On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:11:05AM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote: > On Mon Jul 09, 2007 at 17:43:47 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Ok, uploading. > > <sigh> -- please kick this one out, I just noticed I built it with > > stable-security as the target. > I'd be happy to do that if you, or somebody else, could tell me > how to do so.. Hmm. :/ I don't know enough about the structure of the security.d.o dak setup to say. 'dak process-accepted' or 'dak process-unchecked', maybe? > > Let me know if you would like me to re-roll -7 or prepare a -8 instead. > I think we need a -8 if the -7 has been seen, right? Depends on the extent to which it's been seen; but anyway, if there's doubt I may as well go ahead with a -8 so that we're not stalled while -7 is being cleaned out of the wrong queue. I'm uploading -8 to oldstable-security now. Hopefully I got everything right this time. (Clearly I need to have security holes in my packages more frequently so that I become more adept at this!) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
