Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372531: fixed in wzdftpd 0.5.2-1.1sarge2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#363978: fixed in rssh 2.2.3-1.sarge.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#369829: fixed in wzdftpd 0.5.2-1.1sarge2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:02:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378059: fixed in hiki 0.6.5-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#373913: fixed in mysql-dfsg-4.1 4.1.11a-4sarge5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:02:27 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379064: fixed in libdumb 1:0.9.2-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:30 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372115: fixed in postgresql 7.4.7-6sarge3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:01:37 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372734: fixed in base-config 2.53.10.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 364017 + fixed
Bug#364017: evms_activate segfaults and locks the machine completely on boot
with degraded RAID-5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361863: fixed in mpg123 0.59r-20sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 330895 + fixed
Bug#330895: blender [CVE-2005-3302]: Arbitrary code execution when importing a
.bvh file
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> tag 344398 + fixed
Bug#344398: CVE-2005-4470: Integer overhead in header parser for .blend import
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:02:01 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#367579: fixed in freetype 2.1.7-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 358575 + fixed
Bug#358575: purge mailman deletes all ucf-managed conffiles
Tags were: fixed patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 377285 + fixed
Bug#377285: Zope2 contains information disclosure vulnerability
Tags were: security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 304162 + fixed
Bug#304162: vtk_init does not work because liboctaviz is in a wrong place
Tags were: fixed sarge
Tags added: fixed
> tag 341676 + fixed
Bug#341676: liboctaviz.so not found
Tags were: fixed sarge
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping pro
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 376444 + fixed
Bug#376444: hashcash: CVE-2006-3251: buffer overflow
Tags were: sarge patch security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#375694: fixed in mysql-dfsg-4.1 4.1.11a-4sarge5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the ca
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:49 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378714: fixed in vlan 1.8-1sarge1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 377299 + fixed
Bug#377299: sitebar: CVE-2006-3320: cross-site scripting
Tags were: patch fixed security
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(adminis
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 23:05:43 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#356939: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.3-31sarge9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Package: sandwich
Version: 2.0-0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'sandwich' in a clean 'unstable' chroot,
I get the following error:
Loading required package: zoo
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) :
there is no package called 'lattice'
Error: package 'zoo'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 345905 + fixed
Bug#345905: Kazehakase 0.2.7-2.sarge1
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs databas
On Sun, Aug 27, 2006 at 01:46:42PM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> Package: selinux-policy-refpolicy-targeted
> Version: 0.0.20060813-2
> Severity: grave
>
> Running semanage doesn't work (just typing 'semanage' yields import
> errors), which also breaks the install of
> selinux-policy-refpolicy-targe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384739 patch
Bug#384739: ImportError: No module named xen.xend.server
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Package: tmda
Followup-For: Bug #373390
I've managed to get this package compliant with the new policy and
done some other little fixes. I've read the not-release-on-stable
bug, so not sure wether it's ok to upload the NMU or not, I'll
talk this with the python team.
However, if interested you ca
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # upstream found this out, see the upstream bts entry
> retitle 375080 synfig: g++ 4.1.0, 4.1.1 and 4.2 miscompile the vector parsing
> function in loadcanvas.cpp
Bug#375080: synfig
tags 384739 patch
thanks
Thanks to Nicolas for the hint -- here is a patch that fixes the problem,
all it takes is switching the order in which dh_pycentral/dh_installinit are
called when building.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Devel
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382127: fixed in gnucash 2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now yo
Package: aspell-ru
Version: 0.99g3-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Problems rebuilding an aspell hash file (ru)
** Error: Could not build the hash file for ru
This error was caused by package providing 'ru', although it can be
made evident during other package postins
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 01:32:50PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>> In this case, I see one rather obvious issue (there may be others):
>
>> Steve Langasek has said, in essence
>
>> "When A says X, and we have no evidence to the contrary,
>> we believe A".
>
>> Your object
Hi,
The file is uuencoded in 21_default_background_image.diff.uu, so when
the build process applies the patches, the file is created. So it is
present to be copied into the .debs when they're built.
Cheers,
Christopher Martin
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 20:29, Sean Meiners wrote:
> What versio
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383344 grave
Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> severity 385071 grave
Bug#385071: mozilla-thunderbird: Tiny attachment panel after last upgrade
Severity set to `grave' from `importan
What version did 'apt-get source kdebase' get you? For me it gets:
Get:1 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (dsc) [1810B]
Get:2 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (tar) [28.2MB]
Get:3 ftp://ftp.us.debian.org unstable/main kdebase 4:3.5.4-2 (diff) [1789kB]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 385315 important
Bug#385315: RM: i2c -- RoM; obsolete kernel, dummy bug
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contac
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:27:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385194: kdebase source is missing
debian/debian-kde_default.png
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 385174 grave
Bug#385174: libcaca: missing CACA_DITHERING_NONE constant
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> # no patch found in bug log
> tags 382842 - patch
Bug#382842: alsaplayer: boundary errors in URIs parsing functions
Tags were: patch security
Tags removed: patch
>
End of message, s
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384922 important
Bug#384922: NFS insecure without support for squashing multiple groups
Severity set to `important' from `critical'
>
End of message, stopping processing her
Package: grub
Version: 0.97-14
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.4
grub 0.97-14 had the following changelog enty:
* update-grub: Set interpreter to /bin/bash to cope with non-POSIX
extensions. (also mentioned in #361929)
But /usr/sbin/update-grub still has /bin/sh as its interpr
Your message dated Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:09:38 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line ocp: FTBFS: kickload.c:203: error: 'struct sigcontext' has no
member named 'eax'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been de
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 08:39:10PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> Steve Langasek schrieb:
> > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:54:32PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
> >> The "|| true" after the stop command must be added regardless of the
> >> usage of invoke-rc.d.
> > Why? That's not the cust
In theory gcc-doc has been dropped from gcc-defaults 1.41; in practice,
however, this was done *without* removing the references to the package from
debian/control, which means gcc-doc is still referenced by the archive
database, and the ftp team's tools don't pick this up as a candidate for
binary
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384750 + fixed
Bug#384750: viewcvs: Uninstallable in SID: Depends python < 2.4 but 2.4.3-11 is
installed
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
Hello Richard,
With LSB compliance, I mostly meant the LSB headers. There are tools to
optimize boot sequence based on these headers (dependency information
and such).
I'm referring to this
### BEGIN INIT INFO
### END INIT INFO
section you see in many init scripts now.
I'm not an expert on init, so
Package: efi-reader
Version: 0.7
Severity: serious
efi-reader doesn't build with current toolchain:
(osprey)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/efi-reader-0.7$ gcc-4.1 -W -Wall -I.
-fomit-frame-pointer -Os efi-reader.c -o efi-reader -ldebian-installer
-ldebconfclient
efi-reader.c:27: error: expected spec
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:24:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385304: libtext-wrapi18n-perl: package misses depnedency
on belocs-locales-bin
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been d
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:17:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385297: fixed in avahi 0.6.13-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Package: libaio
Version: 0.3.104-1
Severity: serious
This package fails to build on IA-64 with current binutils:
> (osprey)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/libaio-0.3.104/src$ gcc-4.1 -nostdlib
> -nostartfiles -Wall -I. -g -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -fPIC -c -o
> io_getevents.ol io_getevents.c
> /tmp/cc5J
I know that you have a new upstream version in experimental and will
probably be doing the python transition there, I have every hope that
this NMU won't need any action on your part and will be supersceded by
your new upstream version soon. In the meantime, since I needed to do
the work to have a
Erich,
Thanks for reporting the non-compliances in cryptmount's init-script,
and for your helpful patch. I've incorporated your patch and tried to
make the script more LSB compliant in its support for the 'status'
argument and in its return-codes.
Before I issue a revised version o
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:15:35 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385368: python-numarray: postinst fails with raise
ValueError, 'error parsing Python-Version attribute'
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim th
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:10:29AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Package: archivemail
> > Version: 0.6.2-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Tags: security
>
> This is CVE-2006-4245. Please mention that in a future changelog entry
> for unstable. (I see that you already uploaded 0.6.
Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> Upon investigating this for stable, I wonder if the problem is as bad as
> reported. It seems that archivemail sets up its own temp directory and
> creates its files in it:
>
> # create a temporary directory for us to work in securely
> old_temp_dir = tempfile.temp
I confirm Christoph. Exactly the same happens in Sid.
Ruben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384809 grave
Bug#384809: gcc-doc depends on non-existent package
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:54:19 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383344 important
Bug#383344: thunderbird: crashes on startup on amd64
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
severity 383344 important
thanks
as noone else reported this problem, reduce severity to allow security
fixes to migrate to testing.
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
Alexander Sack| : :' : The universal
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Package: python-numarray
Version: 1.5.2-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
during my sid update today the installation of python-numarray failed
with
Setting up python-numarray (1.5.2-1) ...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/pycentral", line 1325, in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 07:54:32PM +0200, Bastian Kleineidam wrote:
>
>> The "|| true" after the stop command must be added regardless of the
>> usage of invoke-rc.d.
>
> Why? That's not the customary usage at all.
What sho
Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> there is a problem with upstream ja.po localization file,
> please fix it :)
Not a problem with that file, but with gettext 0.15 :-P
Use the attached patch.
--
Matthias Andree
Index: po/ja.po
Package: gnome-tasksel
Version: 0.9.8~pre1
Severity: grave
Tags: upstream, confirmed, sid
The tasks aren't being shown due to the lack of proper GtkTreeView calls.
regards,
-- stratus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Package: opensync-plugin-syncml
Version: 0.4.0+svn20060725-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
multisync-tools is pinned to unstable, the rest of the packages are coming
from testing.
When I run msynctool --listplugins I expect to see syncml, but it is not listed.
Also I n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> package fetchmail
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: fetchmail
> tags 385160 patch fixed-upstream upstream
Bug#385160: fetchmail: FTBFS: /usr/bin/msgfmt: found 1 fatal error
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch, fixed-upstream, upstream
>
End of mess
Package: wireshark-dev
Version: 0.99.2-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to install with the following error:
Setting up wireshark-dev (0.99.2-5) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/wireshark-dev.postinst: line 7: /usr/bin/python2.3: No such
file or directory
dpkg: error processing wireshark-de
Package: lablgtksourceview
Version: 0.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to build with the following error on amd64:
gcc -c -I -fPIC -I '/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.2/lablgtk2' -I `/usr/bin/ocamlc
-warn-error FSPUYZ -dtypes -w m -where` -I/usr/include/gtksourceview-1.0
-I/usr/include/g
tags 385297 + pending confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
thanks
Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 18:23 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe Dubacq:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 12:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe Dubacq:
> > > Package: ava
On 8/30/06, Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I strongly disagree with your arguments. It looks that we have
opposite way of thinking, so I will not reply to them, it is going to
nowhere. Don't worry, as I said, I won't continue searching for this.
When conversations go nowhere, it'
Hi,
I think that I know why some people still see this bug and have reopened
it.
The fix implemented by Stephen (thanks BTW!) is documented
in /var/lib/dpkg/info/libnss-ldap.postinst :
# The /var/lib/libnss-ldap directory is used for one purpose:
# to provide a place to store the 'bind_policy_so
I have more info. I did a stack trace with apache-ssl.dbg built from
source, and it was crashing in libssl.
But this didn't help.
What *did* help was totally purging the apache-ssl package, deleting the
/etc/apache-ssl directory, and reinstalling. It now works fine.
Another theory is that po
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 385297 + pending confirmed upstream fixed-upstream
Bug#385297: avahi-daemon: daemon does not start: assertion failed in
avahi_s_entry_group_reset
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending, confirmed, upstream, fixed-upstream
> thanks
Stopping p
Upon investigating this for stable, I wonder if the problem is as bad as
reported. It seems that archivemail sets up its own temp directory and
creates its files in it:
# create a temporary directory for us to work in securely
old_temp_dir = tempfile.tempdir
tempfile.tempdir = None
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 12:10:29AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: archivemail
> Version: 0.6.2-1
> Severity: grave
> Tags: security
This is CVE-2006-4245. Please mention that in a future changelog entry
for unstable. (I see that you already uploaded 0.6.2-2 to fix this in
unstable.)
noah
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 385315 ftp.debian.org
Bug#385315: RM: i2c -- RoM; obsolete kernel, dummy bug
Bug reassigned from package `i2c' to `ftp.debian.org'.
>
End of message, stopping processing her
I have now built and installed apache-ssl and apache-common from source
using the previous version in testing, 1.34-2. This still fails with the
same error, so I guess it must actually be a bug in a dependency? As
apache is fine, I guess it may be some ssl dependency. Any ideas what
this could
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:37:38PM +0200, Sebastian Dröge wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 12:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe Dubacq:
> > Package: avahi-daemon
> > Version: 0.6.13-1
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > The daemon does not start after switch
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:02:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372947: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:02:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372487: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:02:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372487: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:02:51 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#372947: fixed in python-numarray 1.5.2-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it i
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:32:05 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#361929: fixed in grub 0.97-14
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Am Mittwoch, den 30.08.2006, 12:15 +0200 schrieb Jean-Christophe Dubacq:
> Package: avahi-daemon
> Version: 0.6.13-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> The daemon does not start after switching from 0.6.12-1 to 0.6.13-1.
> Reinstalling 0.6.12-1 for the avahi suite work
tags 382466 pending
thanks
Roland Stigge writes:
> this should be fixed by moving the commands from the "binary" to the
> "binary-arch" target.
Yep. I've already made the changes, but my ADSL hasn't been transferred
to my new home yet, so I can't upload just now. ETA is mid-September.
Thanks
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382466 pending
Bug#382466: adacontrol: FTBFS: dpkg-genchanges: failure: cannot read files list
file: No such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Bug#382763: adacontrol - FTBFS: Incomplete binary-arch target
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stop
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:25:01PM +0200, Norbert Tretkowski wrote:
> I think I have a patch which fixes this problem, building a new kernel
> currently...
if that's 2.6.17-2 then I'm sorry to report that -smp still doesn't work
(same scsi errors; see attached log). -generic works fine though.
A
Package: apache-ssl
Version: 1.3.34-4
Followup-For: Bug #385004
Mine crashes in the same (nasty) way
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Ker
>> found 372487 1.5.2-1
Explanation: you somehow wound up basing 1.5.2-1 on 1.5.1-2 rather
than 1.5.1-4, losing a couple of bug fixes as a result.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSU
Joerg,
As mentioned on -devel/-legal[1] recently and seen in #384019, the
license[2] of Vim's user/reference manual is one that has previously
been suggested to be non-free. Anthony Towns doubted the voracity of
those claims[3] and suggested we contact you to provide another opinion
on the matter
On 8/30/06, Roberto Gordo Saez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this is the common feeling here, I think I made a serious mistake
choosing Debian, because it does not follow my definition of freedom.
I would like to urge to change the Social Contract to be clarified
this in this case. I'm serious ab
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 385278 -1
Bug#385278: i2c: obsolete kernel, dummy bug
Bug 385278 cloned as bug 385315.
> retitle -1 RM: i2c -- RoM; obsolete kernel, dummy bug
Bug#385315: i2c: obsolete kernel, dummy bug
Changed Bug title.
> block 385278 by -1
Bug#385278: i2c: o
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 05:47:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385279: fixed in lm-sensors 1:2.10.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
clone 385278 -1
retitle -1 RM: i2c -- RoM; obsolete kernel, dummy bug
block 385278 by -1
tag 385278 + pending
thanks
Steve Langasek wrote:
Package: i2c
Severity: serious
The i2c package build-depends on kernel-source-2.4.27, which is RC-buggy and
in any case not targetted for inclusion in the e
Hi,
this should be fixed by moving the commands from the "binary" to the
"binary-arch" target.
bye,
Roland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: bobcat
Version: 1.10.1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
When building 'bobcat' on amd64/unstable,
I get the following error:
g++ -c -o xpointer/o/58get.o -Itmp -Wall -O3 xpointer/get.cc
xpointer/get.cc: In member function 'bool FBB::Xpointer::get(int*, int*) const':
xpointer/get.cc:14: er
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there any ARM machine I could log into to find out what the source of errors
is? All ARM machines are either locked down or I can't log into them, and I do
not have any other possibility to get hold of one.
best regards,
Torsten
- --
Torsten
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 380993 + fixed
Bug#380993: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Tags were: patch sid
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrat
Hi,
Attached is the diff for my yum 2.4.0-3.1 NMU.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOOhttp://www.madism.org
diff -u yum-2.4.0/debian/changelog yum-2.4.0/debian/changelog
--- yum-2.4.0/deb
I strongly disagree with your arguments. It looks that we have
opposite way of thinking, so I will not reply to them, it is going to
nowhere. Don't worry, as I said, I won't continue searching for this.
If this is the common feeling here, I think I made a serious mistake
choosing Debian, because
Your message dated Wed, 30 Aug 2006 04:17:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#385181: fixed in soundconverter 0.8.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: libtext-wrapi18n-perl
Version: 0.06-5
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I upgraded Ubuntu 6.06.1 to Debian/tesing.
I added sources.list entiries for the Debian archive and added Pinnings
for Debian and Ubuntu releases into /etc/apt/preferences so that all Ubuntu's
p
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
