Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> submitter 150317 !
Bug#150317: opennap: Broken opennapconf generates bad passwords and mis-outputs
result.
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>.
> submitter 298716 !
Bug#298716: l2tpd: pppd 2.4.2 repl
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401348 grave
Bug#401348: sasl2-bin: Problem started daemon soon after installed
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> retitle 401348 sasl2-bin: saslauthd will not start after fresh install
Bug#401348: sasl2-bin: Problem started daemon soon a
Your message dated Fri, 08 Dec 2006 06:02:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402079: fixed in cdck 0.5.2-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 401454 + moreinfo
Bug#401454: bmpx: exception when accepting albums
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> severity 401454 important
Bug#401454: bmpx: exception when accepting albums
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopp
Package: sasl2-bin
Version: 2.1.19.dfsg1-0.5
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
I seem to miss the solution. It's December 7, i get a sasl2-bin update a
postfix update and the mailserver is done. First i get:
Dec 7 20:18:15 mta1 postfix/smtpd[25575]: warning: SASL authentic
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:33:12 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.4.6-1 upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:33:12 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.4.6-1 upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Your message dated Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:33:12 -0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 1.4.6-1 upload
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibil
Package: kernel-source-2.6.8
Version: 2.6.8-16sarge5
Severity: critical
Justification: root security hole
Noticed:
Intel LAN Driver Buffer Overflow Local Privilege Escalation
http://support.intel.com/support/network/sb/CS-023726.htm
The Intel blurb says Linux, and specifically Debian, is af
From: Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://users.edpnet.be/vanmeel/TeX/reference.zh-tw.tex (in Big5)
Oops, I forgot to run "bin/fixlatex" on it. debiandoc2latex doesn't
provide an "s" function like the other debiandoc2* commands. It's in
my TODO list.
Anyway, I've reuploaded a co
Package: mldonkey-server
Version: 2.8.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I upgraded mldonkey-server package today. Package is broken because of
the newly included "users2" option in "users.ini". This option is
explicitly announced in changelog but seems not to be a valid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.14
> severity 395863 normal
Bug#395863: wmaker: FocusNextKey from the system-wide configuration invalid
after upgrade
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping p
On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 23:57:53 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote:
> the sizes of the cdck 0.5.2-2 packages, as seen on packages.debian.org
> [1] are suspiciously small on arm, powerpc and s390. Looking at the
> buildd logs, those architectures get this warning during build:
[..]
> Trivial patch attached.
Than
From: Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
> >> I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
> >> debiandoc-sgml and debian-reference packages have been released.
> >
> > Thanks.
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 06:58:19PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will do debian-reference later.(once debiandoc-sgml hit unstable)
>
> I have tried this, and there are still issues.
I can confirm this with a pbuilder build.
> First of all, debian-refere
Le mar 28 nov 06 à 09:50 +0100, Thomas Renard a écrit :
> Package: mozilla-plugin-vlc
> Version: 0.8.6-svn20061012.debian-1
> Severity: normal
>
> When starting up any video the browser does no download but only shows
> a blackblank page opened with a "(no video)" message. This is the same
> for m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> retitle 398039 python-cjkcodecs: irrelevant for python2.4, should not ship
> with etch
Bug#398039: python-cjkcodecs: irrelevant for python 2.4, should not
Changed Bug title.
>
End o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> retitle 398899 python-iconvcodec: irrelevant for python2.4, should not ship
> with etch
Bug#398899: python-iconvcodec: irrelevant for python 2.4; should not
Changed Bug title.
>
End
debian-release,
I'm proposing a library transition for libcommoncpp2, the last upload
contained a hidden backward-incompatible ABI change which has only come to
light.
I have patched upstream to bump the soname to 1.5.3 and this will generate a
debian package of libcommoncpp2-1.5.3-0, which sh
Package: cdck
Version: 0.5.2-2
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
the sizes of the cdck 0.5.2-2 packages, as seen on packages.debian.org
[1] are suspiciously small on arm, powerpc and s390. Looking at the
buildd logs, those architectures get this warning durin
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402063: fixed in evince 0.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: botan1.5
Version: 1.5.11-1
Severity: grave
Justification: fails to build from source
botan1.5 uses a crappy perl code which reads /proc/cpuinfo to detect
host type instead of standard config.guess/config.sub. This result on a
false detection of an athlon instead of an athlon64 when /proc
Package: botan1.4
Version: 1.4.12-1
Severity: grave
Justification: fails to build from source
botan1.4 uses a crappy perl code which reads /proc/cpuinfo to detect
host type instead of standard config.guess/config.sub. This result on a
false detection of an athlon instead of an athlon64 when /proc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> severity 401842 normal
Bug#401842: RM: gcc-4.0:several -- RoM; NBS
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006 at 10:12:14PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> Thanks for the bug and the patch! I had flagged the Ubuntu security
> notice, but didn't have time to upload it yet.
Okay, great. I wanted to make sure all the upstreams had the bug
recorded, just in case. :) The Gnome report is
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:47:04 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401379: fixed in gnome-games 1:2.16.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thursday 07 December 2006 21:54, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Sep 25, arthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After having rebooted on my freshly installed machine, I saw that
> > my wifi interface was named eth2_rename. The bug was in the way
> > /etc/udev/rules.d/z25_persistent-net.rules was generat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> unmerge 398899
Bug#398899: RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
Bug#401634: RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
Disconnected #398899 from all other report(s).
> severity 398899 serious
Bug#398899: RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> # Removals from unstable are not release-critical
> severity 398039 normal
Bug#398039: RM: python-cjkcodecs - RoM: python 2.3 only
Bug#401675: RM: python-cjkcodecs -- RoQA; python 2.3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.25
> retitle 401842 RM: gcc-4.0:several -- RoM; NBS
Bug#401842: RM -- gcc-4.0 binaries
Changed Bug title.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # never been built, not RC
> severity 358448 important
Bug#358448: simpledb: FTBFS (amd64): cannot convert 'SQLINTEGER*' to 'SQLLEN*'
for argument '6' to 'SQLRETURN SQLBindCol(void*,
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006, Kees Cook wrote:
> This is the same vulnerability as reported against gv as bug 398292,
> since evince has old gv code embedded (I've updated the wiki to reflect
> this: http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies)
Thanks for the bug and the patch! I had flagged the Ubuntu
unmerge 398899
severity 398899 serious
reassign 398899 python-iconvcodec
retitle 398899 python-iconvcodec: irrelevant for python 2.4; should not
ship with etch
unmerge 398039
severity 398039 serious
reassign 398039 python-cjkcodecs
retitle 398039 python-cjkcodecs: irrelevant for python 2.4, should
Package: klibc
Version: 1.4.30-1
Severity: grave
Justification: fails to build from source
klibc is currently not buildable in testing because it build-depends on
a package in unstable. This bug should be closed when klibc 1.4.30-2 and
linux-headers-2.6.18-3 are both in testing.
[EMAIL PROTECTE
* Fred VIDIL wrote:
> Ok, the xserver upgrade had broken my nvidia driver.
> I only had to reinstall it to solve the problem.
> Sorry for the waste of time.
I'm glad it's working again. Did you by any chance see exactly why it broke
the nvidia driver? Perhaps this could be a bug in either the xser
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # 2.6.19 is not RC
> severity 402000 important
Bug#402000: 1.0.8776-3 does not compile with 2.6.19
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 358448 serious
Bug#358448: simpledb: FTBFS (amd64): cannot convert 'SQLINTEGER*' to 'SQLLEN*'
for argument '6' to 'SQLRETURN SQLBindCol(void*, SQLUSMALLINT, SQLSMALLINT,
void*, SQLLEN, SQLLEN*)'
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> than
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 01:12 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> The Problem here is that libneon26 and libneon26-gnutls are *NOT*
> parallel installable. This causes bazaar to indirectly conflict with
> anything linked against the "normal" openssl linked version.
[...]
> The real solution is to mak
Ok, the xserver upgrade had broken my nvidia driver.
I only had to reinstall it to solve the problem.
Sorry for the waste of time.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One way to solve it is to require the people accessing the LDAP
database using the web to provide the LDAP admin password during the
interaction, and not store it in clear text on the server.
One way to avoid having to pass the LDAP admin password every time is
to store it in a cookie. It would
Package: evince
Version: 0.4.0-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security, patch
This is the same vulnerability as reported against gv as bug 398292,
since evince has old gv code embedded (I've updated the wiki to reflect
this: http://wiki.debian.org/EmbeddedCodeCopies)
Patch attached (applies to both
Cajus Pollmeier skrev:
> Am Donnerstag 07 Dezember 2006 14:37 schrieb Finn-Arne Johansen:
>> Package: gosa
>> Version: 2.5.6-2
>> Severity: critical
>> Tags: security
>> Justification: root security hole
>>
>>
>> The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
>> /etc/gosa/gosa
Margarita,
Margarita Manterola wrote:
On 12/5/06, Jan Evert van Grootheest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am getting upset now
Apt-get is again segfaulting!
Yesterday I removed the *.bin files from /var/cache/apt. Then ran
apt-get update, apt-get -V upgrade and apt-get clean.
Now I do apt-g
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342578: fixed in checkinstall 1.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:17:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#342578: fixed in checkinstall 1.6.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
reassign 389355 udev
tags 389355 confirmed
severity 389355 serious
thanks
I was able to reproduce this bug. The change mentioned for udev fixes
the bug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
usertag 398111 biten-by
usertag 397691 biten-by
thanks
Hi,
After yesterdays update of rrdtool, munin-graph consumes all memory. It
seems this issue is known upstream as well:
http://oss.oetiker.ch/rrdtool-trac/ticket/54
I hope this gets fixed soon :-)
Greetings Arjan
signature.asc
Descriptio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 402009 grave
Bug#402009: twinkle: symbol lookup error when hanging up
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> title 402009 backward-incompatible ABI changes
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
> thanks
Stopping processing he
Your message dated Thu, 7 Dec 2006 19:44:23 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#402017: Depends on removed cpp-4.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 401569
> https://develop.participatoryculture.org/democracy/ticket/5145
Bug#401569: wrong plural form for Romanian makes app to crash on start
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to
https://develop.participatoryculture.org/democ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389355 udev
Bug#389355: installation-report: Warning about boot partition on newworld
powerpc.
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `udev'.
> tags 389355 confirmed
Bug#389355: installation-report: Warning about boot partition
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 18:17:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401198: fixed in cdcover 0.9.1-6.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi,
since didn't get an okay to adjust the dependencies, I only fixed the RC
issue:
diff -Nur cdcover-0.9.1.old/debian/changelog cdcover-0.9.1/debian/changelog
--- cdcover-0.9.1.old/debian/changelog 2006-12-06 13:49:25.0 +0100
+++ cdcover-0.9.1/debian/changelog 2006-12-07 19:04:19.0
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 02:42:15PM +0100, Danai SAE-HAN wrote:
>> I'm confident that this bug (#397571) is solved after new
>> debiandoc-sgml and debian-reference packages have been released.
>
> Thanks. I uploaded debiandoc-sgml and one more package today
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#400874: fixed in apt 0.6.46.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Version: 0.95+dfsg2-0.1
This bug still applies in 0.95+dfsg2-0.1. The difference is that the
problematic file is now provided by the Debian-specific diff rather than the
original tarball.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 402010 + wontfix
Bug#402010: gosa leaves the ldap admin password readable by any web application
Tags were: security
Tags added: wontfix
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admi
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:17:02 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401017: fixed in apt 0.6.46.4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:57:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug is not fixable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 398899 ftp.debian.org
Bug#398899: RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
Bug reassigned from package `python-iconvcodec' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> merge 398899 401634
Bug#398899: RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
Bug#401634: RM:
Package: defoma, fontconfig
Severity: serious
Currently upgrades of font packages with truetype fonts that use defoma
are broken, as can be seen from comments to bugs #401411 and #401615.
One needs to run 'dpkg-reconfigure fontconfig' or "fc-cache -f" after
upgrade. Until this is done, there maybe
* Arnaud Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20061207 00:15]:
> I fix this bug by using module_param instead of MODULE_PARM which is
> deprecated (in favor of module_param) and not type-safe. It builds fine
> but could you please try this patch and tell me if the module behaves
T0P 1O TITLES
0N [EMAIL PROTECTED] N0W!
$79 MS Office Enterprise 2007
$79 Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
$49 Windows XP Pro w/SP2
$59 Adobe Premiere 2.0
$99 Macromedia Studio 8
$69 QuickBooks 2006 Prem.
$129 Autodesk Autocad 2007
$59 Corel Grafix Suite X3
$149 Adobe Creative Suite 2
$59 Adobe Illustrator CS2
Hi,
This is the output:
../kernel-patches/all/apply/exec-shield
START applying exec-shield patch (Exec-shield)
Testing whether "Exec-shield" patch for 2.6.18 applies (dry run):
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mm/mprotect.c.rej
"Exec-shield" patch for 2.6.18 does not apply clean
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:02:07 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401893: fixed in mplayer 1.0~rc1-7
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: gcc-4.0-locales
Version: 4.0.3-8
Severity: serious
gcc-4.0-locales -8 still depends on cpp-4.0 even though cpp-4.0 is not
build anymore for this revision. This will make this package
uninstallable once the old cpp-4.0 binary is removed.
Gruesse,
Frank Lichtenheld
-- System Info
* Mark Purcell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [20061207 06:46]:
> While we await a decision from debian-release. Could you post
> packages to either experimental or people.debian.org so we can
> start the integration.
Sure. I have limited airtime on the network; will do my bes
Am Donnerstag 07 Dezember 2006 14:37 schrieb Finn-Arne Johansen:
> Package: gosa
> Version: 2.5.6-2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
>
> The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
> /etc/gosa/gosa.conf, and to make it readable by
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 398899 RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
Bug#398899: python-central: wrong python versioned dependency by dh_pycentral
Changed Bug title.
> retitle 401634 RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
Bug#401634: python-iconvcodec: de
If a rc bug hunter sees this and wants to beat my regular sponsor to
it. You can find a new package at
http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/uswsusp
TIA,
Tim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
retitle 398899 RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
retitle 401634 RM: python-iconvcodec - RoM: python 2.3 only
severity 401634 serious
reassign 401634 ftp.debian.org
merge 398899 401634
retitle 398039 RM: python-cjkcodecs - RoM: python 2.3 only
reassign 398039 ftp.debian.org
merge 398039 4
Finn-Arne Johansen wrote:
> Package: gosa
> Version: 2.5.6-2
> Severity: critical
> Tags: security
> Justification: root security hole
>
>
> The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
> /etc/gosa/gosa.conf, and to make it readable by the group www-data.
> In this configu
T0P 1O TITLES
0N [EMAIL PROTECTED] N0W!
$79 MS Office Enterprise 2007
$79 Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
$49 Windows XP Pro w/SP2
$59 Adobe Premiere 2.0
$99 Macromedia Studio 8
$69 QuickBooks 2006 Prem.
$129 Autodesk Autocad 2007
$59 Corel Grafix Suite X3
$149 Adobe Creative Suite 2
$59 Adobe Illustrator CS2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> unmerge 401263
Bug#401263: apt segfaults when reading package lists
Bug#401980: apt-get segfaults during Debian installation
Disconnected #401263 from all other report(s).
>
End of m
Why has this bug been merged with #401263 ? I specifically separated
it out from #401263, because I became apparent to me that the problem
was different to the one detailed there. The patch posted to #401263
does not fix the problem I am seeing in the installer.
Gordon
--
Gordon Farquharson
--
Package: gosa
Version: 2.5.6-2
Severity: critical
Tags: security
Justification: root security hole
The documentation in gosa tells the admin to install gosa.conf under
/etc/gosa/gosa.conf, and to make it readable by the group www-data.
In this configuration file, the ldap admin password is stored
(sorry, in the first version of this mail the Cc was to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of the bugnumber)
Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: yacas
> Version: 1.0.57-2.4
> Severity: serious
> Tags: security
>
> Hello Gopal,
> yacas includes a binary with a rpath pointing to /tmp/yacas/
Your message dated Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:38:30 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed in 2.0.730-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Hello again,
one more thing I forgot to mention is that the error I explained above
doesn't go away when you click OK (the only avaiable button), it just
complains again and again so it's impossible to start eclipse at all. To
get out of this circle, I had to kill it manually.
Thanks
Johannes
-
I purged splashy and then I had this:
Configurando mdadm (2.5.6-6) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.18p4s
W: mdadm: unchecked configuration file: /etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf
W: mdadm: please read /usr/share/doc/mdadm/README.upgrading-2.5.3.gz .
W: mdadm: no arrays defined in confi
Package: eclipse-cdt
Version: 3.0.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hello!
With eclipse 3.2.1 installed, eclipse fails to start with CDT 3.0.1-3 installed
as well. After starting up, a message is shown telling "Error notifying
preference change listener. Check the log fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> merge 401263 401980
Bug#401263: apt segfaults when reading package lists
Bug#401980: apt-get segfaults during Debian installation
Merged 401263 401980.
>
End of message, stopping pro
Package: nvidia-kernel-source
Version: 1.0.8776-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
8876 in unstable does not compile with 2.6.19 due to the interrupt
interface change and an struct change in i2c.
The fix is trivial:
diff -ru nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.c nvidia-kernel-patched/nv/nv.c
--- nvidia-kernel/nv/nv.
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.6-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I upgrade mdadm to the current testing (and sid) version. Upgrade fails,
see this log(transalated by hand):
--LOG START--
Configuring mdadm (2.5.6-6) ...
/boot/initrd.img-2.6.18-3-686 has been altered. Canno
Your message dated Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:32:03 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#401917: fixed in bibledit 2.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> found 398292 3.6.1-10sarge1
Bug#398292: GNU gv "ps_gettext()" Buffer Overflow Vulnerability (CVE-2006-5864)
Bug marked as found in version 3.6.1-10sarge1.
>
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> tags 401731 + sarge security
Bug#401731: gv: version 3.6.1-10sarge1 is effectively identical to 3.6.1-10
There were no tags set.
Tags added: sarge, security
> severity 401731 grave
B
T0P 1O TITLES
0N [EMAIL PROTECTED] N0W!
$79 MS Office Enterprise 2007
$79 Adobe Acrobat 8 Pro
$49 Windows XP Pro w/SP2
$59 Adobe Premiere 2.0
$99 Macromedia Studio 8
$69 QuickBooks 2006 Prem.
$129 Autodesk Autocad 2007
$59 Corel Grafix Suite X3
$149 Adobe Creative Suite 2
$59 Adobe Illustrator CS2
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26
> severity 401971 normal
Bug#401971: egroupware-core: "Checking PEAR is installed*: False" but package
php-pear was intalled
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
>
End of message, st
Your message dated Thu, 7 Dec 2006 11:23:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line CVE-2006-4800: GStreamer FFmpeg Plug-in Multiple Buffer
Overflows
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 399821 important
Bug#399821: iceweasel: iceweasel doesn't display pages anymore
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
severity 399821 important
thanks
* Frank Küster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061206 00:20]:
> Hm, do you really think that if an extension that is not even packaged
> for Debian fails to work with iceweasel, this is a RC bug? I'd rather
> think it should be downgraded.
Downgrading to important - of cour
On Thu, Dec 07, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> The python policy implies that if you want to build something against
> the non-default python version, you need python-foo and python2.X-dev.
> Which means in this case, a python-dev dependency should be enough. This
> would avoid pulling several int
Hello Changwoo,
On Tue, 05 Dec 2006, Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> Well, the problem is still on python-central, exactly dh_pycentral which
> has been used during package build. Before these stupid binary-only
> uploads, the packages had the correct Depends, "python (>= 2.3), python
> (<< 2.4)". But the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # this bug was definitely resolved
> close 375077 251-6
Bug#375077: udevd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP server -> boot fails
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> # not inherently a security problem, just an implied one when combined with
> other bugs
> severity 401956 important
Bug#401956: libx11-6: contents of .XCompose file are leaked to su
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 401913 401895
Bug#401913: CVE-2006-6235: arbitrary indirect call in GnuPG
Bug#401895: gnupg2: [CVE-2006-6235] remotely controllable function pointer
Forcibly Merged 401895 401913.
> forcemerge 401914 401894 401898
Bug#401914: CVE-2006-6235:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27
> severity 401593 important
Bug#401593: libssl0.9.8c-4: fails to update in testing
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 401593 unreproducible
Bug#401593: libssl0.9.8c-4: fai
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 401961 serious
Bug#401961: conflicts with libneon26, making most neon-using packages
uninstallable
Bug#401388: libneon26-gnutls should not conflict with libneon26
Bug#401398: neon26: please put two alternative packages in the shlibs files
Seve
Le jeudi 07 décembre 2006 à 08:17 +0100, Loïc Minier a écrit :
> On Wed, Dec 06, 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Shouldn't python-dev be enough? Depending on python-all-dev will bring
> > all python interpreter versions, this sounds overkill to me.
>
> I wanted to depend on python-dev | python-
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
