> Hi,
> I tested it with the exception of samba_3.0.24-6etch3_i386.deb because
> it depends on libgnutls11 that doesn't exist in etch3.
In order to test the packages anyway, you need to add a sources.list
for sarge in /etc/apt/sources.list:
# Sarge
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian sarge main
> I tested it with the exception of samba_3.0.24-6etch3_i386.deb because
> it depends on libgnutls11 that doesn't exist in etch3.
Hmmm, that's because I didn't build it in a chroot...
That defeats the test as you couldn't use samba.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
reassign 425454 pbuilder 0.166
thanks
to-be-fixed in pbuilder 0.167.
At Wed, 23 May 2007 23:45:15 +0200,
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
> I can actually reproduce this:
>
> mkdir /tmp/bindmount
> touch /tmp/bindmount/some_file
> cowbuilder --login --basepath /var/cache/pbuilder/base-lenny.cow
> --b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 425454 pbuilder 0.166
Bug#425454: cowbuilder deletes bind-mounted directories in some cases
Bug reassigned from package `cowdancer' to `pbuilder'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 421527 7.1-2
Bug#421527: hdparm_7.1-1(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: binaries in source?
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 7.1-2, send any further explanations to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
>
reassign 392565 libapache2-mod-ngobjweb
merge 392118 392565
thanks
Bugs #392118 and #392565 seem to be regarding the same issue, so I've
merged them.
Judging from the latest build logs from SOPE package (and tfheen's
comment in #392565), this issue seems to be fixed due to new Apache
package
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 392565 libapache2-mod-ngobjweb
Bug#392565: sope - FTBFS: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or
'__attribute__' before 'apr_off_t'
Bug reassigned from package `sope' to `libapache2-mod-ngobjweb'.
> merge 392118 392565
Bug#392118: libapache2-
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Package: ldb
> Version: 0.9.0-1
> Severity: serious
>
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
>
>> Automatic build of ldb_0.9.0-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
> [...]
>> Reading package lists...
>> Building dependency tree...
>> E: Couldn't fi
reopen 422293
thanks
On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 04:04:22PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>* Now installs a new file libaolserver4.conf into /etc/ld.so.conf.d to add
> the ld.so path for its libraries.
/etc/ld.so.conf.d is not for private libs. Use rpath.
Bastian
--
Without freedom
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 422293
Bug#422293: aolserver4 - Fails to install
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:19:17AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>It looks like an HPPA specific compilation bug. Could you try
>> with -ffunction-sections as suggested ? If it solves the problem, I'll
>> suggest that upstream adds it in an ar
Kai Hendry wrote:
> Could someone please give me a hand with this bug #425753?
>
>
> Sam's 'security only' patches applied cleanly. See attachment.
>
> I've uploaded the patched packages here:
> http://static.natalian.org/2007-05-26/
>
>
> Sam says on #425753:
> """
> The impact of this securi
On sam, 2007-05-26 at 22:28 +0200, Gaetano Guerriero wrote:
> > Could you remove your .cache/sessions (just move it if you don't
> want to
> > lose it, but it should be safe, as there are only saved sessions
> there)
> > and retry startxfce4?
> >
> > Thanks,
>
> Thanks.
>
> Fixed by removing ~/.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> severity 422076 grave
Bug#422076: Can not start jackd, fails with Illegal instruction
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> merge 422076 426144
Bug#422076: Can not start jackd, fai
El Sab, 26 de Mayo de 2007, 11:54 am, Christian Perrier escribió:
> (coipy to submitter of #426002)
>
>> This is a copy of a bug opened upstream. A patch is avaliable for
>> 3.0.25 but not for 3.0.24 on etch.
>> It happens on i386, and alpha. 3.0.24-etch2 suffers from the bug too.
>>
>>
>> I'm usin
Am Samstag, 26. Mai 2007 schrieb Norbert Preining:
> No, we do NOT depend on this, and there is *for*sure* no missing dep on
> fmtools. What do you mean with "fmtools"?
Oh thats weird... the first error I got was "missing fmtutil", after
installing "fmtools" fmtutil was found... Weird.
But then
Package: gnucash-hbci
Version: 2.0.5-2~hbci.2
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
Hallo,
Two days ago I tried to issue a transaction using GnuCash with HBCI. I
got a copple of times a GnuCash crash during the transaction. The last
time I tried it, the transaction succeeded.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 426097 icedove-locales
Bug#426097: new upstream version
Bug reassigned from package `icedove-locale-de' to `icedove-locales'.
> severity 426097 grave
Bug#426097: new upstream version
Severity set to `grave' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping p
On 5/15/07, Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 15, 2007 at 07:18:22AM -0600, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> > I was able to reproduce this, but I am not sure if I can do it
> > consistently. It happened if I performed a reboot from inside of an
> > xterm without shutting xfce down pr
Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
Could you remove your .cache/sessions (just move it if you don't want to
lose it, but it should be safe, as there are only saved sessions there)
and retry startxfce4?
Thanks,
Thanks.
Fixed by removing ~/.cache/sessions.
xfwm4 starts at every 'startxfce4' ( I don't ha
On Do, 2007-05-24 at 09:27 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Is the only difference between your attempts the gnome-session
> version?
> The only change between -1 and -2 is in the session saving code, not
> in
> startup code.
>
> As both were uploaded on different architectures, this may be a pro
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 18:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425966: fixed in dpatch 2.0.25
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2
Severity: critical
I am installing using the 'testing' i386 dvd snapshot from 20070524.
This is installing on an AMD Geode GX3 board. The programs all fail
with 'Floating point exception." and I can't install Debian on the
system as a re
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.5
> severity 426143 wishlist
Bug#426143: binaries without manual page
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Hi guys,
Could someone please give me a hand with this bug #425753?
Sam's 'security only' patches applied cleanly. See attachment.
I've uploaded the patched packages here:
http://static.natalian.org/2007-05-26/
Sam says on #425753:
"""
The impact of this security hole is: Remote denial of ser
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 17:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423796: fixed in ddccontrol 0.4.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 425781 pending
tags 425813 pending
thanks
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sam, 26 Mai 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> So in fact this *IS* enough as it is by now, do you agree?
Yes.
>> I checked in the following code:
>> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then
>>
Thanks for the report, I'll look at it.
regards,
junichi
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED],netfort.gr.jp} Debian Project
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 425781 pending
Bug#425781: upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390)
There were no tags set.
Bug#425813: texlive-base: upgrade fails with 'fmtutil-sys failed'
Bug#425993: jadetex: fails to configure
Tags added: pending
> tags
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 425753 1.2.12.04-1
Bug#425753: maradns - important security upgrade
Bug marked as found in version 1.2.12.04-1.
> severity 425753 serious
Bug#425753: maradns - important security upgrade
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tags 425753 + se
Package: jackd
Version: 0.103.0-5
Severity: grave
Someone claimed:
#422076 [FIXED jack-audio-connection-kit 0.103.0-3]:
Can not start jackd
BUT THIS PROBLEM WAS NOT FIXED, EVEN THOUGH I PROVIDED INFORMATION TO
PROVE THAT IT WASN'T FIXED.
I STILL GET "ILLEGAL INSTRUCTION" ERROR ON PENTIUM II
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ddccontrol
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ddccontrol
> tags 423796 + pending confirmed
Bug#423796: ddccontrol_0.4.2-2 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: wrong architecture list
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, confirmed
> thanks
Stopping pro
Package: sparse
Version: 0.3-1
Severity: serious
Hi Loic,
sparse has no manual page.
Kind regards
Nico
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU cor
On Sam, 26 Mai 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
> So in fact this *IS* enough as it is by now, do you agree?
>
> I checked in the following code:
> if [ -f "$cfgfile.preinst-deleted" ]; then
> echo "It looks like $cfgfile has been removed."
> echo "In most cases this is a consequence
On Fre, 25 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > Or re-instantiate all config files, ie do not delete any but
> > echo/debconf a warning to re-delete it.
> >
> > The former would have a trivial and quick implementation.
>
> With a version check, so that it only happens once, I think it's the way
> to
On Sam, 26 Mai 2007, Matthias Heinz wrote:
> I've got the same problem here. First there's a missing dependency
> on fmtools (i had to install it manually) and then i get the same error:
On *what* ???
apt-cache show fmtools
Description: FM radio tuner
Command-line utility for adjusting the freque
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package scim-uim
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: scim-uim
> tags 422482 + pending
Bug#422482: FTBFS: scim_uim_imengine.cpp:839: error: 'uim_set_surrounding_text'
was not declared in this scope
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopp
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426092: fixed in releaseforge 1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 16:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422293: fixed in aolserver4 4.5.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package releaseforge
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: releaseforge
> severity 426092 grave
Bug#426092: releaseforge seems to be broken
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> tags 426092 + confirmed pending
Bug#426092: releaseforge seems to be broken
Th
Package: gcl
Version: 2.6.7-33
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
cp init_pre_gcl.lsp foo
echo " (in-package \"USER\")(system:save-system \"saved_pre_gcl\")" >>foo
/build/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport/raw_pre_gcl /build/buildd/gcl-2.6.7/unixport/
-libdir
Package: ruby1.9
Version: 1.9.0+20070526-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of ruby1.9_1.9.0+20070526-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20070526-1349
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 15:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423740: fixed in gcc-defaults 1.54
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424486: fixed in lua-graph 1.0.2+dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 15:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423728: fixed in lua-graph 1.0.2+dfsg-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 01:19:17AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>It looks like an HPPA specific compilation bug. Could you try
> with -ffunction-sections as suggested ? If it solves the problem, I'll
> suggest that upstream adds it in an architecture specific way.
That doesn't seem to help.
tags 426129 + patch
thanks
hi,
fixed in svn branches for Qt4.3.0rc1:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-kde/branches/kde4/packages/qt4-x11/debian/patches/30_arm_ftbfs_fixes.dpatch
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 426129 + patch
Bug#426129: qt4-x11: FTBFS on arm
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 15:02:39 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402819: fixed in gnome-reportbug 0.2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 14:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422204: fixed in qps 1.9.18.6-2.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
At first I faced the #425390 bug and now this one. Seems that #425727
could be merged.
It's a amd64 Core 2 Dual, kernel 2.6.21, Debian SID.
--
Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 15:58:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line cannot install java-gcj-compat
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Hi,
This is the backtrace of playground while looping in poll():
0xb7396df6 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb73eedf6 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0xb74b0953 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#2 0x0809bcf8 in ?? ()
#3 0x0008 in ?? ()
#4 0xea60 in ?? ()
#5 0x080
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 13:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#426107: fixed in molly-guard 0.3-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 422204 + patch
thanks
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my qps 1.9.18.6-2.1 NMU.
Cheers,
Julien
diff -u qps-1.9.18.6/debian/rules qps-1.9.18.6/debian/rules
--- qps-1.9.18.6/debian/rules
+++ qps-1.9.18.6/debian/rules
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
rm -f build-stamp
#rm -f proc.cpp
[ ! -f Makefile ] || {
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 422204 + patch
Bug#422204: qps_1.9.18.6-2 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: creates directories in
clean target
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sy
Package: qt4-x11
Version: 4.2.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From the builg log:
Automatic build of qt4-x11_4.2.3-1 on cats by sbuild/arm 98
Build started at 20070426-1856
**
Checking a
Package: hdbc
Version: 1.1.2.0
Severity: serious
Hi John,
hdbc build-depends on ghc6 (>= 6.6), ghc6 (<< 6.6-999), which is not
satisfiable in sid at the moment (ghc6 is 6.6.1-2).
By ignoring this conflict and adding libghc6-mtl-dev to the build-deps,
I was able to build the package. I don't kno
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 426107 confirmed
Bug#426107: molly-guard: Molly-guard failed to stop me halting my server
Tags were: pending
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package molly-guard
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: molly-guard
> tags 426107 + pending
Bug#426107: molly-guard: Molly-guard failed to stop me halting my server
There were no tags set
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 16:38:34 -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Package: mtasc
> Version: 1.13-1
> Severity: serious
>
> From my pbuilder build log:
>
> ...
> ( cd ocaml/mtasc ; ocamllex lexer.mll ; ocamlfind ocamlopt -c expr.ml
> lexer.ml ; ocamlfind ocamlopt -c -pp camlp4o parser.ml ;\
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> found 425836 1:1.2.5-2
Bug#425836: [CVE-2007-1860] A double encoded ".." in a URL can be used to
access URLs on the AJP backend
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.2.5-2.
> found 425
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 16:25:45 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Package: pimd
> Version: 2.1.0-alpha29.17-7
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> In file included from include/linux/netinet/in-my.h:25,
> from include/linux/neti
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 07:47:32PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> On Friday 25 May 2007 04:02:18 am you wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 04:40:57PM -0400, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > > install -s -m 755 mpath_prio_emc
> > > /tmp/buildd/multipath-tools-0.4.7/debian/tmp/sbin/mpat
Package: molly-guard
Version: 0.2.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The typical command I use to shutdown a computer is:
shutdown -h now
I've been doing this for a long time (possibly pre-linux), and it's the
command string that my fingers remember automatically
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 10:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424024: fixed in python-gtkglext1 1.1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Package: php-xajax
Version: 0.2.4-2
Severity: grave
Tags: security
xajax 0.2.5 fixes some XSS vulnerabilities (CVE-2007-2739,
CVE-2007-2740). Sorry, upstream hasn't released more details about
the vulnerability.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro
(coipy to submitter of #426002)
> This is a copy of a bug opened upstream. A patch is avaliable for
> 3.0.25 but not for 3.0.24 on etch.
> It happens on i386, and alpha. 3.0.24-etch2 suffers from the bug too.
>
>
> I'm using Gentoo (the stable tree) and Debian Etch. The recent update that
> fixe
It works for me on lenny (up to date) but not on sid (up to date too).
I tried to build 1.51 from the sources and it works well on sid.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: texlive-base
Version: 2007-7
Followup-For: Bug #425813
Hi,
I've got the same problem here. First there's a missing dependency
on fmtools (i had to install it manually) and then i get the same error:
Setting up texlive-base-bin (2007-9) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... d
Hello,
now I see the following in /usr/include/linux/version.h:
#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE 132629
Should the bug be closed then?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 425803 426065
Bug#425803: upgrade fails due to missing conffiles (see solved bug #420390)
Bug#426065: texlive-base-bin: Could not upgrade: configure failed because
fmtutil-sys failed
Forcibly Merged 425803 426065.
> thanks
Stopping processi
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 08:32:17 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#424896: fixed in gcc-4.2 4.2-20070525-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 426002 samba
Bug#426002: winbind: some users fail to authenticate with error code
NT_STATUS_NO_LOGON_SERVERS
Bug reassigned from package `winbind' to `samba'.
> forcemerge 425680 426002
Bug#425680: samba: The security fix for CVE-2007-2446 br
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 07:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#425999: fixed in hgsvn 0.1.3-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sat, 26 May 2007 07:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#423574: fixed in bootsplash 3.3-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
76 matches
Mail list logo
