Hi Mirco,
I've already fixed the package, but at the moment I've got no reliable
internet connection. Consider that I'm sending this email from my
mobile phone through the gmail web interface -.-'.
As soon as possible, I'll contact my sponsor to update the package.
Thank you for your bugreport.
Hello,
Sorry but release 3.3-pre11-3 doesn't fix this pb to me ;-(
J.
---
Pack Scarlet One, ADSL 6 Mbps + Telephonie, a partir de EUR 29,95...
http://www.scarlet.be/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phil Dibowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:23:44AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> OK,
>>
>> 1. backup your .mozilla-thunderbird directory
>>
>> 2. please try if using a new profile fixes this for you (e.g. move
>> .mozilla-thunderbird somewhere
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 12:23:44AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> OK,
>
> 1. backup your .mozilla-thunderbird directory
>
> 2. please try if using a new profile fixes this for you (e.g. move
> .mozilla-thunderbird somewhere else to test)
>
> 3a. if it doesn't help, please come back
That didn't
Your message dated Wed, 04 Jul 2007 04:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374917: fixed in q-tools 0.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Jens Kubieziel wrote:
> * Daniel Burrows schrieb am 2007-07-02 um 16:44 Uhr:
> > If you change your language to C, do you still get this crash?
> > Run "LANG=C LC_ALL=C aptitude" to check.
>
> Yes, same behaviour as I described.
I've experienced this my
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 431248 grave
Bug#431248: piuparts: AssertionError
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs data
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Alex Henry Ribeiro dos Santos wrote:
> Package: korganizer
> Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
>
> Hey there. I've been an enormous fan of korganizer - it really helped me
> get things organized and made. Compliments ma
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 23:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429006: fixed in reiserfsprogs 1:3.6.19-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 420754 pending
Bug#420754: copy_exec function mistakely uses xen optimised library with glibc
2.5 resulting in an unbootable image
Tags were: patch
Bug#423006: xen-hypervisor-3.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> severity 420754 important
Bug#420754: copy_exec function mistakely uses xen optimised library with glibc
2.5 resulting in an unbootable image
Bug#423006: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 00:12:09 +0200
Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If someone is able to read Japanese, please look into Bug 429174
> for mecab and provide the necessary information what this issue
> is all about in the bug log.
I've checked an upstream mailing list.
It wou
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429324: fixed in goobox 1.9.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 431210 sid lenny
Bug#431210: uninstallable in sid
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, lenny
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Le mardi 03 juillet 2007 à 18:50 +0200, Claudius Hubig a écrit :
> Dear Joss,
>
> I recently received a mail from Marco Bravi asking for a patch or
> something to avoid bug #427406.
>
> I was only able to reply with a workaround, closing applications only
> by using File->Close/Quit (Ctrl+q, most
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> tags 431583 sid lenny
Bug#431583: fails to install: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd:
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/latex209.fmt not a file.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sid, lenny
>
E
severity 431575 important
tag 431575 + confirmed
tag 431575 + lenny
thanks
Hi,
wickey wrote:
> Package: myspell-de-at
> Version: 20051113-9
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
No, it doesn't. it is still installable and Ice* works with it.
It does make it unsuable when yo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 431575 important
Bug#431575: If i want install myspell-de-at or myspell-de-de aptitude will
remove openoffice.org
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tag 431575 + confirmed
Bug#431575: If i want install myspell-de-at or myspell-de-de a
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 20:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427071: fixed in libxml-stream-perl 1.22-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -u libxml-stream-perl-1.22/debian/changelog
libxml-stream-perl-1.22/debian/changelog
--- libxml-stream-perl-1.22/debian/cha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 431123 - lenny
Bug#431123: aptitude: Initializing package states takes very much longer than
before +b1
Tags were: lenny sid fixed-in-experimental
Bug#431367: aptitude waste 4mi
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 07:46:07PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> Frederik Schueler wrote:
>
> The bug is about a package in main depending (or recommending) on a package
> outside main.
ok, good point :-)
> The bug will still be there... There are two obvious solutions to this bug:
> move the p
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#47: fixed in amavisd-new 1:2.4.2-6.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -u amavisd-new-2.4.2/debian/changelog amavisd-new-2.4.2/debian/changelog
--- amavisd-new-2.4.2/debian/changelog
+++ amavisd
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 400868 serious
Bug#400868: alml: dvipdfm is not a virtual package, please don't depend on it
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tags 400868 lenny sid
Bug#400868: alml: dvipdfm is not a virtual package, please don't depend on it
There
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 19:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#430805: fixed in libimage-librsvg-perl 0.07-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: korganizer
Version: 4:3.5.5.dfsg.1-6
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hey there. I've been an enormous fan of korganizer - it really helped me get
things organized and made.
Compliments made, let me add that I rely a lot on it daily for personal and
professiona
Package: beagle
Version: 0.2.17-1
Severity: serious
From my pbuilder build log:
...
checking for BEAGLE_UI... configure: error: Package requirements (
gtk-sharp-2.0 >= 2.4.0
gconf-sharp-2.0 >= 2.4.0
glade-sharp-2.0 >= 2.4.0
gnome-sharp-2.0 >= 2.4.0
gnome-vf
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> forwarded 426910 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135376
Bug#426910: Crash and data loss after applying filters
Forwarded-to-address changed from http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?i
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 the mental interface of
Junichi Uekawa told:
> Hi,
>
> > > I noticed that the sweep problem is caused by libasound2 error.
> > > What's the status of libasound2 update?
> >
> > Waiting for upload [1]
> >
> > Elimar
> >
> > [1]
> > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-alsa/trunk/
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> Hi Luk, Philipp,
>
> IMHO this is not a bug at all.
The bug is about a package in main depending (or recommending) on a package
outside main.
> The userland tools do not work at all without the kernel module, thus
> the dependency is mandatory.
> changing the Depends:
Package: latex209-bin
Version: 25.mar.1992-10
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on installation:
Setting up latex209-bin (25.mar.1992-10) ...
Make the format file of `latex209'. This may take some time. ...
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/mktexupd:
Package: ldapdns
Version: 2.06-3.1
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of passwd beeing unavailable during postrm:
(Re
reassign 427973 nuauth-extra
found 427973 2.2.2-1
thanks
hi,
while doing archive wide piuparts tests your package failt to install
because of conflicting files:
Selecting previously deselected package nuauth.
(Reading database ... 5730 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 427973 nuauth-extra
Bug#427973: file conflicts between packages
Bug reassigned from package `nuauth, nuauth-extra' to `nuauth-extra'.
> found 427973 2.2.2-1
Bug#427973: file conflicts between packages
Bug marked as found in version 2.2.2-1 and
Package: newpki-server
Version: 2.0.0+rc1-8
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of passwd beeing unavailable during postr
found 417011 0.18.2-17
notfixed 417011 0.18.2-14.1
thanks
hi,
netmrg still fails during postrm because of debconf beeing
not available:
Purging configuration files for netmrg ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/netmrg.postrm: line 45: db_get: command not found
dpkg: error processing netmrg (--purge):
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 417011 0.18.2-17
Bug#417011: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Bug marked as found in version 0.18.2-17 and reopened.
> notfixed 417011 0.18.2-14.1
Bug#417011: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Bug marked as not
Package: moodle
Version: 1.8.1-1
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with
the following error:
Setting up moodle (1.8.1-1) ...
Creating config file /etc/moodle/config.php with new version
/usr/share/wwwconfig-common/pgsql.get:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.6
> forwarded 431090 http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=27941
Bug#431090: libnetaddr-ip-perl: Includes non-free RFC documentation
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded t
Package: mono-apache-server
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with
the following error:
Setting up mono-apache-server (1.2.4-1) ...
Can't locate Digest/MD5.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/perl
Package: libmono-cecil0.5-cil
Version: 0.5-2
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with
the following error:
Setting up libmono-cecil0.5-cil (0.5-2) ...
Can't locate File/Basename.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
/usr/local/lib/p
Package: mono-xsp
Version: 1.2.4-1
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install with
the following error:
Setting up mono-xsp (1.2.4-1) ...
Using Mono XSP port: 8081
Binding Mono XSP address: 0.0.0.0
Can't locate Digest/MD5.pm in @INC (@
Package: karrigell-demo
Version: 2.3.3-1
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on installation:
Setting up karrigell-demo (2.3.3-1) ...
chown: cannot access `/usr/share/karrigell/webapps/demo/records': No such
file or directory
dpkg: error pro
Package: interchange-ui
Version: 5.4.2-4
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of debconf beeing unavaila
Package: hylafax-server
Version: 2:4.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Tags: etch-ignore
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of passwd beeing unavail
Package: iiimf-client-gtk
Version: 12.3.91-5
Severity: serious
Usertags: postrm-depends-nonessential
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Justification: Policy violation, see section 7.2
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on purge
because of /usr/sbin/update-gtk-immodules beein
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#431090: fixed in libnetaddr-ip-perl 4.007+dfsg-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Package: gnarwl
Version: 3.3-8.2
Severity: serious
hi,
while running archive wide piuparts tests your package failed on install
because of a missing dependency on ed:
Setting up gnarwl (3.3-8.2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/gnarwl.postinst: line 22: ed: command not found
dpkg: error processing g
Package: myspell-de-at
Version: 20051113-9
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
debian:/home/wickey# aptitude install myspell-de-at
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkeitsbaum wird aufgebaut... Fertig
Lese erweiterte Statusinformationen
Initialisiere Paketstatus...
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:36:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:36:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:36:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:36:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 431572 important
Bug#431572: openoffice.org: Ooo crashed when i try to sort a sheet
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:36:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:35:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
tags 431090 + upstream
thanks
Reported as upstream bug #27941 in the CPAN RT:
http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=27941
Damyan Ivanov dijo [Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 11:35:10AM +0300]:
> > This package's orig.tar.gz includes NetAddr-IP-4.007/docs/rfc1884.txt,
> > which is non-free
>
> Isn't th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 17:33:36 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 431090 + upstream
Bug#431090: libnetaddr-ip-perl: Includes non-free RFC documentation
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
severity 431572 important
thanks
Michael Ott wrote:
> Package: openoffice.org
> Version: 2.2.1-4
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
Suure. Which unrelated software? OpenOffice.org breaking itself? This is
ridiculous. Neither does it fullfill the "breaks the whole syst
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 10:00:53PM -0700, Nathaniel Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:12:11PM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Does installing the version in experimental fix the problem for you?
>
> Yes, the aptitude in experimental (0.4.4-5~2, which appe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 422395 patch
Bug#422395: lilypond: FTBFS: ! I can't find file `lcircle10'.
Tags were: sid lenny
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tag 422395 patch
thanks
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:35:59PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Package: lilypond
> Version: 2.8.7-3
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: builddep-tetex-ftbfs
>
> Hi,
>
> During a r
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.2.1-4
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
soffice
*** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice.bin: double free or
corruption (out): 0x08585ba0 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0xb6cc0b74]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfr
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:02:56 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425066: fixed in abiword 2.4.6-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -u abiword-2.4.6/debian/changelog abiword-2.4.6/debian/changelog
--- abiword-2.4.6/debian/changelog
+++ abiword-2.4.6/debian
reassign 417656 evolution-data-server
found 417656 evolution-data-server/1.8.2-2
close 417656 1.8.2-3
thanks
Heya,
The versioning information for this bug was broken, so I'm fixing it
now :)
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
134: Benutzerfreundlichkeit
Der Benutzer ha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 417656 evolution-data-server
Bug#417656: evolution: Crashes when run
Bug reassigned from package `evolution' to `evolution-data-server'.
> found 417656 evolution-data-server/1.8.2-2
Bug#417656: evolution: Crashes when run
Bug marked as found i
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:15:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:29:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:26:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:51:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in experimental version.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:29:22 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:29:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:29:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:51:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in experimental version.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:26:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 06:51:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in experimental version.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Tue, 03 Jul 2007 16:30:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line evolution has long been ported to the pilot-link 0.12 API
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:25:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:29:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:15:55 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:18:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:29:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:23:53 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:25:48 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:16:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:26:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:16:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:16:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:22:20 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:26:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:18 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:17:50 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:21:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
Your message dated Tue, 3 Jul 2007 16:11:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen th
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
