Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:02:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379479: fixed in statdataml 1.0.9-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 379714 pending
Bug#379714: libxslt1-dev should depend on libgcrypt11-dev, libgpg-error-dev
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here
hi,
the object files are listed in libtool (predep_objects). After removing
this line the build goes well. Also, after an autoconf/automake update
this issue is gone but the package fails to build the following way:
[..]
ar: transportaddressblock.o~ranlib: No such file or directory
[..]
bye,
Package: azureus
Version: 2.4.0.2-3
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
$ azureus
/usr/bin/azureus: line 2: /usr/share/java-config/libswt-3.1-java: No such file
or directory
Please change line 2 of /usr/bin/azureus to
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:47:26 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#376249: fixed in spandsp 0.0.2pre26-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:47:23 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379822: fixed in ksubtile 1.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:47:34 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#378864: fixed in zaptel 1:1.2.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 22:47:20 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379811: fixed in kdbg 2.0.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
I'm not a debian developer, but I have an updated package ready for an
NMU. Rather than the previous patch, I opted for the following which
changes the initialization rather than the declaration of
EOMoreThanOneException, thereby preserving the public interface in
EOUtilities.h. My patched versio
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380593: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.4-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379904: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.4-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:17:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380180: fixed in heartbeat 1.2.4-13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:17:39 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379359: fixed in kiwi 1.9.8-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
You asked how you should upload your package to Debian. I really do wonder
how you got your package uploaded in the first place.
You are supposed to get a sponsor for your package.
If you have your package ready, I suggest you send a mail to debian-mentors
explaining why you need your package up
On Mon, 2006 Jul 31 13:47:21 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> >
> > Define "(un)suitable for UPS management." Does this definition include
> > most people's desktop systems?
>
> Suitable for UPS management:
> Load:
> Powers up when AC returns
> Can be
Hi,
I have prepared a (quite trivial) patch which makes the package build
with autoconf 2.60 (attached below).
Greetings Arjan Oosting
diff -u konserve-0.10.3/debian/changelog konserve-0.10.3/debian/changelog
--- konserve-0.10.3/debian/changelog
+++ konserve-0.10.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,
Package: soya
Severity: serious
Hi,
soya_0.12-1 FTBFS with the following error:
_soya.c:19:19: error: AL/al.h: No such file or directory
_soya.c:20:20: error: AL/alc.h: No such file or directory
and a lot of conseguences (e.g. X undeclared).
Roberto
-- System Information:
Debian Release: test
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 379818 patch
Bug#379818: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you n
Package: raidutils
Version: 0.0.6-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
raidutils_0.0.6-1 FTBFS on all 64bit arches with the following error:
osd_unix.cpp: In function 'int BufferAlloc(uLONG, char**, uLONG, char**, int)':
osd_unix.cpp:2654: error: cast from 'char*' to 'int' loses precision
make[3]: *** [raide
Package: yodl
Version: 2.01.03-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
yodl_2.01.03-1 FTBFS with the following error:
latex yodl.latex
sh: latex: command not found
execute - program indicates failure (status 32512)
execute - program indicates failure (status 32512)
execute - program indicates failure (status 25
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:32:57 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#364374: fixed in greasemonkey 0.6.4-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is n
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 374477 + fixed
Bug#374477: lilo: creates devices in postinstall with mknod not MAKEDEV
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed
> quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Tags 374477 + pending
Bug#374477: lilo: creates devices in postinstall with mknod not MAKEDEV
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Tags 374477 + pending
thanks
I've prepared the package for the patch that Martin provided and I'm going
to upload it as an NMU.
I'm providing the full diff for the NMU, which is basically the same patch
Martin provided plus the changelog entry.
--
Love,
Marga
diff -u lilo-22.6.1/debian/changelo
Hi,
I have prepared a (quite trivial) patch which makes the package build
with autoconf 2.60 (attached below).
Greetings Arjan Oosting
diff -u klog-0.3.3/debian/changelog klog-0.3.3/debian/changelog
--- klog-0.3.3/debian/changelog
+++ klog-0.3.3/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+klog (0.3.3-2
Hi,
I have prepared a (quite trivial) patch which makes the package build
with autoconf 2.60 (attached below).
Greetings Arjan Oosting
diff -u kde-style-polyester-0.9.2/debian/changelog kde-style-polyester-0.9.2/debian/changelog
--- kde-style-polyester-0.9.2/debian/changelog
+++ kde-style-poly
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 373733 + pending
Bug#373733: balazar: segfaults when starting a game
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me i
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 379812 patch
Bug#379812: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> tags 379492 patch
Bug#379492: klog: FTBFS: autoconf 2.60 is not suppo
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:33:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281348: fixed in soya 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:32:41 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380616: fixed in beagle 0.2.7-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 15:33:28 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#281348: fixed in soya 0.12-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your r
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> notfound 380289 2.0.6-1
Bug#380289: heartbeat-2: Local DoS due to world-writable shared memory
[CVE-2006-3815]
Bug marked as not found in version 2.0.6-1.
(By the way, this Bug is currently marked as done.)
> notfound 380289 2.0.6-0bpo1
Bug#380289: he
Your message dated Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:00:25 +0900
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Cheers
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380652 important
Bug#380652: squid fails to start because of "Function not implemented" error
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
> retitle 380652 squid 2.6 needs epoll() support which is not in kernel
Bug#380652: squid fails to start bec
severity 380652 important
retitle 380652 squid 2.6 needs epoll() support which is not in kernel
2.4.x
retitle 377697 squid 2.6 compiled with epoll() support does not start
with kernel <= 2.6.x
merge 380652 377697
thanks
Hi Ambrose,
squid 2.6.STABLE is compiled with epoll() support turned on
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 378571 +patch
Bug#378571: courier-authdaemon: socket directory should have 750 permissions
Tags were: security
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 1 Aug 2006 00:25:00 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line non-bug?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Hi Steve; you said a bit ago that you were going to try to rebuild
libgail.so so that a more useful backtrace from the gnucash crash on
alpha could be obtained.
Should I keep on waiting for this, or proceed on a different tack?
I think that upstream would be happy to take the lead on debugging i
Package: courier-authdaemon
Followup-For: Bug #378571
I couldn't find out why this has changed since sarge, where it shipped
with 770 daemon:daemon permissions. Also, as the submitter points,
upstreams ships with 750, as can be seen in Makefile.*:
chmod 750 $(DESTDIR)@authdaemonvar@
I att
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek schrieb:
>>When upgrading from 2.3.24-1 to 2.3.24-2 the package installation hangs.
>>I have to press Ctrl+C. Apt-get asked me to install a new version of
>>slapd.conf which I did not. Maybe this is related to this behaviour.
>
>
> Are you running nss_ldap on this system
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 10:56:11PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > The init script might be a bit of an issue because you might have two
> > init scripts trying to start the same program, but there are interlocks
> > that should prevent that.
>
> The post-upgrade state is
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:16:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380537: [Pkg-openldap-devel] Bug#380537: slapd: Fails to
start after upgrade to from 2.3.23 to 2.3.24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 06:49:12PM +0200, Roland Gruber wrote:
> Package: slapd
> Version: 2.3.24-2
> Severity: grave
> Justification: renders package unusable
> When upgrading from 2.3.24-1 to 2.3.24-2 the package installation hangs.
> I have to press Ctrl+C. Apt-get asked me to install a new ver
Hi Torsten
Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hmm, that's weird because the main function in Debian's slapd contains
> code that reads like this:
>
> if ( read_config( configfile, configdir ) != 0 ) {
> /* error handling */
> }
> if ( username != NULL ||
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:58:01PM +, Gustavo Franco wrote:
>> python-parted (0.11.3) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>> * Non-maintainer upload.
>> * debian/control:
>>- Build-Depends on libparted1.7. (Closes: #374209)
>> * Merge new parted API patch by Colin Watson. (Clo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380619 serious
Bug#380619: cupsys: does not start at all
Severity set to `serious' from `normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> severity 380571 normal
Bug#380571: linux-uvc - FTBFS: Nothing to be done for `binary-arch'.
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Pleas
Package: cupsys
Version: 1.2.1-3
Severity: grave
Twice, now, I've had the experience of having to not only remove, but purge
cupsys and reinstall it in order to get my bog-standard HP Laserjet to work.
Both times, everything was fine immediately after the reinstall, but when I
tried to print a fe
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:10:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#380635: libsdl1.2debian-all: Packageuninstallable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 380115 380318
Bug#380115: xmms shows file selection box, but doesn't say a beep
Bug#380318: xmms is missing some libraries
Bug#380321: XMMS loads no output plugins
Merged 380115 380318 380321.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:02:13 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line BR crossed with upload of fixed packages - closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the cas
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 379714 libxslt1-dev should depend on libgcrypt11-dev, libgpg-error-dev
Bug#379714: modxslt: FTBFS: libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libgcrypt.la' is not a
valid libtool archive
Changed Bug title.
> reassign 379714 libxslt1-dev 1.1.17-2
Bug#379714: lib
retitle 379714 libxslt1-dev should depend on libgcrypt11-dev, libgpg-error-dev
reassign 379714 libxslt1-dev 1.1.17-2
thanks
Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> creating libmodxslt0.la
>> /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libgcrypt.la: No such file or directory
>> libtool: link: `/usr/l
Hi,
I'm afraid the bug isn't closed in version 1:1.2.10+20060729-1.
bhaal:archives# dpkg -I xmms_1%3a1.2.10+20060729-1_amd64.deb
new debian package, version 2.0.
size 2231656 bytes: control archive= 4375 bytes.
1144 bytes,26 lines control
8161 bytes, 117 lines
Package: slapd
Version: 2.3.24-2
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When upgrading from 2.3.24-1 to 2.3.24-2 the package installation hangs. I have
to press Ctrl+C.
Apt-get asked me to install a new version of slapd.conf which I did not. Maybe
this is related to this behavi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> merge 378498 379264
Bug#378498: Needs recompilation because of ghci 6.4.2
Bug#379264: FTBFS: needs to update for new ghc6
Merged 378498 379264.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Package: directfb
Version: 0.9.25.1-2
Severity: serious
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=directfb&arch=powerpc&ver=0.9.25.1-2&stamp=1153861344&file=log
Build fails with:
../../../lib/direct/system.c: In function 'direct_pagesize':
../../../lib/direct/system.c:64: error: 'PAGE_SIZE' undeclar
Hi Ryan,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 06:50:30PM -0500, Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 12:03:48AM +0200, Uwe Hermann wrote:
> > Hi Ryan,
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 03:07:51PM -0500, Ryan Nowakowski wrote:
> > > > Why are your movies in ~/Movies/Democracy? Are you on a Mac? The D
Package: lilo
Version: 1:22.6.1-7+b1
Followup-For: Bug #374477
Patch to use makedev instead of mknod
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-68
After reading this bug report, I looked into lilo.postinst, and the
only use of "cp" is at:
cp /usr/share/lilo/*.bmp /boot
If this reports "cp: too many input files", it should be some problem
with that directory on the user's machine.
As the user hasn't replied in the last 40 days, I sug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tag 374477 +patch
Bug#374477: lilo: creates devices in postinstall with mknod not MAKEDEV
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 376812 grave
Bug#376812: libglide2: Reproducible segmentation fault with Voodoo2
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:04:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line kernel-patch-uml has been removed, closing outstanding bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is no
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 19:03:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line old 2.4 kernel bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> On Fri, 2006 Jul 28 16:12:35 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > There is no tradeoff without the hack, and the hack is only needed in
> > hardware unsuitable for UPS management. Thus, it must be optional. It is
> > dangerous to data and t
Package: linux-ntfs
Version: 1.13.1-2
Severity: serious
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=linux-ntfs&arch=alpha&ver=1.13.1-2&stamp=1153789838&file=log
Build fails with:
logging.c: In function 'ntfs_log_handler_syslog':
logging.c:365: error: incompatible types in assignment
logging.c: In func
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1658 +0100]:
> anyway the initramfs-tools implementation targets 1.9.0-4sarge1,
> so i'm happy on your input for the sarge specific version.
difficult to say. creating mdadm.conf (see /usr/share/mdadm/mkconf)
and running `mdadm -Asayes
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 03:13:32PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1439 +0100]:
> > mdrun was avoided due too getting random md devices.
> > although according to fjp older mdadm seems to have it's share
> > of problems:
> > http://lists
Note that the freeze cutoff for cdbs is approaching, so we need an idea on
this really quickly.
Am Sonntag, 30. Juli 2006 22:19 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> Christopher Martin wrote:
> > Notice how debian/patches/04_am_maintainer_mode.diff is skipped
> > because "it's already applied" even though
Package: squid
Version: 2.6.1-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
On my kernel (2.4.28), starting the updated squid results in a crash
with the following logged in the syslog:
Jul 31 11:30:58 tea (squid): comm_select_init: epoll_create(): (38) Function
not implemented
Run
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:26:30 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> reassign 378498 haskell-hsql
Bug#378498: Needs recompilation because of ghci 6.4.2
Bug reassigned from package `libghc6-hsql-dev' to `haskell-hsql'.
>
End of message, stopping proces
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:32:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:39:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome-pim removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:48:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line resolved
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:27:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:27:24 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:32:54 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 377983 dansguardian
Bug#377983: dansguardian-2.8.0.6-antivirus-6.3.8-1-1: Dansguardian crashes on
etch.
Warning: Unknown package 'dansguardian-2.8.0.6-antivirus-6.3.8-1-1'
Bug reassigned from package `dansguardian-2.8.0.6-antivirus-6.3.8-1-1'
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:33:19 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 17:39:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line gnome-pim removal
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility t
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:05:45AM +0100, Peter Hicks wrote:
> >> slapd.conf is owned by root.root, and chown-ing it to root.openldap fixes
> >> the problem.
> >
> > Is this because the perms on the file are 0640?
>
> Spot on.
Hmm, that's weird because the main function in Debian's s
Hi John,
I have prepared a little update for haskell-magic to fix the FTBFS and
make libghc6-magic-dev installable again.
I have attached my diff.
Greetings Arjan Oosting
diff -Nru /tmp/GYDPIgfOyG/magic-haskell-1.0.3/debian/changelog /tmp/PPj7bsdfc5/magic-haskell-1.0.3.1/debian/changelog
---
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 07:17:18 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#379137: fixed in boinc 5.4.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380636 important
Bug#380636: python-imdbpy: misses parsers
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
tags 380597 + unreproducible moreinfo
severity 380597 important
thanks
can't reproduce that; which were the versions of python2.3,
python-defaults and python-central before the upgrade? why don't you
dist-upgrade?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380597 + unreproducible moreinfo
Bug#380597: python-tk: /usr/bin/pycentral: /usr/bin/python: bad interpreter: No
such file or directory
There were no tags set.
Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo
> severity 380597 important
Bug#380597: python-tk
also sprach maximilian attems <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.31.1439 +0100]:
> mdrun was avoided due too getting random md devices.
> although according to fjp older mdadm seems to have it's share
> of problems:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/07/msg00244.html
These problems should be sol
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 380636 confirmed
Bug#380636: python-imdbpy: misses parsers
There were no tags set.
Tags added: confirmed
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrato
Hello,
FWIW, upgrading libc6 to 2.3.6-17 solved it. See also bug #226716.
Thank you!
Best,
--Toni++
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Jul 30, 2006 at 07:25:20PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 05:53:27PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > Anyway, I disagree with the way 0.73 fixes the bug: it replicates
> > the functionality provided by mdadm >=2.5-1 into a hack within the
> > package. Granted, the h
Package: python-imdbpy
Version: 2.6-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
wanted to try out the imdbpy package, but the parsers for http and sql
are missing. Only local and mobile are installed.
Andreas
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefer
Package: libsdl1.2debian-all
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Hi,
libdirectfb-0.9-24 has been removed from unstable anb sdl need to be rebuild :
# apt-get install libsdl1.2debian-all
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Some packages could not b
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> merge 379492 379815
Bug#379492: klog: FTBFS: autoconf 2.60 is not supported
Bug#379815: FTBFS: doesn't recognize autoconf 2.60
Merged 379492 379815.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug trac
Package: matrixssl
Version: 1.7.3-1
Severity: serious
Hello,
There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
> Automatic build of matrixssl_1.7.3-1 on avidan by sbuild/i386 0.49
> Build started at 2006073
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> retitle 352084 kazehakase: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), should transition
> to xulrunner
Bug#352084: kazehakase: Build-Dep on mozilla (library), should transition to
xulrunner
Changed Bug title.
(By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 380619 normal
Bug#380619: cupsys: does not start at all
Severity set to `normal' from `grave'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs d
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
> tags 379265 patch
Bug#379265: FTBFS: needs an update for new ghc6
There were no tags set.
Tags added: patch
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Your message dated Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#318548: fixed in libxbox 0.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 379530 normal
Bug#379530: libjaxp1.3-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gcj'
Severity set to `normal' from `serious'
> tags 379530 - patch
Bug#379530: libjaxp1.3-java: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends on 'gcj'
Tags were: patch
Tags removed: pa
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
