Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419189: fixed in glibc 2.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:21 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Can you try applying the following patch to the source package and
>> rebuilding? I don't have a Debian PPC system running AFS to easily
>> test with, but we think this may fix the problem.
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:21 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Can you try applying the following patch to the source package and
> rebuilding? I don't have a Debian PPC system running AFS to easily test
> with, but we think this may fix the problem.
I'm in the middle of a crunch moment in the preparat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> block 414746 by 419939
Bug#419939: libhtml-tree-perl: change in behaviour makes libxml-twig-perl test
fail
Bug#414746: libxml-twig-perl: FTBFS: failed test t/test_bugs_3_22
Was not blocked by any bugs.
Blocking bugs of 414746 added: 419939
> stop
Stop
Package: sylpheed
Version: 2.4.0~beta8-1
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
...this html mail snip:
Please visit the resolution center
located here
http://www.armordolls.it/pay.html"; >https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_login-run=res-center
to verify your identit
Package: codespeak-lib
Version: 0.9.0-3
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of codespeak-lib_0.9.0-3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98
> Build started at 20070418-1401
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: postgresql-8.1-slony1
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
slony1 is missing the dependency on postgresql-8.1 to be able to build,
the configure show that when the server is not installed :
configure: error: /usr/lib/postgresql/8.1/lib/plpgsql.so|sl|dll is n
Your message dated Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419602: fixed in gri 2.12.15-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: kdebase-data
Version: 4:3.5.5a.dfsg.1-6
Severity: serious
http://opengl.org/about/logos/ makes it clear that OpenGL's logo is not
freely modifiable, thus not DFSG-free.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would appear that the FTBFS is triggered by some difference in the
s390, powerpc and sparc autobuilders, respect to the rest.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 07:15:30PM -0500, wrote:
> I'm currently testing a build with such build dependency added, I'll
> post the (rather minimal) patch if it works.
Well. If fixes the posted error, and allows the build to continue to
another error. I know absolutely nothing about mono, so I can
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 332602 patch
Bug#332602: socks4-clients: should depend on libsocks4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tag 416609 patch
Bug#416609: socks4-server: should depend on libsocks4
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping proc
tag 332602 patch
tag 416609 patch
thanks
Both bugs are in fact the same.
---
diff -r a80dd48e23c3 debian/changelog
--- a/debian/changelog Wed Apr 18 19:18:42 2007 -0500
+++ b/debian/changelog Wed Apr 18 19:29:27 2007 -0500
@@
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # A FTBFS in amd64 is RC, now that it is a released arch.
> severity 280262 grave
Bug#280262: socks4-server: FTBFS on amd64: Illegal use of 'extern int errno;'
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact
I'm currently testing a build with such build dependency added, I'll
post the (rather minimal) patch if it works.
--
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975 2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 419049 normal
Bug#419049: shutdown of interfaces before network services are shut down causes
data loss
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 419684 important
Bug#419684: nut-dev: please provide a version of libupsclient compiled with
-fPIC
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> severity 358637 important
Bug#358637: libip* should be compiled with -fPIC; attempt to link the cu
severity 419684 important
severity 358637 important
thanks
> These two bugs cause a FTBFS of the upcoming collectd package, thus I'm
> raising the severity. A shared library should be an appropriate solution in
> my case as well as building using -fPIC.
It is not mandatory for library packages to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> severity 419531 important
Bug#419531: Menus unusables (i.e. without effect) in new gnome-art upload
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> block 419531 with 385657
Bug#385657: gn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 418866 important
Bug#418866: arbortext-catalog: java classes are not built from sources
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
severity 418866 important
thanks
Hmm, at a glance this doesn't look 'serious' to me. The package is in
contrib, and the source appears to be included even if not used in the
build, so why should this be an RC bug?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Deb
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 418499 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#418499: Bug in installation of apache2
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 418499 important
Bug#418499: Bug in installation of apache2
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
- Forwarded message from Ivan Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ivan Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Authen::Passphrase dependencies
Hi,
My name is Ivan Kohler. I'm a CPAN author (IVAN) and Debian developer.
I'm writing to you about your Authen:
Package: pitivi
Version: 0.10.1-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
I decided to give pitivi a try tonight, and it resulted in:
% pitivi
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pitivi", line 85, in ?
_init_gobject_gtk_gst()
File "/usr/bin/pitivi", line
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:36:46PM -0400, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: libauthen-passphrase-perl
> Version: 0.005-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
>
> libauthen-passphrase-perl is impossible to install because it depends
> on libcrypt-unixcrypt-xs-pe
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 21:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418840: fixed in belocs-locales-bin 2.4-2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
I'm going to do an NMU for this bug with the attached patch.
--
Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
diff -urpN locales.orig/debian/changelog belocs-locales-bin-2.4/debian/changelog
--- locales.orig/debian/changelog 2007-04-18 22:57:48.0 +0200
+++ belocs-locales-bin-2.4/debian/changelog 2007-04-18 22:46
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.3
> tags 418840 + patch
Bug#418840: belocs-locales-data: does not work with new libc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact
Package: libauthen-passphrase-perl
Version: 0.005-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable (uninstallable)
libauthen-passphrase-perl is impossible to install because it depends
on libcrypt-unixcrypt-xs-perl, which is not yet packaged (at least to
the ftpmasters' satisfaction, judg
Package: qemu
Version: 0.8.2-4
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I use
qemu win98bug.img -hdb fat:rw:test
I know from /usr/share/doc/qemu/qemu-doc.html that I shouldn't use
non-ASCII filenames, etc.
Apparently data loss occurs, if the *contents* of the file contain some
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 419373 normal
Bug#419373: kaffeine: kaffeine is unable to install when kwlan is installed
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> merge 419373 419477
Bug#419373: kaffeine: kaffeine is unable to install when kwlan is installed
Bug#419477: kaffe
Package: deluge-torrent
Version: 0.5.0-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello after an intended crash of my X session deluge refuse to start
anymore. Here is the log message I've got when started from the prompt
no existing Deluge session
deluge_core; using libtorrent 0.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 419916 serious
Bug#419916: devscripts: file conflict with kdesdk-scripts
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 419916 419754
Bug#419754: devscripts: Fails to install -- file conflicts with kdesdk-scripts
Bug#419916: devscripts: fi
Package: libsnmp10-dev
Severity: serious
Hi,
Could you please stop renaming your -dev package for such small changes
in the API? Most package that build depend on libsnmp9-dev will happely
build with libsnmp10-dev.
I suggest you also provide the libsnmp9-dev package, or rename it to
libsnmp-dev
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-client
> Version: 1.4.4.dfsg1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> When I run aklog, I get the following helpful error message:
> ~$ aklog -d
> Authenticating to cell becket.net (server aquinas.becket.n
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402848: fixed in aolserver4 4.5.0-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: openafs-client
> Version: 1.4.4.dfsg1-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> When I run aklog, I get the following helpful error message:
> ~$ aklog -d
> Authenticating to cell becket.net (server aquinas.becket.n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.2
> reassign 419903 openafs-krb5
Bug#419903: openafs-client: aklog crashes with LWP: stack overflow in process
IO MANAGER!
Bug reassigned from package `openafs-client' to `openafs-krb5'.
Package: php-net-smartirc
Severity: serious
The debian/copyright file says:
Upstream Authors: See /usr/share/doc/php-soap/AUTHORS file.
I can't remember developing php-soap but I did for sure Net_SmartIRC.
Please correct this, and don't refere external files as this is error
prone and difficult
Am Mittwoch, den 18.04.2007, 18:28 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:43:37PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 17.04.2007, 18:27 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > > Package: libgail18
> > > Version: 1.18.0-2
> > > Severity: serious
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > W
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 01:43:37PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 17.04.2007, 18:27 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > Package: libgail18
> > Version: 1.18.0-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > When I try to install both libgail17 and libgail18, I get the following
> > error
Package: openafs-client
Version: 1.4.4.dfsg1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I run aklog, I get the following helpful error message:
~$ aklog -d
Authenticating to cell becket.net (server aquinas.becket.net).
We've deduced that we need to authenticate to realm BECKET
Package: acx100-source
Version: 20060521-3
Severity: serious
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I already have compiled with no problem the acx100 module to the kernel
2.6.18, with the module assistant. I actually checked again, it is still
working. This module do not want to com
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#416318: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.6.r1.dfsg.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:47:11 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#417394: fixed in kdelibs 4:3.5.6.r1.dfsg.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Package: cduce
Version: 0.4.1-1+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of cduce_0.4.1-1+b1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 98
> Build started at 20070418-1208
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Hello,
I have same bug when upgrade uim-common from 1:1.2.1-9 to 1:1.4.1-2.
I think /usr/bin/uim-module-manager execute from postinst generates this error.
# LANG=C uim-module-manager --path /etc/uim --unregister tcode
ERROR: unbound variable (errobj use)
*backtrace*
>>(use srfi-23)
>>(require
Package: asterisk-app-fax
Version: 0.0.20060218-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After installing asterisk 1.4.2~dfsg-4, app-rxfax and app-txfax fail to
load with:
[Apr 18 15:24:44] WARNING[29481] loader.c: Module 'app_rxfax.so' did not
register itself during load
[Apr 18
José Luis Tallón <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Thanks for checking. You have also provided the recipe, so I will try
> and get it ready ASAP
> (I have to finish just one thing before)
Do you have an ETA yet ?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Debian, because code matters more
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> notfixed 419602 2.12.15-2
> thanks
>
> I'm still getting the same error.
Thanks.
>I'm guessing you still have some
> tetex things installed.
>
>
> Kurt
Nah, I simply changed the Build-Depends-Indep line and forgot a
On Mit, 18 Apr 2007, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > Hmm. What about asking removal of texlive-pdfetex? Would be the cleanest
> > solution ;-)
>
> You could still hit the file conflict when upgrading from etch.
Well, at least not in my test-runs, ie etch, install tetex, install
texlive2005, distupgrade
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. What about asking removal of texlive-pdfetex? Would be the cleanest
> solution ;-)
You could still hit the file conflict when upgrading from etch.
--
Florent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 12:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419868: fixed in dhcpcd 1:3.0.17-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > i just uploaded 7.16.2-1 to experimental, i also fixed this bug. please,
> > cpuld you redo the test with this new version?
>
> I tested again after installing libcurl4-openssl. And this indeed works.
> Will try with 7.16.2-1 once its rebu
Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> i just uploaded 7.16.2-1 to experimental, i also fixed this bug. please,
> cpuld you redo the test with this new version?
I tested again after installing libcurl4-openssl. And this indeed works.
Will try with 7.16.2-1 once its rebuilt for amd64 here.
Gr??e/Regards,
Re
On Mit, 18 Apr 2007, Florent Rougon wrote:
> > Yes they do: texlive-extra-utils/2007 depends on
> > texlive-common/2007 conflicts with
> > texlive-pdfetex
>
> That is not enough. With these depends and conflicts, apt could unpack
> texlive-extra-utils/2007 while texlive-pdfetex is
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes they do: texlive-extra-utils/2007 depends on
> texlive-common/2007 conflicts with
> texlive-pdfetex
That is not enough. With these depends and conflicts, apt could unpack
texlive-extra-utils/2007 while texlive-pdfetex is unpac
Am Dienstag, den 17.04.2007, 18:27 +0200 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> Package: libgail18
> Version: 1.18.0-2
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> When I try to install both libgail17 and libgail18, I get the following
> error:
> Unpacking libgail18 (from .../libgail18_1.18.0-2_amd64.deb) ...
> Selecting pre
Package: dhcpcd
Version: 1:3.0.17-1
Severity: critical
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
dhcpcd fails to run, if SET_DOMAIN='yes' is set in /etc/default/dhcpcd with
error:
# ifup eth0
/sbin/dhcpcd-bin: invalid option -- D
usage: dhcpcd [-adknpGHMNRY] [-c script] [-h hostame] [-i c
found 419774 7.16.1-1
notfound 419774 7.16.2-1
thanks
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:28:00PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> Hi,
hi,
> as you spoke on -release about a curl transition I wanted to do a testbuild
> an installed libcurl4-openssl-dev.
>
> The build breaks:
>
of course! :)
>
> .a?
Package: uim-common
Version: 1:1.4.1-2
Followup-For: Bug #419617
On bugs.debian.org this bug is tagged "unreproducible", but I have the same
symptom.
Maybe because at the moment, all uim packages are 1.2, while uim-common is
1.4?
Regards, Jan
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 419318 1:1.4.1-2
Bug#419318: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
Bug marked as found in version 1:1.4.1-2.
> severity 419318 important
Bug#419318: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
Severity set to `important' fro
found 419318 1:1.4.1-2
severity 419318 important
stop
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> This bug is already fixed in 1.4.1-2 in unstable.
Thanks for checking so quickly; I reviewed the above version, and there
are a couple of problems:
- ${misc:Depends} is
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 19:34:11 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419318: Switch to dh_gtkmodules for the gtk 2.10 transition
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 419617 +unreproducible +moreinfo
Unknown tag/s: +moreinfo.
Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid
help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed
ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fi
Package: vsftpd
Severity: serious
Architecture: i386
Version: 2.0.5-2
login of local users fail with this configuration:
# egrep -v '^#' /etc/vsftpd.conf
listen=YES
anonymous_enable=NO
local_enable=YES
write_enable=YES
connect_from_port_20=YES
ascii_upload_enable=YES
ascii_download_enable=YES
se
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 404951 linux-2.6
Bug#404951: Installation Report [mips] [daily-2006-12-27] [Failure] SWARM
(Broadcom BCM91250a)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `linux-2.6'.
> retitle 404951 linux-2.6: sb1-bcm91250a kernel does not boot
severity 419833 normal
tag 419833 moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 08:29:08AM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> Sometimes when logrotate rotates our bind9 log files, it doesn't start
> bind9 again. Altought it stops it. My bind9 logrotate file:
>
> /var/log/named/named.log {
> daily
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 419833 normal
Bug#419833: logrotate of bind9 doesn't always start bind again
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tag 419833 moreinfo
Bug#419833: logrotate of bind9 doesn't always start bind again
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinf
On Mit, 18 Apr 2007, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
> It is in texlive-extra-utils and texlive-pdfetex, which (BTW) do not
> conflict.
Yes they do: texlive-extra-utils/2007 depends on
texlive-common/2007 conflicts with
texlive-pdfetex
Best wishes
Norbert
On 17.04.07 Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Package: albatross
> Version: 1.36-1
> Severity: serious
> User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Usertags: builddep-tetex-ftbfs
>
> Hi,
>
> Your package is failing to build with the following error:
> epstopdf simplecontext.eps
> make[1]: epstopdf: Comman
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419111: fixed in context 2007.03.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418976: fixed in context 2007.03.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#418976: fixed in context 2007.03.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:04:19AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Please be more specific, about what other problems you are talking
> about. Otherwise we are getting nowhere.
I was talking about the potential data loss resulting from taking the
network away from mounted network filesystems and/or
Hi,
Daniel Schepler wrote:
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 15:08:31 pm you wrote:
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-qt-kde/2007/04/msg00253.html
Still, even if it's removed from kdesdk-scripts, the newer devscripts
packages need versioned Replaces, and possibly Conflicts, against
older versions of
package ratpoison
tag 419783 + pending
block 419783 by 419849
thanks
* Aaron M. Ucko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070418 00:45]:
> ratpoison is uninstallable on systems with recent versions of doc-base
> because its doc-base control file lacks an Index: field for the info
> docs.
Thanks for spotting this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package ratpoison
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: ratpoison
> tag 419783 + pending
Bug#419783: ratpoison: missing Index: field in doc-base file
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> block 419783 by 419849
Bug#419849: [debhelper] dh_installinfo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419774: fixed in curl 7.16.2-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:47:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419683: fixed in octaviz 0.4.5-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Your message dated Wed, 18 Apr 2007 07:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#419756: fixed in albatross 1.36-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: bacula-director-mysql
Version: 2.0.3-3+b1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
apt-get install bacula-director-mysql
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible
82 matches
Mail list logo
