serverity 402903 serious
merge 402903 403119
thanks
Hi
This problem is probably not solveable in ssh as this has to
do with package dependencies.
Two problems can exist:
* apt do not handle the replaces field correctly (or have some other problem)
* ssh should conflict and replace all versions
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 09:36 +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> > There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
>
> Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
> uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
>
On 12/18/06, Remi Vanicat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
$ DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer dpkg --configure --pending
Setting up torrentflux (2.1-7) ...
debconf (developer): frontend started
debconf (developer): frontend running, package name is torrentflux
debconf (developer): starting /var/lib/dpkg/info/to
Hi
Sorry misread the bug report. Thought that it was reinstalled when
removing the link. But in this report it was reinstalled when moving
it to disabled.
Regards,
// Ola
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:59:45AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> severity 403317 serious
> thanks
>
> * Ola Lundqvist ([EMA
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 12:46:52AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * H. S. Teoh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:39]:
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:53:38PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > >
> > > [H. S. Teoh]
> > > > Hi, the old patch (currently in unstable) already works---my test was
> > > > inva
I can confirm this bug.
This might be related to some compatibility with libgtk2.0-0 ?
% script log.gtk
% strace gtkdialog
% exit
% grep ^open /tmp/log.gtk | grep -v ENOENT | \
sed -e 's/^.*"\(.*\)",.*/\1/' |xargs grep -li gtkdialog
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
Cheers
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Package: ktrack
Version: 0.3.0-alpha1-8.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package ktrack crashes upon startup from the command line with the
signal 11 (SIGSEV). The shell prints out "ktrack: ERROR: Communication
problem with ktrack, it probably crashed.", and a debug r
tags 403083 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
I did try it with 0.16.2.
So this doesn't help at all.
Could you tell me exactly what command you used to build?
It is sounding like this is a Haddock bug anyway.
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 01:19:27AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> severity 403083 serious
Package: gtkdialog
Version: 2:0.7.9-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I try to run it I get:
** ERROR **: GtkDialog: Could not find the dialog description in the
environment variable 'MAIN_DIALOG'.
aborting...
Aborted
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
A
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403082: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403081: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403081: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 00:47:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403082: fixed in mysql-dfsg-5.0 5.0.30-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 396838 pciutils-dev
Bug#396838: toshset: FTBFS: undefined reference to `gzopen'
Bug reassigned from package `toshset' to `pciutils-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
reassign 396838 pciutils-dev
thanks
Yes, I have the same problem with toshset, so I also reassign it to
pciutils-dev as the bugs in most other packages are reassigned as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/lib$ objdump -t libpci.a | grep gz
*UND* gzopen
*UND*
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> To be honest, I'm beginning to think that trying to manage the inetd
> entries using debconf is actually a mistake and doomed to
> failure. Maybe the first time the package is installed, it can be
> correct and accurate, but later on it's not possible t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403083 serious
Bug#403083: missingh: FTBFS:
dist/build/tmp/MissingH/IO/Binary.hs:"dist/build/tmp/MissingH/IO/Binary.hs":
219:1: Parse error
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tags 403083 - unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#403083: missingh:
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.06-3
Severity: serious
There are currently at least two reports floating around that seem to have
the same root cause: the way devmapper devices are created for lvm
partitions. The relevant reports are:
http://bugs.debian.org/401393 (currently against lilo)
http://bug
Well, after a bit more playing ...
ubuntu 6.10 (edgy), does have a similar problem. It cannot find the cdrom
device (our netinst isos have the same problem).
I tried then a Yellow Dog 4.1 install, and it worked fine, and even was using
udev, altough probably an antiquated version (2.6.15-rc5 base
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061214 08:41]:
> I uploaded an NMU of your package to experimental to see if the test
> case really works on buildds.
It failed as expected on powerpc and also on sparc, and worked on at
least amd64 and powerpc - so I think this package can be uploaded to
unsta
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 04:29:10AM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote:
>On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>
>> >Only enabling it using dpkg-reconfigure makes changes persistent accross
>> >upgrades.
>>
>> Pardon me for being dense, but I don't see a way in the postinst of
>> knowing whether I'm
On Monday 18 December 2006 07:15, José L. Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
> Package: ghdl
> Severity: serious
>
> Currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under
> plain GPL and assigns this copyright only to Tristan Gingold.
>
> But, the source tarball contains, at dir vhdl/librari
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 403660 normal
Bug#403660: abcde: copyright file points to non-existent upstream
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please c
* H. S. Teoh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061218 19:39]:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:53:38PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [H. S. Teoh]
> > > Hi, the old patch (currently in unstable) already works---my test was
> > > invalid because I upgraded apache2 but forgot to upgrade libapr1. Do
> > > you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 235026 pending
Bug#235026: dbmail: Init scripts
Tags were: wontfix sid
Tags added: pending
> tags 236406 pending
Bug#236406: dbmail: Need for Common package
Tags were: wontfix patch
Tags add
Note that broken external links are not grounds for RC bug reports.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403317 serious
Bug#403317: upgrading openvpn removes/recreates the init.d links
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Package: apache2
Version: 2.2.3-3.2
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
>From my build log:
| Automatic build of apache2_2.2.3-3.2 on shockley by sbuild/kfreebsd-amd64 85
| Build started at 20061218-1
On Thursday December 14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 05:20:34PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > No modification required if we remove it from upstream too. Do people
> > use it?
>
> It seems like nobody does, judging from the response. Is there any chance of
> a relativel
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 09:49:36AM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
>> It seems like nobody does, judging from the response. Is there any chance of
>> a relatively quick 1.0.11 without nhfsstone? We have frozen in Debian at the
>> moment, but fixing such a license bug would probably be allowed past the
>>
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 10:29 +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> There has been a regression on your package since 2.4.32-1.
Oh crap. Thanks for the report(s), a properly fixed version will be
uploaded later today, as soon as I'm able.
cheers.
--
Nathan
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:11:30AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-17 02:52]:
> > I just saw the discussion on #394392 mm/msync issue... this may be the
> > same thing presumably strace changes the timing...
>
> Yes, I just wanted to ask you wh
On December 18, 2006 at 8:00PM +0100,
arnaud (at andesi.org) wrote:
> I would like to NMU t-gnus this week except if you intend to do an
> upload soon.
Go ahead. I (submitter of bug#245826) haven't made a plan for NMU.
Thanks,
--
Tatsuya Kinoshita
pgpShLSLasBIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:32:05 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403115: fixed in sqlrelay 1:0.38-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello Andreas
Thanks for providing a patch, I will upload the fixed version this evening...
bye,
-christian-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 403181 - patch
Bug#403181: athcool: FTBFS: undefined references to gz*
Tags were: patch
Bug#396640: efibootmgr: FTBFS: undefined reference to `gzopen'
Bug#396730: uswsusp: FTBFS: undefined reference to `gzclose'
Tags removed: patch
> thanks
Stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403317 wishlist
Bug#403317: upgrading openvpn removes/recreates the init.d links
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
severity 403317 wishlist
thanks
Hi
This is how all packages that install an init.d script works
so it is not serious.
If you think this is a big problem then a serious bug should
be filed to update-rc.d instead. It has been like this for a long
time so I hardly think that the release managers th
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:32:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403110: fixed in cpphs 0.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Hi Marco, ...
After further investigation, and thanks to David Härdeman who helped me in
getting the right shell log information out of the scripts, it seems that
the the scsi-devfs.sh script dies (see the attached log) with :
...
+ echo scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc discs/disc0/disc
no
In fact, this problem is taken care of by the dh_installtex snippets,
and the approach is closer to "ignore errors but display a warning" than
to "run the commands iff tex-common is configured, not ignoring errors":
,[ From lmodern's current postrm ]
| case "$1" in
| remove|disappear)
|
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 403081 libmysqlclient15-dev
Bug#403081: mysql-admin: FTBFS: /usr/include/mysql/m_ctype.h:190: error:
expected ':', ',', ';', '}' or '__attribute__' before 'ATTRIBUTE_FORMAT_FPTR'
Bug reassigned from package `mysql-admin' to `libmysqlclient15-d
reassign 403081 libmysqlclient15-dev
reassign 403082 libmysqlclient15-dev
forcemerge 403081 403082
tags 403081 + patch
thanks
/usr/include/mysql/m_ctype.h uses macros defined
in /usr/include/mysql/my_global.h but does not include it.
Including my_global.h in m_ctype.h leads to other problems.
Copy
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notforwarded 402475
Bug#402475: Debian bcm43xx freezes the system
Removed annotation that Bug had been forwarded to
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18530.
> forwarded 402745 https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?18530
Bug#402745: cvs T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: libcgi-formbuilder-perl
> Version: 3.04.01-1
> Severity: serious
>
> This new upstream version of CGI::FormBuilder has some behavior changes
> and at least one outright bug that, collectively, make it not work with
> versio
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:56:13 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line The page has been restored
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respons
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 08:16:44PM +0100, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
> There is an error earlier in the process. Can you move
> /var/backups/dc=dmz,... move out of the way and try aptitude upgrade again ?
Yes I already tried this and then started an apt-get -f install, it
seems to rebuild this backu
Hello,
I would like to NMU t-gnus this week except if you intend to do an
upload soon.
Regards,
Arnaud Fontaine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, I'm not sure how to fix this. There's a reason why
> the update-* scripts fail (with an understandable error message) when
> the basic file is missing - so this shouldn't be changed. Should we
> really ignore all errors of update-* in
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403092: fixed in gpsbabel 1.3.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mario Iseli wrote:
> Package: slapd
> Version: 2.3.29-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: causes non-serious data loss
>
> Hello,
>
> last night i updated my 2nd LDAP server (just the one with the
> replication) to etch. The upgrade did not work tot
Package: abcde
Version: 2.3.99.6-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 12.5
The copyright file points to non-existent upstream:
http://www.hispalinux.es/~data/abcde.php
regards,
calum.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Archite
Package: torrentflux
Version: 2.1-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to install both version 2.1-6 in the archive and 2.1-7 in
incomming, torrentflux fails to install with error code 10.
When running with debconf debug I've :
$ DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer dpkg --con
Package: sash
Version: 3.7-7.1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
NMU of this package appears to be no longer statically linked.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (950, 'testing'), (750, 'unstable'), (550, 'stable')
Architecture:
Dear Release Managers,
do you consider the following scenario release-critical? If yes, we
have more than one RC bug:
- $packagemanager install B X
- package A is unpacked
- package B which Depends: A is unpacked
- package X which is unrelated is tried to unpack, but fails (e.g. a
file conflic
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403083 normal
Bug#403083: missingh: FTBFS:
dist/build/tmp/MissingH/IO/Binary.hs:"dist/build/tmp/MissingH/IO/Binary.hs":
219:1: Parse error
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 403083 unreproducible help moreinfo
Bug#403083: missing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403204 normal
Bug#403204: eclipse: still using wrong kdialog syntax
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
severity 403204 normal
thanks
- you should have reopened the original report, not opening a new one.
- the package works ok, when zenity is installed. the severity
therefore is not grave.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
severity 392510 normal
thanks
it's not policy violation.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 392510 normal
Bug#392510: eclipse-rcp: creating files in /usr/local violates FHS
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
severity 403083 normal
tags 403083 unreproducible help moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
I tried building this on i386 and couldn't reproduce the problem. It
worked fine. My version of haddock and ghc6 matched yours.
Also, I checked the Debian buildd logs, and no platforms seemed to have
reported this probl
Package: inform
Version: 6.30-2
Followup-For: Bug #289739
Since this bug's fix is small (and only applies to inform-docs, not
inform) and the reporter seems to be a DD, I was wondering whether he
could NMU it; otherwise inform will not be in etch, which seems a bit
silly for the sake of such a sim
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:36:02 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line FW: Re: Need help with RC #396817
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Aaron M. Ucko a écrit :
> Eric H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Please, is someone can tell me what how to do this "manual intervention" ?
>>
>
> I'd suggest the approach I ended up taking -- namely, moving
> /usr/bin/pycentral aside, upgrading to 0.3.0.r2-2, and moving
> pycentral back
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:53:38PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [H. S. Teoh]
> > Hi, the old patch (currently in unstable) already works---my test was
> > invalid because I upgraded apache2 but forgot to upgrade libapr1. Do
> > you still want me to test the new patch?
>
> Ahh - great to hear
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 04:21:51AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> tags 403216 - patch
> thanks
>
> On Fri, 2006-12-15 at 13:26:41 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Package: dpkg-dev
> > Version: 1.13.24
> > Severity: critical
> > File: /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps
> > Tags: patch
>
> Er, there's n
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 06:33:21PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Package: tetex-base
> > Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems that you can't uninstall the package if things aren't set up
> > properly.
>
> Hm, yes. Wh
tags 370132 + help moreinfo
thanks
Hi Aurelien,
>> snmpd no longer works on ia64. It dies when receiving first query.
> I have got the same exact problem on s390. Given that this bug renders
I tested this in a chroot on merulo and raptor by running snmpd as user
and using a different port numbe
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 11:22 +0100, Leszek Koltunski wrote:
> CFLAGS=-g or CFLAGS='' does not make any difference.
Ah, but not setting CFLAGS is different from setting it to the empty
string. When unset, automake picks some defaults (-O -g) which turns on
optimization.
> But here's another clue: n
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 18:33:19 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403645: libattr1: kdeinit fails to start
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: tetex-base
> Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems that you can't uninstall the package if things aren't set up
> properly.
Hm, yes. What happens is:
- tex-common is unpacked
- tetex-base is unpacked
- the install run fa
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401796: fixed in zope-cmfplone 2.5.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 403419 normal
Bug#403419: typo3-src-4.0: Completely broken: "Cannot find tslib/"
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 403419 +moreinfo
Bug#403419: typo3-src-4.0: Completely broken: "Cannot find tslib/"
There were no tags set.
Tags add
Package: libattr1
Version: 2.4.32-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After today dist-upgrade and reboot, kde failed to start telling:
"kdeinit could not start. Check your installation".
The problem seems due to the new libattr1, because after having installed the
previous
El lun, 18-12-2006 a las 10:13 -0500, Aaron M. Ucko escribió:
> Eric H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Please, is someone can tell me what how to do this "manual intervention" ?
>
> I'd suggest the approach I ended up taking -- namely, moving
> /usr/bin/pycentral aside, upgrading to 0.3.0.r2-2,
Package: tetex-base
Version: 3.0.dfsg.3-3
Severity: serious
Hi,
It seems that you can't uninstall the package if things aren't set up
properly.
>From the buildd log I see:
Selecting previously deselected package tetex-base.
Unpacking tetex-base (from .../tetex-base_3.0.dfsg.3-3_all.deb) ...
[...
On Dec 18, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have experimented a bit, thanks to Marco's hints. And we narrowed this done
> to the scsi-devfs.sh script not even being launched. A udevtrigger showed that
> all those scripts are :
>
> Jan 12 22:14:07 udevd[347]: udev_done: seq 2161, pid [
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.22~bpo.2
> reassign 403599 libattr1 2.4.35-1
Bug#403599: Regression in 2.2.42-1
Bug reassigned from package `libacl1' to `libattr1'.
> close 403599 1:2.4.32-1.1
Bug#403599: Regression in
package: libgtk-directfb-2.0-0
severity: serious
tags: upsteam
It was recently found that during a g-i installation the GTK frontend
can easily cause an out of memory error, due to the big amount of memory
allocated at every installation step (nearly 1 MB).
After some investigations with test
Package: udev
Version: 0.103-1
Followup-For: Bug #403136
Hi, ...
I have experimented a bit, thanks to Marco's hints. And we narrowed this done
to the scsi-devfs.sh script not even being launched. A udevtrigger showed that
all those scripts are :
Jan 12 22:14:07 udevd[347]: udev_done: seq 2161
>
> Although gtk-recordmydesktop uses python-central, it lacks a proper
> Python-Version: field, and consequently gets stuck in a half-installed
> state from which one cannot even back it out without manual intervention:
>
>
I installed gtk-recordmydestop 0.3.0r2-1, and it gets stuck in a
half-
Eric H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please, is someone can tell me what how to do this "manual intervention" ?
I'd suggest the approach I ended up taking -- namely, moving
/usr/bin/pycentral aside, upgrading to 0.3.0.r2-2, and moving
pycentral back:
# mv /usr/bin/pycentral /usr/bin/pycentral_
#
Installing libattr1 2.4.32-1 does indeed fix this, but the version
containing the problem is 2.4.35-1, so apt immediately tries to upgrade
it again. It's easy enough to put it on hold, but it's still broken for
Sid until the fix makes it into the newer version.
Mike
__
"Stefan Hornburg (Racke)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) :
> I'm in the progress in merging the package offered by Jean Charles Delepine
> into my sources. While it is definitely better than my last released
> package,
> it still has rough edges. If you are not satisfied with the result tom
package exim4-config
severity #403605 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:41:27PM +0100, Paul Slootman wrote:
> Package: exim4-config
> Version: 4.63-11
> Severity: grave
> Justification: email was bounced, thus lost to me
Bounced e-mail is not lost. Downgrading.
> I have a wildcard MX *
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package exim4-config
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: exim4-config
> severity #403605 important
Bug#403605: exim4-config: dc_other_hostnames expanded by the shell, corrupting
it
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403592: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:09 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401530: fixed in hplip 1.6.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait (wrote) :
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Stefan Hornburg wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Format: 1.7
> > Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:24:57 +0100
> > Source: sympa
> > Binary: sympa
> > Architecture: source i386
> > Version: 5
severity 403585 critical
severity 403599 critical
thanks
I did not see that the system was completely broken after installation.
Cheers,
--
.''`. Aurélien GÉRÔME
: :' :
`. `'` Free Software Developer
`- Unix Sys & Net Admin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403592: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: ghdl
Severity: serious
Currently debian/copyright mentions that the package is licensed under
plain GPL and assigns this copyright only to Tristan Gingold.
But, the source tarball contains, at dir vhdl/libraries/ieee/, *.vhdl
files with this header:
-- Copyright 1995 by IEEE. All rights
severity 403573 important
thanks
This is not a regression so it is not RC. The whole versioned libc6-dev
dependency seems unnecessary, c library is pulled in via build-essential
and there is no explanation why version 2.3.6 or newer is needed.
Cheers,
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
severity 370384 normal
thanks
I basically agree, it is a bit misleading that the jigdo GUI application is
not yet capable of processing .jigdo files.
However, the app is not useless; it is a normal download manager for FTP
and HTTP.
Furthermore, jigdo-file (i.e. the package containing jigdo-li
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403601: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 370384 normal
Bug#370384: If its not capable of processing jigdo files, what's it doing in
testing?
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403585: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403590: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403599: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:02:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#403601: fixed in attr 1:2.4.32-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
