On Mit, 02 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > ! I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
>
> That's an interesting one: It used only texlive-latex-base as
> Build-Dep. It's already fixed by adding tl-latex-recommended, I hope it
> works this time.
Should.
> (Hint: This wouldn't have happened if all package
On 5/2/07, Phil Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: ejabberd
Version: 1.1.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since updating my testing box today, ejabberd has been running but not
listening on any of its ports.
I suspect that this may be an issue with erlang ra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421986 + lenny
Bug#421986: ejabberd: running but not listening
There were no tags set.
Tags added: lenny
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2007 05:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#410403: fixed in kismet 2007-01-R1b-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
tags 410403 patch
thanks
Hi Francois,
As a valid patch has been sitting on this bug report for two months that
fixes the build failure on 64-bit archs, I'm going ahead with a 0-day porter
NMU for kismet to fix the problem. The final patch is attached, and the NMU
will be uploaded to incoming sho
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 410403 patch
Bug#410403: kismet: FTBFS on 64 it arches: gpsmap.cc:2249: error: cast from
'void*' to 'int' loses precision
Tags were: patch
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2007 05:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421606: fixed in sitecopy 1:0.16.3-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
the problem is located in the configuration file /etc/nscd.conf
at line 63-64, make sure that the '#' symbol starts the line and not be
preceded by an empty space/tab or anything else, once you do that, try to
install the package with 'apt-get -f install', 'apt-get install nscd' o
'dpkg -i /var/ca
Package: gnushogi
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: grave
Setting up gnushogi (1.3.2-1) ...
No `START-INFO-DIR-ENTRY' and no `This file documents'.
install-info(/usr/share/info/gnushogi.info): unable to determine description
for `dir' entry - giving up
dpkg: error processing gnushogi (--configure):
su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 330482 serious
Bug#330482: hardware-monitor: memory leak, oom-kill
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
severity 421616 serious
thanks
Hi Mirco,
as the missing dependency makes the package uninstallable, I'm raising
the severity accordingly.
Cheers,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?
signature.asc
Description
In src/linux/zfilew.c
If $HOME is defined, obtaindir attempts to free the result of
getenv("HOME"), which is bad because that value is a static value and
must not be freed. The new glibc does tighter checking of such things,
which is why it is broken under the new glibc.
I've attached a patch, s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 421616 serious
Bug#421616: sid / monodevelop: broken dependencies
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 390691 pending
Bug#390691: ITP: gnome-icon-theme-human -- Ubuntu default Gnome's icons theme
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 405843 pending
Bug#405843: tex-guy: diff file
Tuxpaint works with either pt_BR.UTF-8 or pt_PT.UTF-8. This is
certainly not a bug against tuxpaint-config, which you can see by
checking ~/.tuxpaintrc after running tuxpaint-config, and is
certainly not grave, as it does not render the package unusable,
which is easy to see if you just try some o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 421916 normal
Bug#421916: tuxpaint-config settings aren't used by tuxpaint
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 22:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421729: fixed in stetic 0.1.0~svn.74962+dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Package: f-spot
Version: 0.3.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
launching f-spot from the command line returns:
$ f-spot
Unhandled Exception: System.ArgumentNullException: Argument cannot be null.
Parameter name: key
at
System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2[System.
Package: maxdb-7.5.00
Version: 7.5.00.34-7
Severity: serious
This package fails to build because CLK_TCK is no longer defined with
current glibc. You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
> ven69-a.c
You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead of CLK_TCK. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
For the record, most of these bugs were reported already. I filed the
rest.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 422009 422010
Bug#422009: FTBFS: lposix.c:618: error: 'CLK_TCK' undeclared
Bug#422010: FTBFS: 'CLK_TCK' undeclared
Merged 422009 422010.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 21:47:06 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392654: fixed in atoppatch 1:1.20-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: lua-posix
Version: 1.0-5
Severity: serious
This package fails to build because CLK_TCK is no longer defined with
current glibc. You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead of CLK_TCK. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 376772 serious
Bug#376772: CLK_TCK should be CLOCKS_PER_SEC?
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> merge 376772 420943
Bug#376772: CLK_TCK should be CLOCKS_PER_SEC?
Bug#420943: FTBFS: ddj.c:1025: error: 'CLK_TCK' undeclared
Merged 376772 4
This problem is generic.
You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead of CLK_TCK. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead of CLK_TCK. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead of CLK_TCK. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
Package: lua-posix
Version: 1.0-5
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi!
lua-posix currently fails to build from source in sid [1]:
--- 8< ---
libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=compile cc -c -g -Wall -O2
-I/usr//include/lua5.1 -o lposix.lo lposix.c
lposix.c: In fu
You have to use CLOCKS_PER_SEC instead of CLK_TCK. According to
/usr/include/time.h, CLK_TCK is the "obsolete POSIX.1-1988 name"
for CLOCKS_PER_SEC.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
reopen 419617 !
thanks
Hi,
uim-tcode still has not been built on powerpc, arm, etc.), and I'm getting
a little tired of watching uim-common's postinst fail every time I use
aptitude to upgrade.
So I'm reopening this bug.
Part of the function of Depends and friends is to make absolutely sure tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 419617 !
Bug#419617: uim-common: postinst script fails (in init.scm?)
Bug reopened, originator set to Matijs van Zuijlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syst
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 421142 patch
Bug#421142: gcc-avr: FTBFS: cp: cannot create regular file
`build-tree/gcc-*/gcc/doc/bugreport.texi': No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Subject: gcc-avr: Patch to fix the FTBFS (at least almost)
Followup-For: Bug #421142
Package: gcc-avr
I made a patch to fix the FTBFS.
- debian/control : adapted the build-depends to depend against the right
gcc-source (the original would also match to 4.1.2, which is in
experimental already.
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 421919 builddep-tetex-ftbfs
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Relevant parts:
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
> (/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)kpathsea: Running mktextfm
> ecrm1095
> mktextfm: Running mf-
Package: bcrelay
Version: 1.3.4-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I have pptpd 1.3.4-1 installed.
With bcrelay 1.3.4-1
If I start bcrelay, I get the following error :
bcrelay: pptpd was compiled without support for bcrelay, exiting.
run c
(new) libyate1.2.0_1.2.0-1.dfsg-1_i386.deb optional libs
Shared library for YATE
YATE is a telephony engine aimed at creating a telephony server that
performs well enough to deal with PBX requirements and also flexible
enough for complex Gateway and IVR solutions.
.
This package contains share
user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertags 421821 builddep-tetex-ftbfs
thanks
Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> (./geomview.texi
>> ! I can't find file `epsf'.
>> l.7 \input epsf
>>
>> Please type another input file name:
>> ! Emergency stop.
>> l.7 \input epsf
epsf.tex is in
Hi,
thanks for the hint.
This will be fixed in the next package version.
--
Best regards
Roland Gruber
LDAP Account Manager
http://lam.sourceforge.net
Want more? Get LDAP Account Manager Pro!
http://lam.sourceforge.net/lamPro/index.htm
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: yate
Version: 1.0.0-1.dfsg-2
Tags: security patch upstream pending
Severity: grave
Yate 1.0.0-1.dfsg-2 in Debian stable and 1.1.0-1.dfsg-1 in testing and
unstable contains a Denial of Service Vulnerability.
The patch applied by upstream to CVS and released in yate 1.2.0 can be
found a
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package libyate1.2.0 yate yate-alsa yate-dev yate-doc yate-gtk2 yate-mysql
> yate-openh323 yate-pgsql
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: yate-dev libyate1.2.0 yate-gtk2 yate-mysql
yate-
Package: libgdal1-dev
Version: 1.4.1-4
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package ships an .la file (/usr/lib/libgdal1.4.0.la) which mentions
the /usr/lib/libhdf5.la file in it's dependency_libs file. You don't
have a dependency on libhdf5-serial-dev and that's causing other
packages to fail to build.
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 21:09:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421987: 'CLK_TCK' undeclared
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Hi Øystein,
It's really perfect. Until yet no problem detected. I think it's fixed.
Thanks
Le jeudi 26 avril 2007 à 23:39 +0200, WaVeR a écrit :
> Hi Øystein,
>
> Le jeudi 26 avril 2007 à 06:57 +0200, Øystein Gisnås a écrit :
>
> > With 2.10.1 in unstable, can you please try and see if this p
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 21:10:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401010: evolution: Evolution hangs when i try to read a
mail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: kdebindings
Version: 4:3.5.6-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
CLASSPATH=.:. /usr/lib/jvm/java-gcj/bin/javah -jni org.kde.DCOP.Client
Exception in thread "main" java.io.IOException: can't find class file
org/kde/DCOP/Client.class in
java
Package: libming-util, swftools
Severity: serious
Justification: policy violation
Usertags: qa-file-conflict
hi,
both libming-util and swftools ship 'usr/share/man/man1/png2swf.1.gz' but do
not conflict or add a diversion, thus fail to be installed on the same
environment:
dpkg: error processin
Package: glibc
Version: 2.5-1
Severity: serious
A number of packages fail to build because 'CLK_TCK' is undeclared. I
suppose (but haven't confirmed) this comes from libc. Is this a bug
in libc, the packages or something else?
At least the following packages fail to build:
atftp_0.7.dfsg-1.2:s
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Package: paw
> Version: 1:2.14.04-7
> Severity: serious
>
> This package fails to build in unstable:
>
>> Automatic build of paw_1:2.14.04-7 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
> ..
>> gcc clip.c
>> gcc matrix.c
>> gcc version.c
>> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/paw-2.
Package: ejabberd
Version: 1.1.2-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Since updating my testing box today, ejabberd has been running but not
listening on any of its ports.
I suspect that this may be an issue with erlang rather than with
ejabberd but it manifests in ejabberd
Package: paw
Version: 1:2.14.04-7
Severity: serious
This package fails to build in unstable:
> Automatic build of paw_1:2.14.04-7 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
...
> gcc clip.c
> gcc matrix.c
> gcc version.c
> make[4]: Leaving directory `/build/tbm/paw-2.14.04/build/paw_motif/xbae'
> rebuild shar
Package: moon-buggy
Version: 1.0.51-2
Severity: serious
This package fails to build, probably due to the tetex->texlive
transition. I guess you need to update your build-depends.
> Automatic build of moon-buggy_1.0.51-2 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
...
> (/build/tbm/moon-buggy-1.0.51/esd/moon-b
Package: aterm
Version: 1.0.0-4
Severity: serious
This package fails to build in unstable:
> Automatic build of aterm_1.0.0-4 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.53
...
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -c -Wall -O2 -DNO_DEBUG_OUTPUT
> -I/usr/include/libAfterImage -I. -I.. -I../../src ../../src/thai.c
> gc
Package: commons-daemon
Version: 1.0.2~svn20061127-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error:
compile:
[javac] Compiling 6 source files to
/build/buildd/commons-daemon-1.0.2~svn20061127/target/classes
BUILD FAILED
/build/buildd/commons-daemon-1.0.2~sv
Package: cjk
Version: 4.7.0+cvs20061019-2
Severity: serious
This package fails to build because of the tetex->texlive transition.
You need a build-depends on texlive-extra-utils.
> Automatic build of cjk_4.7.0+cvs20061019-2 on coconut0 by sbuild/ia64 0.49
...
> applying patch 05_fix_examplefiles
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 18:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421919: fixed in fiaif 1.21.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
nearly a week ago a bug was filed against libc6
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=421037) reporting a sigill
when upgrading on a netwinder. Replies to the bug report say that on some
netwinders it does work.
there is still no information in the bug report log on what the illegal
pdftotext fails to work because gs (gs-esp/8.15.3.dfsg.1-1) crashes. gs
version gs-esp 7.07.1 works fine. As a result, indexing of pdf-documents
is not possible using Beagle.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 16:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421799: fixed in binutils 2.17cvs20070426-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
Package: mount
Version: 2.12r-19
Severity: grave
Justification: mount needs libdevmapper1.02 to run, which is not in depends
Hi,
mount does not work on new installs of Sid -- since it depends
on a library runtime that is no longer in Sid, and the dependency
relationship is underspecifi
I'm running the latest version of Banshee on unstable, 0.12.1+dfsg-3+b1, and
I do not have this problem. I started Banshee fine both with no music
library loaded and with 3000 songs loaded.
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 17:51:34 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421925: rosegarden: not installable in sid
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Am Mittwoch, den 02.05.2007, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Jerry Quinn (ibm):
> Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > can you please test if banshee 0.12.1 from unstable solves this for you?
> >
> At the moment testing 0.12.1 requires upgrading glibc and I wanted to
> hold off from that for now...
You can also tak
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 10:46:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the Debian Bug report #421769,
regarding gpsbabel: links with or includes GPL-incompatible code
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s) .
(NB: If you are a system admin
Sebastian Dröge wrote:
can you please test if banshee 0.12.1 from unstable solves this for you?
At the moment testing 0.12.1 requires upgrading glibc and I wanted to
hold off from that for now...
Thanks
Package: rosegarden
Version: 1:1.5.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# apt-get install rosegarden
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impo
Package: fiaif
Version: 1.21.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on i386, very likely to fail everywhere else
Usertags: grid5000 rebuild
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, I discovered that your package
failed to build on i386.
Relevant parts:
(/usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex
Hi,
The dpkg -L matches:
dpkg -L gnome-sudoku | grep -i foot
/usr/share/pixmaps/gnome-sudoku/footprints.png
The file is there too.
And the changelog:
gnome-sudoku (0.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release (Closes: #384670, #378710).
* debian/patches/defaults-py.patch: updated.
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 14:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419644: fixed in wmweather+ 2.9-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: tuxpaint-config
Version: 0.0.7-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi there,
I dunno if this is a tuxpaint or tuxpaint-config bug, but the
contigurations chosen in tuxpaint-config aren't reflected in tuxpaint,
even if saved.
Example:
1) aptitude install tuxpaint
On 5/2/07, Martin Ketzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: gnome-sudoku
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: grave
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your report. There's something weird going on though, it
seems that our package version and dependencies match, but the package
content doesn't. Could you please pas
Package: gnome-sudoku
Version: 0.7.1-1
Severity: grave
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
gnome-sudoku does not start an prints the following on the command-line:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/games/gnome-sudoku", line 7, in ?
from gnome_sudoku.gnome_sudoku imp
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 12:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388600: fixed in mlmmj 1.2.11-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 12:32:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388600: fixed in mlmmj 1.2.11-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 12:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420947: fixed in ethiop 0.7-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> tags 421728 - security
Bug#421728: seahorse: test for user mlock fails
Tags were: security
Tags removed: security
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if yo
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 13:05:45 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#420745: gossip: Gossip forgets all its accounts
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 10:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421143: fixed in qgis 0.8.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Tom,
> snmpd is running at 100% CPU on 2 of my systems, and will not respond to
> polls. I have tried the default config file, which has the same effect.
I suspect this could be an upstream problem.
Do you have the chance to take 5.3.1-3 (from SID) or 5.4~dfsg-1 (from
experimental) and recom
severity 421504 important
forward 421504 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144949
thanks
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
I wouldn't consider loosing clipboard content a data loss that deservers a
grave bug, so downgrading.
> Shift+Delete is a shortcut for cut
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 421504 important
Bug#421504: klipper: Shift+Delete (as a keyboard shortcut for cut) does not
work properly
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> forward 421504 http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144949
Unknown command or malformed argum
Package: docbook-xml
Version: 4.5-2
Severity: serious
Hi,
docbook-xml currently uses bashism in debian/rules, for example the for
loops with the {...} syntax.
The package builds on systems with dash as main shell but it's not
usable because many files are missing.
This might apply to the other do
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 10:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#421861: fixed in skencil 0.6.17-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: mailman
Version: 1:2.1.9-7
Severity: grave
Tags: l10n
Justification: renders package unusable
After upgrading mailman about a month ago, the install
script failed. Here the output of what happens now:
s:~# apt-get install mailman
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4
> package glibc glibc-doc libc0.1 libc0.1-dbg libc0.1-dev libc0.1-dev-i386
> libc0.1-i386 libc0.1-i686 libc0.1-pic libc0.1-prof libc0.1-udeb libc0.3
> libc0.3-dbg libc0.3-dev libc0.3-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388600 serious
Bug#388600: mlmmj: purging the package fails (debconf not available)
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 388600 417022
Bug#388600: mlmmj: purging the package fails (debconf not available)
Bug#417022: depends on no
Subject: nscd: fails to start, syntax error
Package: nscd
Version: 2.5-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I did a sudo aptitude upgrade. The package failed to install with the
following message.
Syntax-Fehler --> syntax error
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 08:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#396964: fixed in lynx 2.8.6-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 421868 important
Bug#421868: cups-pdf: gs hangs eating all memory when printing certain files
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processi
severity 419119 normal
tags 419119 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi Gerd!
On Sam, 14 Apr 2007, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > # sh -x /var/lib/dpkg/info/texlive-lang-german.postinst configure 2>&1 |
> > tee postinst.log
> >
> > And send us the file postinst.log?
>
> That would be the only thin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 419119 normal
Bug#419119: texlive-lang-german: fails to install completely
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 419119 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#419119: texlive-lang-german: fails to install completely
There were no tags set.
Tag
Aurelien Jarno a écrit :
> James Troup a écrit :
>> Package: libc6
>> Version: 2.5-4
>> Severity: serious
>>
>> | Preparing to replace libc6 2.3.6.ds1-11 (using
>> .../archives/libc6_2.5-4_arm.deb) ...
>> | Unpacking replacement libc6 ...
>> | dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 00:43:13 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [php-maint] Bug#421061: php5 - FTBFS: Build-depends against
unavailable package: libsnmp9-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 00:39:50 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [php-maint] Bug#421871: libapache2-mod-php5: Package version
5.2.0-11 not avaliable for i386
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem h
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 07:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419987: fixed in xmltex 1.9-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 2 May 2007 00:36:21 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This is (obviously) fixed in -11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 07:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419987: fixed in xmltex 1.9-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 07:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419987: fixed in xmltex 1.9-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 02 May 2007 07:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419987: fixed in xmltex 1.9-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
