Your message dated Sat, 5 May 2007 16:43:55 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Sat, 05 May 2007 06:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422320: fixed in heartbeat-2 2.0.8-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Sat, 05 May 2007 06:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421415: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sat, 05 May 2007 06:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422107: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.5-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: linux-image-2.6.18-4-footbridge
Version: 2.6.18.dfsg.1-12etch1
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
After updating to the kernel version released with DSA-1286-1, the system has
begun to spontaneously reboot. This is a small Netwinder system, which has been
runnin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 422107 heartbeat: uninstallable due to dependancy on libsnmp9
Bug#422107: uninstallable
Changed Bug title to heartbeat: uninstallable due to dependancy on libsnmp9
from uninstallable.
> tags 422107 +pending
Bug#422107: heartbeat: uninstallable
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 422309 normal
Bug#422309: [amd64] missing 32-bit libgcc.a
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
severity 422309 normal
thanks
> gcc-4.1 4.1.1-21 had this file:
>
> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/32/libgcc.a
>
> which gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5 no longer provides. This breaks build of every package
> building biarch 32-bit stuff that relies on libgcc.
see the changelog, split out into gcc-mul
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:31:06AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:49:20AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> heartbeat is uninstallable in unstable:
> > My gut feeling is that libsnmp9 shouldn't have been removed while
> > packages still depend on it. But apparently it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 422213 -1
Bug#422213: checkinstall_1.6.1-2 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: wrong libc6-dev
build-dep
Bug 422213 cloned as bug 422317.
> reassign -1 libc6-sparc64
Bug#422317: checkinstall_1.6.1-2 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: wrong libc6-dev
build-dep
Bug r
clone 422213 -1
reassign -1 libc6-sparc64
found -1 2.5-2
retitle -1 readlink return type changed without backwards-compatibility symbol
thanks
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 07:58:18PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Friday 04 May 2007 19:36:51 you wrote:
> > On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:17:37PM -0400, F
Jim Watson wrote:
> Also I verified this after a reboot, it would not start xorg until I
> did '# umount /sys ' and the '-l' was not required.
Ok, good to know.
A similar problem has been reported in gentoo as well [1]. Fedora
reverted partially the pci domain patch[2] from Xserver because of ot
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 23:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422269: fixed in kernel-patch-openvz 028.18.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 23:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422189: fixed in ocsinventory-agent 1.01-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 01:17:37PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > If there is a reason you
> > need this versioned build-dep on libc6-dev (which is not explained in the
> > changelog),
> It (sort of) is explained: the last line in the changelog says:
> * Correct the readlink definition to mat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386
> libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3
> libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-
Your message dated Sat, 5 May 2007 00:42:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422309: Acknowledgement ([amd64] missing 32-bit libgcc.a)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is n
Also I verified this after a reboot, it would not start xorg until I did
'# umount /sys ' and the '-l' was not required.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: gcc-4.1
Version: 4.1.2-5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated packages
gcc-4.1 4.1.1-21 had this file:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.1.2/32/libgcc.a
which gcc-4.1 4.1.2-5 no longer provides. This breaks build of every package
building biarch 32-bit stuff that relies o
Brice Goglin wrote:
to umount /sys before starting Xorg (umount -l /sys might do the trick
if /sys is busy).
I will have to forward this bug upstream anyway, but please let me know
if it helps.
Yes, i did that as root
# umount -l /sys
then as user
$ startx
and it just works - thanks
jim
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 10:34:39PM +0200, Marcin Gozdalik wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've been following this discussion as this problem hits many of my
> servers as well.
>
> Recently an upstream patch has appeared:
> http://groups.google.pl/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/4783711fa3d7592/dd12faec9
Brice Goglin wrote:
> I was wondering what you were talking about and where the good strace
> output was.
> Actually your previous mail probably got caught by the spam filter
> before being
> delivering to debian-x. Fortunately, it reached the BTS, so I found it.
>
> open("/sys/bus/pci/devices/00
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 404148 + pending
Bug#404148: kernel: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives //
memory hole mapping related bug?!
Tags were: etch-ignore patch
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 21:17:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420390: fixed in texlive-base 2007-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 20:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422053: fixed in sdd 1.52-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 20:32:10 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422134: fixed in sfind 1.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi
I've been following this discussion as this problem hits many of my
servers as well.
Recently an upstream patch has appeared:
http://groups.google.pl/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/4783711fa3d7592/dd12faec9a78f874
Is it possible to fix this problem in etch?
Best regards,
Marcin Gozd
It looks like:
CFLAGS += -m3dnow -msse
was recently added to debian/rules. Those flags would not be valid
outside of i686.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi. The upload with which you closed this bug does not include the
gij-4.1 package, so the bug is still in fact open in the archive.
Andrew
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
crystalspace has been failing to build on alpha for > 1yr, even though a
patch has been available in the BTS for 6 months today. Previous versions
of the package built fine on all architectures, making this a serious
regression and preventing the package's inclusion in a stable release (or in
test
P.S.:
The real propable reason:
index.html is just a lot of java script (one of that famous web 2, java
script php applications). These java script programs may do almost
anything. When you edit something they usually try to to upload it using
HTTP POST.
What they will not do (and should no
Your message dated Fri, 4 May 2007 12:24:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Request for binNMUs (pth cleanup)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 4 May 2007 12:24:36 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Request for binNMUs (pth cleanup)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
jim wrote:
> I upgraded to kernel 2.6.20 and the kernel issues are fixed but xorg still
> wont start. Now i can attach some more information, hope it helps...
I was wondering what you were talking about and where the good strace
output was.
Actually your previous mail probably got caught by the sp
Hello Loic,
I have tested.
My system: Etch, some Athlon board
davfs2 1.1.2-3
What I have done:
1. Mount the the resource
Create files testwb.html and testwb.xml (using gedit)
unmount the resource
2. Test with cadaver:
The files are on the server and are readable
3. Delete
Package: aolserver4
Version: 4.5.0-4
Severity: serious
> Setting up aolserver4 (4.5.0-4) ...
> Starting web server: aolserver4 failed!
> invoke-rc.d: initscript aolserver4, action "start" failed.
> dpkg: error processing aolserver4 (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned err
Package: jikes-classpath
Version: 2:0.92-4
Severity: serious
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming
ns of Makefiles... no
> checking for gcc... cc
> checking for C compiler default output file name...
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more details.
> make: *** [build-tree/jack-audio-connection-kit-0.103.0/config.status] Error
>
Package: pygoocanvas
Version: 0.8.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of pygoocanvas_0.8.0-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> E: Couldn't find package libgoocanvas-dev
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
> ./setup configure --prefix=/usr/lib/haskell-packages/ghc6
> --with-compiler=/usr/bin/ghc6 files: 256 at
> /usr/share/haskell-devscripts//Dh_Haskell.pm line 138, line 1.
> make: *** [install-a] Error 9
> ******
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 422269 serious
Bug#422269: kernel-patch-openvz doesn't apply cleanly
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 17:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421897: fixed in docbook-xml 4.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 17:32:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417739: fixed in yada 0.53
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 17:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422114: fixed in docbook 4.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
reassign 421790 binutils
thanks
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 02:04:17PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:36:59PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > >From the -5 changelog:
> >* Link using --hash-style=gnu/both.
> >
> > It seems to only generate a gnu hash now. Looking at th
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 17:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422115: fixed in docbook-simple 1.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 17:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422116: fixed in docbook-ebnf 1.2~cr1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 421790 binutils
Bug#421790: gcc-4.1: Dynamic symbol information missing in stripped libraries
Bug reassigned from package `gcc-4.1' to `binutils'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracki
On Friday 04 May 2007 05:59:08 Steve Langasek wrote:
> The latest version of checkinstall is failing to build on alpha and ia64
> because you are build-depending on libc6-dev, which is not the right
> package on these archs (or on non-Linux archs).
I didn't know that. I'm sorry for the inconvenie
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> severity 422254 grave
Bug#422254: lighttpd: Security vulnerabilities in Etch version
Severity set to `grave' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please conta
Package: aolserver4-nsimap
Version: 3.1-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
gcc -pipe -shared -nostartfiles -o nsimap.so nsimap.o -L/usr/kerberos/lib
-lgssapi_krb5 -lpam -lcrypto -lssl -lnsthread -lnsd -L/usr/lib -lc-client
-ltcl8.4 -ldl -lpthr
Package: dfsbuild
Version: 1.0.0
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
Configuring dfsbuild-1.0.0...
configure: /usr/bin/ghc-pkg
configure: Dependency base-any: using base-2.0
configure: Dependency network-any: using network-2.0
configure: Dependency uni
On 5/4/07, Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,
I see other issues with patches.
In 00_previous_patches_transitions.dpatch only the patch against
doc/sitecopy.fr.1 should be kept and 04_manpages_addition_fixes.dpatch
and 02_french-po-fix.dpatch need to be redone.
Thanks Chr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 372902 serious
Bug#372902: smssend: Cleanup of dependencies
Severity set to `serious' from `minor'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian B
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 04:41:28PM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-04 15:31]:
>
> > Package: slpvm
> > Version: 0.1.5-7
> > Severity: critical
> >
> > slpvm doses the buildd. The resulting buildlog is nearly 4GiB of size.
>
> This has been already
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> retitle 421582 [CVE-2007-2459] buffer overflow when reading 8-bit compressed
> BMP files
Bug#421582: libimager-perl: buffer overflow when reading 8-bit compressed BMP
files
Changed
retitle [CVE-2007-2459] buffer overflow when reading 8-bit compressed BMP files
thanks
This has been assigned CVE-2007-2459. Please mention this name in the
changelog when fixing this bug. Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wise
> Version: 2.2.0-4
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> Your build-dependancy texlive-pdfetex (>= 2005.df sg.2-12) cannot be
> satisfied. So wise fails to build.
Actually, I would change a lot more in the Build-Deps:
Build-Depends: debhelper (
On Friday 4 May 2007 00:47, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> Fixed patch in attachment...
This looks fine to me.
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-04 15:31]:
> Package: slpvm
> Version: 0.1.5-7
> Severity: critical
>
> slpvm doses the buildd. The resulting buildlog is nearly 4GiB of size.
This has been already reported as #422155.
I hope that 0.1.5-8, uploaded some time ago, fixes the problem
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 14:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#406816: fixed in missingpy 0.9.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 14:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409689: fixed in missingpy 0.9.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Fri, 4 May 2007 16:29:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in 8.3.14-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Package: lighttpd
Version: 1.4.13-4
Severity: critical
Tags: security patch
Justification: root security hole
1.4.13-4 in etch has two security flaws:
CVE-2007-1870
CVE-2007-1869
I include a patch against the debian source of 1.4.13-4 with
http://www.lighttpd.net/assets/2007/4/13/lighttpd-1.4.x_
Package: slpvm
Version: 0.1.5-7
Severity: critical
slpvm doses the buildd. The resulting buildlog is nearly 4GiB of size.
Bastian
--
No one wants war.
-- Kirk, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 13:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388717: fixed in libdbd-sqlite3-perl 1.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 13:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388717: fixed in libdbd-sqlite3-perl 1.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 422170 important
Bug#422170: hugs: Text.Regex gone!
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 422170 upstream
Bug#422170: hugs: Text.Regex gone!
There were no tags set.
Tags added: upstream
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please con
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 08:18:50AM +0100, Ross Paterson wrote:
> I think you've set the severity of this bug too high: "renders package
> unusable" is just not true. I would say it "has a major effect on the
> usability of a package, without rendering it completely unusable to
> everyone", i.e. im
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> # http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-xml/?rev=770
> tags 421897 + pending
Bug#421897: bashism in debian/rules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> #
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> # http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/debian-xml-sgml/packages/docbook-simple/?rev=774
> tags 422115 + pending
Bug#422115: bashism in debian/rules
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Package: jabber-yahoo
Severity: grave
Hi,
I removed the "Provides: libpth2" in pth 2.0.7-7, hence your package
requires a simple rebuild (no changes required), so that your package
depends on libpth20, in order to be installable again.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunde
Package: jabber-jud
Severity: grave
Hi,
I removed the "Provides: libpth2" in pth 2.0.7-7, hence your package
requires a simple rebuild (no changes required), so that your package
depends on libpth20, in order to be installable again.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunders
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 41 421882
Bug#41: nscd fails to install (incorrectly indented comments in nscd.conf)
Bug#421882: nscd: fails to start, syntax error
Bug#422090: /etc/nscd.conf contains tabs which prevent configuration
Bug#422144: Nscd package fail to
forcemerge 41 421882
thanks , that's just the fourth time today.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
pgpLJfPAUND15.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: amavisd-new-milter
Version: 1:2.4.2-6.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The hardcoded socket path in amavis-milter is present in a strings
result on i386 (/var/lib/amavis/amavisd.sock) , but isn't on a x86_64 arch
(string looks like /var/libH).
The only way to u
The dbs has been patched, therefore, it is now possible to build the
package.
Please use the new (attached) patch, as this also updates build-depend
against the new dbs.
Best regards,
Tobi
--
++[>++>+++>>+>++><<-]>+++.
>++.---.>>--.>
Hi again,
I see other issues with patches.
In 00_previous_patches_transitions.dpatch only the patch against
doc/sitecopy.fr.1 should be kept and 04_manpages_addition_fixes.dpatch
and 02_french-po-fix.dpatch need to be redone.
I'll send new patches for that.
Also patches are applied after the fi
Package: nscd
Version: 2.5-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package does not install here:
Unpacking nscd (from .../archives/nscd_2.5-5_i386.deb) ...
Setting up nscd (2.5-5) ...
Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd/usr/sbin/nscd:
Parse error:
/usr/sbin/nscd: Unkn
Package: linux-image-2.6.20-1-686
Version: 2.6.20-3
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
Hi,
I've filed this bug under the this package since, although one could
argue that initramfs-tools has the problem, the difference appears to be
kernel version.
My machine is configu
On 5/3/07, Varun Hiremath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I fix this bug? As far as I understand, the so name should have
been bumped because of ABI changed in libmrss. But what should be done
now to fix this bug?
something like:
DEB_DH_MAKESHLIBS_ARGS := -V 'libmrss0 (>= 0.17.1)'
but the a
Package: checkinstall
Version: 1.6.1-2
Severity: serious
Hi Felipe,
The latest version of checkinstall is failing to build on alpha and ia64
because you are build-depending on libc6-dev, which is not the right package
on these archs (or on non-Linux archs). If there is a reason you need this
ver
Hi Sebastian!
Hmm, the problem seems to be worse: the init script isn't stopping the
daemon at all, even if there is only 1 running.
Bas.
--
Kind regards,
++
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7
Package: rpm
Version: 4.4.1-14
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to build wxPython from it's spec file on Debian 4.0 it tries
to unpack the tar.bz2 using /usr/bin/bzip2.
The correct path is obviously /bin/bzip2.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT pr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> found 326756 1.1.6-1
Bug#326756: libccscript3: FTBFS (amd64): cannot convert 'long int*' to
'SQLINTEGER*' for argument '2' to 'SQLRETURN SQLRowCount(void*, SQLINTEGER*)'
Bug#365518:
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 11:49:20AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>> heartbeat is uninstallable in unstable:
> My gut feeling is that libsnmp9 shouldn't have been removed while
> packages still depend on it. But apparently it was.
Yes. I don't know why, you might want to check the removal logs. :-)
>
Package: collectd
Version: 3.10.4-1
Severity: serious
I am running 2 instances of collectd (through two config files in
/etc/collectd). Both are started by /etc/init.d/collect start, but
/etc/init.d/collect stop only stops one of them.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers sta
On 4/29/07, Theppitak Karoonboonyanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Probably, a better approach is to have iceape-browser,
iceweasel and libnspr4-0d declare "Provides: libnspr4",
and just have swfdec-mozilla depend on that name?
No. Just alternative dependencies (libnspr4-0d | iceweasel | iceape-b
Package: qps
Version: 1.9.18.6-2
Severity: serious
Your package is failing to build on those autobuilders which use -rsudo
instead of -rfakeroot:
[...]
make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/qps-1.9.18.6'
g++ -c -pipe -Wall -W -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -DQT_NO_DEBUG -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT
-DQT_SHARE
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 421606
Bug#421606: sitecopy: Doesn't find all my site
'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version;
you may need to use 'found' to remove fixed versions.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processi
Your message dated Fri, 04 May 2007 08:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#422155: fixed in slpvm 0.1.5-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 411557
Bug#411557: cairo-java: FTBFS: Requested 'glib-java >= 0.4.2' but version of
glib-java is 0.2.5
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 411557 normal
Bug#411557: cairo-java: FTBFS: Requested 'glib-java >= 0.4.2' but version of
reopen 411557
severity 411557 normal
thanks
It's true that cairo-java now builds in unstable, but the build-dependency
on glib-java should still be versioned. So cairo-java still has a bug here,
AFAICS.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Develop
tags 422125 + patch
quit
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:40:00PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
> failed to build on i386.
>
> Relevant parts:
> sh tests.sh
> Test tests/sched-misc */10 * * * * 1081058400 failed:
> @@ -1,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 422125 + patch
Bug#422125: bcron: FTBFS: tests are not timezome-aware
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
severity 421371 important
thanks
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 01:10:22PM +0200, Alexej Davidov wrote:
> Justification: renders package unusable
No, it does not. Only sid fails and it logs a warning for unresolvable
dependencies.
Bastian
--
... bacteriological warfare ... hard to believe we were onc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 421371 important
Bug#421371: cdebootstrap: missing update-rc.d
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Deb
Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> elinks (0.11.1-1.4) unstable; urgency=high
> .
>* Non-maintainer security upload.
>* Don't look for gettext message catalogs in ../po/ (closes: #417789).
> Thanks, Arnaud Giersch! Reference: CVE-2007-2027.
A less paranoid fix has been ch
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 07:54:41PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Package: hugs
> Version: 98.200609.21-5
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> This breaks compatibility with a ton of packages. I have tried to find
> this in some package, but can't. The lack of it means t
> [...]
> Setting up ocsinventory-agent (1.01-3) ...
> cp: cannot stat `/usr/share/ocsinventory-client/ocsinv.adm': No such file
> or directory [...]
I got the same error, adding an || true on the cp line (59) in file
/var/lib/dpkg/info/ocsinventory-agent.postinst solved the problem for me.
Cheer
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
