On Sun, Sep 24, 2006, Stephen Touset wrote:
> I have no ~/.gnome2/session file.
Bah, I probably got the name wrong, as I don't have one (I don't save
my session).
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006, Stephen Touset wrote:
> Also, stracing gnome-session seems like it may be a bit hard, since it would
> have to be done from within an x terminal, and X stops refreshing the screen
> when gnome-session is started.
-o to write to a file?
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2006 08:41:16 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389287: Package built against libraries from experimental
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is
Package: libgalago1.0-cil
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I tried to upgrade to Beagle 0.2.10, which pulled this in, but I got this
error, and now I can't even shutdown beagle with $(beagle-shutdown):
Setting
Package: xserver-xorg-video-via
Version: 1:0.2.1-4
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
Come on people. I know I've seen this error come up before. Assert is a
macro, not a function. Please don't add packages, even to unstable, if
they won't work under any circumst
If stage2 and stage1.5 are correct then most likely stage1 is correct as
well. So would say just checking there version matches grub-shell would
be enough.
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:01:02AM +0530, Kapil Hari Paranjape wrote:
> Solution 2: (Since "stage1" does not change a lot) we can usually
> ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 291040
Bug#291040: catdvi: Missing dependencies
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug closed, send any further explanations to Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
P
Good Day;
Thanks for contacting us regarding our newest (w)eight (s)uppressant.
Wanting to lose 20-25(Ibs) in 2 weeks is possible, but can be dangerous.
With a proper (d)iet and our latest version of (H)oodialife you will see
surprising results.
Our newest version of (H)oodialife has been rele
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388809 patch
Bug#388809: htmldoc-common fails to upgrade smoothly
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administr
Again, this is solved by updating the replaces/conflicts part of the
control file:
...
Package: htmldoc-common
Architecture: all
Replaces: htmldoc (<< 1.8.27)
Conflicts: htmldoc (<< 1.8.27)
...
--
Alejandro Ríos Peña
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalment
Good Day;
Thanks for contacting us regarding our newest (w)eight (s)uppressant.
Wanting to lose 20-25(Ibs) in 2 weeks is possible, but can be dangerous.
With a proper (d)iet and our latest version of (H)oodialife you will see
surprising results.
Our newest version of (H)oodialife has been rele
Hello,
On Sat, 23 Sep 2006, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> option C, we create a way to extract the version information from every
> >> grub file. So that the grub shell can check that its version matches
> >> the stage files and if not generate a
Package: kguitar
Version: 0.5-2+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of kguitar_0.5-2+b1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060922-0219
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>
Package: xgalaga
Version: 2.0.34-39
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xgalaga_2.0.34-39 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060922-0900
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper
Package: suspend2-userui
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of suspend2-userui_0.6.4-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060922-2312
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
Package: strigiapplet
Version: 0.3.8-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of strigiapplet_0.3.8-1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060922-0600
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:32:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388238: fixed in torrentflux 2.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: suspend2-userui
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of suspend2-userui_0.6.4-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060922-0149
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-De
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 388231 patch
Bug#388231: config/postrm depends on non-essential packages (dbconfig-common,
probably ucf)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Package: stlport5.1
Version: 5.0.99rc2-4
Severity: serious
architectures are allowed to have specific standard libraries, and
linking without them is fatal.
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of stlport5.1_5.0.99rc2-4 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build s
Package: xcache
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of xcache_1.0-4 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060922-0746
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4
Package: strigi
Version: 0.3.8-1
Severity: serious
Please don't use a private copy of the inotify syscalls
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of strigi_0.3.8-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060921-1404
[...]
> ** Using build depen
Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.14.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #389126
Also, stracing gnome-session seems like it may be a bit hard, since it would
have to be done from within an x terminal, and X stops refreshing the screen
when gnome-session is started.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testi
Patch for last svn trunk, using the same postrm rationale, based on [1].
[1]http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/dbconfig-common.html/ch-develguide.html#s-hooks
Regards,
--
Alejandro Ríos Peña
Index: config
===
--- config (re
Package: gnome-session
Version: 2.14.3-1
Followup-For: Bug #389126
I have no ~/.gnome2/session file.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:35:44PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > /build/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.18/debian/build/build-hppa-none-parisc64/scripts/gcc-version.sh:
> > line 11: hppa64-linux-gcc-4.1: command not found
> > /build/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.18/debian/build/build-hppa-none-parisc64/scripts/
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389255 normal
Bug#389255: xserver-xfree86: Graphical session does not start.
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
Package: llvm
Version: 1.7-3.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of llvm_1.7-3.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060921-1829
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reopen 387913
Bug#387913: FTBFS on a few arches
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian b
The appended version handles also mipsel, and moves the linker scripts
to the top level since they aren't Debian specific.
Thiemo
* Force mips/mipsel data segment to start at 0x1000
Patch: arch-mips-data-segment-0x1000.diff
Provided-by: Max Kellermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Added-by:
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.18-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of linux-2.6_2.6.18-1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060924-1209
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: lua-posix
Version: 1.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lua-posix_1.0-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060923-1751
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: cdbs (>=
Package: linuxlogo
Version: 4.14-3
Severity: serious
64-bit kernels return 'parisc64', which can be treated as the same as
'parisc', it would appear.
lamont
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of linuxlogo_4.14-3 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build starte
Package: openmash
Version: 5.2-4
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of openmash_5.2-4 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060924-1757
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depend
Package: motion
Version: 3.2.3-1+b2
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of motion_3.2.3-1+b2 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060924-1856
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> B
Package: maxima
Version: 5.9.3-1.1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of maxima_5.9.3-1.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060922-0819
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: gcl (>=
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW
> #
> tags 274808 pending
Bug#274808: kernel-image-2.4.27-netwinder: Unresolved symbol (do_div64) in
smbfs module
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> tags 320930 pending
Bug#320930: ITP: ape
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.13.22
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hello,
Since libselinux (1.30.28-1), dpkg fails to build from source.
The failing command is the following:
gcc -std=gnu99 -Wall -g -O2 -Wl,-O1 -o dpkg archives.o cleanup.o configure.o
depcon.o enqu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 364819 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29207
Bug#364819: gij-4.1: bus error on hppa.
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29207.
> retitle 364819 [PR29207] gij bus errors on hppa-linux-gnu and alpha-linux-gnu
Bug#3648
Package: gnome-presence-applet
Version: 0.3.1-1+b1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of gnome-presence-applet_0.3.1-1+b1 on peri by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060924-1200
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies su
Package: gcalctool
Version: 5.8.24-1
Severity: grave
The above version of gcalctool was built against gtk-2.10 from
experimental but the package was uploaded to unstable. This makes the
package uninstallable. This problem can most likely been solved by
scheduling binNMUs (given that the build deps
Package: lcdproc
Version: 0.5.0-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of lcdproc_0.5.0-1 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 85
> Build started at 20060922-2246
[...]
> ** Using build dependencies supplied by package:
> Build-Depends: debhelper (>=
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 03:03:24PM +0200, Noèl Köthe wrote:
> grubconf depends on libdbus-1-2 but libdbus-1-2 is removed from sid.
> libdbus-1-3 is now there.
BinNMUs are already done fixing this problem, and available in today's
unstable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever lon
28)
> dpkg-buildpackage: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting.
> dpkg-buildpackage: (Use -d flag to override.)
> **
> Build finished at 20060924-0837
> FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
--
Martin Michlmay
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 385296 + fixed
Bug#385296: broken with ssl on amd64
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:19:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389167: libpt-plugins-avc: depends on unavailable
libraw1394-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If th
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:14:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389166: grubconf: depends on unavailable libdbus-1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388407: fixed in latex-ucs 20041017-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388376: fixed in latex-ucs 20041017-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:44:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of muine 0.8.5-1.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your re
> > The problem was solved by using my own kernel, 2.6.18.
>
> Well, that means you've cathed this (git commit):
> b2ea401bac39e75ebb64038609ed22efbc799905
>
>
> Maybe it's worth to ask to be in next 2.6.17-stable ?
Yes, it will make sense to me. Problem is, that I cannot make any test,
becouse
Package: update-inetd
Version: 4.27
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 11.2
hurd K11 install with updates does not create /etc/inetd.conf.
update-inetd script cannot add entries without file already present.
works OK if /etc/inetd.conf created manually, but this violates Policy.
Sorry if alr
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:15:02 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line DLJ prevents running jython with sun-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:33:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388865: fixed in klogic 1.63-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388376: fixed in latex-ucs 20041017-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 14:34:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388407: fixed in latex-ucs 20041017-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle #389246 install fails in non-interactive mode
Bug#389246: spong-www: sarge to etch upgrade fails
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> reassign 389154 geda-symbols
Bug#389154: geda-gschem: gschem crashing after start and gschem don't work
properly
Bug reassigned from package `geda-gschem' to `geda-symbols'.
> force
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 13:43:39 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 septembre 2006 à 23:51 +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> > > Because the hard problems that you pointed out have been fixed. We
> > > do no longer return "schily" author ID, etc.
> >
> > You no longer return "schily", but
Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Attached is the patch against cscope-15.5-1.1sarge1. It was taken from
> upstream CVS according to the changelog [1] and adapted to this version.
Thanks, update is building now.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:27:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem
causes kernel oops
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.21
> severity 387908 normal
Bug#387908: ftbfs: 500_ping_icmp fails on VServer
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Package: sylpheed-claws-gtk2
Version: 2.5.0~rc3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.1
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 10:19:07PM +0200, Dan Ohnesorg wrote:
> Dne Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Oleg Verych napsal:
>
> > Let's add XFS team in CC.
>
> There isn't
Yes, my MUA...
>
> > On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> > >
reassign 389232 linux-2.6
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: kernel-patch-relayfs
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This kernel patch has been filed for removal in sid. As processing
of ftp.debian.org removal bugs can take some time I'm filing a
bug to keep it out of Etch before the freeze.
#386811 - RM: kernel-patch-relayfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389232 linux-2.6
Bug#389232: linux-image-2.6-amd64: mounting xfs filesystem causes kernel oops
Bug reassigned from package `linux-image-2.6-amd64' to `linux-2.6'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
D
Dne Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:23:15PM +0200, Oleg Verych napsal:
> Let's add XFS team in CC.
There isn't
> On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> > Version: 2.6.17+2
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> More det
Package: twiki
Severity: grave
Tags: security
Justification: user security hole
A vulnerability has been found in twiki:
Directory traversal vulnerability in viewfile in TWiki 4.0.0 through 4.0.4
allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a .. (dot dot) in the
filename parameter.
I cou
Package: kernel-patch-2.2.25-m68k
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This patch shouldn't be included in Etch, which will be kernel 2.6 only.
Cheers,
Moritz
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 388691 serious
Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 388376 pending
Bug#388376: latex-ucs-doc: installs files into /usr/share/texmf/doc against
Debian TeX policy
There were no tags set.
Bug#388407: tex-common: Trying to overwrite
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 383344
Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> close 383344
Bug#383344: thu
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> close 383344 1.5.0.5-1
Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in version 1.5.0.5-1, send any further explanations to
Leszek Koltunski <[EMAIL PRO
Let's add XFS team in CC.
On 2006-09-24, Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
> Version: 2.6.17+2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks the whole system
More details, please.
What happend before this boot?
Why ext3 is recovering?
> raid1: raid set m
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383738 grave
Bug#383738: ppscsi-source: cannot compile with 2.6.17-2 kernel/headers
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> severity 290300 grave
Bug#290300: kernel-patch-ppscsi-2.6: ppscsi does not function properly on 2.6.10
Severity set
reopen 383344
close 383344
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 09:17:08PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> 1.5-4 < 1.5.0.5-1, so this is effectively a no-op. Is the bug closed or not?
>> The bug log is rather confusing...
> Urgh ... looks like I did something completely wrong here. Anyway:
> This bug is closed
close 383344 1.5.0.5-1
thanks
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 08:23:03PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:29:28PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail
> wrote:
> > close 385071 1.5-4
> > close 383344 1.5-4
> > thanks
>
> 1.5-4 < 1.5.0.5-1, so this is effectively a no-op.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 389231 important
Bug#389231: defrag_0.73pjm1-8(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: cast increases required
alignment of target type
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 329907 grave
Bug#329907: kernel-patch-2.6-reiser4: please add support for 2.6.13
Severity set to `grave' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Package: defrag
> Version: 0.73pjm1-8
> Severity: serious
Severity for FTBFS which never build before is important only. Not an
RC bug. Adjusting.
> There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
I am aware of the alignment errors but don't know what to d
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:34:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#388300: fixed in udev 0.100-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 07:42:04PM +0200, Christoph Kaminski wrote:
> Package: asterisk-chan-capi
> Version: 0.7.0-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> I cant load it with asterisk-bristuff (1.2.11.dfsg-1).
> I get this error:
>
> [chan_capi.so]Sep 24 19:41:33 WARNIN
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 02:29:28PM +0200, Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
> close 385071 1.5-4
> close 383344 1.5-4
> thanks
1.5-4 < 1.5.0.5-1, so this is effectively a no-op. Is the bug closed or not?
The bug log is rather confusing...
> p.s. please take care that the bug is listed as To
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:50:03 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378712: fixed (fwd)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
trator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: beagle
Version: 0.2.10-1
Severity: serious
There was an error while trying to autobuild your package:
> Automatic build of beagle_0.2.10-1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 85
> Build started at 20060924-1258
[...]
>
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-14sarge1
Severity: critical
*** Please type your report below this line ***
Install done on iMac DV (Slot Loading)
Specs here:
http://support.apple.com/specs/imac/iMac_Slot_Loading.html
IIRC, this worked with Debain 3.1r2. I'm using the 3.1r3 NetIn
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 389226 Can't locate XML/DOM.pm
Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?
Changed Bug title.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adm
Package: gnome-keyring-manager
Version: 2.16.0-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package gnome-keyring-manager from experimental is uninstallable due
to dependancy on
unavailable libc6 (>= 2.4-1).
--
With best wishes
Dmitry Baryshkov
-- System Information:
Debian Rel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 381112 serious
Bug#381112: muine 0.8.5-1+b1 seems to depend on gstreamer0.8-misc
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366620: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: spong-www
Version: 2.7.7-12
Severity: serious
Hello Clément,
There is an error when upgrading spong-www from sarge to etch,
Setting up spong-common (2.7.7-12) ...
sed: can't read /etc/spong/spong.conf.zeta3: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing spong-common (--configur
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 389226 cli-common-dev
Bug#389226: beagle_0.2.10-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: missing build-dep?
Bug reassigned from package `beagle' to `cli-common-dev'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
This patch causes libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal to use mit gssapi
libraries, becoming equivalent to libsasl2-gssapi-mit.
if this build-depends change is the only way to make building cyrus-sasl2
work, then it should probably be arranged that libsasl2-gssapi-mit is
built from the cyrus-sasl2
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#366620: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375035: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:04:55 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375035: fixed in linux-2.6 2.6.18-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Package: eog
Version: 2.16.0.1-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The package eog from experimental is uninstallable due to dependancy on
unavailable libc6 (>= 2.4-1).
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstabl
reassign 389226 cli-common-dev
thanks
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 10:52 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can't locate XML/DOM.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl
> > /usr/local/lib/perl/5.8.8 /usr/local/share/perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5
> > /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.8 /usr/share/perl/5.8
> >
> cd /usr/src/modules/ndiswrapper && make distclean
>
> Does that help?
>
> *_exports.h *may* exist if timestamps are out of whack. So using 'distclean'
> instead of 'clean' in debian/rules may avoid this in the future.
>
Yes now build fine.
If you plan to change this in debian/rules you could
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
