notfound 429753 2007-9
thanks
Hi Jeff,
On Die, 19 Jun 2007, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> texlive-common won't install because tetex-bin-upgrade isn't
> available. Maybe this is a bug against tex-common instead?
Thanks for the report.
TeX Live 2007 should transit to testing soon, solving this probl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 429753 2007-9
Bug#429753: texlive-commong post-install action fails, blocking tex/latex
install
Bug marked as not found in version 2007-9.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429179: fixed in libphp-phpmailer 1.73-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:47 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > > Any idea at where to look?
> > >
> > > Not really. I freshened my machine to latest unstable this morning...
> > > maybe an strace would point to something? [shrug]
> >
> > Does this h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The problem occurred on 2.6.21, compiled using the kernel package from
Debian source with the only change to the config being
paravirtualization turned off because otherwise the Nvidia kernel
module will not compile. (GPL only violation)
I went ba
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 429673 + experimental unreproducible
Bug#429673: aptitude: Aptitude crashed on second search
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental, unreproducible
> severity 429673 normal
Bug#429673: aptitude: Aptitude crashed on second search
Severity
Your message dated Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#428940: fixed in kwirelessmonitor 0.5.91-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> found 424729 1.2.13-0
Bug#424729: libpng: CVE-2007-2445 VU#684664: a grayscale image with a malformed
tRNS chunk crashes libpng and mozilla
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.13-0.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> found 424729 1.2.15~beta5-1
Bug#424729: libpng: CVE-2007-2445 VU#684664: a grayscale image with a malformed
tRNS chunk crashes libpng and mozilla
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.1
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 384270 pending
Bug#384270: ITP: freeorion -- strategic space conquest game.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 396945 pending
Bug#396945: update-manager: Please package Softw
Package: clamav-freshclam
Version: 0.90.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When installing new clamav-freshclam, I get the following;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>sudo dpkg --configure -a
Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.90.3-1) ...
Replacing config file /etc/cron.d/clamav-freshclam
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> found 426900 2:1.02.18-1
Bug#426900: devmapper: FTBFS
Bug marked as found in version 2:1.02.18-1.
> notfound 426900 1.02.18-1
Bug#426900: devmapper: FTBFS
Bug marked as not found in
Greetings,
I think this package also needs to now depend on one of the header packages
that provides /usr/include/linux/utsrelease.h. In my case the package that
enabled the package to build was linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7.
I have also attached another patch file. I discovered that several othe
If versions in stable/unstable are affected, they should be marked so.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: texlive-common
Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
texlive-common won't install because tetex-bin-upgrade isn't
available. Maybe this is a bug against tex-common instead?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ sudo apt-get install texlive-common
Readin
I ran into the same problems, and as I had a modified exim4-conf I
moved away /etc/exim4 and tried to reinstall exim4-conf to no avail:
Running update-exim4.conf with bash -x I saw the following:
[...]
+ UPEX4C_internal_tmp=/tmp/ex4XdyiYF
+ trap 'rm -f /tmp/ex4XdyiYF' EXIT INT TERM
+ gentmpconf
> Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
> can't see it...
>
> Tim
Greetings,
Yes I sent another email with the attachment. For some reason reportbug -A
am-utils-6.1.5.patch did not send the attachment. Not sure what went wrong.
Let me know if anything else is amiss.
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422631: fixed in hbf-cns40-3 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422633: fixed in hbf-cns40-5 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427451: fixed in hbf-cns40-6 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: zope-debhelper
Version: 0.3.9
Severity: grave
Tags: security
The maintainer scripts generated by zope-debhelper leave passwords in
/var/cache/debconf/config.dat. Passwords are therefor world readable by
any user of the system. Tagging this bug a security since this is a
local privilege es
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427459: fixed in hbf-cns40-7 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427452: fixed in hbf-cns40-3 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422637: fixed in hbf-kanji48 1.0-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427460: fixed in hbf-cns40-4 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:23 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422635: fixed in hbf-cns40-7 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:14:09 +0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429008: libmarc-xml-perl: FTBFS: failed test t/namespace
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Greetings,
Not sure why the attachment did not work. Anyways here it is again.
Regards,
Jason
--- acinclude.m4 2006-05-11 13:28:18.0 -0400
+++ acinclude.m4.new 2007-06-19 15:28:19.0 -0400
@@ -10158,6 +10158,7 @@
[
#include
#include
+#include
],
[
if (argc > 1)
@@ -10165,
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:26 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427457: fixed in hbf-kanji48 1.0-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: exim4-config
Version: 4.67-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Setting up exim4-config (4.67-3) ...
2007-06-19 22:28:01 Exim configuration error in line 30 of
/var/lib/exim4/config.autogenerated.tmp:
malformed macro definition
Invalid new configfile /var/lib/exim4
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:22 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422634: fixed in hbf-cns40-6 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> Package: ekg2
[...]
>> Your package fails to build:
> I just uploaded ekg2_20070619+1215-1 which contains a potential fix. Can
> you schedule it to be tried on alpha soon so we kn
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:19 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422632: fixed in hbf-cns40-4 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427454: fixed in hbf-jfs56 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 19 Jun 2007, at 8:37 pm, Jason Harrison wrote:
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please
review and if
acceptable apply.
Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
can't
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427453: fixed in hbf-cns40-2 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:20 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427458: fixed in hbf-cns40-5 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429252: fixed in ekg2 20070619+1215-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:15 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427453: fixed in hbf-cns40-1 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Package: ekg2
> Version: 20070305+1821-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: experimental
>
> Heya,
>
> Your package fails to build:
I just uploaded ekg2_20070619+1215-1 which contains a potential fix. Can
you schedule it to be tr
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:16 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422630: fixed in hbf-cns40-2 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:32:24 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422636: fixed in hbf-jfs56 1.0-3.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 100.14.06-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Just upgraded to Nvidia 100.14.06-1, after building with m-a a-i nvidia-kernel
and
then installing the latest nvidia-glx, the Nvidia spash screen "beta" comes up,
and
the following system c
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 21:46:46 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line same bug as 417593 ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibilit
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please review and if
acceptable apply.
Regards,
Jason
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture:
Tommaso Colombo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-bin
> Version: 3.0-30
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> Trying to install tetex-bin on a lenny machine causes the following
> error:
>
> Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-bin.postin
У Пнд, 2007-06-18 у 09:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette пише:
> Please send us the result of that command:
> gconftool -R /apps/panel/applets
>
/apps/panel/applets/applet_6:
toplevel_id = panel_0
bonobo_iid = OAFIID:SensorsApplet
attached_toplevel_id =
use_custom_icon = false
action
Package: vlc
Version: 0.8.6.a.debian-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security, fixed-upstream
Justification: user security hole
VLC versions in old-stable, stable and unstable are affectd by multiple
remotely triggerable format string vulnerabilities, addressed in
upstream release 0.8.6c.
http://www.vid
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 18:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429437: fixed in libraw1394 1.2.1-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
100.14.06-1 has recently been released and I'm surprised to see it still
has this bug. Is the maintainer actually aware of it?
--
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 429685 mono-jit
Bug#429685: tomboy: crashes on startup
Bug reassigned from package `tomboy' to `mono-jit'.
> forcemerge 428190 427934 429685
Bug#428190: Runtime crashes on ppc
Bug#427934: tomboy: Crashes on start
Bug#429685: tomboy: crashes on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 429130 -1
Bug#429130: please update/request removal of your package
Bug 429130 cloned as bug 429717.
> reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Bug#429717: please update/request removal of your package
Bug reassigned from package `libapache-mod-python' to `ftp
* Stephane List [Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:50:55 +0200]:
> Package: libtheora-dev
> Version: unstable
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
Hello Stephane.
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libtheora-dev: Depends: libtheora0 (= 0.0.0.alpha7.dfsg-2) but
> 1.0
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my libraw1394 1.2.1-3.1 NMU.
This is correct because makedev is priority required, and it is the
standard way to do things.
As it's really a blocker of the rest of the archive, I'm uploading
this ASAP.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5-1
> forwarded 428794 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11301
Bug#428794: kbd upgrade breaks keyboard driver
Bug#428882: xserver-xorg-input-kbd: xserver-xorg-input-keyboard br
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 3.0-30
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Trying to install tetex-bin on a lenny machine causes the following
error:
Setting up tetex-bin (3.0-30) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/tetex-bin.postinst: line 948:
/usr/share/tex-common/tetex-bin-upgrade: No such
clone 429130 -1
reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
retitle -1 RM: libapache-mod-python -- RoM: obsolete (apache1 removal);
superseded by libapache2-mod-python
severity -1 normal
block 429130 by -1
thanks
Hi!
libapache-mod-python is no more installable since apache 1.3 has been removed.
It is replaced by
Had the same issue, this resolved it for me:
ln -s /usr/lib/perl5/Bundle/Apache2.pm /usr/lib/perl5/Apache2.pm
ln -s /usr/lib/perl5/Apache2/compat.pm /usr/lib/perl5/Apache/compat.pm
ln -s /usr/lib/perl5/Apache2/RequestUtil.pm /usr/lib/perl5/Apache/
RequestUtil.pm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
reopen 429344
thanks
You still do not use the system-wide copy of PHPMailer.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 429344
Bug#429344: Needs to use libphp-phpmailer
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 429437 critical
Bug#429437: /dev/MAKEDEV does not exist in a chroot when udev does not run
Severity set to `critical' from `minor'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 429619 grave
Bug#429619: openssh-server upgrade kills ability to login using password
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> merge 428968 429619
Bug#428968: openssh-server: password based authentication not working following
upgrade
Bug#4296
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> reassign 429171 apt
Bug#429171: dpkg fails to refresh package list due to mmap error
Bug reassigned from package `dpkg' to `apt'.
> # dpkg has nothing to do with that
> forcemerge 42
Package: libghc6-anydbm-dev
Version: 1.0.1
Severity: serious
For dpkg/apt:
Depends: ghc6 (<< 6.6-999), ghc6 (>= 6.6), libghc6-mtl-dev, libghc6-missingh-dev
(>= 0.18.0)
but for ghc-pkg:
depends: base-2.0 haskell98-1.0 mtl-1.0 MissingH-0.18.0
So, apt thinks it should install with MissingH-0.18.4,
Package: libghc6-hslogger-dev
Version: 1.0.3
Severity: serious
Hi,
I don't know all the event leading up to this problem, since I can't
even remove some of the current packages, but I now get:
Setting up libghc6-hslogger-dev (1.0.3) ...
Reading package info from stdin ... done.
ghc-pkg: package h
Package: libghc6-missingpy-dev
Version: 0.9.0
Severity: serious
Debian dependencies:
Depends: ghc6 (<< 6.6-999), ghc6 (>= 6.6), python-dev (>= 2.4),
libghc6-missingh-dev (>= 0.18.4)
ghc-pkg dependencies:
depends: base-2.0 MissingH-0.18.3 anydbm-1.0.1
You should add lighc6-anydbm-dev to the "Dep
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 04:39:22PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> ssh 4.6p1 defaults to having challenge_response_authentication and
> kbd_interaction_authentication to off.
Assuming you mean the defaults in the code, where do you see that?
servconf.c:fill_default_server_options() says:
if (
Hello,
This build failed to an error in a recent ruby-gnome2 upload
that accidently left out mkmf-gnome.rb. This has already been
solved in sid, so a rebuild of this package should work fine.
Regards,
Paul
--
Student @ Eindhoven | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
University of
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427899: fixed in update-manager 0.64-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#427899: fixed in update-manager 0.64-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#429474: fixed in liboro-java 2.0.8a-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
severity 428977 normal
reassign 428977 ftp.debian.org
retitle 428977 RoM: cipe-source, cipe-common, pkcipe -- RoM; Orphaned, dead
upstream, does not work with any debian kernel, low popcon, obsoleted by openvpn
thanks
hi
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 12:17:00PM +0200, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> The cip
retitle 400362 RM: libapache-miniwiki-perl -- RoQA; orphaned, doesn't work with
Apache 2
reassign 400362 ftp.debian.org
thanks
Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Due to the recent removal of apache (including it's accompanied
> packages of apache-common, apache-dbg, apache-dev, apache
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 428977 normal
Bug#428977: CIPE is abandoned upstream, icompatible with all unstable kernels,
low popcon and obsoleted by openvpn
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> reassign 428977 ftp.debian.org
Bug#428977: CIPE is abandoned upstream, ic
Hi,
I've browsed through the bug logs, but this is ugly.
We're breaking all those APIs, and there is no sane way of finding out
what to use.
Also, please keep the severity of those bugreports to 'grave', since
they cause FTBFS on all the other packages.
I am wondering why libboost needs to be
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 17:47 +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > > Any idea at where to look?
> >
> > Not really. I freshened my machine to latest unstable this morning...
> > maybe an strace would point to something? [shrug]
>
> Does this help?
Look at /bin/gunzip, which is
The bug is not out of date
I have the same problem (deian unstable)
thanks,
marco
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 429208 1.4.001.dfsg-1
Bug#429208: [CVE-2007-3155] unspecified vulnerability fixed in 1.4.001,
1.2.107-2
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.4.001.dfsg-1, send any further expla
Hi,
could this be a broken filesystem where gunzip is hardlinked to cat
instead of gzip for example?
What does "gzip -d" do? What is the md5sum of gzip and gunzip?
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
the problem only arises when updating from a previous
version. Fuse-utils contains a link
lrwxrwxrwx 1 mrvn mrvn 8 Jun 19 14:43 /usr/share/doc/fuse-utils -> libfuse2
and depends on libfuse2 (= 2.6.5-1). So on a fresh install the
copyright will be there and reachable.
On the other hand, on
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.4.5.3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
aptitude crashed on following sequence:
1. start aptitude
2. press /
3. enter abc
4. press enter
5. press /
6. enter a
Ouch! Got SIGABRT, dying..
zsh: abort aptitude
-- System Information:
Debian R
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Frank,
>
> On Die, 19 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
>> - I'm working on refining debianize-updmap and debianize-fmtutil, as
>> well as update-fontlang and texconfig, and I think I'll be able to
>> upload tex-common and texlive-bin with that soon
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 11:36:28AM +0100, Mark Crean wrote:
> I am finding the same, or very similar. This is the result of "aptitude
> upgrade" or (subsequently) "aptitude install exim4-config":
>
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> A package failed to install. Trying to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 400340 2.0.0.4-1
Bug#400340: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Bug marked as found in version 2.0.0.4-1.
> reopen 400340
Bug#400340: Source package contains non-free IETF RFC/I-D's
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> thanks
Stopp
found 400340 2.0.0.4-1
reopen 400340
thanks
As far as I can tell, the file is still present in (essentially) the
same location:
-pkg icedove ver 2.0.0.0-4
+pkg icedove ver 2.0.0.4-1
icedove http://bugs.debian.org/400340
-
icedove-2.0.0.0/icedove-2.0.0.0-source.tar.bz2:mozilla/directory/c-sdk
Hi Frank,
On Die, 19 Jun 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> - I'm working on refining debianize-updmap and debianize-fmtutil, as
> well as update-fontlang and texconfig, and I think I'll be able to
> upload tex-common and texlive-bin with that soon.
Good good, although I must say that I didn't follo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package xorg-server
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status repo
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 10:42:53AM +0200, Martin Ketzer wrote:
> first the conf-file (didn't know about that)
reportbug should have included the config automatically. No idea why
this did not work.
> # /etc/exim4/update-exim4.conf.conf
> #
> # Edit this file and /etc/mailname by hand and execute
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I just came back from the US (and I am happy to have left this strange
> country), can someone give me a short update where we are at the moment?
- I'm working on refining debianize-updmap and debianize-fmtutil, as
well as update-fontlan
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> #
> # bts-link upstream status pull for source package samba
> # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html
> #
> user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting user to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (was [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
> # remote status report for
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:02:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#393393: fixed in liburi-perl 1.35.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5-1
> found 429064 2.1-1
Bug#429064: linux-libc-dev: conflicts with
Bug marked as found in version 2.1-1.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
I am finding the same, or very similar. This is the result of "aptitude
upgrade" or (subsequently) "aptitude install exim4-config":
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
A package failed to install. Trying to recover:
Setting up exim4-config (4.67-3) ...
2007-06-19 11:12:16 Exi
Your message dated Tue, 19 Jun 2007 11:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424597: fixed in af 2.4.3-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reopen 416824
thanks
Hello all:
I regret to say that the patch still doesn't seem to work. I did quick test
and it failed. I'll look into more detail ASAP.
Meanwhile I suggest using hibernate scripts and tweak
the /etc/hibernate/common.conf enabling the LockKDE option. In this way the
s
Em Seg, 2007-06-18 às 18:06 +0100, Gustavo Noronha Silva escreveu:
> Em Sáb, 2007-06-16 às 12:09 +0200, Loïc Minier escreveu:
> Was waiting on the 0.7.2 APT upload to unstable; I'd like to upload this
> into unstable proper already. Will do this today, as my sencond upload
> at debconf =)
Upload t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 416824
Bug#416824: klaptopdaemon: lock & hibernate allowing unauthorised access
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
Hi,
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
Please find the used diff below.
Cheers,
Andi
diff -Nur af-2.4.3~/debian/changelog af-2.4.3/debian/changelog
--- af-2.4.3~/debian/changelog 2007-06-19 11:29:29.0 +000
El martes, 19 de junio de 2007, Sune Vuorela escribió:
> Hi!
>
> I took a quick look at this bug - but I only got partly thru.
>
> The autoconf tests fails because the names of the symlinks have been
> changed.
>
> Every occurency of -lboost_foo or boost_foo in
> m4/k3d_with_external_boost.m4 shoul
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> retitle 429140 RM: rivet -- RoM; abandoned upstream; no users
Bug#429140: RM: rivet -- RoM; dead upstream; no users
Changed Bug title to `RM: rivet -- RoM; abandoned upstream; no user
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
