On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:03:04AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:01:41 -0700
> with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> and subject line jamvm: missing file: /usr/lib/logging.properties
> has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
>
>
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411472: fixed in zodb 3.6.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> Package: dtc
>> Severity: serious
>> Justification: Policy 3.9
>>
>> This question is:
>> * modifying another package configuration which is completely against
>> the policy
>> * doing a warning that mysql-server is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: dtc-xen
> Version: 0.2.6-5
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
>
> Hi,
>
> dtc-xen creates files in /etc/dtc-xen in its postinst, in particular ssl
> private keys, and only after that chmods them. This means that th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Julien Cristau wrote:
> Package: dtc-xen
> Version: 0.2.6-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> dtc-xen's postinst creates (19!!) users with home directories under
> /home, and will break if /home is on nfs (which is a pretty common
> setup). If the use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 411472 python-zodb
Bug#411472: move zope3 python modules to /usr/lib/zope3
Bug reassigned from package `zope3' to `python-zodb'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administ
reassign 411472 python-zodb
thanks
* 2007-03-12 03:29, Steve Langasek wrote:
> So, who is adding this conflict? It looks like it's easier to add the
> conflict in python-zodb, which has matching versions in etch and sid right
> now (zope3 has a new upstream version in unstable that won't be consi
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:44:35PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Package: dtc
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> > in the debian_config script you can find oddities like:
> > if [ ""$conf_use_nated_vhosts = "true" -o ""$conf_use_nat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # get this bug where it can be seen
> reassign 404148 linux-2.6
Bug#404148: kernel: data corruption with nvidia chipsets and IDE/SATA drives //
memory hole mapping related bug?!
Bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre HABOUZIT wrote:
> severity 414478 grave
> thanks
>
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:49:25AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>>> Package: dtc
>>> Severity: grave
>>> Justification: renders package unusable
>>>
>>>
>>> in the debian_config script yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Package: dtc
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> in the debian_config script you can find oddities like:
>
> if [ ""$conf_use_nated_vhosts = "true" -o ""$conf_use_nated_vhosts =
> "yes" ]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Package: dtc
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 3.9
>
> This question is:
> * modifying another package configuration which is completely against
> the policy
> * doing a warning that mysql-server is already
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 21:01:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line jamvm: missing file: /usr/lib/logging.properties
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Version: 2:0.92-4
FWIW, Nicolas has given a very good analysis of this bug, but his mail was
only sent to control@, not to the bug itself.
Here is his mail:
> Hello,
> Thanks Michel and Matthew for your answers.
> I'm reassigning this bug to classpath. It is fixed upstream in classpath
> 0.92.
Enrico,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 07:30:04PM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
> http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx
> says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int.
Microsoft's docs are totally useless for correctly implementing ODBC on
64-bit architectures. Please explain the /problem/
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Package: dtc
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 10.7
>
>
> Not to mention that /root do not necessarily exists ...
It does NOT do that anymore already in the uploaded version, in fact it
saves in /var/lib/dtc as it has been recommended to me by some people in
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:17:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#412387: fixed in apt-proxy 1.9.35-0.3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Hi folks,
Hmm, lots of proposed patches on this one. :) Well, upgrading directly from
woody to etch is not supported, but it's possible for a user to have removed
the woody version of the package without purging it, and then install the
etch version, and perhaps that would trigger this code path.
Hello,
> In the meanwhile, adding a conflicts between python-zodb and zope3 is the
> quickest way to solve the issue. For lenny, we'll modularize the whole zope
> package as upstream is planning.
So, who is adding this conflict? It looks like it's easier to add the
conflict in python-zodb, which
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:01:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414401: arch2darcs: FTBFS in Etch: build-depends on
libghc6-hslogger-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
Please don't close this bug until the actual fix is available... I
can't find it in the pool yet -- and it's still broken on my system.
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#405704: imapproxy: fails to start - breaks install/upgrade,
whi
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 19:01:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414401: arch2darcs: FTBFS in Etch: build-depends on
libghc6-hslogger-dev
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt w
clone 386469 -1
tags -1 =patch
reassign -1 update-inetd
retitle -1 update-inetd: no reason to restart inetd on service removal
severity -1 important
thanks
Discussing with Marco on IRC, it seems he's reluctant to have inetd running
when no services are configured, but it's clear in any case that
u
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 386469 -1
Bug#386469: "openbsd-inetd, action "start" failed" when upgrading
Bug 386469 cloned as bug 414485.
> tags -1 =patch
Bug#414485: "openbsd-inetd, action "start" failed" when upgrading
Tags were: help
Tags set to: patch
> reassign -1 upda
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 414478 grave
Bug#414478: dtc: ETOOMUCHCRACK quote
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databa
severity 414478 normal
thanks
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 12:49:25AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Package: dtc
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
>
> in the debian_config script you can find oddities like:
>
> if [ ""$conf_use_nated_vhosts = "true" -o ""$conf_use
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 414478 normal
Bug#414478: dtc: ETOOMUCHCRACK quote
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
Package: dtc
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
in the debian_config script you can find oddities like:
if [ ""$conf_use_nated_vhosts = "true" -o ""$conf_use_nated_vhosts = "yes"
] ; then
or
if [ ""$RET = "true" -o ""$RET = "yes" ] ; then
Please learn pro
Package: dtc
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 3.9
This question is:
* modifying another package configuration which is completely against
the policy
* doing a warning that mysql-server is already doing, hence making it
twice. this is abuse.
-- System Information:
Debian Rele
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.2.6-5
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Hi,
dtc-xen creates files in /etc/dtc-xen in its postinst, in particular ssl
private keys, and only after that chmods them. This means that they is
a race condition which makes these files readable by anyone.
Cheers,
Julien
si
Package: dtc-xen
Version: 0.2.6-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
dtc-xen's postinst creates (19!!) users with home directories under
/home, and will break if /home is on nfs (which is a pretty common
setup). If the users already exist (not necessarily created by this
package), it will override their sett
Your message dated Mon, 12 Mar 2007 01:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405704: fixed in up-imapproxy 1.2.4-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: dtc
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.7
Not to mention that /root do not necessarily exists ...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:36:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414381: sshfs from testing-proposed-updates is
uninstallable due wrong dependences
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has be
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:57:10PM -0400, Mike Young wrote:
> So I decided to try some of the other packages that I upgraded
> previously at the same time.
> They all seemed to go well except for uw-imapd (the one with the error
> previously).
> This time around there was a more serious error th
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:55:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libtowitoko2: postinst calls wrong paramter for pscd restart
install fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 15:55:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line libtowitoko2: postinst calls wrong paramter for pscd restart
install fails
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt wit
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 413116 classpath 0.91-3
Bug#413116: jamvm: missing file: /usr/lib/logging.properties
Bug reassigned from package `jamvm' to `classpath'.
> # I tested it with 0.92-4, but 0.92-1 was probably fixed too.
> notfound 413116 0.92-4
Bug#413116: jamvm
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
> > Last time, when i reported bug, was on host workinprogress and update from
> > -3 to -4 .
> > Today i updated host freedom from -4 to -5 and the failure was the same,
> > this time also locked the update o
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Norman Messtorff wrote:
> Attached you will find a logfile with my trials and the snipplet of my
> dpkg.log from upgrade on 2007-03-05.
Ok, but this dpkg.log only shows the status of openbsd-inetd *after* the
upgrade has been started. Context at the begin
Version: 2.0.7-7.3
Hello,
This bug was fixed in the above-mentioned NMU version, but unfortunately the
bug closure message never reached the BTS due to a mail problem in the BTS.
The changelog for this NMU is as follows.
towitoko (2.0.7-7.3) unstable; urgency=high
* Non-maintainer upload.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/11/2007 02:50 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 10:01:22PM -0300, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
> wrote:
>>> But there is a problem with this translation:
>
>>> @@ -319,6 +305,8 @@
>>> #: ../templates:9001
>>> msgid "LDAP
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Nicolas Fran�ois wrote:
Otherwise, I either can't reproduce this bug or don't understand the
problem described in this bug: Is it that jamvm doesn't work, or just that
the java.util.logging package cannot be configured?
Jamvm does not work on the trivial Java program _when
Nicolas François wrote:
Michel, Matthew, Bob, can you confirm that this bug still exists?
Can you try the above example? And if it works, can you also provide an
application which fails?
Your example works fine when loading the class directly from the filesystem:
$ jamvm -Djava.util.logging.co
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 20:50 +0100, Amaya wrote:
> Regis Boudin wrote:
> > For more informations, see bug #357439 :
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357439
>
> Regis, do you think we can merge these?
I'm not sure the BTS would be very happy about merging bugs assigned to
differ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 404875 toolbar-fancy
Bug#404875: toolbar-fancy: Appears to do nothing
Bug reassigned from package `toolbar-fancy' to `toolbar-fancy'.
> close 404875
Bug#404875: toolbar-fancy: Appears to do nothing
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.
reassign 404875 toolbar-fancy
close 404875
thanks
Since the version it was found and fixed in are the same, the BTS
assumes it's still open. So I'm clearing the version information.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 402675 4.0.0-1
Bug#402675: l10n broken
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 4.0.0-1, send any further explanations to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
close 402675 4.0.0-1
thanks
Marking as closed in 4.0.0-1, since there wasn't any "4.0" in Debian.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regis Boudin wrote:
> For more informations, see bug #357439 :
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357439
Regis, do you think we can merge these?
--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' :-- Emma Goldma
Tomas Pospisek wrote:
You could have a try at downgrading openbsd-inetd manually (through
dpkg) back to 0.20050402-4 [1] and then try to reproduce the problem
again with aptitude...
?
*t
I went ahead and downgraded openbsd-inetd back to 0.20050402-4 and
retried the upgrade.
Everything went s
Hello,
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms714556.aspx
says that SQL_C_SLONG represents a long int.
convert.c has it like this:
case SQL_C_SLONG:
case SQL_C_LONG:
len = 4;
if (bind_size > 0)
*((SDWORD *) rgbValueBindR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 394142 0.3.0-1
Bug#394142: FTBSF on ia64: error CS0136: A local variable named `args' cannot
be declared...
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 0.3.0-1, send any further explanat
close 394142 0.3.0-1
thanks
So, the problem is that the changelog in unstable and in testing don't
seem to perfectly match.
In testing we have: 0.2.1-1 -> 0.2.1-1.1
In unstable we have: 0.2.1-1 -> 0.2.1-1ubuntu1 -> 0.2.1-1.1
So the BTS thinks that the version in testing and the version in
unstab
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: elilo
> Version: 3.6-3
> Severity: grave
> Tags: d-i
>
> In my d-i logs, after elilo-installer reports elilo fails to install:
>
> Mar 11 17:51:23 apt-install: Setting up elilo (3.6-3) ...
> Mar 11 17:51:23 apt-install: dpkg: --compare-versions ta
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:47:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413698: fixed in aptitude 0.4.4-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
The actual problem failing the install is farther on:
Mar 11 17:51:23 apt-install: Running elilo...
Mar 11 17:51:23 apt-install: elilo: /etc/elilo.conf: No such file or directory
Mar 11 17:51:24 apt-install: dpkg: error processing elilo (--configure):
Mar 11 17:51:24 apt-install: subprocess post-
Package: elilo
Version: 3.6-3
Severity: grave
Tags: d-i
In my d-i logs, after elilo-installer reports elilo fails to install:
Mar 11 17:51:23 apt-install: Setting up elilo (3.6-3) ...
Mar 11 17:51:23 apt-install: dpkg: --compare-versions takes three arguments:
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Hi,
I can reproduce the problem with i386, too. Working on it.
Thanks,
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Thomas,
> Unless I'm not misstaken (there are only indications but no evidence so
> far), then the cause of the problem we're witnessing here is, that
> /etc/init.d/openbsd-inetd stop is aparently *not* being executed before
> the update. Can anybody refute this?
>
> - In case you happe
Very strange, but i cannot reproduce this bug again on my machine.
Upgrade from:
-3 to -4: no problems
-4 to -5: no problems
-3 to -5: no problems
-5 plain install: no problems.
Every time purged the package.
Downgrade from:
-5 to -4: no problems
All on the same machine i've reported some
On Sun, 11 Mar 2007, Leonardo Boselli wrote:
Last time, when i reported bug, was on host workinprogress and update from
-3 to -4 .
Today i updated host freedom from -4 to -5 and the failure was the same,
this time also locked the update of ipopd .
After i stopped by hand openbsd-inetd the two pa
Package: zoneminder
Version: 1.22.3-1
Severity: serious
sbuild uses the first alternative of a build-depends. Please put
libmysqlclient15-dev in first position of the alternative.
> Automatic build of zoneminder_1.22.3-1 on maxwell by sbuild/kfreebsd-i386 98
> Build started at 2007031
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 397400 rpm
Bug#397400: rpm_4.4.1-11_sparc: FTBFS: relocation truncated to fit
Bug reassigned from package `rpm' to `rpm'.
> close 397400
Bug#397400: rpm_4.4.1-11_sparc: FTBFS: relocation truncated to fit
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.d
reassign 397400 rpm
close 397400
thanks
This bug was marked as found and fixed in the same version so the code
assumed this bug was still open. Removing the versions since this
doesn't look like a bug in rpm.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:02:50PM -0600, Bob Black wrote:
> Does anyone have a logging.properties file that works with jamvm
> (+ classpath)?
jamvm uses classpath's java.util.logging. I don't think it would require
any special content.
Here is an example:
== logging.properties
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 01:56:42PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:44 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
>> I'm suggesting either. I'm happy to maintain the package seperately, but
>> I intend to go through the differences between the versions and confirm
>> that they are compati
Package: srcinst
Version: 0.8.7
Severity: serious
Tags: etch
This package fails to build in Etch (but not in Sid) due to
libghc6-hslogger-dev not being available in Etch.
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:00:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automatic build of srcinst_0.8.7 on qa by sbuild/amd64
Package: arch2darcs
Version: 1.0.9
Severity: serious
Tags: etch
This package fails to build in Etch (but not in Sid) due to
libghc6-hslogger-dev not being available in Etch.
>
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:05:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Automatic build of arch2darcs_1.0.9 on qa by sbuil
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 413910 normal
Bug#413910: bins: missing dependencies for bins-edit-gui
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 413910 normal
thanks
* Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-11 15:32]:
> If bins-edit-gui depends on libgladexml-perl, then the Debian package
> shipping bins-edit-gui must have "Depends: libgladexml-perl". Same for
> the other missing dependencies. Maybe you want to put bins-edit-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 413910 bins
Bug#413910: bins: needs libglade-gnome0 but libgladexml-perl depends on
libglade0 not libglade-gnome0
Bug reassigned from package `libgladexml-perl' to `bins'.
> severity 413910 serious
Bug#413910: bins: needs libglade-gnome0 but
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:02:00 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#333835: fixed in ctrlproxy 3.0.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:00:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#411975: fixed in dballe 3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Yes, yes I know. This bug is actually a mixed thing somewhere between
wxWidgets, Mesa and Xorg.
And you're running GLX without DRI, which is (almost) the only situation
triggering the bug I have seen.
For more informations, see bug #357439 :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357439
So far, none of the people reporting this bug have provided information that
can be used to track it down. Most users are quoting the failure to set up
openbsd-inetd -- that's not news, what we need is output from the *unpack*
stage of the upgrade showing why the attempt to *stop* the previous ine
Package: libimdb-film-perl
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: serious
As the imdb.com website is likely to change during the lifetime of a
stabel release, and because this will break libimdb-film-perl's
functionality, the package should not be released in stable/main. I
am considering uploading it to vola
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:54:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > Could you please re-NMU with the correct shlibs info?
>
>> Please take my apologies, uploaded with the following updated patch:
>
>> diff -N
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 13:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409644: fixed in fuse 2.5.3-4.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:28:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405606: fixed in aiccu 20070115-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:54:24PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could you please re-NMU with the correct shlibs info?
> Please take my apologies, uploaded with the following updated patch:
> diff -Nur fuse-2.5.3.old/debian/changelog fuse-2.5.3/debian
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:28:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405606: fixed in aiccu 20070115-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:28:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405610: fixed in aiccu 20070115-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Package: sshfs
Version: 1.6-1+b1
Severity: grave
It depends on non-existed package libfuse, but should depend on
libfuse2, like version from testing or unstable.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing-proposed-updates
APT policy: (720, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (720
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 10:07:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#413969: asterisk: Fails to start after not being able to
find format_mp3.so
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been deal
Hi Giuseppe,
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 12:31:22PM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 10/03/2007 alle 14.43 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> > Here's the final NMU diff for the NMU which I'm uploading. The NMU will be
> > uploaded to incoming shortly.
> [...]
> I prepared a new uploa
Hi Simon,
Here is a shorter patch, that implements the pcscd restart in a
policy-compliant fashion. This uses invoke-rc.d directly, without checking
if pcscd is already running. This does carry the possibility that pcscd
will be started when it's not already running, but only in circumstances
th
On 2007-03-11 01:19 -0800, Frank Bauer wrote:
> I do understand that Ion3 is not finished yet and you as the author of this
> gem should know the best when the software is "stable", but as I mentioned
> earlier, some features from Ion3 are huge usability improvement over Ion2
> and current snapshot
Quotting Tuomo Valkonen:
"Why do you want a random broken and unsupported development snapshot?"
It works for me (and for my friends) just fine. I'm using it right now, as I
recently
switched from stable to testing just to get the idea about the upcoming Etch.
Quotting Tuomo Valkonen:
"Can't y
Package: amaya
Version: 9.53~dfsg.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I can't start amaya, and I have this message :
(amaya:2766): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_widget_set_colormap: assertion
`!GTK_WIDGET_REALIZED (widget)' failed
The program 'amaya' received an X Window System er
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:28:47 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#405610: fixed in aiccu 20070115-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Il giorno sab, 10/03/2007 alle 14.43 -0800, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Here's the final NMU diff for the NMU which I'm uploading. The NMU will be
> uploaded to incoming shortly.
[...]
Hi Steve,
I prepared a new upload for this package too. It has been ready for one
week now sin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 333052 important
Bug#333052: race in the modules loader?
Bug#333522: udev: modules randomly aren't loaded at startup - "Unknown symbol"
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Sun, 11 Mar 2007 14:04:05 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#414280: Kernel 2.6.18 causes software to hang / use 100%
CPU
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Hello Tomas,
On 10/03/2007, at 9:16 AM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
...
Note the line "Stopping internet superserver: inetd.". This line is
not present in ... Ben Low's report [2] (maybe just not visible
there, since not the whole screen dump is included),
...
My apologies for the overzealous tri
Hey Srdjan,
This original message couldn't get through ;-(
Mark
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Date: Sunday 11 March 2007 10:06
From: Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message was created au
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 414280 linux-2.6
Bug#414280: Kernel 2.6.18 causes software to hang / use 100% CPU
Warning: Unknown package 'linux-image-2.6-'
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6-*' to `linux-2.6'.
> --
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
severity 333052 important
thanks
Ok, there's been precisely one report of this problem by a user in the last
9 months. While it's possible that there is still a race condition in
module-init-tools, it seems unlikely that a real bug of this nature would
have been hit by so few people when m-i-t is
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 17:44 +1100, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> I'm suggesting either. I'm happy to maintain the package seperately, but
> I intend to go through the differences between the versions and confirm
> that they are compatible, and steal anything good from the php-bundled
> version, so in
tag 410106 pending
thanks
I've prepared a NMU of libpng from experimental, which does what vorlon
suggested, symlinking libpng12.pc to libpng14.pc (as it's currently done
with libpng.pc)
The debdiff is attached to the bug report, it has correctly built
gtk2-engines-xfce and I'm currently rebuildi
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
