I have reviewed Arjan's patch, and I consider that it's very well done.
Therefore, I'm going to upload a package that applies it.
This package is orphaned, and maintained by QA. Therefore, this is not
numbered as an NMU, but as a normal package.
The patch is exactly the same as the one submitted
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:32:22 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381815: fixed in haskelldb 0.9.cvs.601-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> clone 382597 -1
Bug#382597: clamav-freshclam calls start_daemon in a way that fails
Bug 382597 cloned as bug 382599.
> reassign -1 clamav-freshclam
Bug#382599: clamav-freshclam calls start_daemon in a way that fails
Bug reassigned from package `lsb-bas
clone 382597 -1
reassign -1 clamav-freshclam
retitle -1 clamav-freshclam: uses start_daemon incorrectly
severity 382597 minor
retitle 382597 lsb-base: fails to document LSB functions adequately
thanks
On 8/11/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.1-12
Severity: se
Package: lsb-base
Version: 3.1-12
Severity: serious
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joey>/etc/init.d/clamav-freshclam start
Starting ClamAV virus database updater:
freshclam/sbin/start-stop-daemon: stat /var/run/clamav/freshclam.pid: No
such file or directory (No such file or directory)
failed!
sh -x re
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 19:17:14 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#374327: fixed in ssmtp 2.61-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 382445
Bug#382445: thunderbird: Does not start at all
Bug is already open, cannot reopen.
> severity 382445 important
Bug#382445: thunderbird: Does not start at all
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> tags 382445 + unreproducible
Bug#382
reopen 382445
severity 382445 important
tags 382445 + unreproducible
thanks
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:44:51PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
> nothing happens. No process; ps auxw shows nothing related to
> thunderbird. So I try to run thunderbird via /usr/lib/thunderbird-bin
> from the comma
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:15:19 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382592: reportbug: crash
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your respo
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:32:12 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379775: fixed in rsplib 1.0.0-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 381338 + fixed
Bug#381338: kakasi: incomplete copyright statement
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debia
Alexander Sack wrote:
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
I downloaded the source from mozilla and installed and that worked. It
occurs to me that prior to upgrading thunderbird via dselect it was
pulling configuration and mail folders from ~/.mozilla-thunderbi
This one time, at band camp, Julien Danjou wrote:
>Package: lightlab
>Version: 0.3-3.1
>Severity: serious
>
>Hello,
>
>There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
Ok, I've been planning on filing for removal of this package; I don't use
it, upstream's dead, I doubt it has any other users.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 06:14:17PM +0200, Mohammed Adnène Trojette <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006, Julien Danjou wrote:
> > > (3) If it's reproducible, can you trace through the code and see where
> > > it fails? In particular, what value is being returned fr
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.22
Severity: grave
check the following logs
$ reportbug texlive-base-bin
*** Welcome to reportbug. Use ? for help at prompts. ***
Using 'LI Daobing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' as your from address.
Detected character set: UTF-8
Please change your locale if this is incorre
tags 381338 + pending
Thanks
I have prepared a package that fixes this bug. It's not the same patch as
the one submitted Francesco Pedrini, since it had so many errors. I copied
the boiler plate included in the source files (updating the FSF address),
and added the list of authors provided by up
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 381338 + pending
Bug#381338: kakasi: incomplete copyright statement
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Bonevich wrote:
>
> I downloaded the source from mozilla and installed and that worked. It
> occurs to me that prior to upgrading thunderbird via dselect it was
> pulling configuration and mail folders from ~/.mozilla-thunderbird. I
> noticed
Hi Roberto,
On Mon, 2006-07-31 at 19:11:56 +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
> severity 376812 grave
> thanks
>
> Upgraded severity to grave because I think it the package should be
> not be released with this bug. It is ususable and crashes the display
> when triyng to use it.
Thanks for the rep
forcemerge 382319 382579
thanks
Quoting Richard Rawstron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: samba
> Version: 3.0.23b-1
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> After running apt-get dist-upgrade to update samba to 3.0.23b-1 the smbd
> daemon fails to start rendering the servi
I've downloaded the new upstream release of gerbv, and tested it in a box
that fails with the 1.0.1 version, and it doesn't fail with the 1.0.2
version.
Here's a link to download the new upstream release:
http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/gerbv/gerbv-1.0.2.tar.gz
As this is an RC bug, I'
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forcemerge 382319 382579
Bug#382319: Samba panic action
Bug#382579: smbd fails to start after upgrade to samba 3.0.23b-1
Bug#382296: samba: smbd SEGFAULTS on startup
Bug#382387: smbd 3.0.23b core dumps on start
Bug#382552: samba: segfault with "pdb_get_
Package: loop-aes-modules
Version: 3.1d+3+3
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of loop-aes-modules_3.1d+3+3 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 20060812-0033
> **
Alexander Sack - Debian Bugmail wrote:
Running thunderbird-bin is always wrong.
Figured as much, but it was the only thing giving me feedback.
Running thunderbird should work. If it does not, please try to start
from a different user account where you haven't used thunderbird
before.
If
Your message dated Sat, 12 Aug 2006 00:07:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Uploading new package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibili
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 181494 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#181494: glibc: contains non-free docs
Tags were: fixed-in-experimental sarge-ignore
Tags added: fixed-in-experimental
> tag 361064 + fixed-in-experimental
Bug#361064: glibc: [patch] make building glibc-2.4 without
On Sun, Jul 23, 2006, Xav wrote:
> Package: gcfilms
> Version: 6.1-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
>
> When I launch it, I get this :
>
> $ gcfilms
> *** unhandled exception in callback:
> *** Can't locate object method "signal_connect" via package "GCFrame" at
>
Hello,
Just to comment that same problem here. I applied the "fix" of Xavier
Queralt, it seems that know has compiled.
Kernel version is 2.6.17.6
--
Carles Pina i EstanyGPG id: 0x8CBDAE64
http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 380756 + fixed
Bug#380756: Python transition (#2): you are building a private python module !
Tags were: patch
Tags added: fixed
> tag 381456 + fixed
Bug#381456: adonthell segfault on AMD-32
Tags were: patch confirmed
Bug#374601: adonthell: segfaul
Package: docbook-xsl
Version: 1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1
Severity: serious
Hi,
Your package is failing to install with the following error:
Setting up docbook-xsl (1.70.1.dfsg.1-0.1) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/docbook-xsl.postinst: line 16: update-xmlcatalog: command
not found
dpkg: error processing docboo
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.23b-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After running apt-get dist-upgrade to update samba to 3.0.23b-1 the smbd daemon
fails to start rendering the service unusable. The nmbd daemon starts
successfully. Previously was running samba 3.0.22-1 succ
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 381526 important
Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc
Severity set to `important' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380318: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380115: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380321: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380321: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380321: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380318: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org
retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
thanks
Hi guys,
ok well, as JS stays with an interpretation of CDDL and GPL that the
whole world does not follow (all wrong, of course :) ), lets go and fix
this. The sane way is to remove cdrtools from
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380115: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380115: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377109 ftp.debian.org
Bug#377109: cdrtools: GPL violation - makefiles distributed under
non-GPL-compatible license
Bug reassigned from package `cdrtools' to `ftp.debian.org'.
> retitle 377109 RM: cdrtools -- RoM: non-free, license problems
Bu
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 13:53:33 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380318: fixed in xmms 1:1.2.10+20060801-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 378346 libgail-dev
Bug#378346: gnucash: GnuCash 2.0 unexpectedly quits when trying to open an
account register.
Bug reassigned from package `gnucash' to `libgail-dev'.
> retitle 378346 libgail-dev: gnucash crashes in libgail on alpha
Bug#3783
Package: rt3.4-apache2
Version: 3.4.4-2
Severity: grave
Tags: etch
Please see #308503.
When I try to start Apache2, after adding:
Include "/etc/request-tracker3.4/apache2-modperl2.conf"
Apache will fail to start, and I get this in my Apache error log:
[Fri Aug 11 15:08:52 2006] [error] Can't l
reassign 378346 libgail-dev
retitle 378346 libgail-dev: gnucash crashes in libgail on alpha
thanks
Reassigned to libgail in accordance with upstream's recommendation;
see below.
Thomas
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:32:27PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Chris Shoemaker
Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The distribution should be stable-security instead of
testing-proposed-updates. Please also remove all the i18n updates:
Ok, I'll make a new package with the correct distribution.
The i18n updates are automatically made by the build process, it's only
timtestamp upda
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> The patch also covers the python transition and Julien Danjou's patch.
Here is an updated patch that actually builds :)
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
diff -u adonthell-0.3.4.cvs.20050813/config.guess
adonthell-0.3.4.cvs.20050813/config.g
tags 381526 +unreproducible
tags 381526 +moreinfo
thanks
* Stepan Golosunov wrote:
> Vim has undeclared file conflict with vim-doc 1:6.3-071+1sarge1 on
> /usr/share/doc/vim which breaks upgrades from sarge.
What's the error message? I just tried to reproduce your problem and
did an upgrade in a s
On Friday 11 August 2006 20:26, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
> > Argh, thanks Mohammed,
> > should be fixed in the attached patch, sorry.
>
> ;)
>
> +v2 as pubblished by the Free Software Foundation.
>
> s/pubblished/published/
What a mess... _no
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:47:31 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382386: fixed in tightvnc 1.2.9-18
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 381526 +unreproducible
Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible
> tags 381526 +moreinfo
Bug#381526: vim: undeclared conflict with vim-doc
Tags were: unreproducible
Tags added: moreinfo
>
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
> Argh, thanks Mohammed,
> should be fixed in the attached patch, sorry.
;)
+v2 as pubblished by the Free Software Foundation.
s/pubblished/published/
--
adn
Mohammed Adnène Trojette
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 15:33:03 -0300
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line NMU Acknowledged
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381622: fixed in lyx 1.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 11:17:47 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381976: fixed in lyx 1.4.2-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
On Friday 11 August 2006 17:13, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
> > tags #381338 +patch
> > thanks
>
> Be careful, there are many typos...
>
Argh, thanks Mohammed,
should be fixed in the attached patch, sorry.
I was really tired when I wrote that :
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 293556 + unreproducible moreinfo help
Bug#293556: gnupg kill my pubring.gpg
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo, help
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking syste
also sprach James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.11.1853 +0100]:
> Obviously this works for me - I've never had gpg trash a pubring.gpg
> and I've often interrupted it while it was fetching a key. If you
> want anything to happen to this bug, more information is definitely
> going to be needed
tags 293556 + unreproducible moreinfo help
thanks
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> severity 293556 grave
> thanks
>
> It just did it again. I am thus making the bug RC.
Obviously this works for me - I've never had gpg trash a pubring.gpg
and I've often interrupted it while it was fe
On 8/10/06, Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've seen the warning from sort somewhere before. There is a new
version uploaded, but for some reason it's not accepting my GPG
signature. I'm still in the keyring so I'm awaiting a reply from the
admins - I'll try contacting them through
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 10:44:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#381666: fixed in libselinux 1.30.22-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
On 8/10/06, Angelina Carlton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please send the output of "apt-cache policy coreutils"
coreutils:
Installed: 5.97-3
Candidate: 5.97-3
Version table:
*** 5.97-3 0
500 http://debian.yorku.ca unstable/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
Well, I w
Package: mxv
Version: 1.32-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Hi,
now that ivtools was updated to provide a correct Imakefile fragment,
mxv fails to compile because:
* it uses old /usr/X11R6/include path
* it needs g++4 tweaks
* it needs a fortran guru
I know that mxv has been requested to be r
"I've tested the aforementioned additions in my AMD64 box before building XMMS from source. The resulting package correctly builds the Output/ plugins, therefore with this changes XMMS is able to work correctly under Sid in AMD64.
-- Alberto CapellaGNU/Linux user Nº 414744[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 03:59:55PM +0200, InterNetX - Sebastian Wiesinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> reassign 382467 mutt
> thanks
>
> Sorry,
>
> it was my mistake to assign this bug to xsltproc, because (as I was
> told now) it's working as it should, and exiting with an error
> *because* it'
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287494: fixed in lopster 1.2.0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 382252 normal
Bug#382252: ImportError: No module named bdiff
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> tags 382252 + moreinfo unreproducible
Bug#382252: ImportError: No module named bdiff
Tags were: patch
Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible
>
severity 382252 normal
tags 382252 + moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
As I said, I cannot reproduce this bug. So I tag it
and downgrade the severity for now.
Best regards,
Vincent
PS: I will be on vacation (without email access) for 10 days.
Vincent Danjean a écrit :
> Michael Gebetsroith
I looked at this briefly and I it appears to be a problem with the
libtool script that is used. When building in Output/alsa I get errors
like:
../../libtool: line 3944: 'ELF [0-9][0-9]*-bit [LM]SB (shared
object|dynamic lib )': command not found
../../libtool: line 5802: test: : integer
Package: view3ds
Version: 1.0.0-9.1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of view3ds_1.0.0-9.1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006081
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
// Ola
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 08:55:26AM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote:
> tags 382386 + patch
> thanks
>
> This adds support for HPPA linux machines.
>
> lamont
>
> diff -ur t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
> tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
> --- t/tightvnc
This one time, at band camp, Ralf Schlatterbeck said:
> Comparing the exploitable code from
> http://www.overflow.pl/adv/clamav_upx_heap.txt
> to the code present in the source of libclamav1_0.84-2.sarge.9_i386.deb
> it seems to me that the current stable version of libclamav1 is
> vulnerable.
>
>
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 08:02:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#382465: fixed in tla 1.3.5+dfsg-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 382386 + patch
thanks
This adds support for HPPA linux machines.
lamont
diff -ur t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
--- t/tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf2006-08-10 22:50:08.0
+
+++ tightvnc-1.2.9/Xvnc/config/cf/linux.cf
On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 12:21:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Just guessing, but do you have uswsusp (user software suspend)
> installed? This package also provides a "resume" binary but it is
> installed to /usr/sbin/ in the initrd.
> As scripts/local-premount/resume does not use an absolute pa
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Francesco Pedrini wrote:
> tags #381338 +patch
> thanks
Be careful, there are many typos...
+Kakasi is Free Software, this means that you can redistribuite
s/redistribuite/redistribute/g
+This software is distribuited in the hope that it will be useful,
s/distribuited/di
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 382386 + patch
Bug#382386: tightvnc_1.2.9-17(hppa/unstable): FTBFS: needs some porting work
Tags were: help
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 352800 patch
Bug#352800: coda-client: Missing Build Dependancy
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you ne
Comparing the exploitable code from
http://www.overflow.pl/adv/clamav_upx_heap.txt
to the code present in the source of libclamav1_0.84-2.sarge.9_i386.deb
it seems to me that the current stable version of libclamav1 is
vulnerable.
Can you confirm/deny this? IMHO stable should be fixed?!
I can sup
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382467 xsltproc
Bug#382467: mutt compile error while trying to include external (http://) xsl
file
Bug reassigned from package `mutt' to `xsltproc'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tra
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 382467 mutt
Bug#382467: mutt compile error while trying to include external (http://) xsl
file
Bug reassigned from package `xsltproc' to `mutt'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trackin
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > "Per" == Per Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Per> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> >> What about that: mkdir /tmp/tempuserdir lyx -userdir
> >> /tmp/tempuserdir -e latex foo.lyx rm -rf /tmp/tempuserdir
>
> Per> Yes, I think that's an acceptable workaround.
>
> Could
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 293556 grave
Bug#293556: gnupg kill my pubring.gpg
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs dat
Hi,
IIRC, adding a build-dep on docbook-xsl might fix this.
Cheers,
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: lmms
Severity: grave
Version: 0.1.4-1
hi,
lmms keeps segfaulting right after the configuration dialog finished:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lmms
Segmentation fault
removing ~/.lmmsrc.xml makes it start the configuration assistant again. GDB
Backtrace shows:
gdb) bt
[..]
#15 0xa7a6a1b8 i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reopen 382134
Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade
path
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
> severity 382134 normal
Bug#382134: postgresql-common: Problems in unpacking; possible bumpy upgrade
path
Severity
reopen 382134
severity 382134 normal
found 382134 58
thanks
Debian Bug Tracking System [2006-08-11 6:03 -0700]:
> So, the conclusion is that I borked the install by massaging too hard
> when I installed pg 8.1. After purging the old database, it works.
However, there are still some things that
severity 382029 normal
retitle 382029 gnome-gv gratuitously opens URLs from .recently-used
stop
Hi Christian,
> gnome-gv couldn't display the file here, too, but I did not notice any FTP
> connections.
>
> Which process exactly was it that you attached the strace to? Firefox or a
> still runnin
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 382029 normal
Bug#382029: gnome-gv continually opens gratuitious FTP connections to
208.113.133.22
Severity set to `normal' from `critical'
> retitle 382029 gnome-gv gratuitously opens URLs from .recently-used
Bug#382029: gnome-gv continually
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> found 372796
Bug#372796: ImportError: No module named eric3config
Bug reopened.
> close 372796 3.9.0-1
Bug#372796: ImportError: No module named eric3config
'close' is deprecated; see http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#closing.
Bug marked as fixed in
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 14:53:32 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Works now
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 382480 confirmed
Bug#382480: FTBFS: dh-installudev only in recent debhelper
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please con
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> package mdadm mdadm-udeb
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: mdadm mdadm-udeb
> tags 382480 + pending
Bug#382480: FTBFS: dh-installudev only in recent debhelper
Tags were: confirmed
Tags
Package: 44bsd-rdist
Version: 2000-6
Severity: grave
Tags: security
44bsd-rdist creates a temporary file with mktemp(3), and opens it without
using O_EXCL, which makes it vulnerable to symlink attacks.
Thanks,
Matej
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscr
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.5.2-10
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 4.2
As subject says, dh-installudev is only available with most recent versions of
debhelper, so
requires a tightened build-dependency on debhelper.
According to debhelper changelog, dh-installudev was introduced in versio
Just guessing, but do you have uswsusp (user software suspend)
installed? This package also provides a "resume" binary but it is
installed to /usr/sbin/ in the initrd.
As scripts/local-premount/resume does not use an absolute path for
resume, maybe it picks the wrong resume binary.
Cheers,
Michael
tag 380756 patch
thanks
On Wed, Aug 09, 2006, Mohammed Adnène Trojette wrote:
> So please consider build depending on libsdl-ttf2.0-dev.
Same thing about libsdl-mixer and libsdl.
I've prepared a patch but it is not perfect. Here it is, but I don't tag
all the reports "patch" yet, though.
The pa
Your message dated Fri, 11 Aug 2006 02:32:04 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#360359: fixed in cthugha 1.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Package: adacontrol
Version: 1.4r20-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
The buildd logs on all archs report a failure:
dh_installdirs -padacontrol /usr/bin /usr/share/doc/adacontrol
dh_install -padacontrol adactl /usr/bin
dh_installdocs -padacontrol doc/*.html doc/*.pdf doc/*.txt
dh_installi
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
