl: FTBFS: failed tests
Tags were: upstream
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
tags 432544 + patch
thanks
On mar, 2007-07-10 at 10:10 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum dijo [Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 12:18:00PM +]:
> > Package: libxml-atom-perl
> > version: 0.25-1
> > Severity: serious
> > User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20070708
[snip..]
> I'm reportin
Package: gmpc
Version: 0.15.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 7.2
I've built this package using libcurl3 and it built fine, see below.
The dependency on libcurl4 renders this packages uninstallable.
See #430488
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
A
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> fixed 390429 4
Bug#390429: bcm5700-source: does not compile against 2.6.18
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Package: cowdancer
Version: 0.37
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
To start, I have a custom configuration for pbuilder which I tried to move over
to cowbuilder. I am compiling packages for i386 on etch using AMD64 on Sid.
I built the initial pbuilder environment (that wor
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jul 2007 17:03:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug fixed in e2fsprogs 1.40.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Hello Marcus, I'm still with problems with Tomcat5.5.20-2. I have the
following installation.
Debian 4.0 ethc for AMD64
adduser 3.102
apache2-utils 2.2.3-4
apache2.2-common 2.2.3-4
ecj-bootstrap 3.2.1-3
sun-java5-jre 1.5.0-10-3
sun-java5-bin 1.5.0-10-3
libtomcat5.5-java 5.5.20-2
java-gcj-compat-d
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 09:37:57PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: fireflier
> Version: 1.1.7
> Severity: serious
Is there a reason why this package suddenly has become a native package?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:41:06 Josef Spillner wrote:
> Solution: find out why SILC changed, there are now differently named
> packages in sid, or maybe the code just needs to be updated.
GGZ SVN now contains the code for Grubby to use the SILC 1.1 interface instead
of the 1.0 version. The diff
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 324316 patch
Bug#324316: syck: FTBFS on amd64: Fails during tests.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 378440 patch
Bug#378440: NMU to fix build failure(s)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 415217 patch
Bug#415217: syc
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 13:00:28 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:41:09AM +0200, t wrote:
>> Package: e2fsprogs
>> Version: 1.40-1
>> Severity: critical
>> Justification: breaks the whole system
>>
>>
>> I added the following line for a dm-crypt partition to my fstab:
>> LABEL
tags 324316 patch
tags 378440 patch
tags 415217 patch
tags 418308 patch
tags 359245 patch
tags 432416 patch
thank you
Hello,
I believe to have fixed this bug in an updated package (version 0.55
+svn256) of syck. I am taking over the maintainership from Robert
Jordens with his permission, and woul
Quoting http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libapache-request-perl.html
(under problems): This package has been requested to be removed.
Charles Fry wrote:
Can somebody help me understand this. Is libapache-request-perl really
scheduled for removal from unstable, and if so, how would I have been
* Charles Fry [Tue, 10 Jul 2007 11:55:05 -0400]:
> Can somebody help me understand this. Is libapache-request-perl really
> scheduled for removal from unstable, and if so, how would I have been able
> to determine that on my own?
You would've find out by building the package in pbuilder, sbuild,
Can somebody help me understand this. Is libapache-request-perl really
scheduled for removal from unstable, and if so, how would I have been able
to determine that on my own?
thanks,
Charles
On 7/10/07, Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: libhtml-mason-perl
version: 1:1.35-3
Sev
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> tag 432494 wontfix
> thanks
>
> On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
>> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
>> i386.
>>
>> libdb3-dev is being removed from unstable.
>>
>
> And so will cyrus21-imapd. I am no
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:29:47PM +0200, Håvard Moen wrote:
> I have now registered this as bug 432563.
Thank you very much.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Head
Package: easytag
Version: 2.1.1-1
Followup-For: Bug #432257
Same bug on this system. I'll try downgrading as original reporter
notes for a temporary fix.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 16:15:45 +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> Since I am not familiar with the nb_NO locale and do not know how it
> is supposed to behave, I'd like to ask you to file that bug against
> sed or libc (after applying your judgment about which package might be
> at fault).
>
> I am incl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 432544 + upstream
Bug#432544: libxml-atom-perl: FTBFS: failed tests
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
