On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:41:37PM -0400, mlaks wrote:
> > The warnings about /usr/lib/X11 are innocuous warnings, not errors. But if
> > you get the same warning about /etc/X11/fonts/misc on install, that would be
> > a serious problem, because that directory is contained in the xfonts-base
> > p
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 382696 serious
Bug#382696: r-doc-html: preinst removes a symlink as directory/
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> tag 382696 patch
Bug#382696: r-doc-html: preinst removes a symlink as directory/
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384273 unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#384273: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font
'cursor
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assi
tags 384273 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:59:47PM -0400, mlaks wrote:
> *** Please type your report below this line ***
> I did a fresh install of etch using business card disk, installed
> desktop packages.
> I then upgraded to sid
> from etch. I had a working X initi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384261 nvidia-graphics-modules-i386
Bug#384261: nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-k7: cannot install: depends on unavailable
kernel image
Bug reassigned from package `nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-k7' to
`nvidia-graphics-modules-i386'.
>
End of message, stopp
Subject: xfonts-base: xorg wont start could not open default cursor font
'cursor'
Package: xfonts-base
Version: 1:1.0.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I did a fresh install of etch using business card disk, installed
deskt
Hola Andreas Tscharner!
> >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378253
> >If you have a package ready, I could sponsor the upload.
> Yes, I have a package ready, but my sponsor (Christian Bayle) was on
> holydays. He should have returned Sunday or yesterday.
> I'll try to contact him,
reassign 384263 xserver-xorg-core
found 384263 1:1.1.1-3
close 384263 2:1.0.2-10
quit
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:09:48PM -0500, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> With the recent update from xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-9 to
> xserver-xorg-core_1%3a1.1.1-3 the ati module fails to load because the
> ABI misma
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:48:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384262: Fonts don't get displayed anymore
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 384263 xserver-xorg-core
Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) doesn't match the server's
version (1)
Bug reassigned from package `xorg' to `xserver-xorg-core'.
> found 384263 1:1.1.1-3
Bug#384263: ati: module ABI major version (0) do
> > Your package is failing to build on amd64 with the following
> I saw that. I was just about to file a bug on the kernel package...
>
> > error:
> > ../../../../../../config/makedepend/makedepend: warning:
> > /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h: non-portable whitespace encountered at line 7
> > ../../.
severity 384168 wishlist
thanks
Steve Langasek a écrit :
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:10:07PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
So if acpid is indeed required, then this package must depend on it.
If not, the init script or postinst script must be in written in a way
that it does not fail on i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384168 wishlist
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 335352 patch
Bug#335352: libaio: Support for amd64.
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 318795 patch
Bug#318795: libaio: We can't compile programs using it
There we
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 358317 patch
Bug#358317: tla-buildpackage: Needs adapting to new tla-load-dirs libraries
There were no tags set.
Bug#336529: tla-buildpackage: cannot import new project
Tags added: patch
> thanks bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384168 serious
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Severity set to `serious' from `wishlist'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Hi William,
I've cleaned up the packaging for libaio, attached is a patch which
fixes as well the two bug reports filed against it.
I'll be uploading an NMU in few days for this long standing RC
bug, given the 0-day NMU policy in place.
thanks,
guillem
diff -u libaio-0.3.104/debian/compat libaio
Hi,
Complete patch could be like:
diff -Nru /tmp/4Wpx9wE03I/tla-buildpackage-0.9.10/tbp-importdsc
/tmp/nD436KD2yu/tla-buildpackage-0.9.10.1/tbp-importdsc
--- /tmp/4Wpx9wE03I/tla-buildpackage-0.9.10/tbp-importdsc 2005-04-17
04:45:26.0 +0200
+++ /tmp/nD436KD2yu/tla-buildpackage-0.9
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.1.1-3
Severity: grave
Since the installation of xserver-xorg-core 1:1.1.1-3 almost all fonts
don't get displayed anymore. Reverting to 1:1.0.2-9 solves the problem.
Regards, Ole
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
Package: alacarte
Version: 0.8-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
$ alacarte
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/alacarte", line 20, in ?
from Alacarte.GnomeFront import GnomeFront
File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/Alacarte/GnomeFront.py", line
Package: xorg
Version: 1:7.0.23
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
With the recent update from xserver-xorg-core_1.0.2-9 to
xserver-xorg-core_1%3a1.1.1-3 the ati module fails to load because the
ABI mismatch.
This was in the /var/log/Xorg.0.log:
(II) LoadModule: "ati"
(II
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:57:29PM -0400, Bob Hauck wrote:
> Package: xserver-xorg-core
> Version: 1:1.1.1-3
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After doing an apt-get upgrade, X will no longer start and gives an
> error message that says the modular driver for "radeon"
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:57:49 +
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384256: xserver-xorg-core newer than xserver-xorg-video-all
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this i
Package: nvidia-kernel-2.6.17-1-k7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
This package depends on linux-kernel-2.6.17-1-k7, which is unavailable.
There is a package available called linux-kernel-2.6.17-2-k7.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers te
Your message dated Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:48:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379624: FTBFS of the java bytecode generator on IA64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384168 wishlist
Bug#384168: does not install without acpid
Severity set to `wishlist' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 336529 358317
Bug#336529: tla-buildpackage: cannot import new project
Bug#358317: tla-buildpackage: Needs adapting to new tla-load-dirs libraries
Merged 336529 358317.
> thanks bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistan
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:47:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#383976: fixed in glibc 2.3.6.ds1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
severity 384168 wishlist
thanks
So if acpid is indeed required, then this package must depend on it.
If not, the init script or postinst script must be in written in a way
that it does not fail on installation.
Hi Peter,
I agree that this would be nice, but I can't see how the lack of this
fe
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 352512 serious
Bug#352512: hal: hal locks out acpid
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> reassign 352512 hal,acpid
Bug#352512: hal: hal locks out acpid
Bug reassigned from package `hal' to `hal,acpid'.
> merge 380520 352512
Bug#352512: h
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:47:38 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382831: fixed in pearpc 0.4.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Hi,
package uploaded, but I didn't check it builds on AMD64, autobuilders
will tell us.
Thanks
Christian
Andreas Tscharner a écrit :
> Hello Margarita,
>
> Margarita Manterola wrote:
>> There's been no activity in Bug#378253 for a month now. Do you have any
>> news regarding this?
>>
>> http://
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 336529 grave
Bug#336529: tla-buildpackage: cannot import new project
Severity set to `grave' from `normal'
> thanks bts
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrat
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 378253 + fixed
Bug#378253: FTBFS on amd64: undefined reference to `__dn_expand' and
`__res_query'
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adm
On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 03:16:17PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> submitter 382175 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 06:45:08PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 10:51:54PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2006
Package: xserver-xorg-core
Version: 1:1.1.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After doing an apt-get upgrade, X will no longer start and gives an
error message that says the modular driver for "radeon" is using an outdated
ABI. It appears that the version of xserver-xorg-
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:08:07AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 20:39 < aurel32> To fix the problem:
> 20:39 < aurel32> - I don't understand why __ functions are diverted in
> alsa-oss, maybe this is not necessary???
Or you could call a version of open which always binds locally (I
suspect __li
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:00:31PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:56:13PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I now have a more precise idea of the problem. The following command
> > produce a segfault:
> >
> > LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libaoss.so /bin/b
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 03:56:13PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I now have a more precise idea of the problem. The following command
> produce a segfault:
>
> LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libaoss.so /bin/bash -x /bin/egrep
>
> where /bin/grep contains:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> exec grep -
system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: swig1.3
Version: 1.3.29-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of swig1.3_1.3.29-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2
>> Thus, I'd say this bug has been fixed, and deserves to be closed.
> ...but not on IA64, therefore I retitled the bug report previously.
> Therefore, I've reopened it (in a seperate mail).
smarteiffel has also built on ia64. Why does this bug need to remain open?
--
Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 09:52:14PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> The name "Open Publication License" is right, the URL was wrong.
Could you please correct the URL then? I guess the following is the
correct one:
http://opencontent.org/openpub/
> The book by Steve Oualline uses this license, I
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:36:23PM +0200, Denis Barbier wrote:
> reassign 382988 kdebase
> thanks
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:58:39PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >Could someone give me some clue as to what programs in xbase-config are
> > segfaulting in this case? I'm dig
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 383030 + fixed
Bug#383030: multiple buffer overflows in libmusicbrainz
Tags were: patch security
Tags added: fixed
> tag 383402 + fixed
Bug#383402: mb_Delete() fails to free memory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processi
severity 160579 minor
thanks
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:21:20PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I'd like to request removal of knowledgetree for testing for these
> reasons:
> * Has two security issues;
> * Has an open request for adoption since a couple of months but no takers;
> * Has low popco
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 160579 minor
Bug#160579: slashdot / slashcode disclosing passwords
Severity set to `minor' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, D
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:32:17 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384142: fixed in duplicity
0.4.2-3+sftp+amazons3+compression
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Package: boson
Version: 0.11-4
Severity: serious
Justification: upgrade path is not offered
Hello fellows,
I found that boson is not upgradable to 0.12dfsg-1 on my system because
it contains a file which is also part of boson-base.
merci ~ # LANG=C aptitude upgrade boson
Reading package lists..
severity 383971 important
thanks
Yes, this is a bug in bison when upgrading from the previous version (which
shipped /usr/bin/yacc by mistake) to the current version (which no longer
ships /usr/bin/yacc, but doesn't take appropriate steps to reinstate the
alternative-controlled version). This is
Hi,
I'd like to report some similar behavior to what is listed in #360554 and
#370186.
hald-addon-storage is probing my scsi hard disk drives every few seconds,
which causes them to click audibly as the drive heads move all the way from
where they were (parked or doing something else) to where
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 383971 important
Bug#383971: /usr/bin/yacc does not exist after an upgrade
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admi
reassign 382988 kdebase
thanks
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:58:39PM +, David Nusinow wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>Could someone give me some clue as to what programs in xbase-config are
> segfaulting in this case? I'm digging in to the libxkb* code now, but my
> guess is that this is a server config
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382988 kdebase
Bug#382988: No keyboard layout available under kcontrol!
Bug reassigned from package `xbase-clients' to `kdebase'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system adminis
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384193 + fixed
Bug#384193: revelation: i386 build broken
There were no tags set.
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Package: evolution-exchange
Version: 2.6.2-3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of evolution-exchange_2.6.2-3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006082
Package: numerix
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: no longer builds from source
numerix does not build on Alpha:
[...]
alpha-linux-gnu-gcc -fPIC -Wall -O2 -Duse_slong -c -o kernel/n/o/numerix-t.o
kernel/n/alpha/numerix.S
kernel/n/alpha/karatsuba.S: Assembler messages:
Package: evolution-jescs
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of evolution-jescs_2.6.4-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006082
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:34:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384193: revelation: i386 build broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Package: mediawiki1.7
Version: 1.7.1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security
By default I got
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 825 2006-08-02 15:09 AdminSettings.php
should be 640 permissions.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers proposed-updates
APT policy: (670, 'proposed-updates
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 380520 hal,acpid
Bug#380520: acpid and hald conflict
Bug reassigned from package `acpid' to `hal,acpid'.
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debi
reassign 380520 hal,acpid
quit
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:51:14PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> reassign 380520 acpid
> thanks
> >But hald is started by udev, so it's hard to control that order sensibly.
> ^^ dbus
> It's not so hard. By default it wor
James Vega wrote:
> In the manual-copyright help toic, the text states that the user manual
> and reference manual are licensed under the Open Publication License[0]
> (which is also referred to in the subsequent frombook topic). The
> URL[1] listed under manual-copyright points to the Open Cont
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:16:28PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > The other two packages are arch: any and so can be binNMUed, but I'm
> > puzzled why they build-depend on python-all-dev if they only build
> > for the current version of python. Perhaps this is something you
> > would like
Martin Wuertele wrote:
> If I rebuild the package with current python (2.4) from sid it works, i
> I rebuild it it with pythong 2.3 from sid or from testing it works as
> well. However building with the default python in sid results in a
> python 2.4 dependency. I therefore prefere to build against
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 380520 acpid
Bug#380520: acpid and hald conflict
Warning: Unknown package 'hald'
Bug reassigned from package `hald' to `acpid'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administr
Kenshi Muto wrote:
...
I suspect your file hasn't any Printer line by something reason.
...
Correct. I manually added a Printer line to /etc/cups/classes.conf and
was then able to start cupsd.
I initially tried to use lpadmin, but that failed because it tries to
communicate with cupsd. I fo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 384152 important
Bug#384152: update-grub: generates wrong device entries in menu.lst
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pl
reassign 380520 acpid
thanks
But hald is started by udev, so it's hard to control that order sensibly.
^^ dbus
It's not so hard. By default it works fine after reboot.
This means that *hal* is breaking *acpid*, not vice versa.
Right, so acpid is "b
Package: powermanga-data
Version: 0.80-3
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.1
There are no information on where data files came from, but at least one
of the included files appears to be non-free:
/usr/share/games/powermanga/sounds/bonus4.wav
The following strings are included in the file
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 383905 gnome-btdownload is uninstallable
Bug#383905: gnome-btdownload prevents move to new python version
Changed Bug title.
> severity 383905 grave
Bug#383905: gnome-btdownload is uninstallable
Severity set to `grave' from `wishlist'
>
End of
Package: ekiga
Version: 2.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of ekiga_2.0.2-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006082
reassign 380520 hald
thanks
I believe that acpid has the prior claim on
/proc/acpi/events.
Furthermore, if acpid starts first, hald runs.
But if hald starts first, acpid doesn't run. This
means that *hal* is breaking *acpid*, not vice
versa. So, hal's bug.
--
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTEC
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 380520 hald
Bug#380520: acpid and hald conflict
Warning: Unknown package 'hald'
Bug reassigned from package `acpid' to `hald'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administra
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 07:52:25PM +0200, Janek Kozicki wrote:
> The log is in the attachment. I have added some newlines in it, so that
> it is easier to read. The problem persists even after I fetched today's
> etch updates with aptitude.
dpkg-buildpackage is for building packages, not debian/ru
In case you feel that this LC_LOCALES is an actual problem that causes
this compilation failure of linux-kbuild-2.6.17 I can make yet another
fresh install of etch on this machine. No problem at all to do that.
--
# Janek Kozicki
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Le mar 22 août 2006 19:18, Joey Hess a écrit :
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Setting up duplicity (0.4.2-2+sftp+amazons3+compression.2) ...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>ls -l
> > /usr/lib/python2.3/site-packages/duplicity/__init__.py* -rw-r--r--
> > 1 root root 134 Aug 6 21:09
> > /usr/lib/python2.3/site-pack
Bastian Blank said: (by the date of Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:10:41 +0200)
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:23:57PM +0200, Janek Kozicki wrote:
> > 1.
> > package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 fails to build on etch, with this problem:
>
> Please provide the log, it works for me.
zgroza32 is a fresh and clean in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> close 369117 3.01-8
Bug#369117: xpdf: FTBFS (cannot build with support of Freetype2)
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in ve
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 384142 serious
Bug#384142: fails to work with python 2.3.5
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> tag 384142 - unreproducible
Bug#384142: fails to work with python 2.3.5
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags removed: unreproducible
> tag 38414
tags 384211 moreinfo
thanks
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 06:23:57PM +0200, Janek Kozicki wrote:
> 1.
> package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 fails to build on etch, with this problem:
> touch: cannot touch `debian/stamps/build': No such file or directory
> I'm not good at editing rules file, so the fix I used
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 384211 moreinfo
Bug#384211: linux-kbuild-2.6.17: FTBFS * 2 (two problems, proposed fixes)
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system admini
I forgot to mention, that it is the following files from
linux-kernel-headers that are needed by linux-kbuild-2.6.17:
zgroza:/usr/include# grep serio_device_id ./* -R
./linux/serio.h:struct serio_device_id id;
./linux/serio.h:struct serio_device_id *id_table;
./linux/mod_devicetab
Package: linux-kbuild-2.6.17
Version: 2.6.17-3
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source
Hi,
1.
package linux-kbuild-2.6.17 fails to build on etch, with this problem:
touch: cannot touch `debian/stamps/build': No such file or directory
I'm not good at editing rules file,
--- Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Are you still seeing this error with useradd? Does it happen with
> libnss-ldap 251-5, which is now the current version in testing/unstable?
Yes. I just ran the following:
% sudo /usr/sbin/useradd -d /var/lib/nfs -g nogroup -s /bin/fa
Package: swig1.3
Version: 1.3.29-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of swig1.3_1.3.29-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006082
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> The amd64 buildd has been able to build smarteiffel:
>
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=smarteiffel&ver=1.1-11&arch=amd64&stamp=1153996697&file=log&as=raw
jup...
> Thus, I'd say this bug has been fixed, and deserves to be closed.
...but not on IA64,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380787 serious
Bug#380787: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Severity set to `serious' from `important'
> merge 380787 383989
Bug#380787: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Bug#3
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 379624
Bug#379624: FTBFS of the java bytecode generator on IA64
'reopen' is deprecated when a bug has been closed with a version;
use 'found' or 'submitter' as appropriate instead.
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> thanks
Stopping processi
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:02:02 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#384068: fixed in notify-python 0.1.0-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:31:28 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Works for me (and the buildds)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your res
On 8/22/06, Lukáš Lalinský <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> Lukáš Lalinský is upstream maintainer as well as Debian package
> maintainer. He is in the process of dealing with this.
>
> Lukáš, could you put a note about your plans the two open bugs?
Sure. Fix for both of
Hi!
briquolo 0.5.5-1 (recompiled for sarge with no changes) works fine
here. And lowers productivity massively. ;-)
Graphics: nVidia Corporation NV44 [GeForce 6200 TurboCache(TM)] (rev a1)
Driver: NVIDIA Accelerated Graphics Driver for Linux-x86 1.0-8762
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 40
Package: revelation
Version: 0.4.7-3
Severity: serious
Not sure what happend, but the dependencies of the i386 package are broken.
An up-to-date pbuilder on my local machin creates the correct package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (
Dnia 21-08-2006, pon o godzinie 17:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Cichecki wrote:
> > Package: libc6
> > Version: 2.3.6-19
> > Severity: grave
> > Justification: renders package unusable
> >
> > I cannot upgrade from libc6_2.3.6-19 to
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 08:54:41AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dnia 21-08-2006, pon o godzinie 17:06 +0200, Aurelien Jarno napisał(a):
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:15:10AM +0200, Tomasz Cichecki wrote:
> > > Package: libc6
> > > Version: 2.3.6-19
> > > Severity: grave
> > > Just
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:28:33PM +0200, Tobbe Eriksson wrote:
> Package: duplicity
> Version: 0.4.2-2+sftp+amazons3+compression.2
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> duplicity can not be installed.
>
>
> apt-get install duplicity
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree... Do
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 384142 + unreproducible
Bug#384142: fails to work with python 2.3.5
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> severity 384142 important
Bug#384142: fails to work with python 2.3.5
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
> thanks
Stop
tag 384142 + unreproducible
severity 384142 important
thanks
On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 01:45:05AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: duplicity
> Version: 0.4.2-2+sftp+amazons3+compression.2
> Severity: serious
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>python -V
> Python 2.3.5
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>duplicity
> Traceb
Your message dated Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:29:56 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line duplicity: Can not be installed in sid, broken deps.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the c
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Die, 22 Aug 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> > I have prepared a package for 1.01, on the way fixing some bugs, here is
>> > the relevant Debian changelog entry:
>> > * add correct license statement into the copyright file and include
>> > the lis
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
