Hi,
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 20:48 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > * postrm|inst: Check for update-modules before calling.
> > Fixes: "gom: postinst fails: line 21: update-modules: command not
> > found", thanks to Lucas Nussbaum (Closes: #408243).
>
> Why is this the right fix? More sp
Am Freitag 02 Februar 2007 06:36 schrieb Cajus Pollmeier:
> Am 02.02.2007 um 06:03 schrieb Steve Langasek:
> > This bug still affects testing, and unstable only has a fix in the
> > form of a
> > new upstream version. Is anyone preparing a backport fix for etch?
>
> I sent a patch for sarge - whic
Your message dated Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:47:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408469: fixed in ca-certificates 20061027.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case i
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 06:57:49AM +0100, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Please let kernel-patch-grsecurity2 to testing. It's a new upstream
> release (add support of 2.6.19.2 and 2.4.32), but fixes CVE-2007-0257.
> I think adding such a kernel patchset won't instabilize Etch in any way.
According
> > Minimal (untested) change, but that should make it, no?
>
> > Another brutal solution is of course testing the existence of the
> > directory before running the find on it
>
> Yes, this change appears to be sufficient to solve the current problem.
> You'll want to quote the "$h", btw.
OK.
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 08:34:47AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Definitely..:)
> I'm afraid that my NMU, intended for simple l10n stuff, just revealed
> that problem.
> > I believe you MUST be able to remove a package more than once,
> > idempotently (policy 6.2), but currently, you cannot.
Am 02.02.2007 um 06:03 schrieb Steve Langasek:
This bug still affects testing, and unstable only has a fix in the
form of a
new upstream version. Is anyone preparing a backport fix for etch?
I sent a patch for sarge - which hasn't been applied since then. Will
check, if that patch applies
This bug still affects testing, and unstable only has a fix in the form of a
new upstream version. Is anyone preparing a backport fix for etch?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move th
Hello,
> * postrm|inst: Check for update-modules before calling.
> Fixes: "gom: postinst fails: line 21: update-modules: command not
> found", thanks to Lucas Nussbaum (Closes: #408243).
Why is this the right fix? More specifically -- if gom depends on
update-modules being called for p
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.7-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 9.1.2
The change requested in 408154 is a policy violation. Packages are not
allowed to ship any directories under the /usr/local heirarchy; they must be
created in the postinst and removed in the prerm.
This bug now blocks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408450 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#408450: Sporadic abort() when using libnss-ldap
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> severity 408450 important
Bug#408450: Sporadic abort() when using libnss-ldap
Severity set to `import
tags 408450 moreinfo unreproducible
severity 408450 important
thanks
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:18:10PM -0600, Jim Studt wrote:
> I noticed my postfix bouncing mail when 'deliver' failed with a glibc
> malloc checking memory error.
> Investigation showed it to always occur in a getpwnam() call.
Your message dated Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:17:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407538: fixed in netbase 4.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
severity 408406 important
thanks
Sorry, I don't see any reason that this bug should be considered 'grave'.
You've indicated in bug #408450 that the malloc crash is ultimately caused
by libnss-ldap, not by deliver itself. The behavior of the malloc checker
here is reasonable, the behavior of deliv
Your message dated Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:17:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407538: fixed in netbase 4.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 408406 important
Bug#408406: glibc malloc checker can abort deliver resulting in bounced mail
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system ad
Your message dated Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:17:01 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#407538: fixed in netbase 4.29
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 407172 serious
Bug#407172: wodim: Bad driver opts 'burnfree'
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
tags 408390 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 10:24:14AM -0500, Clint Adams wrote:
> Package: vlc-nox
> Version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1
> Severity: grave
> Also applies to 0.8.6.a.debian-1
> I did an 'aptitude install vlc', and tried to run vlc from an xterm:
> zsh/2 12
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408390 moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#408390: vlc-nox: segfaults under X
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 409312 serious
Bug#409312: missing dependency on libwpd8c2a
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you nee
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 408373 important
Bug#408373: scribble: contains non-free data
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, De
"peter green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reopen 380552
> thanks
>
> looks like this is still an issue.
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=5.97-5.3;arch=s390;stamp=1170189620
> FAIL: pwd-long
Thanks for reporting that.
Somehow, even gnulib's getcwd is failing,
and then the rob
severity 408373 important
thanks
On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 01:12:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> Package: scribble
> Version: 1.10-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: Policy 2.2.1
> The file "Official Long Words List.txt" in the source package, which
> seems to be used to compile the wordlis
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 15:06 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > - It doesn't segfault when debian.exe does not exist prior to running.
> > - If you remove all the LoadLanguageFile lines, it won't segfault either.
>
> Sorry, but this isn't reproducible at all for me using the 2.19-2 version
> tha
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 380552
Bug#380552: coreutils - FTBFS
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug#407628: coreutils FTBFS on s390
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping
reopen 380552
thanks
looks like this is still an issue.
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=coreutils;ver=5.97-5.3;arch=s390;stamp=1170189620
FAIL: pwd-long
Your message dated Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:02:18 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409307: fixed in tau 2.15.6b1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi Martin,
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 12:14:09PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Automatic build of sshfs-fuse_1.6-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52
> > make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sshfs-fuse-1.6'
> > if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT
> > -DFUSE_USE_VERS
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 409281 + pending
Bug#409281: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libdb4.4-java
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 409225 + moreinfo
Bug#409225: Can't update from python-uno_2.1-2 to python-uno_2.1-3
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: moreinfo
> severity 409225 important
Bug#409225: Can't update from python-uno_2.1-2 to python-uno_2.1-3
Severity set to `import
severity 397389 normal
thanks
Sorry for the late reply. Unfortunately your report never made it to our
mailing list due to its size. The installation-report package has been
modified now so hopefully this will not happen as easily in the future.
> Comments/Problems:
> 1. Everything was dandy up
tag 409225 + moreinfo
severity 409225 important
reassign 409225 pythoon-central
thanks
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Today while trying to update python-uno from version 2.1-2 to 2.1-3,
> I've got:
>
> Preparing to replace python-uno 2.1-2 (using .../python-uno_2.1-3_i386.deb)
> ...
> Traceback
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 409281 experimental
Bug#409281: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libdb4.4-java
Tags were: pending experimental
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing h
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 397389 normal
Bug#397389: installation-report: Installation report [daily i386 image] Show
stopper bugs
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 409288 experimental
Bug#409288: nscd: does not start because of missing libssp.so.0
Tags were: experimental
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Hi,
I have a little bit more info on this bug. The seminar style is also
included in tetex-extra:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dlocate seminar.sty
tetex-extra: /usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/seminar/seminar.sty
latex-beamer: /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/beamer/emulation/beamerseminar.sty
texpower: /usr/s
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:40:02PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> reopen 398421
> thanks
> I'm afraid it's not fixed yet! (at least, not all the 64-bit issues)
> Now it doesn't segfault right away, but segfaults are still very common
> when processing real nsi files.
> How to reproduce:
> svn
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:40:02PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> Given the current state of this package wrt 64-bit support, maybe it'd be
> a good idea to ship the i386 version only. After all, for a developer it's
> not a big problem to use a chroot for building her installers.
(or building
Package: casper
Version: 1.79+debian-1
Severity: serious
/etc/rc0.d/S89casper attempts to use the 'file' command, but 'file' is
not required by the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 409281 experimental
Bug#409281: FTBFS: Missing build-dependency on libdb4.4-java
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
Package: tau-racy
Version: 2.15.6b1-3
Severity: serious
tau-racy expects to find taud and pprof in non-existent
/usr/lib/tau/unknown/bin/, because of the way the package is built.
This is a fatal error preventing the use of racy, which is the only
graphical frontend shipped for TAU in etch.
-- Sy
Package: java-common
Version: 0.25
Severity: grave
After migrating from java 1.5 to java6, my jre was not
working anymore in my browser, complaining it could not find the java
binary. After following the symlinks, I found out that /etc/alternatives
was still pointing to java 1.5.
/usr/share/doc/su
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409213: fixed in libgd2 2.0.34~rc1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
> Package: sshfs-fuse
> Version: 1.6-1
> Severity: serious
>
> > Automatic build of sshfs-fuse_1.6-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52
> ...
> > make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sshfs-fuse-1.6'
> > if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT
> > -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=26 -DLI
reopen 398421
thanks
I'm afraid it's not fixed yet! (at least, not all the 64-bit issues)
Now it doesn't segfault right away, but segfaults are still very common
when processing real nsi files.
How to reproduce:
svn co -r 44882 svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/people/rmh/win32-loader
cd win32-load
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 398421
Bug#398421: segfaults on startup (amd64)
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
Your message dated Thu, 1 Feb 2007 21:07:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#409277: cant start mysql-server-5.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: bulmages-admin
Version: 0.5.9+svn20061021+20061210-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On executing "nuevaemp" prints:
/usr/bin/nuevaemp: line 3: /usr/share/bulmages/dbmodels/creabulmages: No
existe el fichero o el directorio
So no new enterprises can be created. I
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> tags 409288 + experimental
Bug#409288: nscd: does not start because of missing libssp.so.0
There were no tags set.
Tags added: experimental
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Hi!
While waiting for this bug to be properly fixed, a possible workaround
can be moving the offending file away, before the netbase package
is installed, and then restoring the original version of the file
back to its correct location.
Detailed workaround description:
* proceed with the instal
Package: nscd
Version: 2.5-0exp3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
here is the problem:
# /etc/init.d/nscd start
Starting Name Service Cache Daemon: nscd/usr/sbin/nscd: error while loading
shared libraries: libssp.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or
Package: openoffice.org
Version: 2.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
checking for /usr/share/java/libdb4.4-java.jar... no
configure: error: db Java bindings not found
make[1]: *** [stamp/build] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 05:16:11PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:38:03PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
So, as a workaround for Etch until this is fixed (presumably by upstream
changes to udev and/or the kernel), how about changing the following lines
in the udev initr
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:02:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Package: mysql-server-5.0
Version: 1 09:58:46 monitor su(pam_unix)[27393]: authentication failure;
logname=ellanos uid=614 euid=0 tty= ruser=fflores rhost= user=root
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT
[ adding mika on cc ]
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 04:38:03PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote:
> Looking at:
> http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gi/tools/draklive?revision=1.116&view=markup
>
> there's an interesting line which sleeps while the usb storage scanning
> kernel thread is running (sea
Looking at:
http://cvs.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gi/tools/draklive?revision=1.116&view=markup
there's an interesting line which sleeps while the usb storage scanning
kernel thread is running (search the page for usb-stor-scan).
The usb scanning thread is called usb-stor-scan and the scsi sc
Hi --
rafkill saves to the working directory. If you start it via the menu, this is
the home directory. But if you start via the command line, it's whatever
directory you happen to be in. You can reproduce the bug by starting in a
directory to which you don't have write permission.
I don't kno
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 00:12 +0100, Ton van Oostveen wrote:
> The link you posted does not help me any further, permissions of the
> plugin are ok.
> I could try to compile Ekiga and libs on my own, but I prefer a working
> Debian version.
Did you also try strace to see if ekiga can find the plugin
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 13:17:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#387717: fixed in tnftp 20050625-0.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
tags 387717 patch
stop
Hi,
I've created a patch and NMU'ed it to DELAYED/0 according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
The patch is attached.
The problem was, that upstream renamed a few releases ago the binary
from tnftp to ftp -- but the maintainer forg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 387717 patch
Bug#387717: tnftp not listed as ftp alternative
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408269: fixed in nufw 2.0.9-5.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408364: fixed in karrigell 2.3.2-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.2-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of audacity_1.3.2-1 on lxdebian.bfinv.de by sbuild/s390 98
[...]
> make[5]: Entering directory
> `/build/buildd/audacity-1.3.2/lib-src/soundtouch/source/SoundTouch'
>
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408364 patch
Bug#408364: karrigell: must pre-depend on adduser, not depend on it
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
tags 408364 patch
stop
Hi,
I've created a patch moving adduser to the pre-depends and NMU'ed it to
DELAYED/0 according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
The patch is attached.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian Venthur ht
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:02:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408251: fixed in maildir-bulletin 0.68
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: sshfs-fuse
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: serious
> Automatic build of sshfs-fuse_1.6-1 on em64t by sbuild/amd64 0.52
...
> make[2]: Entering directory `/build/tbm/sshfs-fuse-1.6'
> if x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -D_REENTRANT
> -DFUSE_USE_VERSION=26 -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\"
tags 408269 patch
stop
Hi,
I've created a patch adding passwd and adduser (the package uses adduser
in it's preinst too) to the pre-depends and NMU'ed it to DELAYED/0
according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
The patch is attached.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408269 patch
Bug#408269: nauth: missing pre-dep on passwd
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
tags 408251 patch
stop
Hi,
I've created a patch adding adduser to the pre-depends and NMU'ed it to
DELAYED/0 according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
The patch is attached.
This package seems to need some packaging love.
Cheers,
Bastian
--
Bastian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408251 patch
Bug#408251: maildir-bulletin: missing pre-dep on adduser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408248: fixed in ldapdns 2.06-3.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:17:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#408270: fixed in onak 0.3.2-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:46:42AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I've created a patch adding adduser to the depends and NMU'ed it to
> DELAYED/0 according to
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
>
> In order to be as minimal invasive as possible I did not to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408248 patch
Bug#408248: ldapdns: missing dep on adduser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs da
tags 408248 patch
stop
Hi,
I've created a patch adding adduser to the depends and NMU'ed it to
DELAYED/0 according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
The patch is attached, please note that this package uses yada and has a
very unusual packaging style.
Ch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 408270 patch
Bug#408270: onak: missing dep on adduser
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs datab
tags 408270 patch
stop
Hi,
I've created a patch adding adduser to the depends and NMU'ed it to
DELAYED/0 according to
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/09/msg00020.html
In order to be as minimal invasive as possible I did not touch the
postrm as Masami did in his proposed pat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 409243 normal
Bug#409243: fails to boot.
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Deb
82 matches
Mail list logo
